
基于树种组成的大兴安岭天然林主要树种树高-胸径曲线研究
路文燕, 董灵波, 田园, 汪莎杉, 曲宣怡, 魏巍, 刘兆刚
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 157-165.
基于树种组成的大兴安岭天然林主要树种树高-胸径曲线研究
Modelling height-diameter curves of main species for natural forests based on species composition in Greater Khingan Mountains, northeast China
【目的】分析混交林中不同树种组成情况对单木树高-胸径关系的影响,构建大兴安岭地区兴安落叶松和白桦的树高曲线模型,为森林质量精准提升提供理论依据。【方法】以大兴安岭中部地区112块兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii)-白桦(Betula platypiylla)混交林的样地调查数据为基础,采用多元逐步回归建立包含单木、林分和树种组成信息的兴安落叶松和白桦树高-胸径预测基础模型,并采用层次分割方法量化不同变量对单木树高-胸径关系的影响程度。最后,采用混合模型方法解决样地调查数据中存在的嵌套效应和异方差问题。【结果】大兴安岭地区兴安落叶松-白桦混交林中主要树种(兴安落叶松和白桦)单木树高-胸径关系除受自身胸径大小影响,还受林分特征(优势木树高、林分平均胸径和林分平均树高)和树种组成(兴安落叶松、白桦蓄积比例)信息的共同影响,其对各树种树高-胸径变异的解释能力依次为单木胸径(82%)>林分因子(16%)>树种组成(2%);各树种树高-胸径混合模型均以包含3个随机参数、方差协方差结构pdSymm和异方差校正函数varPower的组合最优,兴安落叶松和白桦单木树高-胸径混合模型的调整决定系数(Radj2)分别较基础模型提升约2.50%和3.44%,达到了0.789 5和0.744 7。【结论】在具体的森林经营实践中,可通过采伐或补植的方式来调整林分的树种组成情况以达到促进林木树高生长的作用。
【Objective】An in-depth understanding of how species composition influences the relationship between individual tree height (HT) and diameter at breast height (DBH) in mixed forests is important for effective implementation of forest quality improvements. 【Method】 The functions relating the HT and DBH of individual larch (Larix gmelinii) and birch (Betula platyphylla) were estimated using multiple stepwise regression with tree, stand, and species information extracted from 112 larch-birch mixed forests in the central part of Greater Khingan Mountains. The effects of the different variables on the relationship between HT and DBH were quantified using hierarchical partitioning. Finally, mixed-effects modelling techniques were employed to characterize nesting effects and solve heteroscedasticity problems within the sample survey data. 【Result】 The correlations between HT and DBH of the main tree species in Greater Khingan Mountains were affected simultaneously by the DBHs of the individual trees, stand characteristics (i.e., HT of dominant tree, as well as mean DBH and HT of the stand), and species composition (i.e., the volume percentage of larch and birch). The individual contributions on the HT-DBH relations from the various variables were as follows: DBH of individual tree (82%) > stand characteristics (16%) > species composition (2%). Furthermore, the mixed-effect models of HT-DBH were each optimally combined with three random parameters, as well as variance covariances with pdSymm structure and heteroscedasticity correction with varPower functions, in which the values of Radj both increased by about 2.50% and 3.44% (0.789 5 of larch and 0.744 7 of birch) when compared with that of the basic model. 【Conclusion】 From the perspective of forest management practices, individual tree HT growth can be promoted by adjusting the species composition of forests through suitable cutting or replanting.
树种组成 / 兴安落叶松 / 白桦 / 树高曲线 / 天然林 / 混合模型
tree species composition / larch(Larix gmelinii) / birch(Betula platyphylla) / tree height curve / natural forest / mixed model
[1] |
|
[2] |
曾翀, 雷相东, 刘宪钊, 等. 落叶松云冷杉林单木树高曲线的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(2):182-189.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
王怡, 汤景明, 孙拥康. 青冈栎人工林树高曲线模型研究[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(1):1-5.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
陈浩, 罗扬. 马尾松树高-胸径非线性混合效应模型构建[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2021, 41(4):439-448.
|
[7] |
代忠迪, 姜立春. 大兴安岭不同生态区域兴安落叶松树高曲线的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(4):583-589.
|
[8] |
臧颢, 雷相东, 张会儒, 等. 红松树高-胸径的非线性混合效应模型研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(6):8-16.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
车盈, 金光泽. 物种多样性和系统发育多样性对阔叶红松林生产力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7):2241-2248.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
吴旭平, 吕勇, 张雄清, 等. 基于立地因子的杉木人工林断面积生长混合效应模型研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(2):75-82.
|
[16] |
董利虎, 李凤日, 贾炜玮. 基于线性混合效应的红松人工林枝条生物量模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(12):3391-3398.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
赵喆, 刘延文, 纪福利, 等. 华北落叶松-白桦凋落物混合分解研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(12):74-78,84.
|
[19] |
刘月, 王君, 杨雨春, 等. 不同林分密度胡桃楸胸径、树高、材积与冠幅关系[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(3):28-35.
|
[20] |
李菁, 骆有庆, 石娟. 基于生物多样性保护的兴安落叶松与白桦最佳混交比例——以阿尔山林区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16): 4943-4949.
|
[21] |
夏成财, 刘忠玲, 王庆成, 等. 16年生落叶松白桦纯林与混交林林分生长量及生物量对比[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012, 40(10):1-3.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
娄明华, 张会儒, 雷相东, 等. 基于空间自相关的天然蒙古栎阔叶混交林林木胸径-树高模型[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(6):67-76.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |