基于景观偏好的城市公园景观健康效益评价机制研究

黄硕; 郑宇; 成林莉; 季春悦; 王姗; 董建文

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020

黄硕, 郑宇, 成林莉, 季春悦, 王姗, 董建文

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 221-228.

PDF(1950 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1950 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 221-228. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020

研究论文

基于景观偏好的城市公园景观健康效益评价机制研究

黄硕 ¹^,² ,
郑宇 ¹^,^* ,
成林莉 ² ,
季春悦 ² ,
王姗 ² ,
董建文 ²

作者信息 +

The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference

HUANG Shuo ¹^,² ,
ZHNEG Yu ¹^,^* ,
CHENG Linli ² ,
JI Chunyue ² ,
WANG Shan ² ,
DONG Jianwen ²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】景观偏好是研究人与被选择感知的环境交互作用的结果,与景观元素的构建紧密联系,对于研究城市公园的健康景观营造具有重要意义。受新冠肺炎疫情影响,人们对于城市公园的健康功能提出更高的要求。从游客自身需求出发,构建城市公园景观元素、景观偏好与景观健康效益评价三者之间的结构模型,探讨基于景观偏好的城市公园景观健康效益评价机制,为城市公园景观健康功能提升和优化建设提供参考。【方法】以福州西湖公园为例,运用位置大数据手段、问卷调查法、质性扎根法与结构方程模型分析法等,探索疫情影响下基于景观偏好的城市公园景观健康效益评价机制。【结果】①与疫情前相比,疫情期间研究区景观环境中构筑物与设施类景观元素偏好增加4.918%,空间与氛围类减少4.996%;相对而言,无论是否涉及疫情,在各类景观环境的选择中,自然元素都是非常重要的组成部分,游客更加偏好于自然元素较多的景观环境;②在景观偏好的反映特性中,修正后易读性(0.45)和神秘性(0.59)能够有效反映景观偏好,其中神秘性的影响系数最大;③消除疲劳(0.70)、集中注意力(0.67)、恢复活力(0.62)、稳定情绪(0.56)都能够有效反映景观环境的健康效益,其中消除疲劳的影响系数最大;④景观偏好对景观健康效益评价有一定的正向影响,但影响不显著,可以通过景观元素产生间接影响。【结论】通过质性分析,结合景观元素、景观偏好以及健康效益三者之间结构方程模型的评价结果,可以为提升城市公园景观健康效益提供一定的方向,从而进行针对性地开发保护和改造,提高公园的效能。

Abstract

【Objective】Affected by the new crown pneumonia epidemic, people have put forward higher requirements for the health functions of urban parks. Landscape preference is the result of the interaction between people and the chosen environment, and is closely related to the construction of landscape elements. It is of great significance for studying the construction of healthy landscapes in urban parks. 【Method】Taking the Xihu Park of Fuzhou City as an example, this research used location big data methods, questionnaire survey methods, qualitative grounding methods and structural equation model construction to explore the evaluation mechanism of urban park landscape health benefits based on landscape preference. 【Result】 (1) Compared with the period of the epidemic, the preference for landscape elements of structures and facilities increased by 4.918%, the preforence for space and atmosphere decreased by 4.996%. Relatively speaking, regardless of whether there were any changes in various landscape environments before and after the epidemic, natural elements have always been a very important part of the selection. Tourists preferred the environment with more natural elements. (2) In the reflection characteristics of landscape preferences, the revised legibility (0.45) and mystery (0.59) can effectively reflect landscape preference, in which mystery had the largest influence coefficient. (3) The eliminating fatigue (0.70), focusing (0.67), rejuvenating (0.62) and calming mood (0.56) can effectively reflect the health benefit evaluation, among which the influence coefficient of eliminating fatigue maximum. (4) Landscape preference showed a certain positive impact on the evaluation of health benefits, but the impact coefficient was not significant, and it had an indirect impact through landscape elements.【Conclusion】The qualitative analysis combined with the evaluation results of the structural equation model among landscape elements, landscape preferences and health benefits can provide a certain direction for the improvement of the health benefits of urban parks, then carried out targeted development, protection, transformation and improvement, afterwards improve the effectiveness of the park.

导出引用

黄硕, 郑宇, 成林莉, 等. 基于景观偏好的城市公园景观健康效益评价机制研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2022, 46(5): 221-228 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020

HUANG Shuo, ZHNEG Yu, CHENG Linli, et al. The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2022, 46(5): 221-228 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020

中图分类号： X828;TU984

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	VAN DEN BERG A E, KOOLE S L, VAN DER WULP N Y. Environmental preference and restoration:how are they related?[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2003, 23(2):135-146.DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	谭少华, 郭剑锋, 赵万民. 城市自然环境缓解精神压力和疲劳恢复研究进展[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2010, 29(4):55-60. TAN S H, GUO J F, ZHAO W M. Research progress on the relief of mental stress and fatigue recovery in urban natural environment[J]. Regional Res Development, 2010, 29(4):55-60.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2010.04.012. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	HANSMANN R, HUG S M, SEELAND K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2007, 6(4):213-225.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	宋立民, 鲁苗. 景观偏好的差异性探究[J]. 设计, 2016(21):27-29. SONG L M, LU M. The study of the difference of landscape preference[J]. Design, 2016(21):27-29. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	GOBSTER P, CHENOWETH R E. The dimensions of aesthetic preference:a quantitative analysis[J]. J Environ Manag, 1989, 29(1):47-72. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	ZUCKERMAN M, ULRICH R S, MCLAUGHLIN J. Sensation seeking and reactions to nature paintings[J]. Pers Individ Differ, 1993, 15(5):563-576.DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90340-9. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	陈云文, 胡江, 王辉. 景观偏好及栽植空间景观偏好研究回顾[J]. 山东林业科技, 2004, 34(4):54-56. CHEN Y W, HU J, WANG H. Review on landscape preference and landscape preference of planting space[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2004, 34(4):54-56.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2004.04.041. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S, BROWN T. Environmental preference[J]. Environ Behav, 1989, 21(5):509-530.DOI:10.1177/0013916589215001. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. A psychological perspective[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	BARROSO F L, PINTO-CORREIA T, RAMOS I L, et al. Dealing with landscape fuzziness in user preference studies: photo-based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2012, 104(3/4):329-342.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.005. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	YU K J. Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and western design experts[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 1995, 32(2):107-126.DOI:10.1016/0169-2046(94)00188-9. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	周春玲, 张启翔, 孙迎坤. 居住区绿地的美景度评价[J]. 中国园林, 2006, 22(4):62-67. ZHOU C L, ZHANG Q X, SUN Y K. Scenic beauty estimation of residential quarter green area[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2006, 22(4):62-67.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2006.04.015. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	郑哲. 基于精神病人行为改善作用的庭园康复功能研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2014. ZHENG Z. Research on rehabilitation effects of garden through psychiatric patients' behavior improvement[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	唐佳薇. 基于旅游照片的湖南省国家森林公园游客景观偏好研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2018. TANG J W. Hunan beautiful forest research on tourist landscape preference based on tourist photos in national forest park of Hunan Province[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	柯鑫, 韩雪, 许建强. 植物景观健康效益的发展及其应用探究[J]. 城市建筑, 2020, 17(33):139-142. KE X, HAN X, XU J Q. Research on the development and application of plant landscape health benefit[J]. Urban Archit, 2020, 17(33):139-142.DOI:10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2020.33.39. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	NIELSEN T S, HANSEN K B. Do green areas affect health?Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators[J]. Health Place, 2007, 13(4):839-850.DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001. 本文引用 [1]

[17]

张彩红, 薛伟, 辛颖, 等. 基于层次分析法的贵州玉舍国家森林公园休养地适宜度评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(2):215-219.

ZHANG

C H

, XUE

, XIN

, et al. Suitability evaluation of rest and recuperation sites in Guizhou Yushe National Forest Park by analythic hierarchy process CAHP[J]. J Nanjing For U (Nat Sci Edi), 2020, 44(2): 215-219. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201812009.

本文引用 [1]

[18]	HANSMANN R, HUG S M, SEELAND K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2007, 6(4):213-225.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	王晓易. 2017大众点评吃货节开启亿元基金打造内容生态体系[N]. 南方都市报,2015-05-12(2). 本文引用 [1]

[20]	GRIMM L G, YARNOLD P R. Reading and Understanding more Multivariate Statistics[M]. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2000. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	黄章展, 黄芳铭, 周先捷. 环境偏好与环境恢复性知觉关系之研究--以山景景观为例[J]. 户外游憩研究, 2008, 21(1):1-25. HUANG Z Z, HUANG F M, ZHOU X J. The relationship between environmental preference and restorative perception of environment:a case study of mountain landscape[J]. Outdoor Recreation Study, 2008, 21(1):1-25. 本文引用 [2]

[22]	PESCHARDT K K, STIGSDOTTER U K. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2013, 112:26-39.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013. 本文引用 [2]

[23]	SUN M H, RYAN C, PAN S. Assessing tourists' perceptions and behaviour through photographic and blog analysis: the case of Chinese bloggers and New Zealand holidays[J]. Tour Manag Perspect, 2014, 12:125-133.DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2014.09.007. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	STEPCHENKOVA S, ZHAN F Z. Visual destination images of Peru:comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography[J]. Tour Manag, 2013, 36:590-601.DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.08.006. 本文引用 [1]

[25]

王志鹏, 王薇, 邢思懿. 城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):223-231.

WANG

Z P

, WANG

, XING

S Y

. Relationship between the characteristics and usage patterns of urban park green space and population health[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(5):223-231.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006004.

本文引用 [1]

[26]	ÜLENGIN F, KABAK Ö, ÖNSEL Ş, et al. A problem structuring model for analyzing transportation environment relationships[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2010, 200(3):844-859.DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.023. 本文引用 [1]

[27]

刘群阅, 陈烨, 张薇, 等. 游憩者环境偏好、恢复性评价与健康效益评估关系研究:以福州国家森林公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(2):381-391.

LIU

Q Y

, CHEN

, ZHANG

, et al. Tourists' environmental preferences,perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park[J]. Resour Sci, 2018, 40(2):381-391.DOI:10.18402/resci.2018.02.14.

本文引用 [1]

[28]	柯惠新, 沈浩. 调查研究中的统计分析法[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国传媒大学出版社, 2005. KE H X, SHEN H. Statistics in survey research[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Communication University of China Press, 2005. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	O'LEARY-KELLY S W, J VOKURKA R. The empirical assessment of construct validity[J]. J Oper Manag, 1998, 16(4):387-405.DOI:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	CHEN Y S, LIN L S. Structural equation based latent growth curve modeling of watershed attribute-regulated stream sensitivity to reduced acidic deposition[J]. Ecol Model, 2010, 221(17):2086-2094.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.05.010. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	KUPPAM A R, PENDYALA R M. A structural equations analysis of commuters' activity and travel patterns[J]. Transportation, 2001, 28(1):33-54.DOI:10.1023/A:1005253813277. 本文引用 [1]