
间伐对杉木人工林生态系统碳储量的短期影响
王有良, 林开敏, 宋重升, 崔朝伟, 彭丽鸿, 郑宏, 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 邱明镜
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 65-73.
间伐对杉木人工林生态系统碳储量的短期影响
Short-term effects of thinning on carbon storage in Chinese fir plantation ecosystems
【目的】研究不同间伐强度下杉木人工林生态系统碳储量及其分配格局,进一步优化林分经营管理措施,准确评估间伐对杉木人工林生物量和碳储量的短期影响,为提高人工林的碳汇能力提供依据。【方法】以福建省三明市官庄国有林场11年生杉木人工林为研究对象,选择坡度、坡位、土壤条件相对一致的林分,按照完全随机区组试验设计,设置弱度间伐(31%,伐后林分2 250株/hm2,LIT)、中度间伐(45%,伐后林分1 800株/hm2,MIT)、强度间伐(63%,伐后林分1 200株/hm2,HIT)等3种间伐强度;共设置9块20 m×20 m样地,采集深度为1 m剖面内不同土层的土壤;并在样地内每木检尺,利用生物量回归方程对乔木层生物量进行估算,同时实测林下植被和凋落物生物量;通过元素分析仪测定植被和土壤碳含量,并根据碳含量估算碳储量。【结果】间伐后3年,杉木人工林乔木层碳储量随着间伐强度的增加而减小,LIT、MIT、HIT处理样地乔木层碳储量依次为66.16、58.78、49.71 t/hm2;杉木人工林灌木层和草本层的碳储量随着间伐强度的增加而显著增加,分别占生态系统碳储量的0.03%~0.19%和0.01%~0.67%;凋落物层碳储量占生态系统碳储量的2.87%~4.32%,间伐对凋落物层碳储量无显著影响;土壤有机碳储量在不同间伐处理间差异显著(P<0.05),杉木人工林土壤层碳储量随着间伐强度的增加而降低,HIT处理土壤层碳储量较LIT和MIT处理降低了32.07%和1.03%。间伐后3年,杉木人工林生态系统碳储量随着间伐强度增加而显著降低(P<0.05),LIT、MIT和HIT处理样地总碳储量依次为173.85、161.12、121.73 t/hm2。乔木层和土壤层碳储量之和占比超过90.00%,表明乔木层和土壤层是巨大的碳库,且间伐短期降低生态系统总碳储量。【结论】间伐后短期内杉木人工林乔木层、凋落物层和土壤层碳储量随着间伐强度的增加而下降,而灌木层和草本层的碳储量则随着间伐强度的增加而增加,表明间伐3年后试验林地还处于恢复期,杉木人工林间伐短期内会降低生态系统总碳储量。研究结果可部分解释间伐后短期内杉木人工林生态系统各组分碳储量的分布格局,并为研究区的人工林碳汇增加和可持续经营提供科学依据。
【Objective】 Thinning is an important management measure in plantation forest management, which can change the growth environment and affect the growth, productivity and carbon storage of the forest stands. As an important tree species for afforestation in southern China, Chinese fir occupies an indispensable position in forestry production. Therefore, studying the short-term impact of different thinning intensities on carbon storage in Chinese fir plantations helps to optimize forest management measures, and accurately evaluate the short-term effects of thinning on the biomass and carbon storage, which is important in the development of carbon sink forestry, and can provide a basis for improving carbon sink capacity.【Method】 The 11-year-old Chinese fir plantations in Guanzhuang State Forest Farm in Sanming City, Fujian Province, with consistent slopes, slope positions and soil conditions were selected for research. The experiment was designed according to a random block design with three levels of thinning intensity with light thinning (31%, LIT, 2 250 plants/hm2 in post-cutting stand), moderately intensive thinning (45%, MIT, 1 800 plants/hm2 in post-cutting stand),and highly intensive thinning (63%, HIT, 1 200 plants/hm2 in post-cutting stand). A total of nine 20 m×20 m sample plots were set up, and soils from different soil layers in a 1 m section were collected. In the sample plot, the biomass of the tree layer was estimated using the biomass regression equation, and the biomass of the understory vegetation and litter were measured. The carbon content of the vegetation and soil was measured using an element analyzer, and the carbon storage was estimated based on the carbon content. The carbon storage and distribution pattern of each component in the ecosystem were examined after three thinning treatments. The carbon storage of each component of the ecosystem during the growth of the Chinese fir after three thinning treatments was analyzed to evaluate the effects of thinning on the carbon storage of the Chinese fir plantation.【Result】 Three years after thinning, the carbon storage of the tree layer and the soil layer decreased with the increase in thinning intensity. The carbon storage of the tree layer for the LIT, MIT, and HIT plots was 66.16, 58.77, and 49.71 t/hm2, respectively. The carbon storage of the shrub layer and herb layer significantly increased with the increase in thinning intensity, accounting for 0.03%-0.19% and 0.01%-0.67% of the carbon storage of the ecosystem, respectively. There was no significant effect on the carbon storage of the litter layer, and the litter layer carbon storage accounted for 2.87%-4.32% of the ecosystem carbon storage. The soil carbon storage decreased with the increase in thinning intensity, and the soil organic carbon storage was significantly different between different thinning treatments (P < 0.05). The soil carbon storage from the HIT treatment reduced 32.07% and 1.03% compared with LIT and MIT treatments. Three years after thinning, the carbon storage significantly decreased with the increase in thinning intensity (P < 0.05). The total carbon storage of the LIT, MIT and HIT plots was 173.85, 161.12 and 121.73 t/hm2, with the sum of the carbon storage of the tree layer and soil layer accounting for more than 90.00%. It indicates that the tree layer and soil layer are huge carbon pools, and thinning will reduce the total carbon storage in short-term in the ecosystem.【Conclusion】The carbon storage of the arbor, litter layer and soil layer in the Chinese fir plantation short-term decreased with the increase in thinning intensity after thinning, while the carbon storage of the shrub and herb layer increased with the increase in thinning intensity, indicating that the intensity of thinning increased after three years, and that the experimental forest land is still in the recovery period. The research revealed that thinning of Chinese fir plantations will reduce the total carbon storage of the ecosystem in short-term, provide a scientific basis for the carbon sink and sustainable management of plantations in the study area.
thinning / Chinese fir plantations / ecosystem / carbon storage / carbon allocation
[1] |
陈雅如, 赵金成. 碳达峰、碳中和目标下全球气候治理新格局与林草发展机遇[J]. 世界林业研究, 34(6):1-5.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
Thinning represents an important and frequently used silvicultural technique that improves forest wood products and has obvious effects on forest carbon stocks and stock changes. Here, we used the carbon budget model CBM-CFS3 to simulate the effects of thinning on carbon storage and changes in larch forest ecosystems under thirteen thinning scenarios. Simulation results demonstrate that strong thinning greatly reduces the biomass carbon density of larch forests compared to non-thinning forests. The minimum and maximum average biomass carbon density, respectively, were 30.3 tC ha<sup>-1</sup> and 47.8 tC ha<sup>-1</sup>, a difference of 58% under set scenarios in the simulated time scale. The dead organic matter (including soil) carbon density increased in all thinned larch forests stands, compared with non-thinning stands, and the pattern of variation was opposite to that found for biomass carbon density. However, the total ecosystem carbon density of larch forests declined with thinning because the increase in dead organic matter carbon is insufficient to offset the loss of biomass carbon caused by thinning. Thus, strong thinning can transform larch forest ecosystems from carbon sinks into carbon sources. Future work should consider the carbon sequestered in wood materials acquired via thinning and their use as substitutes for other construction materials with less favorable lifecycle carbon footprints, such as steel, cement, aluminum and PVC.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
王祖华, 刘红梅, 王晓杰, 等. 经营措施对森林生态系统碳储量影响的研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(1):83-88.
|
[11] |
高云昌, 张文辉, 何景峰, 等. 黄龙山油松人工林间伐效果的综合评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(5):1313-1319.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
刘慧, 董希斌, 曲杭峰, 等. 抚育间伐对小兴安岭天然针阔混交林碳储量的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(2):31-35.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
梁晶. 间伐对长白山林区典型林分类型土壤碳储量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2015.
|
[16] |
郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 王友良, 等. 间伐强度对杉木中龄林生长和结构的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(4):369-376.
|
[17] |
李燕, 张建国, 段爱国, 等. 杉木人工林生物量估算模型的选择[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(12):3036-3046.
|
[18] |
彭舜磊, 王华太, 陈昌东, 等. 宝天曼自然保护区森林土壤碳氮储量分布格局分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(5):30-34.
|
[19] |
殷博, 董鹏飞, 党坤良. 抚育间伐对红桦林生态系统碳密度的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(1):105-112.
|
[20] |
董莉莉, 刘红民, 汪成成, 等. 间伐对蒙古栎次生林生态系统碳储量的短期和长期影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50(5):614-620.
|
[21] |
徐金良, 毛玉明, 成向荣, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林碳储量的长期影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(7):1898-1904.
|
[22] |
武朋辉, 党坤良, 常伟, 等. 抚育间伐对秦岭南坡锐齿栎天然次生林碳密度的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(10):75-82.
|
[23] |
刁娇娇, 肖文娅, 费菲, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林生长及生态系统碳储量的短期影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017, 37(3):134-139.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
游伟斌, 梁芳, 贾忠奎, 等. 抚育间伐对北京山区油松林乔木层碳储量的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(23):203-206.
|
[26] |
成向荣, 虞木奎, 葛乐, 等. 不同间伐强度下麻栎人工林碳密度及其空间分布[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(5):1175-1180.
|
[27] |
彭文宏, 牟长城, 常怡慧, 等. 东北寒温带永久冻土区森林沼泽湿地生态系统碳储量[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(6):1526-1538.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
陈心桐, 徐天乐, 李雪静, 等. 中国北方自然生态系统土壤有机碳含量及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(4):1133-1140.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |