基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例

吕程翔; 胡秀艳; 武洋; 殷齐琪; 张志飞; 秦文栋; 王君櫹; 周生路

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018

吕程翔, 胡秀艳, 武洋, 殷齐琪, 张志飞, 秦文栋, 王君櫹, 周生路

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6) : 210-216.

PDF(4467 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(4467 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6) : 210-216. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018

研究论文

基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例

吕程翔 ¹ ,
胡秀艳 ² ,
武洋 ² ,
殷齐琪 ¹ ,
张志飞 ¹ ,
秦文栋 ¹ ,
王君櫹 ³ ,
周生路 ¹^,^*

作者信息 +

Ecological optimization zoning and management based on the spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility in Jintan District,Changzhou City

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】基于生态服务供需可达性,探究生态系统与社会经济系统的空间耦合,为国土空间规划中的生态空间优化和分区管控提供定量依据。【方法】以常州市金坛区为研究区,首先评估其生态服务价值并计算生态服务供需比,利用改进潜能模型得到生态供给可达性进而评价生态供需协调度;其次叠加生态服务供需比和供需协调度得到生态优化区;最后借助PLUS模型进行情景模拟,根据两类情形下生态供给能力响应差异提出各分区管控策略。【结果】研究区内生态供需耦合空间分异明显,可划分为供需协调保护区、供需匹配保育区、供需拮抗培育区、供需损益补偿区4类生态优化区,面积占比分别为47.3%、18.8%、23.1%、10.8%,供需管控实施重点分别为:继续保护增强生态服务供给能力,维护生态供需优质协调状态;保护培育区内生态服务供给能力,继续提升生态供需协调匹配程度;大力提升区内生态供给的质和量;严禁生态占用和破坏。供需管控情形下研究区生态服务供给能力得到优化提升,相较于自然发展情形提升15.6%。【结论】基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区,能更有效地把握区域生态供需空间分异和管控实施重点。

Abstract

【Objective】Territorial spatial planning is crucial for building ecological civilization, with ecological space optimization and zoning management serving as the foundation for effective planning.【Method】The study area was Jintan District in Changzhou City. First, we evaluated ecological service values and calculated the ecological service supply-demand ratio. We then assessed the ecological supply-demand coordination degree using an improved potential model to determine ecological supply accessibility. Next, we superimposed the ecological service supply-demand ratio and coordination degree to identify ecological optimization zones. Scenario simulations were conducted with the PLUS model, and control strategies were proposed based on the differences in ecological supply capacity responses between the scenarios.【Result】The study area showed significant spatial variation in ecological supply and demand coupling. We identified four types of ecological optimization zones: supply and demand coordination protection zone (47.3%), supply and demand matching conservation zone (18.8%), supply and demand antagonism cultivation zone (23.1%), and supply and demand loss and gain compensation zone (10.8%). The focus of supply and demand control should be: continuing to protect and enhance ecological service supply capacity, maintaining the coordination of supply and demand quality; protecting and cultivating regional ecological service supply capacity, and improving supply and demand coordination; significantly increasing the quality and quantity of regional ecological supply; and strictly prohibiting ecological occupation and destruction. The supply and demand control scenario improved ecological service supply capacity by 15.6% compared with the natural development scenario.【Conclusion】Ecological optimization zoning based on spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility effectively addresses regional ecological supply and demand differentiation and prioritizes control implementation.

导出引用

吕程翔, 胡秀艳, 武洋, 等. 基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2024, 48(6): 210-216 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018

LÜ Chengxiang, HU Xiuyan, WU Yang, et al. Ecological optimization zoning and management based on the spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility in Jintan District,Changzhou City[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(6): 210-216 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018

中图分类号： X321

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	陈阳, 岳文泽, 张亮, 等. 国土空间规划视角下生态空间管制分区的理论思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(8):1-9. CHEN Y, YUE W Z, ZHANG L, et al. Theoretical thinking on ecological space zoning from the perspective of territorial space planning[J]. China Land Sci, 2020, 34(8):1-9.DOI:10.11994/zgtdkx.20200730.100813. 本文引用 [1]

[2]

郭天威, 陆春锋, 王君櫹, 等. 基于三生空间耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化——以扬州市为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):133-142.

GUO

T W

, LU

C F

, WANG

J X

, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the coupling of ecological-production-living spaces: taking Yangzhou City as an example[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(5):133-142.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004045.

本文引用 [1]

[3]

彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13):4562-4572.

PENG

, YANG

, XIE

, et al. Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong Province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(13):4562-4572.DOI:10.5846/stxb201601020007.

本文引用 [1]

[4]	BURKHARD B, KROLL F, NEDKOV S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply,demand and budgets[J]. Ecol Indic, 2012, 21:17-29.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	ZHANG L Q, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern:a case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,China[J]. Urban Ecosyst, 2017, 20(3):701-714.DOI:10.1007/s11252-016-0629-y. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7):1277-1289. MA L, LIU H, PENG J, et al. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2017, 72(7):1277-1289.DOI:10.11821/dlxb201707012. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	白杨, 王敏, 李晖, 等. 生态系统服务供给与需求的理论与管理方法[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17):5846-5852. BAI Y, WANG M, LI H, et al. Ecosystem service supply and demand: theory and management application[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(17):5846-5852.DOI: 10.5846 /stxb201606121124. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	王宏亮, 高艺宁, 王振宇, 等. 基于生态系统服务的城市生态管理分区——以深圳市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23):8504-8515. WANG H L, GAO Y N, WANG Z Y, et al. Urban ecological management division based on ecosystem services:a case study of Shenzhen City[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(23):8504-8515.DOI:10.5846/stxb202004090852. 本文引用 [1]

[9]

韩增林, 刘澄浩, 闫晓露, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配与耦合协调的生态管理分区——以大连市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(22):9064-9075.

HAN

Z L

, LIU

C H

, YAN

X L

, et al. Coupling coordination and matches in ecosystem services supply-demand for ecological zoning management:a case study of Dalian[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(22):9064-9075.DOI:10.5846/stxb202103220757.

本文引用 [1]

[10]	张晓玲, 吕晓. 国土空间用途管制的改革逻辑及其规划响应路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6):1261-1272. ZHANG X L, LYU X. Reform logic of territorial space use regulation and the response path of land spatial planning[J]. J Nat Resour, 2020, 35(6):1261-1272.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200601. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	KROLL F, MÜLLER F, HAASE D, et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(3):521-535.DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	张金光, 赵兵. 基于可达性的城市公园选址及布局优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):151-158. ZHANG J G, ZHAO B. Location and layout optimization of urban parks based on accessibility[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):151-158.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201710022. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	管青春, 郝晋珉, 许月卿, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的农业生态管理分区[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(7):1359-1373. GUAN Q C, HAO J M, XU Y Q, et al. Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Resour Sci, 2019, 41(7):1359-1373.DOI:10.18402/resci.2019.07.16. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	BARÓ F, PALOMO I, ZULIAN G, et al. Mapping ecosystem service capacity,flow and demand for landscape and urban planning:a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57:405-417.DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1740-1746. XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resour Sci, 2015, 37(9):1740-1746. DOI:1007-7588(2015)09-1740-07. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecol Econ, 1998, 25(1):3-15.DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2. 本文引用 [1]

[17]

胡和兵, 刘红玉, 郝敬锋, 等. 城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(8):2565-2576.

H B

, LIU

H Y

, HAO

J F

, et al. Spatio-temporal variation in the value of ecosystem services and its response to land use intensity in an urbanized watershed[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(8):2565-2576.DOI:10.5846/stxb201201100048.

本文引用 [1]

[18]

李佳鸣, 冯长春. 基于土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值及其改善效果研究——以内蒙古自治区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13):4741-4750.

J M

, FENG

C C

. Ecosystem service values and ecological improvement based on land use change: a case study of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous region[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(13):4741-4750.DOI:10.5846/stxb201806301440.

本文引用 [1]

[19]	WILLIAMS S D, HANSEN K, SMITHEY M, et al. Using social determinants of health to link health workforce diversity,care quality and access,and health disparities to achieve health equity in nursing[J]. Public Health Rep, 2014, 129(Suppl 2):32-36.DOI: 10.1177/00333549141291S207. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	LUO W, WANG F H. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment:synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region[J]. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 2003, 30(6):865-884.DOI:10.1068/b29120. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3):793-810. WANG S J, KONG W, REN L, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China[J]. J Nat Resour, 2021, 36(3):793-810.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210319. 本文引用 [2]

[22]	张雪飞, 王传胜, 李萌. 国土空间规划中生态空间和生态保护红线的划定[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2430-2446. ZHANG X F, WANG C S, LI M. Demarcating ecological space and ecological protection red line under the framework of territory spatial planning[J]. Geogr Res, 2019, 38(10):2430-2446.DOI: 10.11821/dlyj02017122. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	LIANG X, GUAN Q F, CLARKE K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model:a case study in Wuhan,China[J]. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 2021,85:101569.DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569. 本文引用 [1]

[24]

王子尧, 黄楚梨, 李倞, 等. 耦合InVEST-HFI-PLUS模型的生态分区规划与动态评估——以博尔塔拉蒙古自治州为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(14):5789-5798.

WANG

Z Y

, HUANG

C L

, LI

, et al. Ecological zoning planning and dynamic evaluation coupled with Invest-HFI-Plus model:a case study in Bortala Mongolian autonomous prefecture[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(14):5789-5798.DOI:10.5846/stxb202108202319.

本文引用 [1]