
看跌期权下的风险规避型营林企业最优策略
Strategies for risk-averse forestry enterprises under the put option contract
【目的】在木材市场价格随机波动背景下,研究风险规避型营林企业购买看跌期权规避价格波动风险的有效性,为营林企业合理安排种植经营提供决策参考。【方法】运用条件风险价值(CVaR)度量准则,研究风险规避型营林企业在未购买期权和购买看跌期权下的最优策略,并对2种情形下的最优策略进行比较。【结果】营林企业种植规模、木材生产量以及条件风险价值均随风险规避程度的增加而减少,而单位面积蓄积量随风险规避程度的增加而增加。期权费补贴有利于提高营林企业种植规模,但会促使营林企业减少质量投入,进而降低种植林地的单位面积蓄积量。当期权执行价格较高时,营林企业种植规模、木材生产量以及条件风险价值均随期权执行价格的增加而增加,但单位面积蓄积量随期权执行价格的增加而减少。【结论】风险规避型营林企业通过购买看跌期权可以规避木材价格波动风险,降低自身风险规避行为带来的不利影响。政府给予期权费补贴的同时应采取配套措施和规范期权市场,鼓励营林企业增加质量投入,提高种植林地的单位面积蓄积量水平。
【Objective】Under the background of random fluctuations in the wood market price, the effectiveness of purchasing put options to avoid the risk associated with such fluctuation was studied to generate risk-averse forestry enterprises and provide a decision-making reference.【Method】Based on the conditional value at risk (CVaR) measurement criteria, the optimal strategies of risk-averse forestry enterprises under the conditions of buying no options or buying put options were studied and the optimal strategies of two scenarios were compared.【Result】Planting scale, wood production, and the conditional risk value of forestry enterprises were found to decrease as risk aversion and unit area accumulation increases. Increasing the amount of option fee subsidies would likely expand the planting scale, but would reduce the enthusiasm to improve the unit area accumulation. Under the condition of a high option strike price, the planting scale, timber production and conditional values at risk would increase with the option strike price, while the unit area accumulation would likely decrease.【Conclusion】Fluctuating timber prices can be avoided and the adverse effects of risk aversion behavior can be reduced by purchasing put options to create risk-averse forestry enterprises. The government should take supporting measures and standardize the option market, encourage forestry enterprises to increase its quality input, and improve the unit area accumulation of planted forest land.
[1] |
|
[2] |
崔海鸥, 刘珉. 我国第九次森林资源清查中的资源动态研究[J]. 西部林业科学, 2020, 49(5)90-95.
|
[3] |
史莹赫, 于豪谅, 田明华. 中国木材对外贸易依存度问题研究[J]. 林业经济, 2018, 40(04):25-32.
|
[4] |
国家林业局. 2001—2019中国林业和草原统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2002—2020.
State Forestry Administration. China forestry statistical yearbook 2001-2019[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2002-2020.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
朱传波, 季建华, 包兴. 供应风险规避下基于VaR的零售商订货策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2014, 23(6): 861-866.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
徐广业, 张旭梅. 风险规避下基于价格折扣的双渠道供应链协调[J]. 系统管理学报, 2016, 25(6):1114-1120.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
叶飞, 林强, 莫瑞君. 基于B-S模型的订单农业供应链协调机制研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(1):66-76.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
陈静, 李佩, 张永芬. 制造商产品质量风险管理的期权策略优化研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(8):77-90.
|
[21] |
伏红勇, 但斌. 基于天气期权的 “公司+农户” 型订单契约机制研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2015, 30(6): 768-778.
|
[22] |
余星, 张卫国, 刘勇军. 基于期权套期保值的最优订单问题[J]. 系统工程, 2017, 35(9):27-35.
|
[23] |
朱晓霞, 彭正龙. 规避定单农业违约行为的期权和期货套期保值策略分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2008, 29(10):26-30.
|
[24] |
宁攸凉, 李岩, 马一博, 等. 我国林业产业发展面临的挑战与对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2021, 34(4):67-71.
|
[25] |
国家林业和草原局. 中国森林资源报告(2014—2018)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,2019.
|
[26] |
盛炜彤. 关于我国人工林长期生产力的保持[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(1):1-14.
|
[27] |
许传德. 从连续八次森林资源清查数据看我国森林经营[J]. 林业经济, 2014, 36(4):8-11,36.
|
[28] |
欧阳君祥, 李宇昊, 吴小群, 等. 森林采伐管理若干问题的分析研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(5):4-8,27.
|
[29] |
王妹, 温作民, 严舒. 林业上市公司生命周期成本粘性研究[J]. 林业经济, 2020, 42(6):52-60.
|
[30] |
全良, 崔文素, 赵凤. 林业产业上市公司成长性评价研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2021, 41(1)34-41.
|
[31] |
张智光. 可再生资源型企业的绿色特征与绿色战略类型体系研究:以林业企业为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(6):1-8.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |