不同楸树品种对茎腐病的抗性差异研究

祝艳艳; 贾瑞瑞; 付钰; 常林; 岳远征; 杨秀莲; 王良桂

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203017

不同楸树品种对茎腐病的抗性差异研究

祝艳艳, 贾瑞瑞, 付钰, 常林, 岳远征, 杨秀莲, 王良桂

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2) : 155-165.

PDF(4090 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(4090 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2) : 155-165. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203017

研究论文

不同楸树品种对茎腐病的抗性差异研究

作者信息 +

Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究不同品种和不同繁殖方式楸树(Catalpa bungei)苗对烟草疫霉(Phytophthora nicotianae)(菌株QS.1)侵染的抗性差异,为楸树引种栽培、抗病育种提供依据。【方法】以‘洛楸1号’组培苗(LQ-Z)、‘金丝楸’(JSQ)、‘楸杂1号’(QZ)、‘豫楸1号’(YQ)的1年生组培苗,以及‘洛楸1号’扦插苗(LQ-Q)、‘楸树5-8’(Q5-8)、‘楸树8-1’(Q8-1)的1年生扦插苗,6个生产上推广的楸树品种为试验材料,用烟草疫霉(菌株QS.1)进行侵染,测定楸树相关渗透物质含量、保护酶活性和光合气体参数等变化,分析不同处理楸树幼苗感染烟草疫霉(菌株QS.1)后的生理指标变化。【结果】菌株QS.1侵染后2~4 d,供试的各楸树品种均感病。楸树品种组培苗中,‘楸杂1号’和‘豫楸1号’对菌株QS.1侵染的抗性最弱,‘金丝楸’的抗病力最强;楸树品种扦插苗中,‘楸树5-8’和‘楸树8-1’对菌株QS.1侵染抗性较强;‘洛楸1号’扦插苗抗病性大于组培苗,除‘金丝楸’外,楸树品种的扦插苗较组培苗具有更高的抗性。【结论】不同楸树品种在接菌后感染致病存在差异,不同楸树品种的抗烟草疫霉(菌株QS.1)致病能力与光合性能的维持及防御相关酶活性的调节有关。

Abstract

【Objective】 To investigate the differences in resistance to Phytophthora nicotianae (strain QS.1) infestation by Catalpa bungei cultivars and breeding methods, providing basis for C. bungei introduction and cultivation and disease resistance breeding. 【Method】 The annual seedlings of ‘Jinsiqiu’ (JSQ),‘Qiuza 1 hao’ (QZ),‘Yuqiu 1 hao’ (YQ),‘Luoqiu 1 hao’ (LQ-Z)tissue cultured seedlings,and cutting seedling‘Luoqiu 1 hao’(LQ-Q),‘Qiu5-8’(Q5-8), ‘Qiu 8-1’(Q8-1),six C. bungei cultivars were used as experimental materials and infested with P. nicotianae strain QS.1 to determine relevant osmotic substance content,protective enzyme activity and photosynthetic gas parameters. 【Result】 After infection 2-4 d by strain QS.1,all C. bungei cultivars tested were susceptible to the disease and in the case of seedlings ‘Qiuza 1 hao’ and ‘Yuqiu 1 hao’ had the weakest resistance to the disease caused by the strain QS.1,while ‘Jinsiqiu’ had the strongest resistance to the disease; as far as the cuttings of C. bungei cultivars were concerned,Q5-8 and Q8-1 were more resistant to the infection of strain QS.1; ‘Luoqiu 1 hao’ cuttings were more resistant to the disease than the histoculture seedlings,and the cuttings of other species had stronger resistance to QS.1 infection than the histoculture seedlings,except for‘JSQ’.【Conclusion】 There were differences in infection pathogenesis among different C. bungei cultivars after inoculation. The pathogenic ability of different C. bungei cultivars against P. nicotianae strain QS.1 is related to the maintenance of photosynthetic performance and the regulation of defense-related enzyme activities.

导出引用

祝艳艳, 贾瑞瑞, 付钰, 等. 不同楸树品种对茎腐病的抗性差异研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2024, 48(2): 155-165 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203017

ZHU Yanyan, JIA Ruirui, FU Yu, et al. Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(2): 155-165 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203017

中图分类号： S763.7

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	HUANG W L, YE N L, XIAN B H. Investigation of stem base rot of sweetpotato and the pathogeny identification[J]. Chinese Agri Cultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(18):135141. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	CHANG L, LIU K, WANG L G, et al. First report of Phytophthora nicotianae causing stem canker of Catalpa bungei (Chinese Catalpa) in China[J]. Plant Dis, 2022, 106(4):1309.DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1778-PDN. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	CLINE E T, FARR D F, ROSSMAN A Y. A synopsis of Phytophthora with accurate scientific names,host range,and geographic distribution[J]. Plant Heath Prog, 2008, 9(1):32.DOI: 10.1094/php-2008-0318-01-rs. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	BAI G, YANG D H, CHAO P J, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of NtbHLH gene family in tobacco (Ni-cotiana tabacum) and the role of NtbHLH86 in drought adaptation[J]. Plant Divers, 2021, 43(6):510-522.DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.10.004. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	BOUGHALLEB-M’HAMDI N, BENFRADJ N, MIGLIORINI D, et al. Phytophthora nicotianae and P.cryptogea causing gummosis of citrus crops in Tunisia[J]. Trop Plant Pathol, 2018, 43(1):36-48.DOI: 10.1007/s40858-017-0180-2. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	林霞. 樱桃抗茎腐病机理与效应因子PnAvh241功能初步研究[D]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2019. LIN X. Study on the cherry resistance mechanism of stem rot disease and the function of the RxLR effector PnAvh241[D]. Yantai: Yantai University, 2019. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	陈瑞泰, 朱贤朝, 王智发, 等. 全国16个主产烟省(区)烟草侵染性病害调研报告[J]. 中国烟草科学, 1997, 18(4):1-7. CHEN R T, ZHU X C, WANG Z F, et al. A report of investigating and studying tobacco infectious diseases of 16 main tobacco producing provinces(regions)in China[J]. Chin Tob Sci, 1997, 18(4):1-7. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	PANABI R F, GUL S, ALI G, et al. Phytophthora nicotianae diseases worldwide: new knowledge of a long-recognised pathogen[J]. Phytopathol Mediterr, 2016, 55(1):20-40.DOI: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16423. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	ZHANG C S, FENG C, ZHENG Y F, et al. Root exudates metabolic profiling suggests distinct defense mechanisms between resistant and susceptible tobacco cultivars against black shank di-sease[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11:559775.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.559775. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. LI H S, SUN Q, ZHAO S J. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and piochemical pxperiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. 本文引用 [6]

[11]	杨兰芳, 庞静, 彭小兰, 等. 紫外分光光度法测定植物过氧化氢酶活性[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(20):364-366. YANG L F, PANG J, PENG X L, et al. Measurement of catalase activity in plants by ultraviolet spectrophotometry[J]. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2009(20):364-366.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2009.20.247. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	DODDS P N, RATHJEN J P. Plant immunity:towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(8):539-548.DOI: 10.1038/nrg2812. 本文引用 [1]

[13]

赵小虎, 陈翠莲, 焦春香, 等. 不同油菜品种对油菜菌核病敏感性差异的生理生化特性研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2006, 25(5):488-492.

ZHAO

X H

, CHEN

C L

, JIAO

C X

, et al. Physiological and biochemical reaction responses to Sclerotium blight inoculation among different rapeseed varieties[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2006, 25(5):488-492.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2006.05.007.

本文引用 [1]

[14]

李赤, 于莉, 刘付东标, 等. 富贵竹中可溶性糖、蛋白质含量与细菌性茎腐病的关系[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2007, 29(6):620-622.

, YU

, LIU

F D B

, et al. Relation between contents of soluble sugar and protein in Dracaena sanderiana Virens and bacterial stem rot[J]. J Jilin Agric Univ, 2007, 29(6):620-622.DOI: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2007.06.011.

本文引用 [2]

[15]

杨汉波, 曹广黎, 韩珊, 等. 核桃对炭疽病菌抗性相关的生理生化响应差异研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(4):463-470.

YANG

H B

, CAO

G L

, HAN

, et al. Study on the difference in physiological and biochemical response of walnut (Juglans spp.) to anthracnose resistance[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2020, 38(4):463-470.DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2020.04.012.

本文引用 [2]

[16]	ALI S, KHAN A S, ANJUM M A, et al. Effect of postharvest oxalic acid application on enzymatic browning and quality of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) root slices[J]. Food Chem, 2020, 312:126051.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126051. 本文引用 [2]

[17]	朱学明, 史祥鹏, 雍道敬, 等. 内生放线菌A-1诱导苹果对炭疽叶枯病的抗性[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(6):949-954. ZHU X M, SHI X P, YONG D J, et al. Induction of resistance against Glomerella cingulata in apple by endophytic actinomycetes strain A-1[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2015, 51(6):949-954.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2015.0129. 本文引用 [2]

[18]

王莎莎, 盛业龙, 马文广, 等. 抗氧化系统参与不同抗性烟草品种幼苗对干旱和低温综合抗性的形成[J]. 生物技术通报, 2014(1):132-142.

WANG

S S

, SHENG

Y L

, MA

W G

, et al. Involvement of antioxidant defense system in drought and chilling comprehensive resistance formation in different resistant varieties of tobacco seedlings[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2014(1):132-142.DOI: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2014.01.025.

本文引用 [2]

[19]	刘杜玲, 张博勇, 孙红梅, 等. 早实核桃不同品种抗寒性综合评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 34(3):967-974. LIU D L, ZHANG B Y, SUN H M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on cold resistance of early fruiting walnut cultivars[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2015, 34(3):967-974.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0917. 本文引用 [1]

[20]

张燕梅, 李栋梁, 李俊峰, 等. 烟草疫霉侵染后剑麻H.11648叶片细胞超微结构和防御酶活性研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(6):1161-1165.

ZHANG

Y M

, LI

D L

, LI

J F

, et al. Changes in ultrastructure and activities of defense-related enzymes in leaves of sisal H.11648 after Phytophthora nicotianae Breda infection[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2018, 39(6):1161-1165.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2018.06.018.

本文引用 [1]

[21]	MAGBANUA Z V, DE MORAES C M, BROOKS T D, et al. Is ca-talase activity one of the factors associated with maize resistance to Aspergillus flavus?[J]. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2007, 20(6):697-706.DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-20-6-0697. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	YANG H, LUO P G. Changes in photosynthesis could provide important insight into the interaction between wheat and fungal pathogens[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(16):8865.DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168865. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	MOHSENZADEH S, MALBOOBI M A, RAZAVI K, et al. Physiological and molecular responses of Aeluropus lagopoides (Poaceae) to water deficit[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 56(3):314-322.DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.03.008. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	BERGER S, SINHA A K, ROITSCH T. Plant physiology meets phytopathology:plant primary metabolism and plant-pathogen interactions[J]. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58(15/16):4019-4026.DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm298. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	KRETSCHMER M, DAMOO D, DJAMEI A, et al. Chloroplasts and plant immunity:where are the fungal effectors?[J]. Pathogens, 2019, 9(1):19.DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9010019. 本文引用 [1]

[26]

马迎莉, 高雨, 袁婷婷, 等. 重金属铬胁迫对髯毛箬竹光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(1):54-60.

Y L

, GAO

, YUAN

T T

, et al. Effects of heavy metal chromium stress on the photosynthetic characteristics of Indocalamus barbatus McClure[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(1):54-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712013.

本文引用 [1]

[27]	STEWART J D, ZINE EL ABIDINE A, BERNIER P Y. Stomatal and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in black spruce seedlings during multiple cycles of drought[J]. Tree Physiol, 1995, 15(1):57-64.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/15.1.57. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33:317-345.DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533. 本文引用 [1]