3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应

韦庆钰, 黄海龙, 吴纯泽, 苏嘉熙, 卫星

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 93-101.

PDF(2174 KB)
PDF(2174 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 93-101. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012048
研究论文

3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应

作者信息 +

Response of Populus cathayana cutting seedlings of three ploidy types to fertilizer under film mulching and drip irrigation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】 研究指数施肥与常规施肥在覆膜滴灌形式下对1年生多倍体青杨(Populus cathayana)扦插苗生长、根系形态、生物量积累和光合作用的影响,选出更适合其生长规律的滴肥方式,旨在提高多倍体青杨扦插苗质量的条件下缩短苗木生长周期,为不同倍性青杨扦插苗水肥管理提供理论依据。【方法】 以2倍体、3倍体和4倍体1年生青杨扦插苗为对象,设置覆膜滴灌下指数施肥(8.01 g/株, EF)、常规施肥 (7.98 g/株, CF) 和不施肥 (CK) 3种处理。每次施肥前测定青杨扦插苗苗高和地径,绘制生长曲线。在生长旺盛期进行生理指标的测定,最终收获苗木后,分离根系对其进行扫描,获得根系形态指标。最后烘干苗木根、茎、叶测定各器官生物量。【结果】 生长结束时与指数滴肥处理相比,常规滴肥处理更显著地促进青杨扦插苗生长,苗高和地径分别比对照增加27.80%和13.81%(P<0.05),多倍体(3倍体、4倍体)苗木各营养器官生物量显著增加,4倍体青杨插条根系生物量最高为25.73 g。主要表现在多倍体苗木根系长度、根系直径、根系表面积、根系体积和根尖数量分别显著高出对照182.60%、32.97%、122.02%、119.48%和178.25%(P<0.05),且各指标从大到小依次为3倍体>4倍体>2倍体植株的。常规滴肥下多倍体叶片叶绿素含量较对照显著高出14.66%,苗木单株光合产量较对照显著高出38.79%,且各指标从大到小依次为4倍体>3倍体>2倍体。覆膜常规滴肥苗木气孔导度低于指数滴肥,但却保持着较高的胞间CO2浓度,其中多倍体植株气孔导度大于2倍体植株的。【结论】 覆膜滴肥情况下,常规滴肥更有助于促进多倍体青杨扦插苗生长,3倍体和4倍体植株生长差异不大。

Abstract

【Objective】 Effects of exponential fertilization (EF) and conventional fertilization (CF) with film mulching and drip irrigation on the aboveground growth, root morphology, biomass allocation and photosynthesis of one-year-old Populus cathayana seedlings were investigated in this study to shorten the growth cycle of seedlings under the conditions of improving the quality of P. cathayana polyploidy seedlings and provide a theoretical basis for water and fertilizer management of P. cathayana cutting seedlings of different ploidy types. 【Method】 A nitrogen fertilization experiment was conducted with one-year-old diploid, triploid and tetraploid P. cathayana cutting seedlings under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching. Further,three treatments with film mulching and drip irrigation were applied: exponential fertilization (8.01 g per seedling, EF), constant fertilization (7.98 g per seedling, CF), and non-fertilization (CK). We fertilized one-year-old P. cathayana seedlings every 15 days from the end of May by drip irrigation facilities, and seven times in the whole seedling growth period. During the experimental period, the height and base diameter of the seedlings were measured before each fertilization, and the data were used to plot the growth curve. Photosynthesis was measured during the period of vigorous growth, including chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr). When these P. cathayana seedlings were harvested, roots were separated from the plants for scanning and calculating their morphological indices, namely, root length, diameter, surface area, volume and tips. After drying, the biomass of the roots, stems and leaves of each cutting seedling was determined.【Result】 By the end of the growing season, CF promoted the growth of P. cathayana one-year-old cutting seedlings more significantly than EF did, and the seedling height and ground diameter were significantly increased by 27.80% and 13.81%, respectively (P < 0.05). The biomass of P. cathayana one-year-old cutting seedlings with polyploid (the triploid and tetraploid seedlings) under CF treatment increased significantly; the biomass of roots, stems and leaves of seedlings treated with CF was significantly higher than that of CK by 102.25%, 191.02% and 102.90%, respectively (P < 0.05); and the biomass of roots of tetraploid P. cathayana cuttings was the highest at 25.73 g. The root length, diameter, surface area, volume and tips of polyploid seedlings under CF treatment was 182.60%, 32.97%, 122.02%, 119.48% and 178.25% higher than those of CK, respectively (P < 0.05), and those with different ploidy types were in the order triploid > tetraploid > diploid. Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic yield per stem of polyploid seedlings under CF treatment were 14.66% and 38.79% greater than those of CK, respectively (P < 0.05), and the order of those with different ploidy types was tetraploid > triploid > diploid. The Gs of P. cathayana one-year-old cutting seedlings under CF treatment were lower than those of EF but maintained a high Ci. The Gs of the polyploid seedlings of both EF and CF were higher than those of diploid seedlings, indicating that polyploid P. cathayana one-year-old cutting seedlings could maintain a high photosynthetic physiological process while reducing water transpiration. 【Conclusion】 Constant fertilization regimes under film mulching and drip irrigation effectively promoted the growth of P. cathayana one-year-old cutting seedlings, and no significant difference between triploid and tetraploid seedlings was observed.

关键词

青杨 / 扦插苗 / 多倍体 / 覆膜滴肥

Key words

Populus cathayana / cutting seedlings / polyploid / fertilizer under film mulching and drip irrigation

引用本文

导出引用
韦庆钰, 黄海龙, 吴纯泽, . 3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 45(5): 93-101 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012048
WEI Qingyu, HUANG Hailong, WU Chunze, et al. Response of Populus cathayana cutting seedlings of three ploidy types to fertilizer under film mulching and drip irrigation[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(5): 93-101 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012048
中图分类号: S723.7   

参考文献

[1]
YANG F, XIAO X W, ZHANG S, et al. Salt stress responses in Populus cathayana Rehder[J]. Plant Sci, 2009, 176(5):669-677.DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.008.
[2]
LEI Y B, YIN C Y, LI C Y. Differences in some morphological,physiological,and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii[J]. Physiol Plant, 2006, 127(2):182-191.DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00638.x.
[3]
朱之悌, 林惠斌, 康向阳. 毛白杨异源三倍体B301等无性系选育的研究[J]. 林业科学, 1995, 31(6):499-505.
ZHU Z T, LIN H B, KANG X Y. Studies on allotriploid breeding of Populus tomentosa B301 clones[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 1995, 31(6):499-505.
[4]
李凤兰, 张志毅, 张民侠. 白杨染色体加倍技术研究及三倍体育种(Ⅲ):加倍体某些形态特征的观察[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1994, 16(2):15-18.
LI F L, ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG M X. Studies on chromosome doubling and triploid breedingof white poplar (Ⅲ): the observation of some morphological charactersin triploids of white poplar[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 1994, 16(2):15-18.
[5]
MASHKINA O. A method of inducing diploid pollen in woody species[EB/OL].(1989 -01-01)[2019-10-05].http.www.research gate.net/prblication/337446175.
[6]
郑彩霞, 张志毅. 白杨染色体加倍技术研究及三倍体育种(Ⅳ):加倍体白杨生理特性的初步研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1994, 16(2):19-25.
ZHENG C X, ZHANG Z Y. Studies on chromosome doubling triploid breedingof white poplar: a preliminary study on physiological characteristicsof polyploid white poplar (Ⅳ)[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 1994, 16(2):19-25.
[7]
SEGRAVES K A, ANNEBERG T J. Species interactions and plant polyploidy[J]. Am J Bot, 2016, 103(7):1326-1335.DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1500529.
[8]
康向阳. 关于杨树多倍体育种的几点认识[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(5):149-153.
KANG X Y. Some understandings on polyploid breeding of poplars[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2010, 32(5):149-153.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.05.028.
[9]
郭霞. 黑膜在小青杨新无性系扦插育苗中的应用与评价[J]. 山东林业科技, 2013, 43(3):59-60.
GUO X. Application and evaluation of black film in cutting seedling of new Populus cathayana×simonii clones[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2013, 43(3):59-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2013.03.018.
[10]
苏晓华, 黄秦军, 张冰玉, 等. 中国杨树良种选育成就及发展对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2004, 17(1):46-49.
SU X H, HUANG Q J, ZHANG B Y, et al. The achievement and developing strategy on variety selection and breeding of poplar in China[J]. World For Res, 2004, 17(1):46-49.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2004.01.010.
[11]
赵雪梅, 孙向阳, 康向阳, 等. 短轮伐期毛白杨不同密度林分土壤有机碳和全氮动态[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15):4714-4721.
ZHAO X M, SUN X Y, KANG X Y, et al. Dynamics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents in short-rotation triploid Populus tomentosa plantations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(15):4714-4721.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201106160816.
[12]
井大炜. 地膜覆盖对杨树林下土壤生物学特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6):269-273.
JING D W. Effects of plastic film mulching on soil biological characters in poplar field[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2013, 33(6):269-273.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.06.049.
[13]
ZHANG G Q, LIU C W, XIAO C H, et al. Optimizing water use efficiency and economic return of super high yield spring maize under drip irrigation and plastic mulching in arid areas of China[J]. Field Crop Res, 2017, 211:137-146.DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.026.
[14]
TIMMER V R. Exponential nutrient loading:a new fertilization technique to improve seedling performance on competitive sites[J]. New For, 1997, 13(1/2/3):279-299.DOI: 10.1023/A:1006502830067.
[15]
徐志红, 戴良选, 张斌, 等. 氮素指数施肥对赤皮青冈苗期生长的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(11):85-92.
XU Z H, DAI L X, ZHANG B, et al. Effect of exponential N fertilization on growth of Cyclobalanopsis gilva seedlings[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2020, 40(11):85-92.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.11.011.
[16]
张程, 郝龙飞, 刘婷岩, 等. 指数施肥对白桦裸根苗养分动态的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(10):24-29.
ZHANG C, HAO L F, LIU T Y, et al. Effect of exponential fertilization on nutrient dynamic of Betula platyphylla bare-rooted seedlings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(10):24-29.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.10.006.
[17]
ZHAO J, CHEN X, WEI H X, et al. Nutrient uptake and utilization in Prince Rupprecht’s larch (Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr.) seedlings exposed to a combination of light-emitting diode spectra and exponential fertilization[J]. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2019, 65(4):358-368.DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2019.1631715.
[18]
李茂, 任正标, 郑鸣鸣, 等. 指数施肥对杉木优良无性系生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2020, 26(2):400-409.
LI M, REN Z B, ZHENG M M, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of the superior clone of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2020, 26(2):400-409.DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2019.05045.
[19]
黄复兴, 范川, 李晓清, 等. 施肥对盆栽香樟幼苗细根生长的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(5):103-108,114.
HUANG F X, FAN C, LI X Q, et al. Effects of fertilization on the fine root growing of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2013, 28(5):103-108,114.
[20]
王益明, 万福绪, 李瑞瑞, 等. 指数施肥对美国山核桃幼苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(9):21-25.
WANG Y M, WAN F X, LI R R, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and nutrient accumulation of Carya illinoensis seedlings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2018, 46(9):21-25.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2018.09.005.
[21]
孙一, 马履一, 贾忠奎, 等. 欧美107杨砂培扦插苗对指数施肥的响应[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2010, 30(6):18-22.
SUN Y, MA L Y, JIA Z K, et al. Nutrient uptake of Populus × euramericana cv.‘74/76’ cuttage in response to different exponential regimes under sand culture[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2010, 30(6):18-22.
[22]
INGESTAD T, LUND A B. Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants[J]. Scand J For Res, 1986, 1(1/2/3/4):439-453.DOI: 10.1080/02827588609382436.
[23]
ZABEK L M, PRESCOTT C E. Steady-state nutrition of hybrid poplar grown from un-rooted cuttings[J]. New For, 2007, 34(1):13-23.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-006-9033-4.
[24]
谭露曼. 锥栗芽苗砧嫁接容器育苗技术研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2016.
TAN L M. Study on nurse seedling graft and anvil container seedling technology in Castanea henryi[D]. Changsha:Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016.
[25]
何茜, 丁晓纲, 王冉, 等. 指数施肥下黑木相思根系特征值的动态变化[J]. 广东林业科技, 2011, 27(5):1-6.
HE Q, DING X G, WANG R, et al. Root characteristics dynamic change of Acacia melanoxylon seedlings under index fertilization[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2011, 27(5):1-6.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2011.05.001.
[26]
吴俊文, 何茜, 李吉跃, 等. 不同氮素指数施肥下楸树无性系叶片发育动态变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(7):19-28.
WU J W, HE Q, LI J Y, et al. Dynamic changes of foliage growth of Catalpa bungei clones under different nitrogen exponential fertilizations[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2015, 37(7):19-28.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140437.
[27]
王燕, 晏紫依, 苏艳, 等. 不同施肥方法对欧洲云杉生长生理和根系形态的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(6):15-21.
WANG Y, YAN Z Y, SU Y, et al. Effects of different fertilizing methods on growth,physiological characteristics and root morphological traits of Picea abies[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2015, 30(6):15-21.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.06.03.
[28]
张云龙, 李博扬, 卫星. 覆膜滴灌对青杨扦插苗生长的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2019, 35(5):1-8.
ZHANG Y L, LI B Y, WEI X. Effects of mulching film drip irrigation on the growth of Populus cathayana rooted cuttings full text replacement[J]. For Eng, 2019, 35(5):1-8.DOI: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2019.05.001.
[29]
DUMROESE R K, PAGE-DUMROESE D S, SALIFU K F, et al. Exponential fertilization of Pinus monticola seedlings: nutrient uptake efficiency,leaching fractions,and early outplanting performance[J]. Can J For Res, 2005, 35(12):2961-2967.DOI: 10.1139/x05-226.
[30]
魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 苗木指数施肥技术研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(7):140-146.
WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Advances in study on seedling exponential fertilization regime[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2010, 46(7):140-146.
[31]
魏红旭, 徐程扬, 马履一, 等. 不同指数施肥方法下长白落叶松播种苗的需肥规律[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(3):685-690.
WEI H X, XU C Y, MA L Y, et al. Nutrient upkate of Larix olgensis seedlings in response to different exponential regimes[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(3):685-690.
[32]
HAWKINS B J, BURGESS D, MITCHELL A K. Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions[J]. Can J For Res, 2005, 35(4):1002-1016.DOI: 10.1139/x05-026.
[33]
林晓明, 徐程扬, 王奇峰, 等. 氮、磷对107杨苗木生物量的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(2):13-16.
LIN X M, XU C Y, WANG Q F, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on biomass accumulation of Populus × euramericana cv. ‘74/76’ cuttings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(2):13-16.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.02.021.
[34]
DONG S F, CHENG L L, SCAGEL C F, et al. Nitrogen mobilization,nitrogen uptake and growth of cuttings obtained from poplar stock plants grown in different N regimes and sprayed with urea in autumn[J]. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24(3):355-359.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.3.355.
[35]
KELLY J M, ERICSSON T. Assessing the nutrition of juvenile hybrid poplar using a steady state technique and a mechanistic model[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 180(1/2/3):249-260.DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00564-9.
[36]
高椿翔, 赵瑞青, 贾改霞, 等. 速生杨扦插育苗施肥方法的研究[J]. 河北林业科技, 2004(1):11-12.
GAO C X, ZHAO R Q, JIA G X, et al. Study on fertilization method of cutting seedling of fast-growing poplar[J]. J Hebei For Sci Technol, 2004(1):11-12.DOI: 10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2004.01.004.
[37]
HENDRICKS J J, NADELHOFFER K J, ABER J D. Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nutrient cycling[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 1993, 8(5):174-178.DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90143-D.
[38]
NADELHOFFER K J. The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine-root production in forest ecosystems[J]. New Phytol, 2000, 147(1):131-139.DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00677.x.
[39]
BURTON A J, PREGITZER K S, ZOGG G P, et al. Latitudinal variation in sugar maple fine root respiration[J]. Can J For Res, 1996, 26(10):1761-1768.DOI: 10.1139/x26-200.
[40]
GORDON W S, JACKSON R B. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots[J]. Ecology, 2000, 81(1):275-280.DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0275:NCIFR]2.0.CO;2.
[41]
康向阳. 林木三倍体育种研究进展及展望[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2020, 50(2):136-143.
KANG X Y. Research progress and prospect of triploid breeding of forest trees[J]. Sci Sin (Vitae), 2020, 50(2):136-143.
[42]
GREER B T, STILL C, CULLINAN G L, et al. Polyploidy influences plant-environment interactions in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.)[J]. Tree Physiol, 2018, 38(4):630-640.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpx120.
[43]
王溢, 邱彤, 韩强, 等. 不同2n雌配子来源的青杨杂种三倍体与其亲本蛋白质组差异研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(5):1-9.
WANG Y, QIU T, HAN Q, et al. Comparative proteomics of two Populus spp.(Section Tacamahaca) allotriploid derived by different types of 2n female gamete and their parents[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(5):1-9.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170425.
[44]
梁泉, 廖红, 严小龙. 植物根构型的定量分析[J]. 植物学通报, 2007, 42(6):695-702.
LIANG Q, LIAO H, YAN X L. Quantitative analysis of plant root architecture[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2007, 42(6):695-702.
[45]
罗杰, 陈洪, 申玲, 等. 不同肥料种类及其施肥水平对1年生桢楠幼苗光合生理及生长特性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(5):826-836.
LUO J, CHEN H, SHEN L, et al. Effect of different fertilizers and N levels on the photosynthetic physiology and growth of one-year-old Phoebe zhennan S.Lee seedlings[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2017, 23(5):826-836.
[46]
徐晓鹏, 傅向东, 廖红. 植物铵态氮同化及其调控机制的研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(2):152-166.
XU X P, FU X D, LIAO H. Advances in study of ammonium assimilation and its regulatory mechanism in plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2016, 51(2):152-166.
[47]
NICODEMUS M A, SALIFU F K, JACOBS D F. Growth,nutrition,and photosynthetic response of black walnut to varying nitrogen sources and rates[J]. J Plant Nutr, 2008, 31(11):1917-1936.DOI: 10.1080/01904160802402856.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0600404)

编辑: 吴祝华

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(2174 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/