退耕还林农户技术禀赋对经果林换种的影响

王卫卫, 张应良

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 215-222.

PDF(1435 KB)
PDF(1435 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 215-222. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012035
研究论文

退耕还林农户技术禀赋对经果林换种的影响

作者信息 +

The impact of farmers’ technical endowment on the adopting new varieties of fruit forest

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】 分析退耕还林农户在采用果树新品种时的行为决策逻辑,为引导退耕经果林换种,促进后续产业持续发展以及巩固退耕还林成果提供参考。【方法】 基于退耕农户技术禀赋对采用经果林新品种行为决策影响机理的理论分析,利用川渝397份退耕柑橘种植户微观调查数据,运用IVProbit模型、IVTobit模型实证分析不同技术禀赋的退耕农户在换种行为方面的差异及原因。【结果】 退耕农户的经果林管理技术水平普遍不高,且农户之间存在显著的差异。种植管理技术水平对退耕农户换种与否有正向影响,技术水平越高,换种可能性越大;种植管理技术水平对退耕农户换种时期、换种强度的正向影响更为显著,技术水平高的农户,在采用新品种方面表现出很强的“追新”特征。【结论】 通过实施相应的举措提升退耕农户整体技术水平,对于推动果树品种更新换代,促进退耕还林后续产业持续健康发展具有重要意义。

Abstract

【Objective】 The purpose of this study is to analyze the complementation with management technology characteristics of adopting new fruit tree varieties and reveal the decision-making logic of farmers in adopting new fruit tree varieties. We aim to provide a reference for guiding the adoption of fruit tree varieties, promoting the sustainable development of follow-up industries and consolidating the achievements of conversion from farmland to forest.【Method】 Based on the theoretical analysis of the influence mechanism of farmers’ technical endowments on the decision-making behavior of adopting new varieties, using micro survey data of 397 farmers in Sichuan and Chongqing, China, we analyzed differences among and reasons for farmers with different technical endowments’ adoption behavior of new varieties through the IVProbit and IVTobit models.【Result】 The level of economic fruit forest management technology of farmers returning farmland to forest is generally not high, and there are significant differences among farmers. The level of management technology has a positive impact on the adoption of new varieties. Farmers with higher levels of management technology are more likely to adopt new varieties. The level of management technology has a positive impact on the period and the intensity of adopting new varieties. Farmers with a higher level of management technology are characterized by “catching up with the new” in adopting varieties. 【Conclusion】 Effective measures to improve the management technology of farmers who have returned farmland to forest are conducive to the renewal of varieties and the healthy development of the follow-up industry.

关键词

退耕还林 / 农户 / 技术禀赋 / 经果林 / 新品种 / 产业发展

Key words

conversion of farmland to forest / farmers / technical endowment / fruit forest / new varieties / industrial development

引用本文

导出引用
王卫卫, 张应良. 退耕还林农户技术禀赋对经果林换种的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 45(5): 215-222 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012035
WANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yingliang. The impact of farmers’ technical endowment on the adopting new varieties of fruit forest[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(5): 215-222 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012035
中图分类号: F307.2;S7-9   

参考文献

[1]
罗细芳. 三峡库区坡耕地经果林经济复合模式生态特征研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2004.
LUO X F. Studies on ecological characteristics of compound economic forest model in slope land of three gorges reservoir region[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2004.
[2]
张连刚, 支玲, 王光玉, 等. 农户对退耕还林工程满意度的影响因素及提升路径——基于云南省鹤庆县和贵州省织金县的调查数据[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(12):123-132.
ZHANG L G, ZHI L, WANG G Y, et al. Influencing factors and improving path of farmers’ satisfaction with the grain for green project: a case study of Heqing County in Yunnan Province and Zhijin County in Guizhou Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(12):123-132. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191213.
[3]
GRILICHES Z. Hybrid corn:an exploration in the economics of technological change[J]. Econometrica, 1957, 25(4):501-522.DOI: 10.2307/1905380.
[4]
SCHMOOKLER J. Invention and economic growth[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.
[5]
FEDER G, SLADE R. The role of public policy in the diffusion of improved agricultural technology[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1985, 67(2):423-428. DOI: 10.2307/1240713.
[6]
FEDER G, UMALI D. The adoption of agricultural innovations:a review[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1993, 43(3/4):215-239. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(93)90053-A.
[7]
LIU E M. Time to change what to sow: risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95(4):1386-1403.DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00295.
[8]
BARHAM B L, CHAVAS J P, FITZ D, et al. Risk,learning,and technology adoption[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2015, 46(1):11-24.DOI: 10.1111/agec.12123.
[9]
BRICK K, VISSER M. Risk preferences,technology adoption and insurance uptake: a framed experiment[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, 118:383-396.DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.010.
[10]
孔祥智, 方松海, 庞晓鹏, 等. 西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J]. 经济研究, 2004, 39(12):85-95,122.
KONG X Z, FANG S H, PANG X P, et al. Analysis of the effect of household endowments on the agricultural technology adoption decision in West China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2004, 39(12):85-95,122.
[11]
贺梅英, 庄丽娟. 市场需求对农户技术采用行为的诱导: 来自荔枝主产区的证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(2):33-41.
HE M Y, ZHUANG L J. Inducement of market demand to farmers’ technology adoption behavior:evidence from main production areas of litchi[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014(2):33-41.
[12]
毛慧, 周力, 应瑞瑶. 风险偏好与农户技术采纳行为分析——基于契约农业视角再考察[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(4):74-89.
MAO H, ZHOU L, YING R Y. Farmers’ risk preferences and their technology adoption behavior: an examination from the perspective of contract farming[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(4):74-89.
[13]
杨兴杰, 齐振宏, 陈雪婷, 等. 政府培训、技术认知与农户生态农业技术采纳行为—以稻虾共养技术为[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(5):198-208.
YANG X J, QI Z H, CHEN X T, et al. Government training, technology cognition and farmer eco-agricultural technology adoption behavior:taking rice and shrimp co-culture technology as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(5):198-208. DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20210523.
[14]
TAYLOR J E, ADELMAN I. Agricultural household models: genesis,evolution,and extensions[J]. Review of Economics of the Household, 2003, 1(1/2):33-58.DOI: 10.1023/A:1021847430758.
[15]
刘莹, 黄季焜. 农户多目标种植决策模型与目标权重的估计[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(1):148-157,160.
LIU Y, HUANG J K. A multi-objective decision model of farmers’ crop production[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010, 45(1):148-157,160.
[16]
杨俊, 杨钢桥. 风险状态下不同类型农户农业生产组合优化——基于target-MOTAD模型的分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2011(1):49-59.
YANG J, YANG G Q. Optimization of agricultural production mix of different types of farmers in risk state:based on target-MOTAD model[J]. China Rural Survey, 2011(1):49-59.
[17]
周丽霞, 蔡志坚, 王杰, 等. 风险规避、社会网络对农地转出契约期限的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3):217-223.
ZHOU L X, CAI Z J, WANG J, et al. Impacts of risk aversion and social network on the contract period of land transfer[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 45(3):217-223. DOI: 10.3069/j. issn. 1000-2006. 202005053.
[18]
黄季焜, 齐亮, 陈瑞剑. 技术信息知识、风险偏好与农民施用农药[J]. 管理世界, 2008(5):71-76.
HUANG J K, QI L, CHEN R J. The knowledge about technology information,predilection for running risks and peasants’ application of pesticides[J]. Management World, 2008(5):71-76.DOI: http://192.168.22.105/handle/311030/5913
[19]
满明俊, 周民良, 李同昇. 农户采用不同属性技术行为的差异分析——基于陕西、甘肃、宁夏的调查[J]. 中国农村经济, 2010(2):68-78.
MAN M J, ZHOU M L, LI T S. Analysis on the differences of farmers’ technical behaviors with different attributes:based on the investigation of Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2010(2):68-78.

基金

国家社会科学基金重点项目(20AGL023)

编辑: 李燕文

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1435 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/