无患子果实成熟过程及其油脂、皂苷动态变化

郑玉琳, 刘济铭, 史双龙, 贾黎明, 翁学煌, 罗水晶, 盛克寨

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4) : 76-82.

PDF(2096 KB)
PDF(2096 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4) : 76-82. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103047
专题报道Ⅱ(执行主编方升佐)

无患子果实成熟过程及其油脂、皂苷动态变化

作者信息 +

Maturation processes and the dynamics of oil and saponin in Sapindus mukorossi

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】无患子(Sapindus mukorossi)是重要的生物日化和生物质能源树种,近年来我国无患子产业蓬勃发展,但目前在生产上仍没有明确的采收期或者确定最适采收时间的方法。通过对果实生长发育过程及内含物含量动态变化间的关系研究,确定无患子果实的最适采收时间。【方法】选取5株长势中等、开花结实良好的8年生实生无患子树,于果实膨大期的末期到果实脱落期,每隔4 d每株树采摘15个发育正常的果实,观察其外观变化,并进行果实、种子、果皮及种仁干质量,果实横径、纵径、侧径,种子横径、纵径、侧径共10项表型指标测定,以及种仁含油率、单种仁油质量、果皮含皂苷率、单果皮皂苷质量及含水率的测定。【结果】①9月底果实由绿色变为金黄色,随后在10月上半个月内失水,果皮表面皱缩,果实横径下降7.95%,侧径下降10.71%。②8月底至9月初种仁体积较小,呈绿色,随后逐渐长大,在9月20日左右由绿转黄,且在9月底完全变为黄色。种子横径、纵径和侧径在10月上旬明显下降, 其中横径下降10.81%,纵径下降4.87%,侧径下降8.96%。③果实和果皮的干质量变化趋势相同,均在10月15日之前上升,随后小幅波动,且果皮干质量发生第2次明显上升时种子干质量下降。④种仁油质量在9月中旬及之后较高,果皮皂苷质量在10月上旬和中旬较高。【结论】果皮中皂苷和种仁中油的积累在10月上旬均达到最高,针对果皮皂苷和种仁油的应用,最佳采果期在10月上旬和中旬。由果实外观判断,生产上,果实完全变为金黄且果皮开始皱缩后的20 d内,为最佳采果期。

Abstract

【Objective】Soapberry (Sapindus mukorossi) is an important raw material species for biochemical, biomass energy industries. In recent years, China’s soapberry industry has seen booming growth. The fruiting period of soapberry is several months long and there is no clear harvesting period or method to determine the harvesting time during production. In this study, we conducted observations of fruit growth and development dynamics, as well as dynamic changes in the contents of inclusions, to clearly determine the harvesting time of soapberry fruits during production.【Method】Five eight-year-old living soapberry trees with medium growth and good flowering, and fruit set were selected. Three fruit sequences were randomly chosen from each tree every four days from the end of the fruit expansion period to the fruit abscission period. The ten phenotypic indicators, seed kernel oil content, mass of single kernel oil, pericarp saponin content, mass of single pericarp saponin and water content were determined.【Result】① The change in fruit color from green to golden yellow occurred at the end of September, followed by a water loss in the first half of October, along with wrinkling of the pericarp surface. A 7.95% decrease in the transverse diameter and a 10.71% decrease in the lateral diameter of the fruit were also observed. ② The seed kernels were small and green from the end of August to the beginning of September; these then grew gradually before changing from green to yellow around September 20 and completely changed to yellow at the end of September. The transverse diameter, longitudinal diameter and lateral diameter of the seeds decreased significantly in early October, with the transverse diameter decreasing by 10.81%, the longitudinal diameter by 4.87%, and the lateral diameter by 8.96%. ③ The dry mass of the fruit and pericarp showed the same trend, both rising until October 15 and then fluctuating slightly. We innovatively found that the dry mass of seeds decreased when the se-cond significant rise in pericarp dry mass occurred. The fruits finished drying in mid-October. ④ The content of single kernel oil was higher in mid-September and thereafter, whereas the content of single pericarp saponin was higher in early and mid-October.【Conclusion】 The accumulation of saponins in the peel and the oil of the seed kernels was the highest in early October, and the best fruit harvesting periods for peel saponin and the oil of single seed kernels were in early and mid-October. Judging from the fruit’s appearance, the optimum fruit harvesting period was within 20 days after the fruit completely turned golden yellow and the peel started to wrinkle in production.

关键词

无患子 / 果实 / 皂苷 / 内含物 / 能源树种

Key words

Sapindus mukorossi (soapberry) / fruit / saponin / inclusion / energy tree

引用本文

导出引用
郑玉琳, 刘济铭, 史双龙, . 无患子果实成熟过程及其油脂、皂苷动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 45(4): 76-82 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103047
ZHENG Yulin, LIU Jiming, SHI Shuanglong, et al. Maturation processes and the dynamics of oil and saponin in Sapindus mukorossi[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(4): 76-82 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103047
中图分类号: S725.5   

参考文献

[1]
中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志: 四十七卷( 第一分册) 无患子科清风藤科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 15.
[2]
刘济铭, 陈仲, 孙操稳, 等. 无患子属种质资源种实性状变异及综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6):44-54.
LIU J M, CHEN Z, SUN C W, et al. Variation in fruit and seed properties and comprehensive assessment of germplasm resources of the genus Sapindus[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(6):44-54.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190606.
[3]
CHEN C C, NIEN C J, CHEN L G, et al. Effects of Sapindus mukorossi seed oil on skin wound healing:in vivo and in vitro testing[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(17):4178.DOI: 10.3390/ijms20102579.
[4]
卫星杓, 戴腾飞, 刘诗琦, 等. 施肥对无患子叶片养分动态及产量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(5):17-24.
WEI X B, DAI T F, LIU S Q, et al. Effects of formula fertilization on leaf nutrient dynamics and yield of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn[J]. Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(5):17-24.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803015.
[5]
张赟齐, 高世轮, 卫星杓, 等. 光合模型对无患子叶片光合响应参数计算结果的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(4):32-40.
ZHANG Y Q, GAO S L, WEI X B, et al. Effects of photosynthetic models on the calculation results of photosynthetic response parameters in Sapindus mukorossi leaves[J]. Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(4):32-40.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180163.
[6]
贾黎明, 孙操稳. 生物柴油树种无患子研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(6):191-196.
JIA L M, SUN C W. Research progress of biodiesel tree Sapindus mukorossi[J]. China Agric Univ, 2012, 17(6):191-196.
[7]
徐圆圆, 贾黎明, 陈仲, 等. 无患子三萜皂苷研究进展[J]. 化学通报, 2018, 81(12):1078-1088.
XU Y Y, JIA L M, CHEN Z, et al. Advances on triterpenoid saponin of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Chemistry, 2018, 81(12):1078-1088.DOI: 10.14159/j.cnki.0441-3776.2018.12.003.
[8]
高媛, 贾黎明, 苏淑钗, 等. 无患子物候及开花结果特性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(6):34-40,123.
GAO Y, JIA L M, SU S C, et al. Phenology and blossom-fruiting characteristics of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Northeast For Univ, 2015, 43(6):34-40,123.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20150522.062.
[9]
高媛. 无患子树体高光效构型与源库营养的调控研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2020.
GAO Y. The research about regulation on high-light efficiency canopy architecture and source-sink nutrition of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2020.
[10]
ZHAO G C, GAO Y H, GAO S L, et al. The phenological growth stages of Sapindus mukorossi according to BBCH scale[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(6):462.DOI: 10.3390/f10060462.
[11]
范辉华, 汤行昊, 姚湘明, 等. 不同采果期对无患子主要经济性状的影响[J]. 河北林业科技, 2015(2):9-11.
FAN H H, TANG X H, YAO X M, et al. The influence of different fruiting stages on the main economic characters of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. Hebei For Sci Technol, 2015(2):9-11.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3356.2015.02.004.
[12]
刁松锋. 无患子花果性状多样性及果实发育规律研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2014.
DIAO S F. Research into genetic diversity of flower and fruit characteristics and rhythm of fruit development of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014.
[13]
邵文豪, 刁松锋, 董汝湘, 等. 无患子果实发育动态及内含物含量变化[J]. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(5):697-701.
SHAO W H, DIAO S F, DONG R X, et al. Dynamic changes of fruit development and pulp inclusion of Sapindus mukorossi[J]. For Res, 2014, 27(5):697-701.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2014.05.020.
[14]
ARGENTA L C, DO AMARANTE C V T, BETINELLI K S, et al. Comparison of fruit attributes of ‘Fuji’ apple strains at harvest and after storage[J]. Sci Hortic, 2020, 272:109585.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109585.
[15]
吴彬彬, 饶景萍, 李百云, 等. 采收期对猕猴桃果实品质及其耐贮性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2008(4):4788-4792.
WU B B, RAO J P, LI B Y, et al. Effect of harvest date on fruit quality and storage duration of kiwifruit[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sin, 2008(4):4788-4792.
[16]
陈仁伟, 张晓煜, 杨豫, 等. 贺兰山东麓砾石葡萄园赤霞珠最佳采收期的确定[J]. 中国农业气象, 2020, 41(9):564-574.
CHEN R W, ZHANG X Y, YANG Y, et al. Determination of the optimal harvest period for the grape variety cabernet sauvignon in gravel vineyard at the eastern foothills of Helan Mountain[J]. Chin J Agrometeorology, 2020, 41(9):564-574.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2020.09.003.
[17]
ONEY-MONTALVO J E, AVILÉS-BETANZOS K A, DE JESÚS RAMÍREZ-RIVERA E, et al. Polyphenols content in Capsicum chinense fruits at different harvest times and their correlation with the antioxidant activity[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(10):1394.DOI: 10.3390/plants9101394.
[18]
韩卫娟, 李加茹, 梁玉琴, 等. 柿果实和叶片中可溶性单宁含量的年变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):61-66.
HAN W J, LI J R, LIANG Y Q, et al. Annual variation of soluble tannin in the fruits and leaves of persimmon[J]. Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(6):61-66.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.012.
[19]
黄展文, 王颖, 李明娟, 等. 采收成熟度对龙滩珍珠李果实品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(7):203-210.
HUANG Z W, WANG Y, LI M J, et al. Effect of harvest maturity on the quality of ‘Longtan’ pearl plum[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2021, 47(7):203-210.DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025487.
[20]
KALKISIM O, TURAN A, OKCU Z, et al. Evaluation of the effect of different harvest time on the fruit quality of fosa nut[J]. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2016, 58(2):89-92.DOI: 10.1007/s10341-015-0259-1.
[21]
刘辉军, 魏超宇, 韩文, 等. 基于全卷积神经网络的黄花梨采收期可见-近红外光谱检测方法[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(9):2932-2936.
LIU H J, WEI C Y, HAN W, et al. Determination of Huanghua pear’s harvest time based on convolutional neural networks by visible-near infrared spectroscopy[J]. Spectrosc Spectr Anal, 2020, 40(9):2932-2936.
[22]
NARANJO-TORRES J, MORA M, HERNÁNDEZ-GARCÍA R, et al. A review of convolutional neural network applied to fruit image processing[J]. Appl Sci, 2020, 10(10):3443.DOI: 10.3390/app10103443.
[23]
刘俊涛, 仲静, 刘济铭, 等. 无患子初果期人工林土壤和叶片C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4):67-75.
LIU J T, ZHOGN J, LIU J M, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of soil and leaf in Sapindus mukorossi plantation at early fruiting stage[ J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(4):67-75.DOI: 10.12302/ j.issn.1000-2006.202104011.
[24]
赫文琦, 魏松坡, 贾黎明. 无患子皂苷对3种植物病原菌的抑菌活性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(5):96-100.
HE W Q, WEI S P, JIA L M. Bacteriostasic activity of the soapnut saponin to plant pathogen[J]. Northeast For Univ, 2018, 46(5):96-100.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2018.05.020.
[25]
袁振, 陈美谕, 贾黎明, 等. 太行山片麻岩地区微地形土层厚度特征及其植被生长阈值[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(10):156-163.
YUAN Z, CHEN M Y, JIA L M, et al. Difference of soil thickness among micro-topographies and their thresholds for vegetation growth in gneiss area of Taihang Mountains[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2018, 54(10):156-163.
[26]
HINKLEY D V, HINKLEY E A. Inference about the change-point in a sequence of binomial variables[J]. Biometrika, 1970, 57(3):477-488.DOI: 10.1093/biomet/57.3.477.
[27]
芮雪. 无患子种子形态结构与内含物研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2020.
RUI X. Study on the Sapindus structure and inclusion of seedless seeds[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2020.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(32071793)

编辑: 吴祝华

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(2096 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/