基于4-Scale模型的人工林郁闭度遥感估测

何萍; 于颖; 范文义; 杨曦光

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108045

何萍, 于颖, 范文义, 杨曦光

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1) : 23-30.

PDF(26232 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(26232 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1) : 23-30. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108045

专题报道Ⅰ:智慧林业之森林参数遥感估测

基于4-Scale模型的人工林郁闭度遥感估测

作者信息 +

Remote sensing estimation of plantation canopy closure based on 4-Scale model

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】 为了寻找受区域影响较小、精度较高且鲁棒性较好的郁闭度遥感估算模型,采用4-Scale几何光学模型估算人工林树冠孔隙率及郁闭度。【方法】 选择内蒙古旺业甸林场和广西高峰林场为实验区,首先对4-Scale模型进行参数敏感性分析,模拟林分在不同敏感性参数下的树冠孔隙率P_{vg_c}(树冠为刚体时的冠间孔隙率)和P_vg(考虑树冠内部孔隙的孔隙率),建立P_{vg_c}、P_vg与敏感性参数的一一对应关系数据库。其次,根据数据库建立P_{vg_c}和P_vg与敏感性参数的统计关系模型。然后根据获得的敏感性参数估算P_{vg_c}和P_vg,进而估算林分郁闭度。最后,分别采用样线法与鱼眼相机测定法测量的郁闭度检验基于P_{vg_c}和P_vg估算的林分郁闭度。【结果】 基于 P_{vg_c}和P_vg估算的人工林郁闭度精度分别为88.17%和92.8%。P_{vg_c}与敏感性参数林木株数和冠半径相关性更高,模型的R²和均方根误差(RMSE)分别为0.814和0.043。P_vg与敏感性参数LAI的相关性更高,模型的R²和RMSE分别为0.795和0.040。【结论】 P_{vg_c}和P_vg均可以用来估算人工林郁闭度,虽然P_vg估算郁闭度的精度更高,但是其估算的郁闭度不是林业上定义的郁闭度,林业上定义的郁闭度指树冠为刚体时冠层垂直投影面积比。因此,采用P_{vg_c}估算人工林郁闭度更加准确。应在获得树木株数与树冠半径的基础上,采用P_{vg_c}估算人工林郁闭度。

Abstract

【Objective】 Canopy closure is important for forest management planning. To find methods and models for estimating canopy closure that are less affected by the region, with higher accuracy and better robustness, the study adopted a 4-Scale geometric-optical model to estimate the canopy closure of plantations. 【Method】 Wangyedian Forest Farm in Inner Mongolia and Gaofeng Forest Farm in Guangxi Autonomons Region were selected as the study areas. First, a parameter sensitivity analysis of the 4-Scale model was performed, and the canopy gap fraction P_{vg_c} (the gap fraction when the canopy was a rigid body) and P_vg (the gap fraction of the gaps in a crown were considered) under different sensitivity parameters were simulated. Then, a one-to-one correspondence database of P_{vg_c}, P_vg and the sensitivity parameters was established. Second, statistical relationship models between P_{vg_c} and P_vg and the sensitivity parameters were established based on the database. Then, P_{vg_c} and P_vg were estimated based on the sensitivity parameters, and the stand canopy closure was estimated. Finally, the canopy closure measured by the transects and the fish eye camera measurement method were used to test the canopy closure based on P_{vg_c} and P_vg respectively. 【Result】 The accuracy of plantation canopy closure estimated by P_{vg_c} and P_vg was 88.17% and 92.8%, respectively. P_{vg_c} had a higher correlation with the number of trees and crown radius. The R² and RMSE values of the model are 0.814 and 0.043, respectively. The correlation between P_vg and LAI was high, and the R² and RMSE of the model were 0.795 and 0.040, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Both P_{vg_c} and P_vg can be used to estimate canopy closure in plantations. Although P_vg has higher accuracy in estimating canopy closure, the estimated canopy closure is not the canopy closure defined in forestry. Canopy closure is defined as the ratio of the vertical projection area of the canopy when it is a rigid body. Therefore, the use of P_{vg_c} to estimate the canopy closure of plantations was more accurate. To obtain the number of trees and radius of the crown, P_{vg_c} was used to estimate the canopy closure of the plantation.

导出引用

何萍, 于颖, 范文义, 等. 基于4-Scale模型的人工林郁闭度遥感估测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2023, 47(1): 23-30 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108045

HE Ping, YU Ying, FAN Wenyi, et al. Remote sensing estimation of plantation canopy closure based on 4-Scale model[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2023, 47(1): 23-30 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108045

中图分类号： S771.8

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	濮毅涵, 徐丹丹, 王浩斌. 基于数码相片的林冠郁闭度提取方法研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(6): 153-160. PU Y H, XU D D, WANG H B. An approach on estimating canopy closure via digital images[J]. For Resour Manag, 2020(6): 153-160. DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.06.024. https://doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.06.024 本文引用 [2]

[2]

CHEN

G S

, LOU

T T

, JING

W P

, et al. Sparkpr: an efficient parallel inversion of forest canopy closure[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7:135949-135956. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941966.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941966

本文引用 [2] 摘要

Forest canopy closure is an important parameter to study forest ecosystem and understand the status of forest resources. With the development of remote sensing big data, the amount of remote sensing data has increased sharply, which makes the existing serial processing of remote sensing data face severe challenges.In order to satisfy the requirements of efficient remote sensing data processing, Spark open source framework is applied to the parallel processing of remote sensing images, and a parallel forest canopy density inversion algorithm based on Spark is proposed. We call this algorithm Sparkpr. Based on the GF-1 remote sensing images and 80 actual measured sample points obtained by Maoershan Laoshan Experimental Forest Farm of Northeast Forestry University in 2016. In this paper, a multi-element linear regression algorithm is used to carry out parallel inversion of the forest canopy density in the Laoshan Experimental Forest Farm of the Maoershan. The comparison experiment between single machine mode and spark standalone and spark on yarn mode is carried out. The experimental results show that the serial and parallel inversion results of forest depression density based on the model are consistent, and the parallel inversion results are accurate and credible. With the increase of computing nodes, the efficiency of parallel inversion is also improving.

[3]	FERHAT K, OSMAN T. Onset of canopy closure for black pine, Turkish red pine and Scots pine forests[J]. J For Sci, 2018, 64(5): 224-229. DOI: 10.17221/153/2017-JFS. https://doi.org/10.17221/153/2017-JFS http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/153/2017-JFS.html 本文引用 [1]

[4]

FIALA

A C S

, GARMAN

S L

, GRAY

A N

. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 232(1/2/3): 188-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.069.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.069

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112706003896

本文引用 [1]

[5]

OKIN

G S

, CLARKE

K D

, LEWIS

M M

. Comparison of methods for estimation of absolute vegetation and soil fractional cover using MODIS normalized BRDF-adjusted reflectance data[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 2013, 130: 266-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.021.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.021

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425712004531

本文引用 [1]

[6]	KORHONEN L, KORHONEN K T, RAUTIAINEN M, et al. Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques[J]. Silva Fenn, 2006, 40(4): 577-588. DOI: 10.14214/sf.315. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.315 本文引用 [3]

[7]	PALETTO A, TOSI V. Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques[J]. Eur J Forest Res, 2009, 128(3): 265-272. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-009-0262-x. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0262-x http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10342-009-0262-x 本文引用 [1]

[8]	O’BRIEN R A. Comparison of overstory canopy cover estimates on forest survey plots[J]. Usda for Serv Int Res Pap, 1989, 1989(417): 1-5. 本文引用 [1]

[9]

J R

, MAO

X G

. Comparison of canopy closure estimation of plantations using parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric models based on GF-1 remote sensing images[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(5): 597. DOI: 10.3390/f11050597.

https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050597

https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/11/5/597

本文引用 [1]

[10]

AHMED

O S

, FRANKLIN

S E

, WULDER

M A

, et al. Characterizing stand-level forest canopy cover and height using Landsat time series, samples of airborne LiDAR, and the Random Forest algorithm[J]. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens, 2015, 101: 89-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.007.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.007

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924271614002755

本文引用 [1]

[11]

MARVIN

D C

, ASNER

G P

, SCHNITZER

S A

. Liana canopy cover mapped throughout a tropical forest with high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 2016, 176: 98-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.028.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.028

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425715302492

本文引用 [1]

[12]

GUNLU

, BASKENT

E Z

. Estimating crown closure of forest stands using landsat tm data: a case study from Turkey[J]. Environ Eng Manag J, 2015, 14(1): 183-193. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2015.019.

https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2015.019

http://www.eemj.icpm.tuiasi.ro/pdfs/vol14/no1/19_434_Gunlu_12.pdf

本文引用 [1]

[13]	TONG S Q, ZHANG J Q, HA S, et al. Dynamics of fractional vegetation coverage and its relationship with climate and human activities in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Remote Sens, 2016, 8(9): 776. DOI: 10.3390/rs8090776. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090776 http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/9/776 本文引用 [1]

[14]

XIAO

, TAO

J P

, XIAO

, et al. Monitoring vegetation cover in Chongqing between 2001 and 2010 using remote sensing data[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2017, 189(10): 493. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6210-1.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6210-1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884302

本文引用 [1] 摘要

In this study, we applied asymmetric Gaussian function fitting to reconstruct a high-quality MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series dataset. Following this, we retrieved vegetation cover data from the Chongqing area between 2001 and 2010 using this dataset, applying a dimidiate pixel method. We then used several analytical indices to analyze spatial and temporal changes and trends related to these changes. We determined that a reconstruction of the MODIS NDVI dataset using asymmetric Gaussian fitting in conjunction with a data quality weight coefficient improved data quality and created a foundation for accurate estimations of vegetation cover. We also determined that vegetation cover in the Chongqing area decreased gradually from east to west. During the 10-year study period, vegetation cover in the Chongqing area generally increased, changing from low to high coverage. This increase in vegetation cover was mainly the result of ecological protection policies and improving climate conditions. We also found that changes in vegetation cover were mainly the result of urban construction and afforestation initiatives, but vegetation cover improved overall.

[15]	TANG L, HE M Z, LI X R. Verification of fractional vegetation coverage and NDVI of desert vegetation via UAVRS technology[J]. Remote Sens, 2020, 12(11): 1742. DOI: 10.3390/rs12111742. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111742 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/11/1742 本文引用 [1]

[16]	FENG L L, JIA Z Q, LI Q X, et al. Spatiotemporal change of sparse vegetation coverage in northern China[J]. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 2019, 47(2): 359-366. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-018-0912-x. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-018-0912-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-018-0912-x 本文引用 [1]

[17]

JACQUEMOUD

. Inversion of the PROSPECT+SAIL canopy reflectance model from AVIRIS equivalent spectra: theoretical study[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 1993, 44(2/3): 281-292. DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90022-P.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90022-P

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/003442579390022P

本文引用 [1]

[18]

谷成燕, 杜华强, 周国模, 等. 基于PROSAIL辐射传输模型的毛竹林叶面积指数遥感反演[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(8): 2248-2256.

摘要

采用PROSAIL辐射传输模型建立毛竹林叶面积指数(LAI)冠层反射率查找表，并结合Landsat TM卫星遥感数据，实现了毛竹林LAI的定量反演.结果表明： PROSAIL模型各输入参数的敏感性由高到低依次为LAI>叶绿素含量(Cab)>叶片结构参数(N)>平均叶倾角(ALA)>等效水厚度(Cw)>干物质含量(Cm)，并以LAI、Cab两个主要敏感因子用于构建毛竹林LAI冠层反射率查找表；基于PROSAIL模型的毛竹林LAI遥感反演结果与实测LAI具有很好的一致性，二者相关系数为0.90，均方根误差和相关的均方根误差也较小，分别为0.58和13.0%，但也存在反演LAI平均值高于实际值的问题.

C Y

, DU

H Q

, ZHOU

G M

, et al. Retrieval of leaf area index of Moso bamboo forest with Landsat Thematic Mapper image based on PROSAIL canopy radiative transfer model[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24(8): 2248-2256. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0383.

https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0383

本文引用 [1]

[19]

C Y

, DU

H Q

, MAO

F J

, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of PROSAIL model parameters when simulating Moso bamboo forest canopy reflectance[J]. Int J Remote Sens, 2016, 37(21/22): 5270-5286. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1239287.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1239287

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01431161.2016.1239287

本文引用 [2]

[20]

, STRAHLER

A H

. Geometric-optical bidirectional reflectance modeling of the discrete crown vegetation canopy: effect of crown shape and mutual shadowing[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1992, 30(2): 276-292. DOI: 10.1109/36.134078.

https://doi.org/10.1109/36.134078

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/134078/

本文引用 [1]

[21]

ZENG

, SCHAEPMAN

M E

, WU

B F

, et al. Scaling-based forest structural change detection using an inverted geometric-optical model in the Three Gorges region of China[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 2008, 112(12): 4261-4271. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.007.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.007

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425708002319

本文引用 [1]

[22]	CHEN J M, CIHLAR J. Plant canopy gap-size analysis theory for improving optical measurements of leaf-area index[J]. Appl Opt, 1995, 34(27): 6211-6222. DOI: 10.1364/AO.34.006211. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.006211 https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-34-27-6211 本文引用 [1]

[23]	CHEN J M, LEBLANC S G. A four-scale bidirectional reflectance model based on canopy architecture[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1997, 35(5): 1316-1337. DOI: 10.1109/36.628798. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.628798 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/628798/ 本文引用 [1]

[24]

VERSTRAETE

M M

, PINTY

, MYNENI

R B

. Potential and limitations of information extraction on the terrestrial biosphere from satellite remote sensing[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 1996, 58(2): 201-214. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00069-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00069-7

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425796000697

本文引用 [1]

[25]

CHEN

J M

. Canopy architecture and remote sensing of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by boreal conifer forests[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1996, 34(6):1353-1368. DOI: 10.1109/36.544559.

https://doi.org/10.1109/36.544559

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/544559/

本文引用 [1]

[26]

孙振峰, 张晓丽, 李霓雯. 机载与星载高分遥感影像单木树冠分割方法和适宜性对比[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(11): 66-75.

SUN

Z F

, ZHANG

X L

, LI

N W

. Comparison of individual tree crown extraction method and suitability of airborne and spaceborne high-resolution remote sensing images[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(11): 66-75. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180446.

https://doi.org/10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180446

本文引用 [1]

[27]	PU R L, GONG P, YU Q. Comparative analysis of EO-1 Ali and Hyperion, and Landsat ETM+ Data for mapping forest crown closure and leaf area index[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2008, 8(6): 3744-3766. DOI: 10.3390/s8063744. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8063744 http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/8/6/3744 本文引用 [1]

[28]

R L

, GONG

. Wavelet transform applied to EO-1 hyperspectral data for forest LAI and crown closure mapping[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 2004, 91(2): 212-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.006.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.006

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0034425704000811

本文引用 [1]

[29]

刘婧怡, 汤旭光, 常守志, 等. 森林叶面积指数遥感反演模型构建及区域估算[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2014, 29(1): 18-25.

LIU

J Y

, TANG

X G

, CHANG

S Z

, et al. Application of remote sensing to inverse the forest leaf area index and regional estimation[J]. Remote Sens Technol Appl, 2014, 29(1): 18-25. DOI: 10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2014.1.0018.

https://doi.org/10.11873/j.issn.1004-0323.2014.1.0018

本文引用 [1]

[30]	ZHAO J, LI J, LIU Q H, et al. Estimating fractional vegetation cover from leaf area index and clumping index based on the gap probability theory[J]. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation, 2020, 90: 102-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102112 本文引用 [1]

[31]	XIAO Z Q, WANG T T, LIANG S L, et al. Estimating the fractional vegetation cover from GLASS leaf area index product[J]. Remote Sens, 2016, 8(4): 337. DOI: 10.3390/rs8040337. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040337 http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/4/337 本文引用 [1]