小兴安岭3种槭树不同生长期叶性状变异及相关性分析

彭仲韬; 郭嘉兴; 王艺璇; 王磊; 金光泽; 刘志理

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205036

彭仲韬, 郭嘉兴, 王艺璇, 王磊, 金光泽, 刘志理

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 131-139.

PDF(4018 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(4018 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 131-139. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205036

研究论文

小兴安岭3种槭树不同生长期叶性状变异及相关性分析

彭仲韬 ¹ ,
郭嘉兴 ¹ ,
王艺璇 ² ,
王磊 ² ,
金光泽 ¹ ,
刘志理 ¹^,^*

作者信息 +

Variation and correlation analysis of leaf traits of three Acer species in different growth periods in the Xiaoxing’an Mountains of northeast China

PENG Zhongtao ¹ ,
GUO Jiaxing ¹ ,
WANG Yixuan ² ,
WANG Lei ² ,
JIN Guangze ¹ ,
LIU Zhili ¹^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】叶性状对植物资源获取、光合能力等起重要作用。本研究分析植物通过叶性状的调整以适应不同生长期的生存策略。【方法】以小兴安岭3种典型槭树:花楷槭(Acer ukurunduense)、青楷槭(A. tegmentosum)和五角枫(A. pictum subsp. mono)为研究对象,在展叶期(6月初)、叶稳定期(7月中旬)和叶凋落期(9月初)3个时期分别测定比叶面积、叶干物质含量、叶绿素含量及叶厚4个叶性状,分析叶性状的生长动态以及性状间的相关性。【结果】在不同生长期,3种槭树的叶性状均发生了显著变异,且随生长期变化存在相似的变异规律,展叶期的叶厚和叶稳定期的叶干物质含量显著高于其余两个时期。叶性状间的相关关系随生长期不同发生了显著变化。3种槭树在展叶期选择“快速投资-收益”型策略,在叶稳定期和叶凋落期则偏向于“缓慢投资-收益”型策略。叶性状及其相关性在不同树种间也存在显著差异。【结论】植物可通过叶性状变异及调整叶性状间的相关关系来适应生长期的变化,并最终形成不同的生存策略。

Abstract

【Objective】 Leaf traits play important roles in plant resource acquisition and photosynthetic capacity. Therefore, plants can adapt to different leaf-growth periods by adjusting their leaf traits. 【Method】Acer ukurunduense, A. tegmentosum and A. pictum subsp. mono, three typical Acer species in the Xiaoxing’an Mountains of northeast China were selected as the objects of the study. During the three growth periods of leaf expansion (early June), leaf stabilization (mid-July), and leaf senescence (early September), the specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, chlorophyll, and leaf thickness were measured. Additionally, the growth dynamics of the leaf traits and the correlations between traits were analyzed. 【Result】 Significant differences existed in leaf traits among different Acer species in different growth periods, and the leaf thickness in the leaf expansion period and leaf dry matter content in the leaf stabilization period were significantly higher than the other two periods. The correlation between leaf traits varied significantly with different growth periods. Three Acer species exhibited the “quick investment-return” strategy in the leaf expansion period and the “slow investment-return” strategy in the leaf stabilization and leaf senescence periods. Leaf traits and their correlations were significantly different at the species level. 【Conclusion】Plants adapt to different growth periods through leaf trait variations and different combinations of leaf traits, and finally form various survival strategies.

导出引用

彭仲韬, 郭嘉兴, 王艺璇, 等. 小兴安岭3种槭树不同生长期叶性状变异及相关性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2024, 48(1): 131-139 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205036

PENG Zhongtao, GUO Jiaxing, WANG Yixuan, et al. Variation and correlation analysis of leaf traits of three Acer species in different growth periods in the Xiaoxing’an Mountains of northeast China[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(1): 131-139 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205036

中图分类号： S718

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	WRIGHT I J, REICH P B, CORNELISSEN J H C, et al. Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships[J]. New Phytol, 2005, 166(2):485-496.DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x. 本文引用 [3]

[2]	FAJARDO A, SIEFERT A. Phenological variation of leaf functional traits within species[J]. Oecologia, 2016, 180(4):951-959.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3545-1. 本文引用 [2]

[3]	HE N P, LI Y, LIU C C, et al. Plant trait networks:improved resolution of the dimensionality of adaptation[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 2020, 35(10):908-918.DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.003. 本文引用 [2]

[4]	OSNAS J L D, LICHSTEIN J W, REICH P B, et al. Global leaf trait relationships:mass,area,and the leaf economics spectrum[J]. Science, 2013, 340(6133):741-744.DOI: 10.1126/science.1231574. 本文引用 [3]

[5]	刘晓娟, 马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2015, 45(4):325-339. LIU X J, MA K P. Plant functional traits: concepts,applications and future directions[J]. Sci Sin (Vitae), 2015, 45(4):325-339.DOI: 10.1360/N052014-00244. 本文引用 [2]

[6]	CUI E Q, WENG E S, YAN E R, et al. Robust leaf trait relationships across species under global environmental changes[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1):2999.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16839-9. 本文引用 [4]

[7]	FUNK J L, LARSON J E, VOSE G. Leaf traits and performance vary with plant age and water availability in Artemisia californica[J]. Ann Bot, 2021, 127(4):495-503.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa106. 本文引用 [2]

[8]	JANKOWSKI A, WYKA T P, ZYTKOWIAK R, et al. Cold adaptation drives variability in needle structure and anatomy in Pinus sylvestris L.along a 1 900 km temperate-boreal transect[J]. Funct Ecol, 2017, 31(12):2212-2223.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12946. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	张林, 罗天祥. 植物叶寿命及其相关叶性状的生态学研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(6):844-852. ZHANG L, LUO T X. Advances in ecological studies on leaf lifespan and associated leaf traits[J]. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2004, 28(6):844-852.DOI:10.1752/cjpe.2004.0110. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	POORTER L. Leaf traits show different relationships with shade tolerance in moist versus dry tropical forests[J]. New Phytol, 2009, 181(4):890-900.DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02715.x. 本文引用 [4]

[11]	BASNETT S, DEVY S M. Phenology determines leaf functional traits across Rhododendron species in the Sikkim Himalaya[J]. Alp Bot, 2021, 131(1):63-72.DOI: 10.1007/s00035-020-00244-5. 本文引用 [2]

[12]	LI S J, WANG H, GOU W, et al. Leaf functional traits of dominant desert plants in the Hexi Corridor,northwestern China:trade-off relationships and adversity strategies[J]. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2021, 28:e01666.DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01666. 本文引用 [5]

[13]	CONEVA V, CHITWOOD D H. Genetic and developmental basis for increased leaf thickness in the Arabidopsis Cvi ecotype[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9:322.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00322. 本文引用 [3]

[14]	RICHARDSON A D, DUIGAN S P, BERLYN G P. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content[J]. New Phytol, 2002, 153(1):185-194.DOI: 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00289.x. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	WU J, ALBERT L P, LOPES A P, et al. Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests[J]. Science, 2016, 351(6276):972-976.DOI: 10.1126/science.aad5068. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	BURNETT A C, SERBIN S P, LAMOUR J, et al. Seasonal trends in photosynthesis and leaf traits in scarlet oak[J]. Tree Physiol, 2021, 41(8):1413-1424.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpab015. 本文引用 [3]

[17]	LIU Y Z, LI G Y, WU X W, et al. Linkage between species traits and plant phenology in an alpine meadow[J]. Oecologia, 2021, 195(2):409-419.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04846-y. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	MOORE T E, JONES C S, CHONG C, et al. Impact of rainfall seasonality on intraspecific trait variation in a shrub from a Mediterranean climate[J]. Funct Ecol, 2020, 34(4):865-876.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13533. 本文引用 [2]

[19]	CHAVANA-BRYANT C, MALHI Y, WU J, et al. Leaf aging of Amazonian canopy trees as revealed by spectral and physiochemical measurements[J]. New Phytol, 2017, 214(3):1049-1063.DOI: 10.1111/nph.13853. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	HUANG L, KOUBEK T, WEISER M, et al. Environmental drivers and phylogenetic constraints of growth phenologies across a large set of herbaceous species[J]. J Ecol, 2018, 106(4):1621-1633.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12927. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	FLYNN D F B, WOLKOVICH E M. Temperature and photoperiod drive spring phenology across all species in a temperate forest community[J]. New Phytol, 2018, 219(4):1353-1362.DOI: 10.1111/nph.15232. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	LIU Z L, JIANG F, LI F R, et al. Coordination of intra and inter-species leaf traits according to leaf phenology and plant age for three temperate broadleaf species with different shade tolerances[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 434:63-75.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.008. 本文引用 [2]

[23]	MCKOWN A D, GUY R D, AZAM M S, et al. Seasonality and phenology alter functional leaf traits[J]. Oecologia, 2013, 172(3):653-665.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2531-5. 本文引用 [2]

[24]	CROFT H, CHEN J M, LUO X Z, et al. Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity[J]. Glob Change Biol, 2017, 23(9):3513-3524.DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13599. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	WRIGHT I J, REICH P B, WESTOBY M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature, 2004, 428(6985):821-827.DOI: 10.1038/nature02403. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	FAJARDO A, MORA J P, ROBERT E. Corner’s rules pass the test of time:little effect of phenology on leaf-shoot and other scaling relationships[J]. Ann Bot, 2020, 126(7): 1129-1139. 本文引用 [1]

[27]

徐丽娜, 金光泽. 小兴安岭凉水典型阔叶红松林动态监测样地:物种组成与群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(4):470-481.

L N

, JIN

G Z

. Species composition and community structure of a typical mixed broad-leaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest plot in Liangshui Nature Reserve,northeast China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2012, 20(4):470-481.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.12233.

[28]	LIU Z L, CHEN J M, JIN G Z, et al. Estimating seasonal variations of leaf area index using litterfall collection and optical methods in four mixed evergreen-deciduous forests[J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2015, 209/210:36-48.DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.04.025. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	RASBAND W S, IMAGE J U S. National institutes of health, bethesda[R/OL]. Maryland, USA: National Institutes of Health, 1997. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ 本文引用 [1]

[30]	R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing[Z]. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017. http://www.R-project.org/. http://www.R-project.org/ 本文引用 [1]

[31]	BASNETT S, NAGARAJU S K, RAVIKANTH G, et al. Influence of phylogeny and abiotic factors varies across early and late reproductive phenology of Himalayan Rhododendrons[J]. Ecosphere, 2019, 10(1):e02581.DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2581. 本文引用 [1]

[32]	ALBERT L P, WU J, PROHASKA N, et al. Age-dependent leaf physiology and consequences for crown-scale carbon uptake during the dry season in an Amazon evergreen forest[J]. New Phytol, 2018, 219(3):870-884.DOI: 10.1111/nph.15056. 本文引用 [1]

[33]	HALLIK L, NIINEMETS Ü, KULL O. Photosynthetic acclimation to light in woody and herbaceous species:a comparison of leaf structure,pigment content and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics measured in the field[J]. Plant Biol, 2012, 14(1):88-99.DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00472.x. 本文引用 [3]

[34]	EVANS J R, POORTER H. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance:the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2001, 24(8):755-767.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	LEISHMAN M R, HASLEHURST T, ARES A, et al. Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants:community- and global-scale comparisons[J]. New Phytol, 2007, 176(3):635-643.DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02189.x. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	DONG N, PRENTICE I C, WRIGHT I J, et al. Components of leaf-trait variation along environmental gradients[J]. New Phytol, 2020, 228(1):82-94.DOI: 10.1111/nph.16558. 本文引用 [1]

[37]

金明月, 姜峰, 金光泽, 等. 不同年龄白桦比叶面积的生长阶段变异及冠层差异[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9):18-26.

JIN

M Y

, JIANG

, JIN

G Z

, et al. Variations of specific leaf area in different growth periods and canopy positions of Betula platyphylla at different ages[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2018, 54(9):18-26.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180903.

本文引用 [1]

[38]	MARENCO R A, ANTEZANA-VERA S A, NASCIMENTO H C S. Relationship between specific leaf area,leaf thickness,leaf water content and SPAD-502 readings in six Amazonian tree species[J]. Photosynthetica, 2009, 47(2):184-190.DOI: 10.1007/s11099-009-0031-6. 本文引用 [1]

[39]

盘远方, 陈兴彬, 姜勇, 等. 桂林岩溶石山灌丛植物叶功能性状和土壤因子对坡向的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(5):1581-1589.

PAN

Y F

, CHEN

X B

, JIANG

, et al. Changes in leaf functional traits and soil environmental factors in response to slope gradient in Karst hills of Guilin[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(5):1581-1589.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201701210173.

本文引用 [2]

[40]	ANDEREGG L D L, LOY X, MARKHAM I P, et al. Aridity drives coordinated trait shifts but not decreased trait variance across the geographic range of eight Australian trees[J]. New Phytol, 2021, 229(3):1375-1387.DOI: 10.1111/nph.16795. 本文引用 [1]

[41]	GRIFFITH D M, QUIGLEY K M, ANDERSON T M. Leaf thickness controls variation in leaf mass per area (LMA) among grazing-adapted grasses in Serengeti[J]. Oecologia, 2016, 181(4):1035-1040.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3632-3. 本文引用 [2]

[42]	LI L, MCCORMACK M L, MA C G, et al. Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests[J]. Ecol Lett, 2015, 18(9):899-906.DOI: 10.1111/ele.12466. 本文引用 [1]

[43]	MARÉCHAUX I, SAINT-ANDRÉ L, BARTLETT M K, et al. Leaf drought tolerance cannot be inferred from classic leaf traits in a tropical rainforest[J]. J Ecol, 2020, 108(3):1030-1045.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13321. 本文引用 [1]

[44]	WILSON P J, THOMPSON K, HODGSON J G. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies[J]. New Phytol, 1999, 143(1):155-162.DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00427.x. 本文引用 [1]

[45]	QI J H, FAN Z X, FU P L, et al. Differential determinants of growth rates in subtropical evergreen and deciduous juvenile trees:carbon gain,hydraulics and nutrient-use efficiencies[J]. Tree Physiol, 2021, 41(1):12-23.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa131. 本文引用 [1]

[46]	田俊霞, 魏丽萍, 何念鹏, 等. 温带针阔混交林叶片性状随树冠垂直高度的变化规律[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23):8383-8391. TIAN J X, WEI L P, HE N P, et al. Vertical variation of leaf functional traits in temperate forest canopies in China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(23):8383-8391.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201801020006. 本文引用 [1]

[47]	朱弘, 朱淑霞, 李涌福, 等. 尾叶樱桃天然种群叶表型性状变异研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12):1168-1178. ZHU H, ZHU S X, LI Y F, et al. Leaf phenotypic variation in natural populations of Cerasus dielsiana[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(12):1168-1178.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0196. 本文引用 [1]

[48]	MARTINEZ K A, FRIDLEY J D. Acclimation of leaf traits in seasonal light environments:are non-native species more plastic?[J]. J Ecol, 2018, 106(5):2019-2030.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12952. 本文引用 [2]

[49]	PÉREZ-HARGUINDEGUY N, DÍAZ S, GARNIER E, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Aust J Bot, 2013, 61(3):167.DOI: 10.1071/bt12225. 本文引用 [1]

[50]	CUBINO J P, BIURRUN I, BONARI G, et al. The leaf economic and plant size spectra of European forest understory vegetation[J]. Ecography, 2021, 44(9):1311-1324.DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05598. 本文引用 [1]

[51]	SAVAGE J A. It’s all about timing—Or is it?Exploring the potential connection between phloem physiology and whole plant phenology[J]. Am J Bot, 2020, 107(6):848-851.DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1480. 本文引用 [1]

[52]	DAYRELL R L C, ARRUDA A J, PIERCE S, et al. Ontogenetic shifts in plant ecological strategies[J]. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32(12):2730-2741.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13221. 本文引用 [1]

[53]	BLOOMFIELD K J, CERNUSAK L A, EAMUS D, et al. A continental-scale assessment of variability in leaf traits:within species,across sites and between seasons[J]. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32(6):1492-1506.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13097. 本文引用 [1]