南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 27-34.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103032
所属专题: “双碳”视域下的生态系统固碳增汇
• 专题报道Ⅰ:"双碳"视域下的生态系统固碳增汇(执行主编 阮宏华 李萍萍) • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:
2021-03-13
接受日期:
2021-09-01
出版日期:
2022-03-30
发布日期:
2022-04-08
通讯作者:
田国双
基金资助:
XUE Beibei(), TIAN Guoshuang(
)
Received:
2021-03-13
Accepted:
2021-09-01
Online:
2022-03-30
Published:
2022-04-08
Contact:
TIAN Guoshuang
摘要:
【目的】探讨不同碳补贴机制下最优轮伐期及碳汇成本的变动规律,为提高碳汇供给和降低碳汇成本提供理论依据。【方法】实地调研福建洋口国有林场杉木人工林经营和营林实践,推导不同碳补贴情境下杉木最优轮伐期和碳汇成本模型,分析立地条件、碳价格、贴现率对最优轮伐期和碳汇成本的影响。【结果】理想情境下,贴现率由2%上涨至7%时,优、中和劣等立地的碳汇成本分别下降了31.42%、32.03%和33.15%,最优轮伐期均缩短4 a。碳价格由20元/t增加至350元/t时,优、中和劣等立地碳汇成本上涨了19.24、19.43和19.38倍,最优轮伐期分别延长了8、9和10 a。年给付情境下,贴现率由2%上涨至7%时,优、中和劣等立地的碳汇成本分别下降了70.35%、70.66%和71.14%,最优轮伐期均缩短4 a。碳价格由20元/t增加至350元/t时,优、中和劣等立地的碳汇成本上涨了15.79、15.82和16.50倍,中等立地和优等立地最优轮伐期均延长1 a,劣等立地最优轮伐期维持不变。【结论】两种碳补贴情境下,碳汇成本和最优轮伐期均与贴现率负相关,与碳价格正相关。在理想情境下,中等立地碳汇成本对碳价格变动的敏感性最强,但在年给付情境下,劣等立地碳汇成本对碳价格变动敏感性最强。总之,在研究区,理想情境更有利于发挥森林生态功能,实现森林生态效益。
中图分类号:
薛蓓蓓,田国双. 不同碳补贴机制下杉木人工林最优轮伐期和碳汇成本分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(2): 27-34.
XUE Beibei, TIAN Guoshuang. An analysis of optimal rotation periods and carbon sequestration cost of Chinese fir plantations under different carbon payment mechanisms[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(2): 27-34.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103032.
表1
不同立地条件下杉木林单位面积营林生产成本"
立地条件 site condition | 营林成本/(元·hm-2) afforestation cost | 采伐运输成本/(元·m-3) cutting and transportation cost | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1年 first year | 第2年 second year | 第3年 third year | 第4年 fourth year | 小计 subtotal | ||
优等fertile land | 12 453.35 | 3 005.58 | 2 995.90 | 2 205.85 | 20 660.63 | 351.25 |
中等general land | 13 400.85 | 2 725.85 | 2 539.85 | 2 706.05 | 21 372.59 | 332.70 |
劣等barren land | 12 467.52 | 2 365.62 | 2 359.35 | 2 312.81 | 19 505.30 | 310.45 |
表2
当前条件下杉木最优轮伐期和碳汇成本计算结果"
立地条件 site conditions | 碳储量/(t·hm-2) carbon storage | 碳汇成本/(元·t-1) carbon sequestration cost | 最优轮伐期/a optimal rotation period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
理想情境 ideal scenario | 年给付情境 annual payment scenario | 理想情境 ideal scenario | 年给付情境 annual payment scenario | 理想情境 ideal scenario | 年给付情境 annual payment scenario | |
优等fertile land | 367.48 | 350.41 | 15.70 | 69.97 | 23 | 22 |
中等general land | 255.69 | 245.23 | 16.02 | 67.06 | 24 | 23 |
劣等barren land | 159.79 | 154.47 | 16.63 | 62.04 | 26 | 25 |
[1] |
BASTIN J F, FINEGOLD Y, GARCIA C, et al. The global tree restoration potential[J]. Science, 2019, 365(6448):76-79. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax0848.
doi: 10.1126/science.aax0848 |
[2] | 李怒云, 宋维明. 气候变化与中国林业碳汇政策研究综述[J]. 林业经济, 2006, 28(5):60-64,80. |
LI N Y, SONG W M. Summary for climate change and forestry carbon sequestration policy under CDM in China[J]. For Econ, 2006, 28(5):60-64,80. | |
[3] | BENÍTEZ P C, MCCALLUM I, OBERSTEINER M, et al. Global supply for carbon sequestration: identifying least-cost afforestation sites under country risk consideration[R]. IIASA Interim Report IR04-022, Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, 2004. |
[4] |
MÜNNICH VASS M. Renewable energies cannot compete with forest carbon sequestration to cost-efficiently meet the EU carbon target for 2050[J]. Renew Energy, 2017, 107:164-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.034.
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.034 |
[5] | 贯君, 曹玉昆, 朱震锋, 等. 基于B-S期权定价理论的落叶松碳汇造林项目经济价值评估与敏感性分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(1):63-70. |
GUAN J, CAO Y K, ZHU Z F, et al. Analysis on the economic value and its sensitivity of Larix gmelini carbon sequestration afforestation project based on the B-S option pricing theory[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2020, 34(1):63-70. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.009.
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.009 |
|
[6] | 简盖元, 王文烂, 刘伟平, 等. 森林碳生产的认识、方式与政策保障[J]. 林业经济问题, 2012, 32(4):313-316,322. |
JIAN G Y, WANG W L, LIU W P, et al. Cognition,mode and policy gua-rantees of forest carbon production[J]. Issues For Econ, 2012, 32(4):313-316,322. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2012.04.006.
doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2012.04.006 |
|
[7] |
DIOCHON A, KELLMAN L, BELTRAMI H. Looking deeper:an investigation of soil carbon losses following harvesting from a ma-naged northeastern red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) forest chronosequence[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 257(2):413-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.015.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.015 |
[8] |
FAUSTMANN M. Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry[J]. YANG F N, CONG P C, ZHENG X X, et al. Trans. Forestry Economicl, 2007(6):72-77. DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2007.06.016.
doi: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2007.06.016 |
[9] |
VAN KOOTEN G C, BINKLEY C S, DELCOURT G. Effect of carbon Taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services[J]. Am J Agric Econ, 1995, 77(2):365-374. DOI: 10.2307/1243546.
doi: 10.2307/1243546 |
[10] | 朱臻, 沈月琴, 徐志刚, 等. 森林经营主体的碳汇供给潜力差异及影响因素研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12):2013-2022. |
ZHU Z, SHEN Y Q, XU Z G, et al. Research on the carbon supply potential capacity difference and its impact factors of forest management subjects[J]. J Nat Resour, 2014, 29(12):2013-2022. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.12.003.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.12.003 |
|
[11] | 黄宰胜, 陈钦. 基于造林成本法的林业碳汇成本收益影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(3):485-492. |
HUANG Z S, CHEN Q. Influencing factors analysis of forestry carbon sequestration cost-benefit based on afforestation cost methods[J]. Resour Sci, 2016, 38(3):485-492. DOI: 10.18402/resci.2016.03.11.
doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.03.11 |
|
[12] | 周伟, 高岚, 郑彬. 两种不同类型人工林固碳的成本效益分析[J]. 林业经济, 2019, 41(3):93-97,118. |
ZHOU W, GAO L, ZHENG B. Cost-benefit analysis on carbon sequestration in two different types of plantation[J]. For Econ, 2019, 41(3):93-97,118. DOI: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2019.03.017.
doi: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2019.03.017 |
|
[13] | 曾程, 沈月琴, 朱臻, 等. 基于造林再造林项目的杉木固碳成本收益分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(1):127-132. |
ZENG C, SHEN Y Q, ZHU Z, et al. Cost and benefit of Cunninghamia lanceolata carbon sequestration based on AR-projects[J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2015, 32(1):127-132. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.019.
doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.019 |
|
[14] | 刘俊昌. 林业经济学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. |
LIU J C. Economics of forestry[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press,2011. | |
[15] | 沈月琴, 王枫, 张耀启, 等. 中国南方杉木森林碳汇供给的经济分析[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(9):140-147. |
SHEN Y Q, WANG F, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Economic analysis of Chinese fir forest carbon sequestration supply in south China[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2013, 49(9):140-147. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130920.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130920 |
|
[16] | 王正淑, 王继军, 刘佳. 基于碳汇的县南沟流域退耕林地补偿标准研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5):779-788. |
WANG Z S, WANG J J, LIU J. Study on the compensation standard of returning farmland to forest in Xiannangou watershed from the perspective of carbon sink[J]. J Nat Resour, 2016, 31(5):779-788. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150560.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150560 |
|
[17] | 徐桂华, 杨定华. 外部性理论的演变与发展[J]. 社会科学, 2004(3):26-30. |
XU G H, YANG D H. Evolution and development of externality theory[J]. J Soc Sci, 2004(3):26-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2004.03.004.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2004.03.004 |
|
[18] |
CHANG S J. Forest property taxation under the generalized Faustmann formula[J]. For Policy Econ, 2018, 88:38-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.008.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.008 |
[19] |
CHANG S J. Forest valuation under the generalized Faustmann formula with taxation[J]. For Policy Econ, 2018, 88:46-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.007.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.007 |
[20] | 简盖元, 冯亮明, 刘伟平. 森林碳生产的激励机理分析[J]. 林业经济问题, 2012, 32(1):46-49. |
JIAN G Y, FENG L M, LIU W P. Analysis of the incentive mechanism on forest carbon production[J]. Issues For Econ, 2012, 32(1):46-49. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2012.01.009.
doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2012.01.009 |
|
[21] |
CACHO O J, HEAN R L, WISE R M. Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives[J]. Aust J Agric Resour Econ, 2003, 47(2):153-179. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.00208.
doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.00208 |
[22] |
MOURA COSTA P, WILSON C. An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration-description and applications in forestry[J]. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2000, 5(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009697625521.
doi: 10.1023/A:1009697625521 |
[23] | 陈则生. 杉木人工林经济成熟龄的研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2010, 30(1):22-26. |
CHEN Z S. The research on age at economic maturity of Chinese fir plantations[J]. Issues For Econ, 2010, 30(1):22-26. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2010.01.005.
doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2010.01.005 |
|
[24] |
KHANAL P N, GREBNER D L, MUNN I A, et al. Evaluating non-industrial private forest landowner willingness to manage for forest carbon sequestration in the southern United States[J]. For Policy Econ, 2017, 75:112-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.004 |
[25] | 孙雅岚. 林业碳汇价值评价方法研究的文献回顾与展望[J]. 现代经济信息, 2012(3):280-281. |
SUN Y L. Literature review and prospect of forest carbon sequestration value evaluation me-thods[J]. Mod Econ Inf, 2012(3):280-281. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-828X.2012.03.230.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-828X.2012.03.230 |
|
[26] | 龙飞, 祁慧博. 面向森林碳汇供给的企业减排路径选择机理与政策模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21):7966-7977. |
LONG F, QI H B. Selection mechanism and policy simulation of enterprises’ emission-reduction path facing forest carbon sequestration supply[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(21):7966-7977. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201905301136.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201905301136 |
|
[27] |
OLSCHEWSKI R, BENÍTEZ P C, DE KONING G H J, et al. How attractive are forest carbon sinks?Economic insights into supply and demand of Certified Emission Reductions[J]. J For Econ, 2005, 11(2):77-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.04.001.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.04.001 |
[28] | 曹先磊, 张颖. 云南思茅松碳汇造林项目减排量、经济价值及其敏感性分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(2):234-242. |
CAO X L, ZHANG Y. Analysis on the China certified emission reductions,economic value and its sensitivity of Pinus kesiya var.langbianensis afforestation project in Yunnan Province[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2017, 26(2):234-242. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2017.02.008.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2017.02.008 |
|
[29] | 汪文隽, 周婉云, 李瑾, 等. 中国碳市场波动溢出效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(12):63-69. |
WANG W J, ZHOU W Y, LI J, et al. Volatility spillovers among Chinese carbon markets[J]. China Popul Resour Environ, 2016, 26(12):63-69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.12.009.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2016.12.009 |
|
[30] | 黄宰胜, 陈钦. 不同情境下桉树碳汇林最佳轮伐期分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(S1):25-31. |
HUANG Z S, CHEN Q. Analysis of the optimal rotation of eucalypt carbon sequestration forests under various scenarios[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(S1):25-31. | |
[31] | 薛蓓蓓, 田国双. 基于碳汇木材复合经营目标的综合效益及影响因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2):205-212. |
XUE B B, TIAN G S. Analysis of comprehensive benefits and influencing factors based on the combined economic value of carbon sequestration and timber benefits[J]. J Nanjing Fore Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45 (2):205-212. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009015.
doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009015 |
[1] | 鲁旭东, 董禹然, 李垚, 毛岭峰. 中国亚热带杉木人工林不同林分发育阶段的群落构建机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1): 67-73. |
[2] | 储安婷, 宁卓, 杨红强. 林业碳汇对人工林最优轮伐期的影响--以杉木和落叶松为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(3): 225-233. |
[3] | 王有良, 林开敏, 宋重升, 崔朝伟, 彭丽鸿, 郑宏, 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 邱明镜. 间伐对杉木人工林生态系统碳储量的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(3): 65-73. |
[4] | 朱念福, 张怀清, 崔泽宇, 杨廷栋, 李永亮, 刘华. 基于空间结构的杉木枝下高可视化模拟研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1): 51-57. |
[5] | 郭传阳, 林开敏, 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 李茂, 郑宏, 游云飞, 陈志云. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5): 125-131. |
[6] | 曹元帅,孙玉军. 基于广义代数差分法的杉木人工林地位指数模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(05): 79-84. |
[7] | 李静,王玲红,程栋梁,徐朝斌,张中瑞,吴永宏,钟全林. 不同龄组天然常绿阔叶林与杉木人工林林下草本层生物量分配特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(05): 170-176. |
[8] | 曾伟,江斌,余林,肖复明,徐海宁. 江西杉木人工林生物量分配格局及其模型构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(03): 177-182. |
[9] | 涂宏涛,万杰,孙玉军,梅光义,刘素真. 不同林龄杉木人工林根生物量及其相容性模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(06): 81-86. |
[10] | 王东,李瑞霞,陈信力,关庆伟. 杉木人工林不同根序的一级根形态差异及其对间伐的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(04): 69-74. |
[11] | 刘应安;洪岩;叶金山. 皖东南山区杉木人工林立地质量数量化评定与产量预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 22(03): 51-55. |
[12] | 孙多. 残留物管理育林法对杉木人工林物种多样性的恢复作用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 20(01): 29-32. |
[13] | 李耀芬;李大纲;宋均庭;黎源忠. 宜春杉木人工林管胞形态变异及其对材性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1988, 12(02): 115-121. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||