HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205047

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 237-244.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205047

HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用

黄永健(), 荀航, 张保, 尤俊昊, 姚曦, 汤锋^*()

国际竹藤中心,国家林业和草原局/北京市共建竹藤科学与技术重点实验室,北京 100102

收稿日期:2022-05-30 修回日期:2022-06-20 出版日期:2024-05-30 发布日期:2024-06-14
通讯作者: *汤锋(fengtang@icbr.ac.cn), 教授。
作者简介:黄永健(huangyongjian@icbr.ac.cn)。
基金资助:
国际竹藤中心基本科研业务费专项资金项目(1632018007);国际竹藤中心基本科研业务费专项资金项目(1632019022)

Simultaneous determination of eight phenolic acids in bamboo shoots by HPLC and its applications

HUANG Yongjian(), XUN Hang, ZHANG Bao, YOU Junhao, YAO Xi, TANG Feng^*()

International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration/Beijing for Bamboo and Rattan Science and Technology, Beijing 100102, China

Received:2022-05-30 Revised:2022-06-20 Online:2024-05-30 Published:2024-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】为实现竹笋中3,4-二羟基苯乙酸、对羟基苯甲酸、香草酸、咖啡酸、对羟基苯甲醛、丁香醛、阿魏酸、3-羟基肉桂酸等8种酚酸类化合物的快速检测,建立一种基于高效液相色谱-二极管阵列(HPLC-PDA)检测方法。【方法】采用Symmetry C18(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm)色谱柱,乙腈和乙酸-水(体积比0.5∶99.5)为流动相,在流速1.0 mL/min、进样量10 μL和柱温30 ℃的条件下梯度洗脱,检测波长275 nm。【结果】 8种酚酸的分离度均在1.5以上,在1.0~50.0 μg/mL的线性范围内,线性关系良好,相关系数R≥0.999 0,检出限[信号强度(S)与噪声强度(N)之比(S/N)为3]为0.12~0.69 μg/mL,定量限(S/N=10)为0.36~2.08 μg/mL,精密度、重复性、稳定性实验相对标准偏差(RSD)均小于5%,加标回收率为80.99%~129.12%,RSD均小于5%。应用该方法,检测了苦竹(Pleioblastus amarus)和苦篱竹(Arundinaria acerba)竹笋中酚酸类物质的含量,8种酚酸总量为(9.35±0.08)~(38.60±0.12) mg/kg;比较了自然生长和避光处理生长条件下苦竹笋中酚酸含量的变化,发现避光处理的竹笋中6种酚酸含量显著降低,总含量下降达46.2%。【结论】 HPLC-PDA检测方法简单方便,灵敏度高,准确可靠,适用于竹笋中酚酸类物质的测定;避光处理可以有效降低苦竹笋样品中酚酸类物质的含量。

关键词: 竹笋, 酚酸类物质, 高效液相色谱, 苦竹, 苦篱竹, 避光处理

Abstract:

【Objective】 Phenolic acids are present in almost all plant-derived foods, and are associated with the organoleptic and nutritional properties of foods. A high-performance liquid chromatography-photo-diode array (HPLC-PDA) method was established for the simultaneous detection of eight phenolic acids in bamboo shoots: 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, syringaldehyde, ferulic acid and 3-hydroxycinnamic acid. 【Method】 Eight phenolic acids were separated on a Symmetry C18 column (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm). Acetonitrile (phase A) and 0.5% acetic acid solution (phase B) were used as the mobile phase, the injection volume was 10 μL, and the detection wavelength was 275 nm. The analysis was performed at 30 ℃ with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. 【Result】 Eight phenolic acids were successfully separated (resolution>1.5), and had a good linear relationship (R ≥ 0.999 0) with a linear range of 1.0-50.0 μg/mL. The detection limits (S/N=3) were 0.12-0.69 μg/mL and the quantification limits (S/N=10) were 0.36-2.08 μg/mL. Precision, repeatability, and stability tests yielded relative standard deviations (RSD) of <5%. Additionally, the recoveries of phenolic acids were 80.99%-129.12%, and the RSD values associated with the recoveries were also <5%. The phenolic acid contents in the actual samples of Pleioblastus amarus bamboo shoots and Arundinaria acerba bamboo shoots were determined using an established method. The contents of eight phenolic acids in the actual bamboo shoots samples varied from (9.35±0.08) to (38.60±0.12) mg/kg. A comparative analysis of phenolic acids in P. amarus bamboo shoots grown under a shading treatment and normal conditions was conducted based on this method. Compared to the shoots grown under normal conditions, the contents of six phenolic acids in P. amarus bamboo shoots grown under the shading treatment were lower, and the content of total detected phenolic acids decreased by 46.2%.【Conclusion】 The method developed here is simple, sensitive, accurate and reliable, and is suitable for determining phenolic acids in bamboo shoots. The results showed that a shading treatment downregulated the accumulation of phenolic acids in P. amarus bamboo shoots.

Key words: bamboo shoots, phenolic acids, HPLC, Pleioblastus amarus, Arundinaria acerba, shading treatment

中图分类号:

S718

黄永健,荀航,张保,等. HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 237-244.

HUANG Yongjian, XUN Hang, ZHANG Bao, YOU Junhao, YAO Xi, TANG Feng. Simultaneous determination of eight phenolic acids in bamboo shoots by HPLC and its applications[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(3): 237-244.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205047.

图/表 9

表1

表2

图1

表3

表4

表5

图2

表6

表7

参考文献 30

[1]	赵学敏. 本草纲目拾遗:十卷[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1963.
	ZHAO X M. Compendium of medica[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 1963.
[2]	崔逢欣, 丁兴萃, 李露双, 等. 毛竹笋呈味物质种类、含量与辛辣味强度的关系[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(6):1041-1049.
	CUI F X, DING X C, LI L S, et al. Relationship between types and contents of flavour substances and spicy intensity in moso bamboo(Phyllostachys edulis) shoots[J]. For Res, 2017, 30(6):1041-1049.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.06.023.
[3]	章志远, 丁兴萃, 崔逢欣, 等. 感官评定方法确定麻竹笋苦涩味物质成分及与口感的关系[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(5):167-173.
	ZHANG Z Y, DING X C, CUI F X, et al. Identification of bitter and astringent components in ma bamboo shoots and their relationship with taste by sensory evaluation[J]. Food Sci, 2017, 38(5):167-173.DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201705027.
[4]	GAO Q, JIANG H, TANG F, et al. Evaluation of the bitter components of bamboo shoots using a metabolomics approach[J]. Food Funct, 2019, 10(1):90-98.DOI: 10.1039/c8fo01820k.
[5]	李露双, 董文慧, 丁兴萃, 等. 麻竹笋转录组测序及苦涩味物质合成基因差异表达分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(4):38-46.
	LI L S, DONG W H, DING X C, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and differential expression analysis of bitter and astringent substances biosynthesis related gene in Dendrocalamus latiflorus[J]. For Res, 2018, 31(4):38-46.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.04.006.
[6]	CHU Y F, SUN J, WU X Z, et al. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common vegetables[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2002, 50(23):6910-6916.DOI: 10.1021/jf020665f.
[7]	CHAMORRO S, VIVEROS A, ALVAREZ I, et al. Changes in polyphenol and polysaccharide content of grape seed extract and grape pomace after enzymatic treatment[J]. Food Chem, 2012, 133(2):308-314.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.031.
[8]	乔丽萍, 傅瑜, 叶兴乾, 等. 酚酸生物活性研究进展[J]. 中国食品学报, 2013, 13(10):144-152.
	QIAO L P, FU Y, YE X Q, et al. Recent advances of phenolic acid bioactivities[J]. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol, 2013, 13(10):144-152.DOI: 10.16429/j.1009-7848.2013.10.032.
[9]	陈清艳. HPLC法同时测定荞麦中8种酚酸类成分[J]. 食品工业, 2022, 43(2):279-282.
	CHEN Q Y. Simultaneous determination of eight phenolic acids in buckwheat by HPLC[J]. Food Ind, 2022, 43(2):279-282.
[10]	赵希娟, 庞雯辉, 谭涛, 等. UPLC-Q-TOF-HRMS技术结合SWATH采集方法同时测定柠檬果实中26种生物活性成分的含量[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(23):306-314.
	ZHAO X J, PANG W H, TAN T, et al. Simultaneous determination of 26 bioactive components in lemon fruits based on UPLC-Q-TOF-HRMS and SWATH acquisition mode[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2022, 48(23):306-314.DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.030869.
[11]	方鑫, 杨峥, 王晨旭, 等. 丹参DnaJ基因的鉴定及胁迫响应分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(1):94-102.
	FANG X, YANG Z, WANG C X, et al. Identification and stress response analysis of DnaJ gene in Salvia miltiorrhiza[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2022, 45(1):94-102.DOI: 10.7685/jnau.202104017.
[12]	李明良, 陈双林, 郭子武, 等. 覆土栽培对高节竹笋呈味氨基酸的影响[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2015, 35(2):54-57.
	LI M L, CHEN S L, GUO Z W, et al. Influence of soil sealing on flavor amino acid in shoot from Phyllostachys prominens stand[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2015, 35(2):54-57.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2015.02.012.
[13]	童龙, 张磊, 李彬, 等. 覆土栽培对绿竹笋品质与适口性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):487-493.
	TONG L, ZHANG L, LI B, et al. Influence of soil-covered cultivation on quality and palatability of Dendrocalamopsis oldhami shoot[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(3):487-493.DOI: 10.13836/j.jjau.2018064.
[14]	王晓娟, 马光良, 陈洪, 等. 不同覆盖措施对梁山慈竹出笋和竹笋适口性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(2):143-149.
	WANG X J, MA G L, CHEN H, et al. Effects of different mulching measures on bamboo shooting and palatability of Dendrocalamus farinosus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(2):143-149.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103054.
[15]	徐圣友, 曹万友, 宋曰钦, 等. 不同品种竹笋蛋白质与氨基酸的分析与评价[J]. 食品科学, 2005, 26(7):222-227.
	XU S Y, CAO W Y, SONG Y Q, et al. Analysis and evaluation of protein and amino acid nutritional components of different species of bamboo shoots[J]. Food Sci, 2005, 26(7):222-227.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2005.07.055.
[16]	苏玉, 李璐, 黄亮, 等. 超微化雷竹笋膳食纤维对高脂血症小鼠的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(15):203-210.
	SU Y, LI L, HUANG L, et al. Superfine dietary fiber from Phyllostachys praecox shoots improves hyperlipidemia in mice[J]. Food Sci, 2019, 40(15):203-210.DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180604-037.
[17]	CHEN G J, CHEN X H, YANG B, et al. New insight into bamboo shoot (Chimonobambusa quadrangularis) polysaccharides:impact of extraction processes on its prebiotic activity[J]. Food Hydrocoll, 2019, 95:367-377.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.04.046.
[18]	LIU L L, LIU L Y, LU B Y, et al. Evaluation of antihypertensive and antihyperlipidemic effects of bamboo shoot angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide in vivo[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2012, 60(45):11351-11358.DOI: 10.1021/jf303471f.
[19]	SINGH P, RATHORE M, PRAKASH H G. The nutritional facts of bamboo shoots have a potential and prospects for utilization as a health food:a review[J]. Asian J Dairy Food Res, 2021, 40(4): 388-397.DOI: 10.18805/ajdfr.dr-1586.
[20]	何乐, 王大成, 吴立军, 等. 苦味西葫芦化学成分研究[J]. 中国现代中药, 2007, 9(7):10-12.
	HE L, WANG D C, WU L J, et al. Studies on the chemical constituents of Cucurbita pepo cv. Dayangua[J]. Mod Chin Med, 2007, 9(7):10-12.DOI: 10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.2007.07.014.
[21]	MOLTEBERG E L, SOLHEIM R, DIMBERG L H, et al. Variation in oat groats due to variety,storage and heat treatment.II:sensory quality[J]. J Cereal Sci, 1996, 24(3):273-282.DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.1996.0059.
[22]	DUIZER L M, LANGFRIED A. Sensory characterization during repeated ingestion of small-molecular-weight phenolic acids[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2016, 96(2):513-521.DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7118.
[23]	VÈRETTE E, NOBLE A C, SOMERS T C. Hydroxycinnamates of Vitis vinifera:sensory assessment in relation to bitterness in white wines[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 1988, 45(3):267-272.DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740450310.
[24]	李雪蕾, 丁兴萃, 张闪闪, 等. 不同光强下麻竹笋不同部位苦涩味物质含量的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(3):161-166.
	LI X L, DING X C, ZHANG S S, et al. The distributions of bitter and astringent taste compounds in the bamboo shoot of Dendrocalamus latiflorus under different light intensities[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(3):161-166.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.029.
[25]	朱玉燕, 邬波龙, 赵宇瑛, 等. 绿竹笋苦味物质成分分析[J]. 食品科技, 2015, 40(8):77-80.
	ZHU Y Y, WU B L, ZHAO Y Y, et al. Analysis of bitter compounds in harvested bamboo shoots[J]. Food Sci Technol, 2015, 40(8):77-80.DOI: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2015.08.018.
[26]	董春凤, 赵一鹤. 储藏时间和温度对甜龙竹笋采后品质的影响[J]. 竹子学报, 2021, 40(4):80-86.
	DONG C F, ZHAO Y H. Effects of storage time and temperature on postharvest quality of Dendrocalamus brandisii shoots[J]. J Bamboo Res, 2021, 40(4):80-86.DOI: 10.12390/jbr2022040.
[27]	李倩, 梁宗锁, 董娟娥, 等. 丹参品质与主导气候因子的灰色关联度分析[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(10):2569-2575.
	LI Q, LIANG Z S, DONG J E, et al. Grey correlation for main climatic factors and quality of Danshen(Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge)[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(10):2569-2575.
[28]	SOMPORN C, KAMTUO A, THEERAKULPISUT P, et al. Effect of shading on yield,sugar content,phenolic acids and antioxidant property of coffee beans (Coffea arabica L cv. Catimor) harvested from north-eastern Thailand[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2012, 92(9):1956-1963.DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5568.
[29]	陈勤操, 戴伟东, 蔺志远, 等. 代谢组学解析遮阴对茶叶主要品质成分的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(6):1066-1077.
	CHEN Q C, DAI W D, LIN Z Y, et al. Effects of shading on main quality components in tea(Camellia sinensis(L) O. Kuntze) leaves based on metabolomics analysis[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52(6):1066-1077.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.06.010.
[30]	SCAFIDI P, PISCIOTTA A, PATTI D, et al. Effect of artificial shading on the tannin accumulation and aromatic composition of the Grillo cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.)[J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2013, 13:175.DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-175.

化合物 compound	分离度 resolution
化合物 compound	甲醇-水 methanol-water	甲醇-0.5%乙酸水 methanol-0.5% acetic acid	乙腈-水 acetonitrile-water	乙腈-0.5%乙酸水 acetonitrile-0.5% acetic acid
3,4-二羟基苯乙酸 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid	—	—	—	—
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid	5.19	4.71	4.19	3.81
香草酸 vanillic acid	2.11	2.33	3.87	4.28
咖啡酸 caffeic acid	0.60	0.75	1.45	1.56
对羟基苯甲醛 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde	1.12	1.10	1.79	1.82
丁香醛 syringaldehyde	2.05	2.06	9.84	9.85
阿魏酸 ferulic acid	3.22	3.00	3.44	3.69
3-羟基肉桂酸 3-hydroxycinnamic acid	2.81	2.68	5.60	5.87

化合物 compound	线性方程 linear equation	R	线性范围/(μg·mL^-1) linear range	检出限/(μg·mL^-1) LOD	定量限/(μg·mL^-1) LOQ
3,4-二羟基苯乙酸 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid	y=8 047.8x+1 350.8	0.999 5	1.0~50.0	0.56	1.69
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid	y=27 830x-9 841.5	0.999 3	1.0~50.0	0.12	0.36
香草酸 vanillic acid	y=12 325x+12 528	0.999 7	1.0~50.0	0.69	2.08
咖啡酸 caffeic acid	y=22 750x-14 252	0.999 1	1.0~50.0	0.66	1.98
对羟基苯甲醛 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde	y=62 943x+14 970	0.999 4	1.0~50.0	0.13	0.40
丁香醛 syringaldehyde	y=30 447x+31 087	0.999 4	1.0~50.0	0.27	0.82
阿魏酸 ferulic acid	y=9 291.6x+3 866.3	0.999 6	1.0~50.0	0.31	0.94
3-羟基肉桂酸 3-hydroxycinnamic acid	y=63 965x+50 228	0.999 0	1.0~50.0	0.12	0.36

化合物 compound	相对标准偏差/%RSD			化合物 compound	相对标准偏差/%RSD
化合物 compound	精密度 precision	重复性 repeatability	稳定性 stability	化合物 compound	精密度 precision	重复性 repeatability	稳定性 stability
3,4-二羟基苯乙酸 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid	2.14	—	1.51	对羟基苯甲醛 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde	2.51	1.18	2.95
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid	0.44	4.18	2.93	丁香醛 syringaldehyde	1.10	4.15	3.15
香草酸 vanillic acid	1.88	4.13	2.45	阿魏酸 ferulic acid	1.15	4.38	4.57
咖啡酸 caffeic acid	1.86	2.75	4.32	3-羟基肉桂酸 3-hydroxycinnamic acid	0.46	4.09	4.90

化合物 compounds	样品含量/ (mg·kg^-1) sample content	添加含量/ (mg·kg^-1) additive content	检测含量/ (mg·kg^-1) detection content	添加回收率/% spiked recovery	相对标准偏差/% RSD	化合物 compounds	样品含量/ (mg·kg^-1) sample content	添加含量/ (mg·kg^-1) additive content	检测含量/ (mg·kg^-1) detection content	添加回收率/% spiked recovery	相对标准偏差/% RSD
3,4-二羟基苯乙酸 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid		1.00	1.25	124.87	4.36	对羟基苯甲醛 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde		1.00	1.21	108.30	4.28
	—	2.00	2.07	103.70	2.63		0.12	2.00	2.30	108.65	4.59
		4.00	4.36	109.05	3.15			4.00	3.76	90.83	4.76
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid		1.00	1.85	109.98	2.32	丁香醛syringaldehyde		1.00	4.48	100.12	4.22
	0.75	2.00	2.88	106.49	3.78		3.48	2.00	5.29	90.16	2.15
		4.00	5.82	126.69	2.49			4.00	6.95	86.58	4.63
香草酸 vanillic acid		1.00	2.98	80.99	3.44	阿魏酸 ferulic acid		1.00	2.09	110.36	2.44
	2.16	2.00	3.99	90.80	4.41		0.99	2.00	3.10	105.58	4.16
		4.00	5.54	84.30	3.41			4.00	5.72	118.14	2.05
咖啡酸 caffeic acid		1.00	2.14	82.56	4.73	3-羟基肉桂酸 3-hydroxycinnamic acid		1.00	1.94	129.12	1.31
	1.31	2.00	3.15	91.64	3.92		0.64	2.00	2.50	92.86	4.03
		4.00	5.02	92.67	1.20			4.00	4.83	104.63	4.29

化合物 compound	竹笋中酚酸含量/(mg·kg^-1) content of phenolic acids
化合物 compound	苦竹笋(宜宾) Pleioblastus amarus bamboo shoots (Yinbin)	苦竹笋(乐山) Pleioblastus amarus bamboo shoots (Leshan)	苦竹笋(南平) Pleioblastus amarus bamboo shoots (Nanping)	苦篱竹笋(肇庆) Arundinaria acerba bamboo shoots (Zhaoqing)
3,4-二羟基苯乙酸 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid	—	0.55±0.02	—	—
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid	0.91±0.03	2.06±0.10	4.09±0.18	2.32±0.07
香草酸 vanillic acid	1.25±0.04	7.13±0.17	—	—
咖啡酸 caffeic acid	1.36±0.01	—	6.11±0.21	3.34±0.17
对羟基苯甲醛 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde	0.85±0.02	0.27±0.01	0.09±0.00	—
丁香醛 syringaldehyde	10.43±0.51	0.47±0.02	0.45±0.01	2.30±0.06
阿魏酸 ferulic acid	1.24±0.04	27.83±0.79	10.52±0.52	9.68±0.40
3-羟基肉桂酸 3-hydroxycinnamic acid	0.96±0.03	0.28±0.00	0.12±0.01	0.23±0.01
总含量 total content	16.94±0.64	38.60±0.12	21.38±0.93	17.89±0.69

HPLC同时测定竹笋中8种酚酸类物质含量的方法研究及其应用

Simultaneous determination of eight phenolic acids in bamboo shoots by HPLC and its applications

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 30

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

流动相 mobile phase	流动相占比/% mobile phase preportion
流动相 mobile phase	0 min	5 min	10 min	25 min	33 min	39 min	45 min	45.01 min	50 min
A	5	5	10	10	16	24	24	5	5
B	95	95	90	90	84	76	76	95	95

化合物 compound	物质含量/(mg·kg^-1) material content		变化率/% change of content	化合物 compound	物质含量/(mg·kg^-1) material content		变化率/% change of content
化合物 compound	避光处理 shading treatment	CK	变化率/% change of content	化合物 compound	避光处理 shading treatment	CK	变化率/% change of content
3,4-二羟基苯乙酸 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid	—	—	—	丁香醛 syringaldehyde	3.43±0.05	10.43±0.51	-68.1
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid	0.74±0.01	0.91±0.03	-19.8	阿魏酸 ferulic acid	0.96±0.03	1.24±0.04	-22.7
香草酸 vanillic acid	2.16±0.04	1.25±0.04	68.7	3-羟基肉桂酸 3-hydroxycinnamic acid	0.64±0.03	0.96±0.03	-30.5
咖啡酸 caffeic acid	1.33±0.04	1.36±0.01	-2.5	总含量 total content	9.35±0.08	16.94±0.64	-46.2
对羟基苯甲醛 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde	0.12±0.00	0.85±0.02	-85.9

[1]	陆启帆, 林上平, 刘胜辉, 郑翔, 毕毓芳, 肖子璋, 姜姜, 王安可, 杜旭华. 施肥对毛竹林产量影响的Meta分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 88-96.
[2]	姚文静, 刘国华, 吴艳萍, 赵福泽, 王福升, 丁雨龙. 长叶苦竹新造林的生长发育规律研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 123-129.
[3]	张志威,关明杰,刘源松. 竹笋壳/脲醛树脂改性淀粉胶黏剂复合材料的降解特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(04): 160-166.
[4]	林树燕,范婷婷,姜明云,张莉,郑笑,丁雨龙1.2*. 3种(品种)地被竹花器官形态特征及学名订正[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 189-193.
[5]	王星,崔晓阳,郭亚芬. 寒温带林区不同林型土壤中游离氨基酸的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(04): 42-48.
[6]	李雪蕾,丁兴萃,张闪闪,章志远,蔡函江,郑友苗. 不同光强下麻竹笋不同部位苦涩味物质含量的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(03): 161-166.
[7]	叶思诚,谭晓风,袁军,张雪洁,石斌. 油茶根系及分泌物中有机酸的HPLC法测定[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(06): 59-63.
[8]	林树燕,丁雨龙. 鹅毛竹与异叶苦竹的繁育系统研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(03): 1-5.
[9]	粟君,尚旭岚,方升佐,李琼琼,邓波. 栽培温度及种源对青钱柳β谷甾醇含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(03): 0-.
[10]	曹越;沈伯葵. 松材线虫体外可溶性多糖组分的定性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1997, 21(02): 70-73.
[11]	汪孙国,华毓坤. 软化工艺条件对竹材及其重组材性能的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1994, 18(01): 51-56.
[12]	陆宪辉. ATP和其它腺苷酸对毛竹脱氧核糖核酸酶的抑制作用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1992, 16(04): 90-93.
[13]	陆宪辉. 毛竹笋中脱氧核糖核酸酶的提纯和特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1991, 15(01): 15-22.