
彩叶桦新品种幼龄期生长适应性早期分析
张曦文, 陈旭, 吴军, 孙国飞, 吴力国, 赵长海, 代伟昭, 刘桂丰
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 124-130.
彩叶桦新品种幼龄期生长适应性早期分析
Growth adaptability analysis of new varieties of color-leafed birch at a young age
【目的】通过彩叶桦新品种的多地点试验,研究其在不同立地条件下的生长表现及稳定性,为选择适应性强的优良新品种提供科学依据。【方法】以彩叶桦新品种6个品系及对照为研究对象,在立地条件不同的6个参试点造林。各参试点试验林均按完全随机区组设计,设置5个区组,区组内每小区定植5~15株,株行距2 m×3 m。调查各参试点彩叶桦新品种幼龄期的树高、地径、保存率等性状,利用DPS统计分析软件对其进行多点联合方差分析及稳定性分析。【结果】①树高、地径生长量在品种间和地点间的差异以及品种与地点的交互作用均表现极显著(P < 0. 01),对开展彩叶桦新品选择及稳定性分析具有重要意义。②彩叶桦新品种中,‘朝霞’系列RG12、RG11生长表现较好,其中:RG12在帽儿山、宝龙店、孟家岗、鹤岗4个参试点的树高、地径生长量最大,其较各参试点试验群体均值分别提高了22.2%、38.3%、18.0%、9.8%和72.2%、43.2%、21.5%、19.1%;RG11在小北湖参试点的树高、地径生长量最大,较当地试验群体均值提高了23.3%和21.5%;‘紫霞’系列紫2在错海参试点的树高生长表现较好,其较当地参试点群体均值提高了9.8%;其他彩叶桦生长表现一般或较差。③在6个彩叶桦新品种中,‘紫霞’系列新品种的保存率较高,平均为90.1%;而‘朝霞’系列新品种保存率较低,平均为78.7%。④依据各品种树高、地径的速生性和稳定性参数综合评价认为RG11较好。【结论】彩叶桦的生长性状在品种间和地点间存在显著差异,品种与地点存在显著交互作用。据幼龄期的分析初步确定‘朝霞’系列RG11的速生性较高、稳定性较强,可在全部6个参试点推广。
【Objective】 The growth performance and stability of new varieties of color-leafed birch were studied under different multi-environment site conditions to provide a scientific basis for selecting excellent new varieties with good adaptability. 【Method】 Six strains of color-leafed birch new varieties and controls were tested at six different sites. A randomized complete block design was used in this study. Each site had 5 blocks, and each plot had 5-15 plants with a 2 m×3 m plant spacing. Tree height, ground diameter, and preservation rate were measured at an early age, and multi-site joint combined variance and stability analyses were conducted using the DPS statistical analysis software. 【Result】 (1) The differences in tree height and ground diameter growth between varieties and locations, and the interaction between varieties by location, were significant (P < 0.01). Therefore, conducting a selection and stability analysis of new birch varieties was important. (2) Among the new birch varieties, the strains RG12 and RG11 showed better growth performance. RG12 had the highest tree height and ground diameter growth at the following four testing sites: Maoershan, Baolongdian, Mengjiagang, and Hegang. RG12 increased by 22.2%, 38.3%, 18.0%, 9.8% and 72.2%, 43.2%, 21.5%, and 19.1% over the population mean, respectively. RG11 had the highest tree height and ground diameter growth at the Xiaobeihu site and increased by 23.3% and 21.5% over local controls, respectively. The tree height growth of Purple 2 in the ‘Zixia’ series performed well in the Cuohai site, with an increase of 9.8% compared to the arerage of the local pilot group. The other color-leafed birch varieties exhibited medium or poor growth performance. (3) Among the six new strains, the conservation rate of the new varieties of the “Zixia” series was 90.1% and was higher than average, while for the new varieties of the “Zhaoxia” series it was 78.7% and was lower than average. (4) Based on the growth and stability parameters of tree height and ground diameter, RG11 was the best variety. 【Conclusion】 The growth traits of color-leafed birch varieties differed significantly, which indicated that variety had a significant effect, as well as location and the variety-location interaction. According to the analysis of trees at a young age, our preliminary results showed that RG11 had rapid growth and stability, and could be promoted at all six testing site regions.
彩叶桦新品种 / 生长适应性 / 多地点试验 / 品种稳定性
new varieties of color-leafed birch / growth adaptability / multi-site test / stability of varieties
[1] |
姚红梅. 彩叶植物对提升城市园林景观的重要作用及应用前景[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2011, 39(6): 98-99.
|
[2] |
董俊岚. 北京彩叶树种资源及其在城市绿化中的应用[J]. 绿化与生活, 2005(1):21-22.
|
[3] |
田世龙, 马庆, 王阳, 等. 紫叶桦与裂叶桦杂交子代的种子活力及叶片性状分离[J]. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(3):40-48.
|
[4] |
宋莹莹, 翟晓鸥, 郁永英, 等. 风箱果新品种‘金盏’的选育[J]. 防护林科技, 2018(7):75-76.
|
[5] |
马立华, 郁永英, 谭振平, 等. 锦带花属2个新品种[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(5):629-631.
|
[6] |
翟晓鸥, 郁永英, 李长海, 等. 彩叶梾木新品种‘辉煌’的选育[J]. 防护林科技, 2021(1):60-62.
|
[7] |
王颖, 翟晓鸥, 李长海, 等. 丁香新品种‘瑜霞’的选育[J]. 防护林科技, 2018(8):73-74.
|
[8] |
刘桂丰, 张姝慧, 李慧玉, 等. 彩叶桦‘紫霞1号’新品种[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):245-246.
|
[9] |
姜静, 金冬雪, 李慧玉, 等. 白桦新品种‘朝霞1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(增刊2):3124-3125.
|
[10] |
姜静, 郑雨, 李慧玉, 等. 白桦新品种‘朝霞2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(增刊2):3126-3127.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
刘宇, 徐焕文, 尚福强, 等. 3个地点白桦种源试验生长稳定性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(5):50-57.
|
[13] |
王军辉, 顾万春, 李斌, 等. 桤木优良种源/家系的选择研究:生长的适应性和遗传稳定性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(3):59-66.
|
[14] |
董虹妤, 刘青华, 金国庆, 等. 马尾松3代种质幼林生长性状遗传效应及其与环境互作[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(6):775-780.
|
[15] |
阮梓材, 胡德活, 陈仲. 杉木子代基因型×环境互作和稳定性的研究[J]. 广东林业科技, 1992, 8(4):13-19.
|
[16] |
唐启义. DPS数据处理系统:实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
油松种源协作组. 油松不同生态型的适应性的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1987, 9(1):11-23.
The Cooperation Group of the Provenance Test of Pinus tabulaeformis. A preliminary study on the adaptability of provenances of Pinus tabulaeformis[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 1987, 9(1):11-23.
|
[22] |
晏姝, 胡德活, 郑会全, 等. 16年生杉木2代种子园家系区域测定分析[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(4):414-418.
|
[23] |
赵兴堂, 夏德安, 曾凡锁, 等. 水曲柳生长性状种源与地点互作及优良种源选择[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(3):140-147.
|
[24] |
王保松, 韩杰峰, 郭群, 等. 35杨等黑杨派杨树无性系区域化试验[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2010, 37(4):1-5.
|
[25] |
刘宁, 丁昌俊, 李波, 等. 12个欧美杨无性系生长初期基因型与环境的互作效应[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(8):63-72.
|
[26] |
吕东林, 林琳, 郭译文, 等. 紫雨桦耐盐性及花色苷合成相关基因的表达特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2):25-32.
|
[27] |
宋佳宝, 刘煜光, 周晓慧, 等. 瞬时热胁迫对秋季3种植物叶片光系统Ⅱ活性和色素含量的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2021, 50(6):140-148.
|
[28] |
张伟龙, 李雕, 杨静慧, 等. 土壤盐碱对彩叶树叶片主成分影响的红外光谱分析[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2020, 27(3):7-13.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |