3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用

程文强; 徐阳; 吴开云; 赵献民; 龚榜初

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109034

3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用

程文强, 徐阳, 吴开云, 赵献民, 龚榜初

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 61-72.

PDF(1947 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1947 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 61-72. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109034

专题报道：乡村振兴视域下经济林果培育专题（Ⅱ）（执行主编李维林方升佐）

3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用

程文强 ¹^,² ,
徐阳 ¹ ,
吴开云 ¹ ,
赵献民 ¹ ,
龚榜初 ¹^,^*

作者信息 +

Comparison of three comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the quality of persimmon fruit

CHENG Wenqiang ¹^,² ,
XU Yang ¹ ,
WU Kaiyun ¹ ,
ZHAO Xianmin ¹ ,
GONG Bangchu ¹^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】通过比较不同果实评价方法的评价效果,选择适合柿果实品质综合评价的统计分析方法,为优异柿种质的精准选择和高效利用提供理论依据。【方法】以浙江省85份柿种质资源为评价对象,测定柿果13项品质指标(单果质量、果实横径、纵径、粗蛋白、维生素C、淀粉、钙及β-胡萝卜素含量、含水率、可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、单宁和粗纤维含量),分别采用主成分分析法、熵值法和熵权TOPSIS法进行果实品质综合评价。【结果】不同柿种质果实品质存在较大差异,变异系数范围为3.82%~87.89%,β-胡萝卜素、单宁、淀粉、粗蛋白、维生素C及钙含量、单果质量和粗纤维含量变异比较丰富,纵径、可溶性糖含量、横径、可溶性固形物含量和含水率的变化较小。主成分分析法综合评价时,长兴1、富阳2、奉化1、莲都2等10个种质资源综合得分最高;熵值法进行综合评价时,武义3、永嘉10、武义4、黄岩2等10个种质柿果品质综合表现较好;采用熵权TOPSIS法进行综合评价时,武义3、永嘉10、武义4、淳安14等10个种质柿果品质综合表现较好。其中,熵值法和熵权TOPSIS法结果较一致,而主成分分析法结果差异较大,3种评价方法造成结果差异的原因主要与理论差异、数据标准化方法的不同以及指标权重的赋值方法不同有关。在柿果品质评价中,由于果实性状指标数据量多,关键指标离散程度小,结合不同种质的生产表现,以熵权TOPSIS法的评价结果更符合实际情况。【结论】基于熵权的TOPSIS模型不但提高了指标赋权的合理性,而且评价结果客观准确,计算简便,更适合用于柿种质果实品质综合评价。

Abstract

【Objective】 This research aims to evaluate the quality of persimmon fruits using three comprehensive methods in order to provide a theoretical basis for the precise selection and efficient utilization of high quality persimmon germplasm. 【Method】 We selected 85 persimmon germplasm resources in Zhejiang Province as the object of evaluation, and examined 13 quality indicators (weight per fruits, diameter of horizontal cross section, diameter of vertical cross section, content of the crude protein, vitamin C, starch, calcium and β-carotene, water content, content of the soluble solids, soluble sugar, tannin and crude fiber) of persimmon fruit. We employed the principal component analysis, the entropy evaluation method and the entropy-weighting TOPSIS method to evaluate fruit comprehensive quality. 【Result】 Fruit quality of different persimmon germplasm resources varied significantly with variation coefficients of 3.82%-87.89%. High variations were found in content of the β-carotene, tannin, starch, crude protein, vitamin C, calcium, fruit weight and crude fiber, and low variations were showed in horizontal and vertical cross section diameters, soluble sugar, soluble solids and water content. The principal component analysis revealed that top scoring persimmon germplasm fruits were Changxing 1, Fuyang 2, Fenghua 1 and Liandu 2. The entropy evaluation method ranked the top scoring persimmon fruits as Wuyi 3, Yongjia 10, Wuyi 4 and Huangyan 2. The entropy-weighting TOPSIS method gave top scoring persimmon fruits to Wuyi 3, Yongjia 10, Wuyi 4, and Chun'an 14. The entropy method and the entropy-weighting TOPSIS method showed relatively similar ranking, while the principal component analysis deviated from the other two methods in scoring. These three methods differ in their theoretical bases, in data standardization methods, and in an index weight assignment. The entropy-weighting TOPSIS based scoring overcame the complexity of the large amount of data on fruit trait indicators and the problem of small dispersion degree of key indicators, and matched best with the production performances and overall quality of different germplasm. 【Conclusion】 The entropy-weight based TOPSIS model simplifies and improves comprehensive evaluation of persimmon germplasm fruit quality compared with scoring by the principal component analysis and the entropy evaluation method.

导出引用

程文强, 徐阳, 吴开云, 等. 3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2023, 47(4): 61-72 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109034

CHENG Wenqiang, XU Yang, WU Kaiyun, et al. Comparison of three comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the quality of persimmon fruit[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2023, 47(4): 61-72 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109034

中图分类号： S665.2

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	杨勇, 阮小凤, 王仁梓, 等. 柿种质资源及育种研究进展[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2005, 20(2): 133-137,170. YANG Y, RUAN X F, WANG R Z, et al. Advances in research of germplasm resources and breeding of Dispyros kaki L[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2005, 20(2): 133-137+170. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2005.02.035. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	CHOE J H, KIM H Y, KIM Y J, et al. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of persimmon peel extracted with different levels of ethanol[J]. Int J Food Prop, 2014, 17(8): 1779-1790. DOI:10.1080/10942912.2012.731460. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	JUNG S T, PARK Y S, ZACHWIEJA Z, et al. Some essential phytochemicals and the antioxidant potential in fresh and dried persimmon[J]. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2005, 56(2): 105-113.DOI:10.1080/09637480500081571. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	GONZÁLEZ E, VEGARA S, MARTÍ N, et al. Physicochemical characterization of pure persimmon juice:nutritional quality and food acceptability[J]. J Food Sci, 2015, 80(3): C532-C539. DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.12772. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	郭伟华, 张放. 柿树中3种主要活性成分研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, 36(1):395-399. GUO W H, ZHANG F. Progress of three active components from Diospyros kaki L[J]. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2015, 36(1):395-399. DOI:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.01.075. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	梁志宏, 李小平, 茹慧玲, 等. 超高压处理对柿浆品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(3): 163-168. LIANG Z H, LI X P, RU H L, et al. Effect of ultra-high pressure treatment on the quality of persimmon pulp[J]. Food Sci, 2018, 39(3):163-168.DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201803025. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	王轩. 不同产地红富士苹果品质评价及加工适宜性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013. WANG X. Research on quality evaluation and processing suitability of Fuji apple from different Chinese origins[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	艾呈祥, 秦志华, 陶吉寒, 等. 32个柿主栽品种SSR图谱构建及遗传变异分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(11):2185-2191. AI C X, QIN Z H, TAO J H, et al. SSR fingerprints and genetic variations of the 32 persimmon major cultivars[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2011, 31(11):2185-2191. 本文引用 [1]

[9]

林轿, 王仕玉, 龚洵, 等. 柿种质资源鉴定及柿属植物亲缘关系研究进展[J]. 热带农业科学, 2020, 40(10):83-89.

LIN

, WANG

S Y

, GONG

, et al. Research progress in identification of persimmon germplasm resources and phylogenetic relationship of Diospyros plants[J]. Chin J Trop Agric, 2020, 40(10): 83-89. DOI:10.12008/j.issn.1009-2196.2020.10.014.

本文引用 [1]

[10]

韩振诚, 潘学军, 安华明, 等. 贵州柿地方品种果实品质及发育动态研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(7):97-106.

HAN

Z C

, PAN

X J

, AN

H M

, et al. Fruit quality and development dynamics of local persimmon cultivars in Guizhou[J]. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 45(7):97-106.DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2017.07.013.

本文引用 [1]

[11]

杜洋文, 邓先珍, 程军勇, 等. 日本甜柿不同品种综合评价体系构建与应用[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(9): 53-57.

Y W

, DENG

X Z

, CHENG

J Y

, et al. Establishment and application of a comprehensive evaluation system for different varieties of Japanese sweet persimmon[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 38(9):53-57. DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2016.09.009.

本文引用 [1]

[12]	吕英忠, 李卓, 张拥兵, 等. 不同柿果实品质分析及综合评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(18):180-186. LYU Y Z, LI Z, ZHANG Y B, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation on fruit quality of different persimmon varieties[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2020, 46(18):180-186.DOI:10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.024640. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	王飞跃, 刘子琦, 李渊, 等. 石漠化治理区火龙果果实品质评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(4):867-874. WANG F Y, LIU Z Q, LI Y, et al. Evaluation of pitaya fruit quality in rocky desertification control area[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2020, 33(4):867-874.DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.4.028. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	杨玉宁, 陈松树, 高尔刚, 等. 基于主成分分析的木通属植物果实品质评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9):191-200. YANG Y N, CHEN S S, GAO E G, et al. Fruit quality evaluation of Akebia Decne based on principal component analysis[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2021, 47(9):191-200.DOI:10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025657. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	马宁, 刘艳霞, 李想, 等. 基于熵权法综合评价植物根际促生菌对烟草的促生作用[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2020, 43(5):887-895. MA N, LIU Y X, LI X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of growth promotion effect of PGPR strains on tobacco based on entropy weight method[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2020, 43(5):887-895.DOI:10.7685/jnau.201910046. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	李玲, 徐舒, 曹如霞, 等. 基于PCA-Entropy TOPSIS的甘薯品种块根质构品质评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(11):2161-2170. LI L, XU S, CAO R X, et al. Evaluation of texture quality of sweetpotato storage roots based on PCA-entropy TOPSIS[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53(11):2161-2170.DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.003. 本文引用 [1]

[17]

杜娅丹, 曹红霞, 柳美玉, 等. 基于层次分析法和熵权法的TOPSIS模型在番茄生长综合评价中的应用[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, 24(6):90-96.

Y D

, CAO

H X

, LIU

M Y

, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of tomato growing with application of TOPSIS model based on AHP and entropy method[J]. Acta Agric Boreali Occidentalis Sin, 2015, 24(6):90-96.DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2015.06.014.

本文引用 [1]

[18]

刘忠玲, 李小艳, 王自力, 等. 基于组合赋权的甘薯品种抗病性的TOPSIS综合评价[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2018, 64(1):40-43.

LIU

Z L

, LI

X Y

, WANG

Z L

, et al. TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation of disease resistance of sweet potato varieties based on combination weighting[J]. Shaanxi J Agric Sci, 2018, 64(1):40-43.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2018.01.013.

本文引用 [1]

[19]

叶霜, 李承荧, 邱霞, 等. 基于组合赋权的TOPSIS模型在果实品质评价中的应用[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(10):111-121.

, LI

C Y

, QIU

, et al. Application of combination weighting based TOPSIS model in fruit quality evaluation[J]. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 45(10):111-121.DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2017.10.014.

本文引用 [1]

[20]	高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. GAO J F. Experimental guidance for plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	于国萍. 食品生物化学实验[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012. YU G P. Food biochemistry experiments[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2012. 本文引用 [1]

[22]

赵献民, 龚榜初, 吴开云, 等. 浙江省农家柿品种果实营养成分的变异分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(1):125-133.

ZHAO

X M

, GONG

B C

, WU

K Y

, et al. Variation analysis of fruit nutrients of native persimmon in Zhejiang Province[J]. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 43(1):125-133.DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2015.01.010.

本文引用 [2]

[23]	荆瑞勇, 卫佳琪, 王丽艳, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同水稻品种品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24):179-184. JING R Y, WEI J Q, WANG L Y, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of different rice varieties based on principal component analysis[J]. Food Sci, 2020, 41(24):179-184.DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20191218-198. 本文引用 [1]

[24]

杨士航, 李光林, 马驰, 等. 基于因子分析联合熵值法的重庆市璧山区设施葡萄经济效益分析与评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(2):477-484.

YANG

S H

, LI

G L

, MA

, et al. Economic benefit analysis and evaluation of facility grape in Bishan District of Chongqing based on factor analysis and entropy method[J]. J South Agric, 2020, 51(2):477-484.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2020.02.030.

本文引用 [1]

[25]

陈佳敏, 汪涛, 郭巧生, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS法对不同产地野菊花醇提物抗氧化性抗炎活性的比较[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2021, 46(4):907-914.

CHEN

J M

, WANG

, GUO

Q S

, et al. Comprehensive antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of alcohol extracts from Chrysanthemum indicum in different areas based on entropy weight and TOPSIS methodology[J]. China J Chin Mater Med, 2021, 46(4):907-914.DOI:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20201122.102.

本文引用 [1]

[26]

郭松, 李在留, 薛建辉. 掌叶木种子及其籽油性状综合评价模型构建和优选[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(6):314-322.

GUO

, LI

Z L

, XUE

J H

. Establishment and optimization of comprehensive evaluation model for seed and seed oil traits of Handeliodendron bodinieri[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2019, 35(6):314-322.DOI:10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.06.038.

本文引用 [1]

[27]

张曦, 戴二玲, 黄嘉南. 建设项目社会稳定风险因素权重确定方法优选:基于肯德尔协同系数的运用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 34(4):124-130.

ZHANG

, DAI

E L

, HUANG

J N

. Optimization of method for determining weight of social stability risk factors in construction projects:based on application of Kendal synergy coefficient[J]. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut (Soc Sci Ed), 2021, 34(4):124-130.DOI:10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2020.0169.

本文引用 [1]

[28]

虞娜, 吴昌娟, 张玉玲, 等. 基于熵权的TOPSIS模型在保护地番茄水肥评价中的应用[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2012, 43(4):456-460.

, WU

C J

, ZHANG

Y L

, et al. Application of TOPSIS model method based on entropy weight to evaluate coupling effect of irrigation and fertilization of greenhouse tomato[J]. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2012, 43(4):456-460.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2012.04.012.

本文引用 [1]

[29]	付冬莹, 李贻学. 基于3种统计分析方法的山东省综合竞争力研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2016, 26(S2):369-372. FU D Y, LI Y X. Comprehensive competitiveness of Shandong Province based on three statistical methods[J]. China Popul Resour Environ, 2016, 26(S2):369-372. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	刘磊, 李争艳, 雷华, 等. 30个猕猴桃品种(单株)主要果实品质特征的综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(4):530-537. LIU L, LI Z Y, LEI H, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of main fruit quality characteristics with 30 kiwifruit cultivars(strains)[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2021, 38(4):530-537.DOI:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20200227. 本文引用 [1]

[31]

韩晓, 刘凤之, 王孝娣, 等. 3种综合评价法在葡萄砧穗组合环境适应性中的应用[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(10):1349-1356.

HAN

, LIU

F Z

, WANG

X D

, et al. Comparison of three comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the grape rootstock-scion combination environmental adaptability[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2017, 34(10):1349-1356.DOI:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20170086.

本文引用 [1]

[32]

李若帆, 马娟娟, 孙西欢, 等. 不同水肥管理模式下糯玉米水氮利用及熵权TOPSIS综合评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(4):111-120.

R F

, MA

J J

, SUN

X H

, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of water and nitrogen utilization of waxy corn based on entropy weight TOPSIS model under different water and fertilizer treatments[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2020, 38(4):111-120.DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2020.04.14.

本文引用 [1]

[33]	敖礼林, 陈兆虎, 饶卫华, 等. 特色方柿丰产优质栽培技术[J]. 科学种养, 2020(4):57-59. AO L L, CHEN Z H, RAO W H, et al. Cultivation techniques for high yield and high quality of characteristic persimmon[J]. 2020(4):57-59.DOI:10.13270/j.cnki.kxzh.2020.04.022. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	张载年. 石城牛心柿早期丰产栽培技术[J]. 中国果树, 2003(4):45-46. ZHANG Z N. Early high-yield cultivation techniques of Shicheng Niuxin persimmon[J]. China Fruits, 2003(4):45-46. DOI:10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2003.04.023. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	金光, 廖汝玉, 沈清标, 等. 优质早熟红柿品种‘早红’的选育[J]. 中国南方果树, 2010, 39(6):13-15. JIN G, LIAO R Y, SHEN Q B, et al. Breeding of a new high-quality and early-maturing astringent persimmon cultivar ‘Zaohong’[J]. South China Fruits, 2010, 39(6):13-15.DOI:10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.2010.06.029. 本文引用 [1]