松墨天牛取食和产卵特性研究

王立超, 陈凤毛, 董晓燕, 田成连, 王洋

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 219-224.

PDF(1536 KB)
PDF(1536 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 219-224. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103022
研究论文

松墨天牛取食和产卵特性研究

作者信息 +

A study on feeding and oviposition characteristics of Monochamus alternatus

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】松墨天牛是一种重要的松林蛀干害虫,也是亚洲地区松材线虫最主要的媒介昆虫,研究松墨天牛取食能力与环境温度、天牛性别以及体质量的关系,分析松墨天牛产卵能力与松树树皮厚度、树干直径以及天牛体质量的关系,为松墨天牛的科学防治提供参考。【方法】从养虫笼中收集天牛,选择体质量(M)在0.3 g≤M <0.6 g的松墨天牛放置在昆虫培养箱中,设置4个温度梯度(25、30、35和40 ℃),比较不同温度条件下天牛的取食能力;选取体质量相似的5头雌成虫和5头雄成虫于昆虫培养箱中,比较天牛雌雄成虫取食差异;选择不同体质量(M<0.3 g,0.3 g≤M<0.6 g和M≥0.6g)天牛放置在温度相同的昆虫培养箱中,比较不同体质量天牛取食能力。在养虫桶中放入直径(D)不同(2.0 cm<D<3.0 cm、4.0 cm≤D<5.0 cm和D≥6.0 cm)的松树树干,再放入体质量相似的松墨天牛,统计天牛在不同直径树干上产卵刻槽的数量差异。在养虫桶中放入树皮厚度(d)不同(d=1、4和9 mm)的松树树干,再放入体质量相似的松墨天牛,统计天牛产卵刻槽数量。在养虫桶中放入相似松树树干,再分别放入不同体质量(M<0.3 g、0.3 g≤M<0.6 g和M≥0.6 g)的松墨天牛,统计松墨天牛在树干上的产卵刻槽数量;选取不同体质量松墨天牛雌成虫,解剖天牛腹部,取出腹中所有的天牛卵,统计卵的数目,比较不同体质量天牛腹中卵数量的差异。【结果】松墨天牛取食能力由大到小时所处温度条件依次为:35、40、30、25 ℃,但是松墨天牛雌成虫和雄成虫之间取食差异不显著。在不同体质量天牛中,M≥0.6 g的天牛取食能力最强,M<0.3 g的松墨天牛取食能力最弱。在不同直径(D)松树树干之间,松墨天牛在D≥6.0 cm树干上产卵刻槽数量最多,在2.0 cm <D <3.0 cm的松树树干产卵刻槽数量最少;在不同树皮厚度(d)树干之间,松墨天牛在d=1 mm的树干上产卵数量最多,在d=9 mm的树干上产卵数量最少;且M≥0.6 g的松墨天牛产卵能力明显比M<0.3 g和0.3 g≤M<0.6 g的松墨天牛产卵能力强,解剖发现M≥0.6 g的松墨天牛腹中卵的数量明显多于其他两种体质量的松墨天牛。【结论】松墨天牛取食能力与天牛的性别无显著关系,与环境温度以及天牛个体大小相关,在35 ℃时取食能力明显大于其他温度下的取食能力,且天牛体质量越大,取食能力越强;松墨天牛的产卵与其体质量、树皮厚度以及树干直径相关,天牛体质量越大、树皮越薄、树干直径越大,天牛产卵数量越多。

Abstract

【Objective】 The beetle (Monochamus alternatus) is an important wood borer in pine forests and it is also the most important vector of pine wood nematodes in Asia. The effects of temperature, sex and weight on the feeding ability and the bark thickness, trunk diameter, and weight on oviposition ability were analyzed regarding M. alternatus to provide a scientific guidance for controlling the beetles.【Method】 The beetles were collected from an insect cage with a weight in the range of 0.3 g≤M<0.6 g that was placed in the insect incubator to compare the feeding ability under four temperature conditions (25, 30, 35 and 40℃). Five female and five male adult beetles of the similar weight were selected and placed in an insect incubator to compare feeding between adult males and females. Beetles with different weights (M<0.3 g, 0.3 g≤M<0.6 g and M≥0.6 g) were placed in the insect incubator at the same temperature to compare feeding abilities with different weights. In order to study the effect of trunk diameter and bark thickness on the oviposition of beetles, pine trunks with different diameters (2.0 cm<D< 3.0 cm, 4.0 cm≤D<5.0 cm, and D≥6.0 cm) and trunks with different bark thicknesses (d=1, 4 and 9 mm) with beetles were placed separately into the insect barrel. The number of oviposition scars was counted. To compare the relationship between the oviposition ability and weight, the number of oviposition scars made by the beetles with different weights (M<0.3 g, 0.3 g≤M<0.6 g and M≥0.6 g) on the trunk was counted, and the abdomens were dissected to count the number of eggs inside.【Result】 The feeding ability of beetles at different temperatures order was as follows: 35, 40, 30, 25 ℃; however, there was no significant difference in feeding between male and female adults. The feeding ability of beetles with M≥0.6 g was the strongest, and that of beetles with M<0.3 g was the weakest. Among trunks with different diameters, beetles preferred to lay eggs on trunks with diameters of D≥6.0 cm, and the number of eggs laid on trunks with diameters of 2 cm<d<3 cm was the lowest. Among trunks with different bark thickness, beetles laid the most eggs on trunks with bark of d=1 mm and the least eggs on trunks with bark of d=9 mm. The oviposition ability of beetles with M≥0.6 g was significantly better than that of beetles with M<0.3 g and 0.3 g≤M<0.6 g. the number of eggs in the abdomen of beetles with M≥0.6 g was significantly more than that of those with other weights.【Conclusion】 The feeding ability of M. alternatus had no significant relationship with sex but was related to weight and temperature. Feeding capacity increased with beetle weight; the feeding ability of M. alternatus at 35 ℃ was higher than that at other temperatures. The oviposition of M. alternatus was related to the size, bark thickness, and trunk diameter. The oviposition ability of the beetles increased with weight, and they preferred to lay eggs on thinner barks and trunks with larger diameters.

关键词

松墨天牛 / 取食 / 产卵 / 温度 / 体质量 / 树干直径 / 树皮厚度

Key words

beetle (Monochamus alternatus) / feeding / oviposition / temperature / weight / trunk diameter / bark thickness

引用本文

导出引用
王立超, 陈凤毛, 董晓燕, . 松墨天牛取食和产卵特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023, 47(2): 219-224 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103022
WANG Lichao, CHEN Fengmao, DONG Xiaoyan, et al. A study on feeding and oviposition characteristics of Monochamus alternatus[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2023, 47(2): 219-224 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103022
中图分类号: S763   

参考文献

[1]
王乔. 墨天牛属(Monochamus Guér)的生物地理学研究[J]. 林业科学, 1988, 24(3): 297-304.
WANG Q. The biogeography of Monochamus Guér (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 1988, 24(3): 297-304.
[2]
MAKIHARA H. Two new species and a new subspecies of Japanese Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)[R]. Bulletin of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 2004, 3: 15-24.
[3]
王洋, 陈军, 陈凤毛, 等. 松墨天牛取食期间传播松材线虫的特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(6): 1-10.
WANG Y, CHEN J, CHEN F M, et al. Transmission of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda:Aphelenchoididae) through feeding activity of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(6): 1-10. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903001.
[4]
ZHAO L, ZHANG X, WEI Y, et al. Ascarosides coordinate the dispersal of a plant-parasitic nematode with the metamorphosis of its vector beetle[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12341.DOI:10.1038/ncomms12341.
[5]
WU Y, WICKHAM J D, ZHAO L, et al. CO2 drives the pine wood nematode off its insect vector[J]. Curr Biol, 2019, 29(13): R619-R620.DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.033.
[6]
FUTAI K. Pine wood nematode,Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2013, 51:61-83.DOI:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172910.
[7]
黄金思, 奚晓桐, 丁晓磊, 等. 基于SNP标记的广东省松材线虫种群分化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(6): 25-31.
HUANG J S, XI X T, DING X L, et al. Study on the population differentiation of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Guangdong Province by SNP markers[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(6): 25-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903007.
[8]
国家林业和草原局. 国家林业和草原局2019年第4号公告[EB/OL].2019. [2021-03-01]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/3457/20190424/162731641935736.html.
[9]
时鹏, 王壮, 曾辉, 等. 低温条件下松墨天牛在我国适生区分布预测[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(4):156-161.
SHI P, WANG Z, ZENG H, et al. Tolerance to temperature stresses on Monochamus alternatus and its potential range in China[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2019, 34(4): 156-161.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.04.23.
[10]
宋红敏, 徐汝梅. 松墨天牛的全球潜在分布区分析[J]. 昆虫知识, 2006, 43(4): 535-539.
SONG H M, XU R M. Global potential geographical distribution of Monochamus alternatus[J]. Chin Bull Entomol, 2006, 43(4): 535-539.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2006.04.025.
[11]
张心团, 赵和平, 樊美珍, 等. 松墨天牛生物学特性的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2004, 31(2): 156-157.
ZHANG X T, ZHAO H P, FAN M Z, et al. Research on biological characters of Monochamus alternatus Hope[J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2004, 31(2): 156-157.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-352x.2004.02.009.
[12]
姚松, 汪来发, 束庆龙, 等. 不同径级松枝松墨天牛取食面积的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(25):20-24.
YAO S, WANG L F, SHU Q L, et al. Study on feeding area of Monochamus alternatus between tree species with different diameter class[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(25): 20-24.
[13]
姚松, 汪来发, 束庆龙, 等. 不同树种松墨天牛取食面积差异的研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2011, 38(6):872-876.
YAO S, WANG L F, SHU Q L, et al. Effect of tree species and branch age on the feeding area of Monochamus alternatus[J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2011, 38(6): 872-876.
[14]
郝德君, 张永慧, 戴华国, 等. 松墨天牛对寄主树木的产卵选择[J]. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48(3):460-464.
HAO D J, ZHANG Y H, DAI H G, et al. Oviposition preference of Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to host plants[J]. Acta Entomol Sin, 2005, 48(3): 460-464. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2005.03.024.
[15]
高娜, 姚洪锡, 李超, 等. 松褐天牛产卵刻痕在黑松树干上分布规律的研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2013, 35(1):33-38.
GAO N, YAO H X, LI C, et al. Distribution of Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) eggs on Pinus thunbergii Parl[J]. J Environ Entomol, 2013, 35(1): 33-38. DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-0858.2013.0106.
[16]
樊建庭, 张冬勇, 章祖平, 等. 松墨天牛取食行为及其与寄主挥发物的关系[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(1):78-82.
FAN J T, ZHANG D Y, ZHANG Z P, et al. Feeding behavior of Monochamus alternatus and its relationship with the host volatiles[J]. J Zhejiang A & F Univ, 2014, 31(1): 78-82. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.012.
[17]
张世渊, 来燕学, 周成枚, 等. 松褐天牛成虫补充营养取食研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 1998, 18(2):44-48.
ZHANG S Y, LAI Y X, ZHOU C M, et al. Study on supplementary feeding of Monochamus alternatus adults[J]. J Zhejiang For S & T, 1998, 18(2): 44-48.
[18]
RODRÍGUEZDELBOSQUE L A. Feeding and Survival of Oncideres pustulata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Adults on Acacia farnesiana and Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae)[J]. Southwestern Entomol, 2013, 38(3): 487-498. DOI: 10.3958/059.038.0311.
[19]
高尚坤, 唐艳龙, 张彦龙, 等. 松褐天牛在马尾松树干上的分布规律[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(5):708-712.
GAO S K, TANG Y L, ZHANG Y L, et al. Distribution of Monochamus alternatus on the trunks of Pinus massoniana[J]. For Res, 2015, 28(5): 708-712. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2015.05.018.
[20]
ANBUTSU H, TOGASHI K. Deterred oviposition response of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to oviposition scars occupied by eggs[J]. A & F Entomo, 2015, 2(3): 217-223. DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2000.00061.x
[21]
胡劭骥, 付达英, 李祖钦, 等. 松墨天牛刻痕在思茅松上的分布及影响因素[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2009, 28(6):1-2,11.
HU S J, FU D Y, LI Z Q, et al. Factors effecting the distribution of the oviposition scars of Monochamus alternatus in Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis[J]. For Pest Dis, 2009, 28(6): 1-2,11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2009.06.001.
[22]
王紫薇, 徐华潮, 汪云珍, 等. 树皮内含物对光肩星天牛取食与刻槽产卵量的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2016, 38(5):942-949.
WANG Z W, XU H C, WANG Y Z, et al. Effect of bark substances on feeding and oviposition of Anoplophora glabripennis[J]. J Environ Entomol, 2016, 38(5): 942-949. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2016.05.11.
[23]
TOGASHI K, SASAKI M, FUJII T. Relationship between body size and ovariole number in three cerambycids inhabiting mulberry orchards[J]. Appl Entomol Zool, 2020, 55(1): 9-16.DOI:10.1007/s13355-019-00646-w.
[24]
TOGASHI K, YAMASHITA H. Effects of female body size on lifetime fecundity of Monochamus urussovii (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae)[J]. Appl Entomol Zool, 2017, 52(1): 79-87.DOI:10.1007/s13355-016-0456-x.
[25]
NAVES P, DE S E, QUARTAU J A. Reproductive traits of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under laboratory conditions[J]. Bull Entomol Res, 2006, 96(3): 289-294. DOI: 10.1079/ber2006422.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0600104)

编辑: 王国栋
PDF(1536 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/