
相对视角下森林碳汇项目农村经济福利效应
Rural economic welfare effects of forest carbon sink projects from a relative perspective
【目的】绝对收入难以全面反映农村居民的经济福利,结合相对收入分析森林碳汇项目农村居民经济福利效应,并提出相应政策建议,以促进森林碳汇项目可持续健康运营。【方法】基于2007—2018年县域统计数据,以四川省为例,采用倾向得分匹配方法,实证测算森林碳汇项目试点县农村居民经济福利效应。【结果】在全样本分析中,相较于非试点县,森林碳汇项目试点县农村居民绝对收入水平普遍更低,乡乡比较表现出明显的福利损失;在异质性分析中,贫困县与民族县实施森林碳汇项目的农村居民经济福利效应为正。【结论】相对视角下实施森林碳汇项目导致农村主观经济福利受损,突出表现为乡乡比较。在贫困地区和民族地区实施森林碳汇项目能够降低城乡收入差距并提高纵向比较时的主观经济福利,从而产生积极的经济福利效应。
【Objective】 Absolute income does not fully reflect rural residents’ economic welfare. To address this, the present study analyzes the economic welfare effects of forest carbon sequestration projects on rural residents based on relative income. Using this information, we propose corresponding policy recommendations to promote the sustainable and healthy operation of forest carbon sequestration projects. 【Method】 Based on county statistics from 2007 to 2018 in the Sichuan Province, propensity score matching was used to empirically measure the economic welfare effects on rural residents within the pilot counties of the forest carbon sequestration project. 【Result】 In the full sample analysis, the absolute income level of rural residents in the pilot counties was generally lower compared with those in non-pilot counties, and the comparison between townships indicated obvious welfare losses; in the heterogeneity analysis, it appears that in ethnic minorities counties and poor counties implementation of forest carbon sequestration projects by rural residents produces a positive economic welfare effect. 【Conclusion】 On average, implementing forest carbon sequestration projects from the perspective of relative income led to a loss of subjective economic welfare in rural areas, as indicated by comparisons between townships. Taken together, the results suggest that implementing forest carbon sequestration projects in impoverished and ethnic minority areas can reduce the urban-rural income gap and improve economic welfare during vertical comparisons, thereby producing positive subjective economic welfare effects.
forest carbon sink / rural economy / comparative perspective
[1] |
漆雁斌, 张艳, 贾阳. 我国试点森林碳汇交易运行机制研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2014, 35(4):73-79.
|
[2] |
李怒云, 杨炎朝, 何宇. 气候变化与碳汇林业概述[J]. 开发研究, 2009(3):95-97.
|
[3] |
周健, 肖荣波, 庄长伟, 等. 城市森林碳汇及其抵消能源碳排放效果:以广州为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18):5865-5873.
|
[4] |
朱臻, 黄晨鸣, 徐志刚, 等. 南方集体林区林农风险偏好对于碳汇供给意愿的影响分析:浙江省风险偏好实验案例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(3):565-575.
|
[5] |
陈瑶, 张晓梅. 林农参与林业碳汇意愿影响因素分析:基于黑龙江省集体林调研数据[J]. 林业经济, 2018, 40(8):98-103.
|
[6] |
明辉, 漆雁斌, 李阳明, 等. 林农有参与林业碳汇项目的意愿吗:以CDM林业碳汇试点项目为例[J]. 农业技术经济, 2015(7):102-113.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
陈冲影. 森林碳汇与农户生计:以全球第一个森林碳汇项目为例[J]. 世界林业研究, 2010, 23(5):15-19.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
曾维忠, 刘胜, 杨帆, 等. 扶贫视域下的森林碳汇研究综述[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017, 38(2):102-109,3.
|
[11] |
宁可, 沈月琴, 朱臻. 农户对森林碳汇认知及碳汇林经营意愿分析:基于浙江、江西、福建3省农户调查[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 13(2):63-69.
|
[12] |
杨帆, 曾维忠, 张维康, 等. 林农森林碳汇项目持续参与意愿及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7):138-147.
|
[13] |
龚荣发, 曾维忠. 政府推动背景下森林碳汇项目农户参与的制约因素研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(5):1073-1083.
|
[14] |
黄宰胜, 陈治淇, 陈钦. 林农碳汇林经营受偿意愿影响因素分析:基于计划行为理论[J]. 林业经济, 2017, 39(3):46-52,91.
|
[15] |
任国强, 尚金艳. 基于相对剥夺理论的基尼系数子群分解方法研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011, 28(8):103-114.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
陈睿. 西南地区农业生态和经济系统协调发展分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(7):54-57.
|
[19] |
胡原, 曾维忠. 碳汇造林项目促进了当地经济发展吗?:基于四川县域面板数据的PSM-DID实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(2):89-98.
|
[20] |
陈丹. 黑龙江省林业碳汇市场建设研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2014.
|
[21] |
李国平, 石涵予. 退耕还林生态补偿标准、农户行为选择及损益[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(5):152-161.
|
[22] |
龚荣发, 程荣竺, 曾梦双, 等. 基于农户感知的森林碳汇扶贫效应分析[J]. 南方经济, 2019(9):84-96.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
李欣, 曹建华, 李风琦. 生态补偿参与对农户收入水平的影响:以武陵山区为例[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(6):51-57.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |