径阶距对评估南盘江流域天然林物种多样性的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108025

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 166-174.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108025

径阶距对评估南盘江流域天然林物种多样性的影响

黎明慧(), 李远发()

广西大学林学院, 广西森林生态与保育重点实验室, 广西南宁 530004

收稿日期:2021-08-12 修回日期:2021-11-19 出版日期:2023-07-30 发布日期:2023-07-20
通讯作者: 李远发* 李远发(xianggelilalyf@sina.com),副研究员。
作者简介:黎明慧(2466279782@qq.com)。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32060340);国家自然科学基金项目(31400542)

Evaluating influences of diameter classes on the species diversity of natural forests in the Nanpan River basin

LI Minghui(), LI Yuanfa()

College of Forestry, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

Received:2021-08-12 Revised:2021-11-19 Online:2023-07-30 Published:2023-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】物种多样性和树木大小是决定森林生态系统稳定性、复杂性的关键因素,也是森林生态系统多样性的典型表征,用长时间未受外界干扰的标准固定样地数据对物种多样性和树木大小的关系进行研究,揭示径阶距和直径分布范围对物种多样性的影响。【方法】在广西雅长兰科植物国家级自然保护区建立了3块不同年龄序列的标准固定样地 (30年生林分, 代号30-YF; 57年生林分, 代号 57-YF; 200年生林分, 代号200-YF),采用2、3、4、5 cm作为径阶距划分直径分布,并计算每个径阶上的物种多度 (number of individual,N)、物种丰富度(species richness,R_S)、多样性指数 (Simpson, D; Brillouin,B_H) 和均匀度指数 (Pielou, E_H; Sheldon, E_S)。【结果】① 物种多度和丰富度随径阶的增大逐渐减小,呈倒“J”形分布;且随径阶距增大而增大,曲线的弯曲程度提高。②多样性指数随着径阶的增大线性降低,受径阶距的影响很小 (P >0.05)。③整体上,径阶增大将促进种间多度的平衡。Pielou均匀度指数随径阶增大出现波动,而Sheldon 均匀度指数呈线性增大,受径阶距的影响小 (P >0.05);④只有当径阶距为2 cm时,林分间的物种多样性指数差异显著 (P<0.05)。【结论】径阶距对同一林分内物种多样性的影响不大,但林龄会加强径阶距对物种多样性的影响,强调了直径分布范围和小树对物种多样性的显著影响。2 cm比其他径阶距能更好地反映南盘江流域天然林之间物种多样性的差异,亦说明了它被广泛使用的合理性。

关键词: 天然林, 树木大小, 径阶距, 丰富度, 多度, 均匀度

Abstract:

【Objective】Species diversity and tree size play an important role in maintaining the stability and complexity of forest ecosystems, and also characterize the diversity of forest ecosystems. The relationship between species diversity and tree size is not well understood. 【Method】Three fixed plots (30-year-old forest, 30-YF; 57-year-old forest, 50-YF; 200-year-old forest, 200-YF) located at Guangxi Yachang orchid national reserve were established and their diameter distributions were divided using diameter classes of 2, 3, 4 and 5 cm. The number of individuals (N), species richness (R_S), diversity (Simpson, D; Brillouin, B_H), and evenness (Pielou, E_H; Sheldon, E_S) were calculated for each diameter class. 【Result】(1) N and R_S displayed a reversed J shape, decreasing with the increase in diameter. N and R_S increased with increasing diameter class, and their curves became more bent. (2) D and B_H were slightly affected by diameter class and showed a linear decrease (P >0.05). (3) Overall, increasing tree diameter promoted a balance of abundance among tree populations. With an increase in diameter, E_H fluctuated and E_S increased linearly and was slightly affected by the diameter classes (P >0.05). (4) A significant difference in species diversity indices was found among the three stands (P<0.05) when the diameter class was 2 cm. 【Conclusion】 Diameter class had little effect on species diversity within the same stand. However, stand age enhanced this effect, highlighting the importance of the diameter range and small trees on species diversity. The diameter of 2 cm better reflects the diversity of species among natural forests in the Nanpan River basin than the other diameter classes. This justifies its widespread use.

Key words: natural forest, tree sizes, diameter class, richness, abundance, species evenness

中图分类号:

S718

黎明慧,李远发. 径阶距对评估南盘江流域天然林物种多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 166-174.

LI Minghui, LI Yuanfa. Evaluating influences of diameter classes on the species diversity of natural forests in the Nanpan River basin[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(4): 166-174.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108025.

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 49

[1]	HUI G, POMMERENING A. Analysing tree species and size diversity patterns in multi-species uneven-aged forests of northern China[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2014, 316:125-138.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.029.
[2]	MACARTHUR R H. Patterns of species diversity[J]. Biol Rev, 1965, 40(4):510-533.DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00815.x.
[3]	赵中华, 惠刚盈. 林分结构多样性研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9):143-152.
	ZHAO Z H, HUI G Y. Advances in structural diversity of stand structure[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2020, 56(9):143-152.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200916.
[4]	周梦丽, 张青, 亢新刚, 等. 云冷杉天然林乔木树种组成及物种多样性对择伐强度的动态响应[J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(1):56-66.
	ZHOU M L, ZHANG Q, KANG X G, et al. Dynamic response to selective cutting intensity on tree species structure and species diversity in a natural spruce-fir forest[J]. Plant Sclence J, 2016, 34(1):56-66.DOI:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.10056.
[5]	LEI X D, WANG W F, PENG C H. Relationships between stand growth and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forests in New Brunswick,Canada[J]. Can J For Res, 2009, 39(10):1835-1847.DOI:10.1139/x09-089.
[6]	LALIBERTÉ E, LEGENDRE P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(1):299-305.DOI:10.1890/08-2244.1.
[7]	VARGA P, CHEN H Y, KLINKA K. Tree-size diversity between single- and mixed-species stands in three forest types in western Canada[J]. Can J For Res, 2005, 35(3):593-601.DOI:10.1139/x04-193.
[8]	MORGENROTH J, NOWAK D, KOESER A. DBH distributions in America's urban forests: an overview of structural diversity[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(2):135.DOI:10.3390/f11020135.
[9]	LEXERØD N L, EID T. An evaluation of different diameter diversity indices based on criteria related to forest management planning[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 222(1/2/3):17-28.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.046.
[10]	WESTPHAL C, TREMER N, OHEIMB G V, et al. Is the reverse Jshaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests?[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 223(1/2/3):75-83.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.057.
[11]	PODLASKI R. Diversity of patch structure in central European forests:are tree diameter distributions in near-natural multilayered Abies-Fagus stands heterogeneous?[J]. Ecol Res, 2010, 25(3):599-608.DOI:10.1007/s11284-010-0690-6.
[12]	白超, 惠刚盈. 林木直径大小多样性量化测度指数的比较研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(3):340-347.
	BAI C, HUI G Y. Study on diversity indices of tree diameter size[J]. For Res, 2016, 29(3):340-347.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2016.03.005.
[13]	DE LIMA R B, BUFALINO L, ALVES JUNIOR F T, et al. Diameter distribution in a Brazilian tropical dry forest domain:predictions for the stand and species[J]. An Acad Bras Ciênc, 2017, 89(2):1189-1203.DOI:10.1590/0001-3765201720160331.
[14]	WANG T, LIANG Y, REN H B, et al. Age structure of Picea schrenkiana forest along an altitudinal gradient in the central Tianshan Mountains,northwestern China[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 196(2/3):267-274.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.063.
[15]	KERÄNEN J, PEUHKURINEN J, PACKALEN P, et al. Effect of minimum diameter at breast height and standing dead wood field measurements on the accuracy of ALS-based forest inventory[J]. Can J For Res, 2015, 45(10):1280-1288.DOI:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0103.
[16]	练琚愉, 陈灿, 黄忠良, 等. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林不同成熟度群落特征的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(2):174-182.
	LIAN J Y, CHEN C, HUANG Z L, et al. Community composition and stand age in a subtropical forest,southern China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2015, 23(2):174-182.DOI:10.17520/biods.2014243.
[17]	KE X, SU Z, HU Y, et al. Measuring species diversity in a subtropical forest across a tree size gradient:a comparison of diversity indices[J]. Pak J Bot, 2017, 49(4):1373-1379.
[18]	MWAVU E N, WITKOWSKI E T F. Woody species alpha-diversity and species abundance distributions in an African semi-deciduous tropical rain forest[J]. Biotropica, 2015, 47(4):424-434.DOI:10.1111/btp.12223.
[19]	WHITFELD T J S, LASKY J R, DAMAS K, et al. Species richness,forest structure,and functional diversity during succession in the new Guinea Lowlands[J]. Biotropica, 2014, 46(5):538-548.DOI:10.1111/btp.12136.
[20]	TAYLOR A R, GAO B L, CHEN H Y H. The effect of species diversity on tree growth varies during forest succession in the boreal forest of central Canada[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 455:117641.DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117641.
[21]	胡云云, 亢新刚, 赵俊卉. 长白山地区天然林林木年龄与胸径的变动关系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(11):38-42.
	HU Y Y, KANG X G, ZHAO J H. Variable relationship between tree age and diameter at breast height for natural forests in Changbai Mountains[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2009, 37(11):38-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2009.11.013.
[22]	REICH P B, BAKKEN P, CARLSON D, et al. Influence of logging,fire,and forest type on biodiversity and productivity in southern boreal forests[J]. Ecology,2001, 82(10):2731-2748.DOI:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2731:IOLFAF]2.0.CO;2.
[23]	LIU N, WANG H, NAN H W. Structural diversity closely associated with canopy species diversity and stand age in species-poor montane forests on Loess Plateau of China[J]. Pol J Ecol, 2017, 65(2):183-193.DOI:10.3161/15052249pje2017.65.2.002.
[24]	LI Y F, HE J A, YU S F, et al. Spatial structure of the vertical layers in a subtropical secondary forest 57 years after clear-cutting[J]. iForest-Biogeosciences and Fore, 2019, 12(5):442-450.DOI:10.3832/ifor2975-012.
[25]	马克平, 刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法 I:α 多样性的测度方法 (下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994, 2(4):231-239.
	MA K P, LIU Y M. The measurement method of biodiversity Ι: α diversity measurement method (ⅱ)[J]. Chinese Biodiversity, 1994, 2(4):231-239.
[26]	COOMES D A, ALLEN R B. Mortality and tree-size distributions in natural mixed-age forests[J]. J Ecol, 2007, 95(1):27-40.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01179.x.
[27]	OGANA F N, OSHO J S A, GORGOSO-VARELA J J. Comparison of Beta,Gamma Weibull distributions for characterizing tree diameter in Oluwa Forest Reserve,Ondo State,Nigeria[J]. J Nat Sci Res, 2015, 4(3):28-36.
[28]	LI Y F, HE J A, YU S F, et al. Spatial structures of different-sized tree species in a secondary forest in the early succession stage[J]. Eur J For Res, 2020, 139(5):709-719.DOI:10.1007/s10342-020-01280-w.
[29]	袁铁象, 张合平, 欧芷阳, 等. 地形对桂西南喀斯特山地森林地表植物多样性及分布格局的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(10):2803-2810.
	YUAN T X, ZHANG H P, OU Z Y, et al. Effects of topography on the diversity and distribution pattern of ground plants in Karst montane forests in southwest Guangxi,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25(10):2803-2810.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140801.007.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2020.0148.
[30]	池森, 王从军, 黎庆菊, 等. 喀斯特次生林幼树更新空间分布格局及种间关联性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12):3989-3996.
	CHI S, WANG C J, LI Q J, et al. Spatial distribution and interspecific associations of regenerating saplings in Karst secondary forests[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31(12):3989-3996.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202012.006.
[31]	郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 等. 广西弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林监测样地种群空间点格局分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(2):183-191.
	GUO Y L, WANG B, XIANG W S, et al. Spatial distribution of tree species in a tropical Karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang,Guangxi,southern China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2015, 23(2):183-191.DOI:10.17520/biods.2014126.
[32]	王艳红, 李帅锋, 郎学东, 等. 地形异质性对云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林物种多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(10):1015-1027.
	WANG Y H, LI S F, LANG X D, et al. Effects of topographic heterogeneity on species diversity in a monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest in Pu'er,Yunnan,China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(10):1015-1027. DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2020.0148.
[33]	WANG X G, HAO Z Q, ZHANG J, et al. Tree size distributions in an old-growth temperate forest[J]. Oikos, 2009, 118(1):25-36.DOI:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16598.x.
[34]	赵中华, 惠刚盈, 袁士云, 等. 小陇山锐齿栎天然林空间结构特征[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(3):1-6.
	ZHAO Z H, (XI\|HUI) G Y, YUAN S Y, et al. Spatial structure characteristic of Quercus aliena var.acuteserrata natural forest in Xiaolongshan[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2009, 45(3):1-6.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.03.001.
[35]	DERROIRE G, BALVANERA P, CASTELLANOS-CASTRO C, et al. Resilience of tropical dry forests-a meta-analysis of changes in species diversity and composition during secondary succession[J]. Oikos, 2016, 125(10):1386-1397.DOI:10.1111/oik.03229.
[36]	KUMAR P, CHEN H Y H, THOMAS S C, et al. Linking resource availability and heterogeneity to under storey species diversity through succession in boreal forest of Canada[J]. J Ecol, 2018, 106(3):1266-1276.DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12861.
[37]	CONDIT R, HUBBELL S P, LAFRANKIE J V, et al. Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees:a comparison of three 50-ha plots[J]. J Ecol, 1996, 84(4):549.DOI:10.2307/2261477.
[38]	AMICI V, SANTI E, FILIBECK G, et al. Influence of secondary forest succession on plant diversity patterns in a Mediterranean landscape[J]. J Biogeogr, 2013, 40(12):2335-2347.DOI:10.1111/jbi.12182.
[39]	WANG W T, JIANG Y, LI B H, et al. Species abundance is jointly determined by functional traits and negative density dependence in a subtropical forest in southern China[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2021, 14(3):491-503.DOI:10.1093/jpe/rtab009.
[40]	赵天梁. 山西华北落叶松群落物种多样性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(6):45-50.
	ZHAO T L. Species diversity of Larix principis-rupprechtii communities in Shanxi Province of northern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2017, 39(6):45-50.DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170067.
[41]	WANG Y, JIANG X B, WU D Z. Species diversity characteristics of a natural Pinus taiwanensis community with different diameter classes and forest densities[J]. J Resour Ecol, 2020, 11(4):349.DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.04.003.
[42]	彭少麟, 王伯荪. 鼎湖山森林群落分析Ⅰ:物种多样性[J]. 生态科学, 1983, 2(1):11-17.
	PENG S L, WANG B S. Analysis on the forest communities of Dinghushan Ⅰ:species dieversity[J]. Ecol Sci, 1983, 2(1):11-17.
[43]	汪殿蓓, 暨淑仪, 陈飞鹏. 植物群落物种多样性研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(4):55-60.
	WANG D P, JI S Y, CHEN F P. A review on the species diversity of plant community[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2001, 20(4):55-60.
[44]	LI Y, HUI G, YU S, et al. Nearest neighbour relationships in Pinus yunnanensis var.tenuifolia forests along the Nanpan River,China[J]. IForest, 2017, 10(4):746-753.DOI:10.3832/ifor2405-010.
[45]	LI Y F, LI M H, MING A G, et al. Spatial pattern dynamics among co-dominant populations in early secondary forests in southwest China[J]. J For Res, 2021, 32(4):1373-1384.DOI:10.1007/s11676-020-01207-6.
[46]	马克平, 黄建辉, 于顺利, 等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅱ:丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J]. 生态学报, 1995, 15(3):268-277.
	MA K P, HUANG J H, YU S L, et al. Plant community diversity in Dongling Mountain,Beijing,ChinaⅡ:species richness,evenness and species diversities[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1995, 15(3):268-277.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1995.03.006.
[47]	VALBUENA R, PACKALÉN P, MARTN-FERNÁNDEZ S, et al. Diversity and equitability ordering profiles applied to study forest structure[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 276:185-195.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.05.015.
[48]	吴昊. 不同类型群落物种多样性指数的比较研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(5):84-89.
	WU H. Comparative study of species diversity indices of different type communities[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2015, 35(5):84-89.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.05.015.
[49]	袁王俊, 卢训令, 张维瑞, 等. 不同植被类型植物物种多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14):4651-4657.
	YUAN W J, LU X L, ZHANG W R, et al. Plant's diversity of different vegetation types[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(14):4651-4657.DOI:10.5846/stxb201312032870.

样地 plot	位置 location	地貌 landform	平均胸径/cm mean DBH	多度 N	丰富度 R_S	主要树种 main species
30-YF	106°19'4.2″E, 24°51'15.9″N	非喀斯特 non-Karst	9.49	3 016	18	细叶云南松(Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia)、栓皮栎(Quercus variabilis)、青冈(Cyclobalanopsis glauca)、铁坚油杉(Keteleeria davidiana)、小果珍珠花(Lyonia ovalifolia var. elliptica)、杨梅(Marella rubra)、二列叶柃(Eurya distichophylla)、盐肤木(Rhus chinensis)
57-YF	106° 14'14.6″E, 24°47'25.4″N	非喀斯特 non-Karst	8.95	1 895	21	细叶云南松、栓皮栎(Q. variabilis)、青冈(C. glauca)、山槐(Albizzia kalkora)、算盘子(Glochidion puberum)、大叶栎(Q. griffithii)
200-YF	106°23'12.6″ E, 24°49'55.3″ N	喀斯特 Karst	6.90	4 596	56	白栎(Q. fabri)、化香树(Platycarya strobilacea)、栓皮栎(Q. variabilis)、珍珠花(L. ovalifolia)、盐肤木(R. chinensis)、杨梅(M. rubra)、大叶紫珠(Callicarpa macrophylla)、铁坚油杉(K. davidiana)

径阶距对评估南盘江流域天然林物种多样性的影响

Evaluating influences of diameter classes on the species diversity of natural forests in the Nanpan River basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	梁梓澳, 王祥福, 王维枫, 闫珂, 李愿会, 董文婷, 王荣女. 青海省天保工程土壤保持效益评价研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 181-188.
[2]	路文燕, 董灵波, 田园, 汪莎杉, 曲宣怡, 魏巍, 刘兆刚. 基于树种组成的大兴安岭天然林主要树种树高-胸径曲线研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 157-165.
[3]	夏凡, 鲍伟东, 盖立新, 巨龙飞, 黄文华, 蒋健, 哈希博. 北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 219-225.
[4]	李鑫, 翁卫松, 李明诗. 太平洋西北部地区天然林景观动态及破碎化驱动力分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 174-182.
[5]	王树梅, 王波, 范少辉, 肖箫, 夏雯, 官凤英. 带状采伐对毛竹林土壤细菌群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 60-68.
[6]	吴思思, 鲁小珍, 王馨悦, 葛之葳. 两种类型人为干扰对城市风景林植物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 128-134.
[7]	侯金,杨建,李玉杰,黄金燕,刘巅,张晋东. 基于红外相机调查的卧龙自然保护区兽类资源时空分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 187-192.
[8]	白欢欢,王雪峰,徐建国. 天然黄山松群落主要树种营养生态位特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 81-88.
[9]	朱光玉,胡松,符利勇. 基于哑变量的湖南栎类天然林林分断面积生长模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 155-162.
[10]	李程,罗鹏,李志清. 红松天然林胸径生长的空间异质性及其与地形的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 129-135.
[11]	成泽虎,丁坤元,刘艳红. 北京油松天然林和人工林乔木层生产力与气候因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(05): 177-183.
[12]	李春干,夏阳丽. 红树林景观空间结构分析方法[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(02): 100-106.
[13]	高祥伟,张志国,费鲜芸. 城市公园绿地空间分布均匀度网格评价模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(06): 96-100.
[14]	马利强,玉宝,王立明,张秋良. 兴安落叶松天然林单木高生长模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 169-172.
[15]	刘建泉,郝虎,王学福. 青海云杉林种、属、科丰富度的垂直分布格局[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 34(04): 97-101.