南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202112035

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 173-181.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202112035

南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征

徐子涵¹(), 王磊², 崔明¹^,^*(), 刘玉国¹, 赵紫晴¹, 李嘉豪¹

1.中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所,北京 100091
2.广东省五华县林业局,广东梅州 514400

收稿日期:2021-12-23 修回日期:2022-01-24 出版日期:2023-05-30 发布日期:2023-05-25
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2021MA013);南水北调水源地丹江口库区岩溶石漠化治理效益监测(2017-07)

Soil stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in water source area of South-to-North Water Diversion Project

XU Zihan¹(), WANG Lei², CUI Ming¹^,^*(), LIU Yuguo¹, ZHAO Ziqing¹, LI Jiahao¹

1. Institute of Desertification Studies, China Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2. Wuhua Forestry Bureau of Guangdong Province, Meizhou 514400, China

Received:2021-12-23 Revised:2022-01-24 Online:2023-05-30 Published:2023-05-25

1. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征——补充材料.zip(2256KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究南水北调中线工程水源区内岩溶地貌背景下,不同植被恢复模式土壤养分与化学计量特征,评价南方岩溶连片分布区北缘林地生境土壤养分供给状况,以期为南水北调中线工程水源涵养区林分经营管理、退化生态系统恢复重建和石漠化治理提供理论依据。【方法】以河南淅川县岩溶区栓皮栎天然次生林、侧柏人工林和杉木人工林下土壤为研究对象,通过室内实验对土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)、全钾(TK)、碱解氮(AN)、速效磷(AP)和速效钾(AK)含量进行测定,并计算土壤各元素的化学计量比,分析不同恢复模式林地生境土壤养分变异状况。【结果】岩溶区不同植被恢复模式下土壤SOC、TN、TP含量分别为10.23~28.99、0.89~2.42、0.43~0.77 g/kg;土壤碳氮质量比(C∶N)、碳磷质量比(C∶P)、氮磷质量比(N∶P)均值分别为10.41~11.89、13.69~80.00、0.18~6.61。土壤养分含量与化学计量比受植被类型与土层深度的影响,表现为表层土壤(0~10 cm)高于下层土壤(>10~20 cm、>20~30 cm)。除TP含量外,两种植被恢复模式土壤养分含量表现为天然次生林高于人工林。相关分析表明,不同植被恢复模式下土壤SOC、TN、TP含量间存在显著相关关系,说明三者空间分布有较一致的变化规律。【结论】在南水北调水源区,自然恢复的栓皮栎次生林是较为理想的植被恢复模式,而3种林分在生长过程中均受到氮或磷元素的限制。在日后的林分经营管理中,针对天然林可适度施用磷肥补给,对人工林添加氮肥,并通过抚育间伐等措施,提高植被对养分的吸收效率,从而促进植被土壤间的协调发展。

关键词: 南水北调水源区, 植被恢复, 土壤养分, 化学计量特征

Abstract:

【Objective】The purpose of this study was to investigate the soil nutrient and stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in the context of Karst landscapes within the water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project and to evaluate the soil nutrient supply status of woodland habitats at the northern edge of the contiguous southern Karst distribution area, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for the forest management, restoration and reconstruction of degraded ecosystems, and rock desertification management in the water-supporting area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. 【Method】The soil under Quercus variabilis natural secondary forest, Platycladus orientalis plantation, and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in the Karst area of Xichuan County of Henan Province was investigated in this study. Soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and available potassium (AK) contents were determined through laboratory experiments, and the stoichiometric ratios of each element were calculated to analyze the soil nutrient balance in forest habitats with different restoration modes. 【Result】The contents of SOC, TN and TP in different vegetation restoration modes in Karst area ranged from 10.23 to 28.99 g/kg, 0.89 to 2.42 g/kg and 0.43 to 0.77 g/kg, respectively; the mean values of soil stoichiometric ratios as C∶N, C∶P and N∶P were 10.41 to 11.89, 13.69 to 80.00 and 0.18 to 6.61, respectively. The soil nutrient contents and stoichiometric ratios were influenced by vegetation types and soil depth, and were higher in the surface soil (0-10 cm) than in the subsoil (>10-30 cm). Except for TP content, the soil nutrient content of the natural secondary forests was higher than that of the artificial forests. The correlation analysis showed that there were significant correlations among SOC, TN and TP contents under different vegetation restoration modes, indicating that the spatial distribution of the three had a more consistent variation pattern. 【Conclusion】In the water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, the naturally restored Q. variabilis secondary forest is an ideal vegetation restoration model, and all three stands were limited by nitrogen or phosphorus during the growth process. In the future stand management, nitrogen supplementation should be moderately strengthened for natural forests, phosphorus fertilizers should be applied to plantation forests, and the nutrient uptake efficiency of vegetation should be improved through measures such as inter-cultivation to promote coordinated development among vegetation soils.

Key words: water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, vegetation restoration, soil nutrient, stoichiometric characteristics

中图分类号:

S714.8

徐子涵,王磊,崔明,等. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 173-181.

XU Zihan, WANG Lei, CUI Ming, LIU Yuguo, ZHAO Ziqing, LI Jiahao. Soil stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in water source area of South-to-North Water Diversion Project[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(3): 173-181.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202112035.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

表3

参考文献 38

[1]	YU Y H, CHI Y K. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil at different depths in a Karst Plateau Mountain Area of China[J]. Pol J Environ Stud, 2019, 29(1): 969-978. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/102781.
[2]	贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1):2-6.
	HE J S, HAN X G. Ecological stoichiometry: searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems[J]. Chin J Plant Eco, 2010, 34(1):2-6. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.002.
[3]	刘立斌, 钟巧连, 倪健. 贵州高原型喀斯特次生林 C、N、P 生态化学计量特征与储量[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(22): 8606-8614.
	LIU L B, ZHONG Q L, NI J. Ecosystem C∶N∶P stoichiometry and storages of a secondary plateau-surface Karst forest in Guizhou Province, southwestern China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(22): 8606-8614. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201805311207.
[4]	章广琦, 张萍, 陈云明, 等. 黄土丘陵区刺槐与油松人工林生态系统生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(4): 1328-1336.
	ZHANG G Q, ZHANG P, CHEN Y M, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabuliformis plantation ecosystems in the Loess hilly-gully region, China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(4): 1328-1336. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201701030010.
[5]	吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 等. 喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 80-92.
	WU P, CUI Y C, ZHAO W J, et al. Characteristics of soil stoichiometric in natural restoration process of Maolan Karst forest vegetation, southwestern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(3): 80-92. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180136.
[6]	王芳芳, 余凤荣, 童晨, 等. 河南省新安县郁山林区土壤速效养分分析[J]. 生态科学, 2021, 40(2): 67-73.
	WANG F F, YU F R, TONG C, et al. Analysis of soil available nutrients in Yushan forest area of Xin’an County, Henan Province[J]. Ecol Sci, 2021, 40(2): 67-73. DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2021.02.009.
[7]	王璐, 喻阳华, 邢容容, 等. 喀斯特高原山地区主要人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(8): 1388-1394.
	WANG L, YU Y H, XING R R, et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soils from main plantations in Karst Plateau mountainous area[J]. J South Agric, 2017, 48(8): 1388-1394. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2017.08.09.
[8]	王磊, 崔明, 周梦玲, 等. 河南省淅川县岩溶区不同恢复年限天然次生林植物群落特征[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(4): 720-728.
	WANG L, CUI M, ZHOU M L, et al. Plant community characteristics of natural secondary forest with different restoration years in Karst area of Xichuan County, Henan Province[J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2020, 37(4): 720-728. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190498.
[9]	刘哲. 南水北调中线水源区淅川县石质荒漠化特征及防治技术研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2018.
	LIU Z. Study on the characteristics and prevention and cure techniques of stony desertification in Xichuan County of the middle line of water diversion from the south to the north[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2018.
[10]	顾汪明, 周金星, 武建宏, 等. 南水北调中线渠首淅川县石漠化治理现状与人工造林技术[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(3): 44-48.
	GU W M, ZHOU J X, WU J H, et al. Artificial afforestation technology for rocky desertification control in Xichuan County of south to north water diversion project[J]. For Resour Manag, 2018(3): 44-48. DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.03.009.
[11]	勇毫, 郭占胜, 杨朝兴, 等. 丹江口库区石漠化现状及治理措施研究:以河南省淅川县为例[J]. 河北农业科学, 2012, 16(2): 75-77.
	YONG H, GUO Z S, YANG C X, et al. Study on status and control measures of rocky desertification in Danjiangkou Reservoir area: a case of Xichuan County,He’nan Province[J]. J Hebei Agric Sci, 2012, 16(2): 75-77. DOI: 10.16318/j.cnki.hbnykx2012.02.001.
[12]	张君, 蔡德宝, 杨树琼, 等. 丹江口库区不同坡度对土壤肥力特征的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2): 32-38.
	ZHANG J, CAI D B, YANG S Q, et al. Soil fertility characteristics of different slopes in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area[J]. Soils Fertil Sci China, 2021(2): 32-38. DOI: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.20014.
[13]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[14]	CAO Y B, WANG B T, WEI T T, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics and element reserves of three stands in a closed forest on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2016, 188(2): 80. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-5057-6.
[15]	BATJES N H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world[J]. Eur J of Soil Sci, 1996, 47(2):151-163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x.
[16]	BAI Y F, CHEN S Y, SHI S R, et al. Effects of different management approaches on the stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N, and P in a mature Chinese fir plantation[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 723: 137868. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137868.
[17]	庞圣江, 张培, 贾宏炎, 等. 桂西北不同森林类型土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(1): 17-23.
	PANG S J, ZHANG P, JIA H Y, et al. Research on soil ecological stoichiometry under different forest types in northwest Guangxi[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2015, 31(1): 17-23.
[18]	庞圣江, 杨保国, 刘士玲, 等. 桂西北喀斯特山区4种森林表土土壤有机碳含量及其养分分布特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 60-64+71.
	PANG S J, YANG B G, LIU S L, et al. The distribution of organic carbon and soil nutrients under four forest types in Karst mountain areas of northwest Guangxi, China[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2018, 38(4): 60-64,71. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.04.011.
[19]	TIAN H Q, CHEN G S, ZHANG C, et al. Pattern and variation of C∶N∶P ratios in China’s soils: a synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98(1): 139-151. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-009-9382-0.
[20]	杨慧, 朱同彬, 王修华, 等. 云南断陷盆地高原面典型小流域土壤元素含量特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(5): 859-865.
	YANG H, ZHU T B, WANG X H, et al. Soil element contents of typical small watershed in the plateau area of Karst fault basin, Yunnan[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2018, 27(5): 859-865. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.05.009.
[21]	YU Y F, HE T G, SONG T Q, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of vegetation successional stages in Karst area of northwest Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018, 49(3): 440-447. DOI: CNKI:SUN:GXNY.0.2018-03-005.
[22]	康冰, 刘世荣, 蔡道雄, 等. 南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(10): 2479-2486.
	KANG B, LIU S R, CAI D X, et al. Soil physical and chemical characteristics under different vegetation restoration patterns in China south subtropical area[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21(10): 2479-2486. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0386.
[23]	王霖娇, 汪攀, 盛茂银, 等. 西南喀斯特典型石漠化生态系统土壤养分生态化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6580-6593.
	WANG L J, WANG P, SHENG M Y, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of soil nutrient elements and its influencing factors in typical Karst rocky desertification ecosystems, southwest China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(18): 6580-6593.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201803290635.
[24]	彭晓, 方晰, 喻林华, 等. 中亚热带4种森林土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(11): 65-72.
	PENG X, FANG X, YU L H, et al. Change characteristic of soil C, N, P stoichiometric ratios in mid-subtropical forests restoration[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2016, 36(11): 65-72. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.11.012.
[25]	胡小燕, 段爱国, 张建国, 等. 广西大青山杉木人工林碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4): 1207-1218.
	HU X Y, DUAN A G, ZHANG J G, et al. Stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of Chinese fir plantations in Daqing Mountain, Guangxi[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(4): 1207-1218. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201812192754.
[26]	张忠华, 胡刚, 祝介东, 等. 喀斯特森林土壤养分的空间异质性及其对树种分布的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 1038-1049.
	ZHANG Z H, HU G, ZHU J D, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and its impact on tree species distribution in a Karst forest of Southwest China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(10): 1038-1049. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01038.
[27]	曾昭霞, 王克林, 刘孝利, 等. 桂西北喀斯特区原生林与次生林鲜叶和凋落叶化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(7): 1907-1914.
	ZENG Z X, WANG K L, LIU X L, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of live fresh leaves and leaf litter from typical plant communities in a Karst region of northwestern Guangxi, China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(7): 1907-1914. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201409211866.
[28]	TURRIÓN M B, LÓPEZ O, LAFUENTE F, et al. Soil phosphorus forms as quality indicators of soils under different vegetation covers[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2007, 378(1/2):195-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.037.
[29]	杨慧, 涂春艳, 李青芳, 等. 岩溶区次生林地不同地貌部位土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(5): 777-781.
	YANG H, TU C Y, LI Q F, et al. Analysis of C,N and P stoichiometry of secondary forest in different landforms in Karst area[J]. J South Agric, 2015, 46(5): 777-781. DOI: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2015.5.777.
[30]	王振宇, 王涛, 邹秉章, 等. 不同生长阶段杉木人工林土壤C∶N∶P化学计量特征与养分动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11):3597-3604.
	WANG Z Y, WANG T, ZOU B Z, et al. Soil C∶N∶P stoichiometry and nutrient dynamics in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations during different growth stages[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31(11):3597-3604. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.005.
[31]	黄昌勇. 土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 33-49.
	HUANG C Y. Soil science[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 33-49.
[32]	贾宇, 徐炳成, 李凤民, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区苜蓿人工草地土壤磷素有效性及对生产力的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(1):42-47.
	JIA Y, XU B C, LI F M, et al. Availability and contributions of soil phosphorus to forage production of seeded alfalfa in semiarid Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(1):42-47. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.01.005.
[33]	吴丽芳, 王妍, 刘云根, 等. 岩溶石漠化区人工植被类型对土壤团聚体生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(6): 63-69.
	WU L F, WANG Y, LIU Y G, et al. Effects of artificial vegetation type on the ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil aggregates in Karst rocky desertification areas[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2021, 49(6): 63-69. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2021.06.013.
[34]	CLEVELAND C C, LIPTZIN D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85(3): 235-252. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0.
[35]	俞月凤, 彭晚霞, 宋同清, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同森林类型植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(4): 947-954.
	YU Y F, PENG W X, SONG T Q, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of plant and soil C, N and P in different forest types in depressions between Karst hills, southwest China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25(4): 947-954. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0068.
[36]	刘兴诏, 周国逸, 张德强, 等. 南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N、P的化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 64-71.
	LIU X Z, ZHOU G Y, ZHANG D Q, et al. N and P stoichiometry of plant and soil in lower subtropical forest successional series in southern China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(1): 64-71. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.010.
[37]	张雨鉴, 王克勤, 宋娅丽, 等. 滇中亚高山5种林型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(1): 73-82.
	ZHANG Y J, WANG K Q, SONG Y L, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in five forest types in subalpine of middle Yunnan Province[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2019, 28(1): 73-82. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.01.009.
[38]	朱秋莲, 邢肖毅, 张宏, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(15): 4674-4682.
	ZHU Q L, XING X Y, ZHANG H, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry under different vegetation area on Loess Hillygully Region[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(15): 4674-4682. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201212101772.

样地类型 sample type	平均海拔/m average altitude	坡度/(°) slope	胸径/cm DBH	树高/m tree hight	林分密度/ (株·hm^-2) stand density	土壤类型 soil type
栓皮栎Quercus variabilis	617	34	16.2±6.74	14.4±5.53	1 816	石灰土
侧柏Platycladus orientalis	561	29	8.5±2.46	6.8±1.54	2 261	石灰土
杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	681	23	16.4±6.64	16.2±6.71	2 211	石灰土

样地 plot	统计项 statistic item	SOC/ (g·kg^-1)	TN/ (g·kg^-1)	TP/ (g·kg^-1)	TK/ (g·kg^-1)	C∶N	C∶P	C∶K	N∶P	N∶K	P∶K
栓皮栎林 Q. varibilis	平均值mean	23.91	2.04	0.50	21.74	11.51	54.99	1.17	4.64	0.10	0.02
	标准差SD	4.36	0.28	0.06	1.08	0.95	19.29	0.30	1.45	0.02	0.00
	变异系数/% CV	18.22	13.96	11.43	4.97	8.27	35.07	26.15	31.21	21.61	7.30
侧柏林 P. orientalis	平均值mean	13.34	1.29	0.39	15.90	10.61	33.80	0.86	3.26	0.08	0.02
	标准差SD	5.16	0.50	0.03	0.38	3.11	29.79	38.05	30.76	37.92	7.22
	变异系数/% CV	38.70	38.85	7.99	2.38	0.03	0.30	0.38	0.31	0.38	0.07
杉木林 C. lanceolate	平均值mean	7.88	0.75	0.80	18.08	10.42	10.02	0.45	0.61	0.04	0.05
	标准差SD	1.72	0.10	0.02	0.38	1.10	2.65	0.10	0.31	0.01	0.00
	变异系数/% CV	21.76	13.24	2.12	2.09	10.53	26.42	23.00	49.67	13.68	3.44

指标index	SOC	TN	TP	TK	C∶N	C∶P	C∶K	N∶P	N∶K	P∶K
SOC	1.000
TN	0.977^**	1.000
TP	-0.458^*	-0.453^*	1.000
TK	0.210	0.184	0.100	1.000
C∶N	0.456^*	0.280	-0.296	0.153	1.000
C∶P	0.922^**	0.889^**	-0.633^**	0.071	0.432^*	1.000
C∶K	0.910^**	0.902^**	-0.482^*	-0.178	0.363	0.901^**	1.000
N∶P	0.909^**	0.909^**	-0.663^**	0.038	0.314	0.987^**	0.902	1.000
N∶K	0.854^**	0.894^**	-0.475^*	-0.242	0.175	0.843^**	0.974^**	0.879^**	1.000
P∶K	-0.508^**	-0.495^**	0.873^**	-0.361	-0.326	-0.605^**	-0.370	-0.620^**	-0.337	1.000

南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征

Soil stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in water source area of South-to-North Water Diversion Project

RichHTML

PDF

详细数据

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	余雅尧, 徐雪蕾, 刘超, 刘佳欣, 杨天宇, 李树明. 宁夏罗山4种典型森林群落植物-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 227-234.
[2]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[3]	丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 90-98.
[4]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[5]	贺坤, 王俊洁, 王本耀, 朱海军, 奉树成. 上海市行道树土壤肥力特征及其空间分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 164-172.
[6]	李威, 李吉平, 张银龙, 李萍萍, 韩建刚. 双碳目标背景下湖泊湿地的生态修复技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 157-166.
[7]	刘青青, 黄智军, 马祥庆, 王正宁, 邢先双, 刘博. 遮阴条件下杉木幼苗生长和C、N、P化学计量特征的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 74-82.
[8]	陈黎, 刘成功, 钱莹莹, 唐晓蝶, 王生树, 李志东, 李燕, 崔珺. 南方红豆杉人工林针叶C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 53-61.
[9]	刘俊涛, 仲静, 刘济铭, 罗水晶, 王冕之, 范嘉霖, 贾黎明. 无患子初果期人工林土壤和叶片C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 67-75.
[10]	孙龙, 窦旭, 胡同欣. 林火对森林生态系统碳氮磷生态化学计量特征影响研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 1-9.
[11]	刘楠, 冯富娟, 张秀月. 原始红松林皆伐后穿透雨对凋落物淋溶过程的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 159-167.
[12]	郭传阳, 林开敏, 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 李茂, 郑宏, 游云飞, 陈志云. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 125-131.
[13]	何斌, 李青, 冯图, 薛晓辉, 李望军, 刘勇. 不同林龄马尾松人工林针叶功能性状及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 181-190.
[14]	郝玉琢,周磊,吴慧,王树力. 4种类型水曲柳人工林叶片-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 101-108.
[15]	王国兵,王瑞,徐瑾,曹国华,阮宏华. 生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 1-6.