南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 93-101.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012048
收稿日期:
2020-12-29
接受日期:
2021-03-05
出版日期:
2021-09-30
发布日期:
2021-09-30
通讯作者:
卫星
基金资助:
WEI Qingyu(), HUANG Hailong, WU Chunze, SU Jiaxi, WEI Xing*()
Received:
2020-12-29
Accepted:
2021-03-05
Online:
2021-09-30
Published:
2021-09-30
Contact:
WEI Xing
摘要:
【目的】 研究指数施肥与常规施肥在覆膜滴灌形式下对1年生多倍体青杨(Populus cathayana)扦插苗生长、根系形态、生物量积累和光合作用的影响,选出更适合其生长规律的滴肥方式,旨在提高多倍体青杨扦插苗质量的条件下缩短苗木生长周期,为不同倍性青杨扦插苗水肥管理提供理论依据。【方法】 以2倍体、3倍体和4倍体1年生青杨扦插苗为对象,设置覆膜滴灌下指数施肥(8.01 g/株, EF)、常规施肥 (7.98 g/株, CF) 和不施肥 (CK) 3种处理。每次施肥前测定青杨扦插苗苗高和地径,绘制生长曲线。在生长旺盛期进行生理指标的测定,最终收获苗木后,分离根系对其进行扫描,获得根系形态指标。最后烘干苗木根、茎、叶测定各器官生物量。【结果】 生长结束时与指数滴肥处理相比,常规滴肥处理更显著地促进青杨扦插苗生长,苗高和地径分别比对照增加27.80%和13.81%(P<0.05),多倍体(3倍体、4倍体)苗木各营养器官生物量显著增加,4倍体青杨插条根系生物量最高为25.73 g。主要表现在多倍体苗木根系长度、根系直径、根系表面积、根系体积和根尖数量分别显著高出对照182.60%、32.97%、122.02%、119.48%和178.25%(P<0.05),且各指标从大到小依次为3倍体>4倍体>2倍体植株的。常规滴肥下多倍体叶片叶绿素含量较对照显著高出14.66%,苗木单株光合产量较对照显著高出38.79%,且各指标从大到小依次为4倍体>3倍体>2倍体。覆膜常规滴肥苗木气孔导度低于指数滴肥,但却保持着较高的胞间CO2浓度,其中多倍体植株气孔导度大于2倍体植株的。【结论】 覆膜滴肥情况下,常规滴肥更有助于促进多倍体青杨扦插苗生长,3倍体和4倍体植株生长差异不大。
中图分类号:
韦庆钰,黄海龙,吴纯泽,等. 3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5): 93-101.
WEI Qingyu, HUANG Hailong, WU Chunze, SU Jiaxi, WEI Xing. Response of Populus cathayana cutting seedlings of three ploidy types to fertilizer under film mulching and drip irrigation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(5): 93-101.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012048.
表2
不同滴肥方式对3种倍性青杨扦插苗生物量的影响"
处理 treatment | 倍性类型 ploidy types | 生物量biomass | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根root | 茎stem | 叶leaf | 总计total | ||||||
EF | 2倍体the diploid | 14.41±0.69 a | 54.69±9.74 a | 40.11±3.96 b | 119.46±13.65 a | ||||
3倍体the triploid | 14.81±0.29 a | 61.62±7.68 a | 46.86±4.55 ab | 134.79±11.85 a | |||||
4倍体the tetraploid | 15.64±0.40 a | 72.68±11.60 a | 56.41±5.45 a | 164.49±17.71 a | |||||
CF | 2倍体the diploid | 19.35±0.22 b | 106.29±5.85 a | 58.20±7.00 a | 188.32±5.89 a | ||||
3倍体the triploid | 20.01±0.05 b | 98.43±4.00 a | 66.48±2.56 a | 190.71±6.10 a | |||||
4倍体the tetraploid | 25.73±0.52 a | 112.54±16.41 a | 65.18±11.09 a | 209.35±21.45 a | |||||
CK | 2倍体the diploid | 8.90±0.12 b | 30.85±3.48 b | 29.15±2.24 a | 72.31±3.18 b | ||||
3倍体the triploid | 9.42±0.21 b | 31.25±4.51 b | 31.86±3.75 a | 67.61±4.94 b | |||||
4倍体the tetraploid | 13.86±0.47 a | 46.92±6.45 a | 32.57±6.28 a | 95.26±4.54 a |
[1] |
YANG F, XIAO X W, ZHANG S, et al. Salt stress responses in Populus cathayana Rehder[J]. Plant Sci, 2009, 176(5):669-677.DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.008.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.008 |
[2] |
LEI Y B, YIN C Y, LI C Y. Differences in some morphological,physiological,and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii[J]. Physiol Plant, 2006, 127(2):182-191.DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00638.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00638.x |
[3] | 朱之悌, 林惠斌, 康向阳. 毛白杨异源三倍体B301等无性系选育的研究[J]. 林业科学, 1995, 31(6):499-505. |
ZHU Z T, LIN H B, KANG X Y. Studies on allotriploid breeding of Populus tomentosa B301 clones[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 1995, 31(6):499-505. | |
[4] | 李凤兰, 张志毅, 张民侠. 白杨染色体加倍技术研究及三倍体育种(Ⅲ):加倍体某些形态特征的观察[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1994, 16(2):15-18. |
LI F L, ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG M X. Studies on chromosome doubling and triploid breedingof white poplar (Ⅲ): the observation of some morphological charactersin triploids of white poplar[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 1994, 16(2):15-18. | |
[5] | MASHKINA O. A method of inducing diploid pollen in woody species[EB/OL].(1989 -01-01)[2019-10-05].http.www.research gate.net/prblication/337446175. |
[6] | 郑彩霞, 张志毅. 白杨染色体加倍技术研究及三倍体育种(Ⅳ):加倍体白杨生理特性的初步研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1994, 16(2):19-25. |
ZHENG C X, ZHANG Z Y. Studies on chromosome doubling triploid breedingof white poplar: a preliminary study on physiological characteristicsof polyploid white poplar (Ⅳ)[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 1994, 16(2):19-25. | |
[7] |
SEGRAVES K A, ANNEBERG T J. Species interactions and plant polyploidy[J]. Am J Bot, 2016, 103(7):1326-1335.DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1500529.
doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500529 |
[8] | 康向阳. 关于杨树多倍体育种的几点认识[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(5):149-153. |
KANG X Y. Some understandings on polyploid breeding of poplars[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2010, 32(5):149-153.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.05.028.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.05.028 |
|
[9] | 郭霞. 黑膜在小青杨新无性系扦插育苗中的应用与评价[J]. 山东林业科技, 2013, 43(3):59-60. |
GUO X. Application and evaluation of black film in cutting seedling of new Populus cathayana×simonii clones[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2013, 43(3):59-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2013.03.018.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2013.03.018 |
|
[10] | 苏晓华, 黄秦军, 张冰玉, 等. 中国杨树良种选育成就及发展对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2004, 17(1):46-49. |
SU X H, HUANG Q J, ZHANG B Y, et al. The achievement and developing strategy on variety selection and breeding of poplar in China[J]. World For Res, 2004, 17(1):46-49.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2004.01.010.
doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2004.01.010 |
|
[11] | 赵雪梅, 孙向阳, 康向阳, 等. 短轮伐期毛白杨不同密度林分土壤有机碳和全氮动态[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15):4714-4721. |
ZHAO X M, SUN X Y, KANG X Y, et al. Dynamics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents in short-rotation triploid Populus tomentosa plantations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(15):4714-4721.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201106160816.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201106160816 |
|
[12] | 井大炜. 地膜覆盖对杨树林下土壤生物学特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6):269-273. |
JING D W. Effects of plastic film mulching on soil biological characters in poplar field[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2013, 33(6):269-273.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.06.049.
doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.06.049 |
|
[13] |
ZHANG G Q, LIU C W, XIAO C H, et al. Optimizing water use efficiency and economic return of super high yield spring maize under drip irrigation and plastic mulching in arid areas of China[J]. Field Crop Res, 2017, 211:137-146.DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.026.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.026 |
[14] |
TIMMER V R. Exponential nutrient loading:a new fertilization technique to improve seedling performance on competitive sites[J]. New For, 1997, 13(1/2/3):279-299.DOI: 10.1023/A:1006502830067.
doi: 10.1023/A:1006502830067 |
[15] | 徐志红, 戴良选, 张斌, 等. 氮素指数施肥对赤皮青冈苗期生长的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(11):85-92. |
XU Z H, DAI L X, ZHANG B, et al. Effect of exponential N fertilization on growth of Cyclobalanopsis gilva seedlings[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2020, 40(11):85-92.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.11.011.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.11.011 |
|
[16] | 张程, 郝龙飞, 刘婷岩, 等. 指数施肥对白桦裸根苗养分动态的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(10):24-29. |
ZHANG C, HAO L F, LIU T Y, et al. Effect of exponential fertilization on nutrient dynamic of Betula platyphylla bare-rooted seedlings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(10):24-29.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.10.006.
doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.10.006 |
|
[17] |
ZHAO J, CHEN X, WEI H X, et al. Nutrient uptake and utilization in Prince Rupprecht’s larch (Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr.) seedlings exposed to a combination of light-emitting diode spectra and exponential fertilization[J]. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2019, 65(4):358-368.DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2019.1631715.
doi: 10.1080/00380768.2019.1631715 |
[18] | 李茂, 任正标, 郑鸣鸣, 等. 指数施肥对杉木优良无性系生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2020, 26(2):400-409. |
LI M, REN Z B, ZHENG M M, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of the superior clone of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2020, 26(2):400-409.DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2019.05045.
doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2019.05045 |
|
[19] | 黄复兴, 范川, 李晓清, 等. 施肥对盆栽香樟幼苗细根生长的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(5):103-108,114. |
HUANG F X, FAN C, LI X Q, et al. Effects of fertilization on the fine root growing of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2013, 28(5):103-108,114. | |
[20] | 王益明, 万福绪, 李瑞瑞, 等. 指数施肥对美国山核桃幼苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(9):21-25. |
WANG Y M, WAN F X, LI R R, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and nutrient accumulation of Carya illinoensis seedlings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2018, 46(9):21-25.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2018.09.005.
doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2018.09.005 |
|
[21] | 孙一, 马履一, 贾忠奎, 等. 欧美107杨砂培扦插苗对指数施肥的响应[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2010, 30(6):18-22. |
SUN Y, MA L Y, JIA Z K, et al. Nutrient uptake of Populus × euramericana cv.‘74/76’ cuttage in response to different exponential regimes under sand culture[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2010, 30(6):18-22. | |
[22] |
INGESTAD T, LUND A B. Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants[J]. Scand J For Res, 1986, 1(1/2/3/4):439-453.DOI: 10.1080/02827588609382436.
doi: 10.1080/02827588609382436 |
[23] |
ZABEK L M, PRESCOTT C E. Steady-state nutrition of hybrid poplar grown from un-rooted cuttings[J]. New For, 2007, 34(1):13-23.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-006-9033-4.
doi: 10.1007/s11056-006-9033-4 |
[24] | 谭露曼. 锥栗芽苗砧嫁接容器育苗技术研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2016. |
TAN L M. Study on nurse seedling graft and anvil container seedling technology in Castanea henryi[D]. Changsha:Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016. | |
[25] | 何茜, 丁晓纲, 王冉, 等. 指数施肥下黑木相思根系特征值的动态变化[J]. 广东林业科技, 2011, 27(5):1-6. |
HE Q, DING X G, WANG R, et al. Root characteristics dynamic change of Acacia melanoxylon seedlings under index fertilization[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2011, 27(5):1-6.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2011.05.001.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2011.05.001 |
|
[26] | 吴俊文, 何茜, 李吉跃, 等. 不同氮素指数施肥下楸树无性系叶片发育动态变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(7):19-28. |
WU J W, HE Q, LI J Y, et al. Dynamic changes of foliage growth of Catalpa bungei clones under different nitrogen exponential fertilizations[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2015, 37(7):19-28.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140437.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140437 |
|
[27] | 王燕, 晏紫依, 苏艳, 等. 不同施肥方法对欧洲云杉生长生理和根系形态的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(6):15-21. |
WANG Y, YAN Z Y, SU Y, et al. Effects of different fertilizing methods on growth,physiological characteristics and root morphological traits of Picea abies[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2015, 30(6):15-21.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.03.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.03 |
|
[28] | 张云龙, 李博扬, 卫星. 覆膜滴灌对青杨扦插苗生长的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2019, 35(5):1-8. |
ZHANG Y L, LI B Y, WEI X. Effects of mulching film drip irrigation on the growth of Populus cathayana rooted cuttings full text replacement[J]. For Eng, 2019, 35(5):1-8.DOI: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2019.05.001.
doi: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2019.05.001 |
|
[29] |
DUMROESE R K, PAGE-DUMROESE D S, SALIFU K F, et al. Exponential fertilization of Pinus monticola seedlings: nutrient uptake efficiency,leaching fractions,and early outplanting performance[J]. Can J For Res, 2005, 35(12):2961-2967.DOI: 10.1139/x05-226.
doi: 10.1139/x05-226 |
[30] | 魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 苗木指数施肥技术研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(7):140-146. |
WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Advances in study on seedling exponential fertilization regime[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2010, 46(7):140-146. | |
[31] | 魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 不同指数施肥方法下长白落叶松播种苗的需肥规律[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(3):685-690. |
WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Nutrient upkate of Larix olgensis seedlings in response to different exponential regimes[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(3):685-690. | |
[32] |
HAWKINS B J, BURGESS D, MITCHELL A K. Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions[J]. Can J For Res, 2005, 35(4):1002-1016.DOI: 10.1139/x05-026.
doi: 10.1139/x05-026 |
[33] | 林晓明, 徐程扬, 王奇峰, 等. 氮、磷对107杨苗木生物量的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(2):13-16. |
LIN X M, XU C Y, WANG Q F, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on biomass accumulation of Populus × euramericana cv. ‘74/76’ cuttings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(2):13-16.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.02.021.
doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.02.021 |
|
[34] |
DONG S F, CHENG L L, SCAGEL C F, et al. Nitrogen mobilization,nitrogen uptake and growth of cuttings obtained from poplar stock plants grown in different N regimes and sprayed with urea in autumn[J]. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24(3):355-359.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.3.355.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.3.355 |
[35] |
KELLY J M, ERICSSON T. Assessing the nutrition of juvenile hybrid poplar using a steady state technique and a mechanistic model[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 180(1/2/3):249-260.DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00564-9.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00564-9 |
[36] | 高椿翔, 赵瑞青, 贾改霞, 等. 速生杨扦插育苗施肥方法的研究[J]. 河北林业科技, 2004(1):11-12. |
GAO C X, ZHAO R Q, JIA G X, et al. Study on fertilization method of cutting seedling of fast-growing poplar[J]. J Hebei For Sci Technol, 2004(1):11-12.DOI: 10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2004.01.004.
doi: 10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2004.01.004 |
|
[37] |
HENDRICKS J J, NADELHOFFER K J, ABER J D. Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nutrient cycling[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 1993, 8(5):174-178.DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90143-D.
doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90143-D |
[38] |
NADELHOFFER K J. The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine-root production in forest ecosystems[J]. New Phytol, 2000, 147(1):131-139.DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00677.x.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00677.x |
[39] |
BURTON A J, PREGITZER K S, ZOGG G P, et al. Latitudinal variation in sugar maple fine root respiration[J]. Can J For Res, 1996, 26(10):1761-1768.DOI: 10.1139/x26-200.
doi: 10.1139/x26-200 |
[40] |
GORDON W S, JACKSON R B. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots[J]. Ecology, 2000, 81(1):275-280.DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0275:NCIFR]2.0.CO;2.
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081 |
[41] | 康向阳. 林木三倍体育种研究进展及展望[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2020, 50(2):136-143. |
KANG X Y. Research progress and prospect of triploid breeding of forest trees[J]. Sci Sin (Vitae), 2020, 50(2):136-143. | |
[42] |
GREER B T, STILL C, CULLINAN G L, et al. Polyploidy influences plant-environment interactions in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.)[J]. Tree Physiol, 2018, 38(4):630-640.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpx120.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx120 |
[43] | 王溢, 邱彤, 韩强, 等. 不同2n雌配子来源的青杨杂种三倍体与其亲本蛋白质组差异研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(5):1-9. |
WANG Y, QIU T, HAN Q, et al. Comparative proteomics of two Populus spp.(Section Tacamahaca) allotriploid derived by different types of 2n female gamete and their parents[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(5):1-9.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170425.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170425 |
|
[44] | 梁泉, 廖红, 严小龙. 植物根构型的定量分析[J]. 植物学通报, 2007, 42(6):695-702. |
LIANG Q, LIAO H, YAN X L. Quantitative analysis of plant root architecture[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2007, 42(6):695-702. | |
[45] | 罗杰, 陈洪, 申玲, 等. 不同肥料种类及其施肥水平对1年生桢楠幼苗光合生理及生长特性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(5):826-836. |
LUO J, CHEN H, SHEN L, et al. Effect of different fertilizers and N levels on the photosynthetic physiology and growth of one-year-old Phoebe zhennan S.Lee seedlings[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2017, 23(5):826-836. | |
[46] | 徐晓鹏, 傅向东, 廖红. 植物铵态氮同化及其调控机制的研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(2):152-166. |
XU X P, FU X D, LIAO H. Advances in study of ammonium assimilation and its regulatory mechanism in plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2016, 51(2):152-166. | |
[47] |
NICODEMUS M A, SALIFU F K, JACOBS D F. Growth,nutrition,and photosynthetic response of black walnut to varying nitrogen sources and rates[J]. J Plant Nutr, 2008, 31(11):1917-1936.DOI: 10.1080/01904160802402856.
doi: 10.1080/01904160802402856 |
[1] | 陈赢男, 韦素云, 曲冠正, 胡建军, 王军辉, 尹佟明, 潘惠新, 卢孟柱, 康向阳, 李来庚, 黄敏仁, 王明庥. 现代林木育种关键核心技术研究现状与展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6): 1-9. |
[2] | 张馨, 马苗苗, 吕婉秋, LEE Joobin, 杨静莉. 大青杨PuZFP103基因的序列特征及逆境胁迫的表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1): 36-44. |
[3] | 杨颖, 段豪, 郭金博, 王紫阳, 施钦, 宣磊, 於朝广. [落羽杉×墨西哥落羽杉(墨杉)]×墨杉回交子代扦插生根性状的遗传变异及QTL定位[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3): 49-57. |
[4] | 李伟强, 戴晓港, 李小平, 李淑娴. 美洲黑杨种质材料倍性鉴定[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(5): 51-58. |
[5] | 丁俊男,宇佳,迟德富. 利用寄生性天敌防治青杨脊虎天牛研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(04): 107-112. |
[6] | 李玲,马玉堃,王轶,刘雪峰. 青杨脊虎天牛伴生真菌研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(06): 55-59. |
[7] | 徐华东,徐国祺,王立海. 低温对红松和大青杨木材力学性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(05): 25-28. |
[8] | 宋福强1,2,杨国亭3,孟繁荣3,田兴军2,董爱荣3,吴庆禹3. 丛枝茵根(AM)真菌对大青杨苗木根系的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(06): 35-39. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||