油桐种质资源叶片结构变异及与环境因子的关系

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108020

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 95-102.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108020

所属专题：乡村振兴视域下经济林果培育专题（Ⅱ）

• 专题报道：乡村振兴视域下经济林果培育专题（Ⅱ）（执行主编李维林方升佐） • 上一篇下一篇

油桐种质资源叶片结构变异及与环境因子的关系

曹林青¹(), 钟秋平¹^,^*(), 邹玉玲¹, 田丰¹, 贺义昌²

1.中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业实验中心,江西分宜 336600
2.江西省林业科学院,江西南昌 330000

收稿日期:2021-08-10 修回日期:2021-11-08 出版日期:2023-07-30 发布日期:2023-07-20
通讯作者: * 钟秋平(fyzqp92@163.com),教授级高级工程师。
作者简介:曹林青(caolq1991@126.com)。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0601304)

Leaf structure variations and relationship with environmental factors among germplasm resources of Vernicia fordii

CAO Linqing¹(), ZHONG Qiuping¹^,^*(), ZOU Yuling¹, TIAN Feng¹, HE Yichang²

1. Experimental Center for Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fenyi 336600, China
2. Jiangxi Academy of Forestry, Nanchang 330000, China

Received:2021-08-10 Revised:2021-11-08 Online:2023-07-30 Published:2023-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】利用同质园法,探究油桐叶片结构对地理环境变化的响应与适应规律。【方法】采用常规石蜡切片法、指甲油印迹法,对46份油桐种质资源叶片解剖结构及气孔特征进行观察测量,结合冗余分析、传统相关分析和系统聚类等方法,研究油桐叶片结构性状的差异及其与环境因子的关系。【结果】油桐种质之间叶片结构特征变异系数较大且存在极显著差异(P<0.01),尤其是栅海比、气孔面积、气孔密度、海绵组织厚度的变异超过20%,叶片解剖结构之间、叶片气孔结构之间分别存在不同程度的相关性。影响油桐叶片结构性状变异的主要地理环境因子为纬度、经度、年均温、年均降水量。主成分分析结果显示,前5个主成分的累积贡献率达91.02%;选取气孔密度、气孔周长、气孔面积等10个叶片性状进行系统聚类,将46份油桐种质资源在欧氏距离5.0处划分为3个类群,聚类结果反映出各个类群中叶片的结构特征,差异主要体现在叶片气孔特征方面。【结论】地理环境的差异是影响油桐叶片结构变异的重要因素。

关键词: 油桐, 叶片结构变异, 环境因子

Abstract:

【Objective】A common garden experiment was used to explore the adaptation mechanisms of leaf structure to geographical environment changes. 【Method】In this study, the anatomical structure and stomatal characteristics of the leaves of 46 Vernicia fordii provenances were observed and measured by the paraffin wax slices method and nail oil seal method. Redundancy analysis, traditional correlation analysis and systematic clustering were used to analyze the differences in leaf structural characteristics, as well as the relationship between leaf traits and environmental factors.【Result】The results showed that the leaf structure characteristics of V. fordii had significant variation (P<0.01), the coefficients of variation of P/S, stomatal area, stomatal density and spongy tissue thickness were more than 20%. There were significant correlations between the leaf anatomical structure and leaf stomatal structure. Latitude, longitude, mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation contributed largely to the variations of leaf structure characteristics of V. fordii. Principal component analysis revealed that the first five principal components represented 91.02%. Ten indexes, including stomatal density, stomatal perimeter and stomatal area, were selected for hierarchical cluster analysis. Overall, 46 V. fordii germplasms were clustered into three groups with a Euclidean distance of 5.0. The clustering results reflected the characteristics of the leaf tissue structure of various groups, and the difference was mainly reflected in the stomatal characteristics. 【Conclusion】 The difference in the geographical environment was one of the major factors that affected the variations of the leaf structure of V. fordii.

Key words: Vernicia fordii, leaf structure variation, environmental factor

中图分类号:

S794.3

曹林青,钟秋平,邹玉玲,等. 油桐种质资源叶片结构变异及与环境因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 95-102.

CAO Linqing, ZHONG Qiuping, ZOU Yuling, TIAN Feng, HE Yichang. Leaf structure variations and relationship with environmental factors among germplasm resources of Vernicia fordii[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(4): 95-102.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108020.

图/表 9

表1

油桐种源地基本情况"

种源名称 provenance name	种源地 provenance site	经度/ (°) longitude (E)	纬度/ (°) latitude (N)	年均气温/℃ annual average temperature	年均降水量/ mm annual mean precipitation	生长季均温/ ℃ growing season mean temperature	生长季降水量/ mm precipitation in the growth season	平均相对湿度/% average relative humidity	≥10 ℃ 年积温/℃ annual accumulated temperature ≥10 ℃	年均日照时间/h average annual sunshine duration
HMY 01—04	湖南麻阳	109.80	27.88	17.30	1 256.70	21.74	1 053.70	78.00	5 512.00	1 421.80
HCL 01—03	湖南慈利	111.14	29.44	17.30	1 383.40	21.85	1 186.10	76.00	5 200.00	1 563.30
HDK	湖南洞口	110.58	27.08	18.00	1 426.40	22.48	1 111.00	77.00	5 229.70	1 424.00
HNY 01—03	湖南宁远	111.94	25.57	18.60	1 450.30	22.85	1 163.60	78.00	5 754.20	1 610.00
HSZ 01—05	湖南桑植	110.17	29.41	16.40	1 418.20	20.74	1 237.90	79.00	5 625.00	1 717.30
JPZ 01—02	江西彭泽	116.54	29.86	17.10	1 485.20	21.89	1 200.80	76.00	5 216.80	2 048.60
HYL 01—02	湖南沅陵	110.39	28.49	16.90	1 384.90	21.25	1 174.60	77.00	5 192.00	1 328.20
JXS	江西修水	114.66	28.98	16.80	1 602.10	21.39	1 308.00	79.00	5 300.00	1 629.00
JWY	江西婺源	117.76	29.33	17.10	1 946.90	21.66	1 595.10	82.00	5 231.00	1 715.10
JAY 01—02	江西安远	115.39	25.19	18.90	1 569.10	22.83	1 303.30	81.00	5 223.00	1 748.70
JDN	江西定南	115.05	24.87	19.00	1 586.10	22.84	1 349.60	80.00	5 998.00	1 677.00
JDY	江西大余	114.29	25.47	18.60	1 583.90	22.60	1 315.40	80.00	5 747.00	1 647.20
JXG	江西兴国	115.48	26.23	19.00	1 545.60	23.29	1 272.90	78.00	5 653.80	1 711.40
JRJ	江西瑞金	115.89	26.01	19.20	1 652.20	23.34	1 369.60	79.00	6 120.00	1 618.00
JXF	江西信丰	115.12	25.46	19.50	1 520.80	23.66	1 261.10	77.00	6 223.20	1 839.00
JSY	江西上犹	114.47	25.93	19.00	1 493.80	23.14	1 232.90	79.00	5 765.60	1 765.20
JHK	江西湖口	116.28	29.73	17.10	1 439.10	21.83	1 164.00	78.00	5 358.70	1 983.80
HWG 01—02	湖南武冈	110.63	26.73	18.06	1 422.60	21.96	1 115.20	77.00	5 320.00	1 510.00
SBJ	陕西宝鸡	107.37	34.38	13.10	635.20	18.24	601.60	70.00	3 826.00	2 139.00
HYX 01—02	湖北郧西	110.43	33.01	15.30	797.70	20.23	731.30	74.00	4 734.40	1 840.00
HLS 01—02	湖南龙山	109.44	29.47	16.10	1 308.10	20.39	1 159.60	80.00	5 100.00	1 219.00
HYS 01—02	湖北英山	115.68	30.75	16.60	1 420.10	21.40	1 217.30	76.00	5 092.50	2 049.30
SSY	陕西山阳	109.87	33.55	13.10	721.00	17.98	673.10	71.00	4 142.70	2 133.80
HZD	湖北曾都	113.34	31.72	15.90	977.00	20.89	852.70	76.00	4 862.00	2 056.30
SSN	陕西商南	110.82	33.57	13.90	863.90	18.65	797.50	69.00	4 265.00	1 973.50
HYSH 01—03	湖南永顺	109.85	29.01	16.40	1 344.60	20.76	1 178.20	79.00	5 170.00	1 306.00

表1

图1

表2

表3

表4

图2

表5

图3

表6

参考文献 21

[1]	纪若璇, 于笑, 常远, 等. 蒙古莸叶片解剖结构的地理种源变异及其对环境变化响应的意义[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3):277-286.
	JI R X, YU X, CHANG Y, et al. Geographical provenance variation of leaf anatomical structure of Caryopteris mongholica and its significance in response to environmental changes[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(3):277-286.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0117.
[2]	朱广龙, 陈许兵, 郭小倩, 等. 酸枣根系结构可塑性对自然梯度干旱生境的适应机制[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5810-5818.
	ZHU G L, CHEN X B, GUO X Q, et al. Plasticity of root morphology of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa in response to natural drought gradient ecotopes[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(16):5810-5818.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201708271544.
[3]	刘梦颖, 刘光立, 康永祥, 等. 高山植物全缘叶绿绒蒿叶片形态及解剖结构对海拔的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(1):35-42.
	LIU M Y, LIU G L, KANG Y X, et al. Responses of leaf morphological and anatomical structure to elevation in an alpine plant Meconopsis integrifolia[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(1):35-42.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201801.035.
[4]	马红英, 李小伟, 杨君珑, 等. 蒙古沙冬青叶片解剖特征与生态因子的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(5):910-917.
	MA H Y, LI X W, YANG J L, et al. Leaf anatomical structures of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus and their relationship with ecological factors[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2020, 29(5):910-917.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.05.006.
[5]	吴建波, 王小丹. 高寒草原优势种紫花针茅叶片解剖结构对青藏高原高寒干旱环境适应性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3):265-273.
	WU J B, WANG X D. Analyzing leaf anatomical structure of dominant species Stipa purpurea adapting to alpine and drought environment at Qingzang Plateau[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(3):265-273.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0322.
[6]	WRIGHT I J, REICH P B, WESTOBY M. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology,structure and nutrient content between species of high-and low-rainfall and high-and low-nutrient habitats[J]. Funct Ecol, 2001, 15(4):423-434.DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x.
[7]	李泽, 谭晓风, 卢锟, 等. 干旱胁迫对两种油桐幼苗生长、气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(5):1515-1524.
	LI Z, TAN X F, LU K, et al. Influence of drought stress on the growth,leaf gas exchange,and chlorophyll fluorescence in two varieties of tung tree seedlings[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(5):1515-1524.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201509201939.
[8]	贾宝光, 林青, 谭晓风, 等. 三年桐EST-SSR标记的开发与种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4):625-636.
	JIA B G, LIN Q, TAN X F, et al. Development of EST-SSR markers and their use for genetic diversity analysis in tung tree(Vernicia fordii(Hemsl.) Airy Shaw)[J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2016, 17(4):625-636.DOI: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.04.006.
[9]	吴攀. 油桐种子油脂累积的分子机制研究[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院武汉植物园), 2019.
	WU P. Study on molecular mechanism of oil accumulation in the seed of tung trees[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019.
[10]	万盼, 黄小辉, 熊兴政, 等. 农药施用浓度对油桐幼苗生长及土壤酶活性、有效养分含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(1):73-80.
	WAN P, HUANG X H, XIONG X Z, et al. Effects of pesticides on soil enzyme activities,available nutrients and growth of Vernicia fordii seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(1):73-80.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201705022.
[11]	石凯, 李泽, 张伟建, 等. 不同光照对油桐幼苗生长、光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(8):35-42,50.
	SHI K, LI Z, ZHANG W J, et al. Influence of different light intensity on the growth,diurnal change of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of tung tree seedling[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2018, 38(8):35-42,50.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.08.006.
[12]	XIAO L H, HUANG J R, WANG Y G, et al. Tung oil-based modifier toughening epoxy resin by sacrificial bonds[J]. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng, 2019, 7(20):17344-17353.DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04284.
[13]	ZHANG L L, LIU X L, PENG J H. Genetic diversity and geographic differentiation of tung tree,Vernicia fordii (Euphorbiaceae),a potential biodiesel plant species with low invasion risk[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(7):402.DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9070402.
[14]	PAN Y, PAN L, CHEN L, et al. Development of microsatellite markers in the oil-producing species Vernicia fordii (Euphorbiaceae),a potential biodiesel feedstock[J]. Appl Plant Sci, 2013, 1(7):1200004.DOI: 10.3732/apps.1200004.
[15]	朱燕华, 康宏樟, 刘春江. 植物叶片气孔性状变异的影响因素及研究方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1):250-256.
	ZHU Y H, KANG H Z, LIU C J. Affecting factors of plant stomatal traits variability and relevant investigation methods[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22(1):250-256.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0011.
[16]	陈新宇, 孟景祥, 周先清, 等. 油松地理种群针叶形态解剖与生理指标遗传变异分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(7):19-30.
	CHEN X Y, MENG J X, ZHOU X Q, et al. Genetic variation of needle morphology and anatomical traits and physiological traits among Pinus tabuliformis geographic populations[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(7):19-30.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190170.
[17]	秦茜, 朱俊杰, 关心怡, 等. 七个甘蔗品种叶片解剖结构特征与光合能力和耐旱性的关联[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(4):705-712.
	QIN X, ZHU J J, GUAN X Y, et al. The correlations of leaf anatomical characteristics with photosynthetic capacity and drought tolerance in seven sugarcane cultivars[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2017, 53(4):705-712.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0038.
[18]	钟悦鸣, 董芳宇, 王文娟, 等. 不同生境胡杨叶片解剖特征及其适应可塑性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(10):53-61.
	ZHONG Y M, DONG F Y, WANG W J, et al. Anatomical characteristics and adaptability plasticity of Populus euphratica in different habitats[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2017, 39(10):53-61.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170089.
[19]	HONG T, LIN H, HE D J. Characteristics and correlations of leaf stomata in different Aleurites montana provenances[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(12):e0208899.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208899.
[20]	王楚楚, 钟全林, 程栋梁, 等. 引种期同质园翅荚木主要叶功能性状与种源地环境关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13):4892-4899.
	WANG C C, ZHONG Q L, CHENG D L, et al. Relationship between the leaf functional traits of Zenia insignis and the provenance environments in common gardens during the introduction period[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(13):4892-4899.
[21]	田丽丽, 李娟, 林海燕, 等. 大叶种茶树叶片解剖结构对纬度的响应[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(21):7262-7268.
	TIAN L L, LI J, LIN H Y, et al. Response of leaf anatomical structure of dayezhong tea germplasm to latitude[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2019, 17(21):7262-7268.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.007262.

项目 item	LT/ μm	UET/ μm	LET/ μm	Pal/ μm	Spm/ μm	P/S	TST	TSP	SD/ (个·mm^-2)	SP/ μm	SA/ μm²	SAL/ μm	SAW/ μm
均值mean	195.93	13.03	11.55	67.55	100.02	0.71	0.35	0.51	340.25	81.74	324.70	24.09	17.02
最大值max	299.15	16.14	14.87	99.14	187.28	1.08	0.47	0.63	540.71	108.38	548.02	31.79	24.00
最小值min	115.59	8.33	7.25	39.05	47.01	0.42	0.26	0.39	219.00	38.43	173.52	14.52	11.64
极差extreme difference	183.56	7.81	7.62	60.09	140.27	0.66	0.21	0.24	321.71	69.95	374.50	17.27	12.36
标准差SD	24.20	1.34	1.24	7.90	20.37	0.33	0.04	0.05	69.28	9.10	70.66	2.55	2.28
变异系数/%CV	12.35	10.28	10.74	11.70	20.37	46.48	11.43	9.80	20.36	11.13	21.76	10.59	13.40
F	19.97^**	5.84^**	3.56^**	14.01^**	12.69^**	9.09^**	8.52^**	7.25^**	16.26^**	5.74^**	10.47^**	7.07^**	10.34^**

指标index	LT	UET	LET	Pal	Spm	P/S	TST	TSP	SD	SP	SA	SAL	SAW
LT	1.00
UET	0.26	1.00
LET	0.29	0.90^**	1.00			-
Pal	0.30	0.14	0.24	1.00
Spm	0.90^**	0.28	0.24	-0.01	1.00
P/S	-0.55^**	-0.14	-0.06	0.58^**	-0.81^**	1.00
TST	-0.58^**	-0.02	-0.01	0.50^**	-0.64^**	0.82^**	1.00
TSP	0.20	0.27	0.16	-0.33	0.57^**	-0.63^**	-0.09	1.00
SD	-0.13	0.21	0.23	0.12	-0.25	0.24	0.18	-0.16	1.00
SP	0.12	0.06	0.05	0.05	0.14	-0.07	-0.02	0.07	-0.63^**	1.00
SA	0.17	-0.06	-0.12	0.08	0.18	-0.07	0.01	0.11	-0.52^**	0.86^**	1.00	.
SAL	0.14	0.03	0.01	0.06	0.16	-0.07	-0.02	0.08	-0.62^**	0.99^**	0.92^**	1.00
SAW	0.17	-0.16	-0.24	0.09	0.17	-0.07	0.01	0.10	-0.36	0.61^**	0.93^**	0.70^**	1.00

排序轴 ordination axis	特征值 eigen value	叶特征与环境因子相关系数 correlation coefficient between leaf characteristics and environmental factors	叶特征累积解释量/% cumulative interpretation of leaf characteristics	叶特征-环境因子变化累积解释量/% cumulative interpretation of leaf characteristics- environmental factors change
第1轴axis 1	0.162	0.625	16.2	55.2
第2轴axis 2	0.051	0.522	21.3	72.4
第3轴axis 3	0.046	0.510	25.9	88.1
第4轴axis 4	0.014	0.521	27.3	93.1

指标 index	成分component
指标 index	PC1	PC2	PC3	PC4	PC5
LT	0.351	-0.359	0.845	-0.094	-0.140
UET	0.325	-0.529	-0.103	0.699	-0.134
LET	0.303	-0.428	-0.104	0.791	-0.176
Pal	-0.004	0.495	0.803	0.275	0.083
Spm	0.512	-0.626	0.539	-0.154	0.173
P/S	-0.383	0.845	0.139	0.304	-0.087
TST	-0.171	0.722	0.061	0.383	0.538
TSP	0.370	-0.438	-0.144	0.018	0.801
SD	-0.724	-0.087	0.231	0.235	0.082
SP	0.882	0.281	-0.138	0.064	-0.015
SA	0.812	0.528	-0.037	-0.038	-0.054
SAL	0.896	0.346	-0.118	0.040	-0.025
SAW	0.534	0.579	0.067	-0.130	-0.077
特征值 eigen value	3.945	3.477	1.808	1.542	1.061
贡献率/% contribution rate	30.344	26.749	13.904	11.862	8.161
累积贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate	30.344	57.094	70.998	82.860	91.021

类群 group	LT/μm	UET/μm	LET/μm	Pal/μm	Spm/μm	P/S	TST	TSP	SD/ (个·mm^-2)	SP/μm	SA/μm²	SAL/μm	SAW/μm
Ⅰ	208.12±15.80	13.17±0.71	11.59±0.71	68.78±6.12	111.75±10.73	0.62±0.07	0.33±0.02	0.53±0.02	336.25±37.38	84.36±2.76	343.03±14.82	24.86±0.66	17.54±0.65
Ⅱ	208.57±14.95	13.48±0.77	11.91±0.67	69.96±6.58	112.39±11.53	0.63±0.09	0.34±0.05	0.54±0.06	321.99±32.17	90.44±3.87	404.63±24.95	26.74±0.95	19.22±0.94
Ⅲ	204.34±9.08	13.25±0.88	11.66±0.91	70.12±5.30	104.95±7.56	0.68±0.07	0.34±0.02	0.51±0.02	441.14±13.66	79.31±5.98	329.81±35.81	23.64±1.59	17.72±1.01
F	0.41	0.65	0.73	0.24	2.39	1.83	0.53	2.56	67.25^**	24.34^**	35.34^**	29.25^**	17.26^**

油桐种质资源叶片结构变异及与环境因子的关系

Leaf structure variations and relationship with environmental factors among germplasm resources of Vernicia fordii

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	韩淑敏, 闫伟, 杨雪栋, 胡博, 于凤强, 高润红. 白榆在我国的潜在分布格局及未来变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 103-110.
[2]	竹磊, 徐军亮, 章异平, 罗鹏飞, 师志强, 候佳玉, 翟乐鑫. 河南洛阳马尾松树干液流昼夜变化特征及其影响因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 92-100.
[3]	董京京, 陈洁, 杨宏, 李蒙, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵. 华中樱桃适生区模拟和生态特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 213-221.
[4]	崔皓, 韩建刚, 郭俨辉, 季淮, 朱咏莉, 李萍萍. 洪泽湖河湖交汇区典型杨树人工林碳通量月尺度变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 19-26.
[5]	龚茂佳, 王娟, 付小勇, 寇卫利, 鲁宁, 王秋华, 赖虹燕. 云南广西蒜头果适生区预测及环境影响因子[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 44-52.
[6]	潘婷婷, 陈林, 杨国栋, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣. 南京北部郊野森林群落物种多样性及其环境解释[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 48-54.
[7]	张赟齐, 刘晨, 刘阳, 叶常奇, 张萌, 贾黎明, 郝艳宾, 苏淑钗. 叶幕微域环境对无患子果实产量和品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 189-198.
[8]	魏玉龙, 张秋良. 兴安落叶松林缘天然更新与立地环境因子的相关分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 165-172.
[9]	张毅, 敖妍, 刘觉非, 赵磊磊, 张永明. 文冠果物候期对环境因子的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 30-36.
[10]	张悦, 冯会丽, 王维枫, 薛建辉, 吴永波, 于水强. 洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 113-120.
[11]	马青江, 孙操稳, 张乐英, 胡梓恒, 张仕娇, 洑香香. 东亚四照花群体中国潜在适生区预测研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 135-140.
[12]	李成龙,刘延惠,丁访军,舒德远,崔迎春,赵文君,侯贻菊,吴鹏. 茂兰喀斯特森林小果润楠蒸腾特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 51-58.
[13]	郑孙元,朱弘,金思雨,王梦娟,孙杰,谷诚诚, 裴引祎,王贤荣,段一凡. 桂花表型变化的环境依赖特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 38-46.
[14]	田耀武,刘谊锋,王聪,王罡,和武宇恒. 伏牛山森林土壤有机碳密度与环境因子的关联性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 83-90.
[15]	万盼,黄小辉,熊兴政,刘芸. 农药施用浓度对油桐幼苗生长及土壤酶活性、有效养分含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(01): 73-80.