基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 210-216.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018

基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例

吕程翔¹(), 胡秀艳², 武洋², 殷齐琪¹, 张志飞¹, 秦文栋¹, 王君櫹³, 周生路¹^,^*()

1.自然资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室,南京大学地理与海洋学院,江苏南京 210023
2.扬州市自然资源和规划局江都分局,江苏扬州 225200
3.南京财经大学公共管理学院,江苏南京 210023

收稿日期:2022-09-07 修回日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2024-11-30 发布日期:2024-12-10
通讯作者: *周生路(zhousl@nju.edu.cn),教授。
作者简介:
吕程翔(lv_chengxiang@126.com)。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41771243);江苏省自然资源科技项目(2023050);江苏省自然资源科技项目(2023037)

Ecological optimization zoning and management based on the spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility in Jintan District,Changzhou City

LÜ Chengxiang¹(), HU Xiuyan², WU Yang², YIN Qiqi¹, ZHANG Zhifei¹, QIN Wendong¹, WANG Junxiao³, ZHOU Shenglu¹^,^*()

1. The Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Geographic and Oceanic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
2. Jiangdu Branch of Yangzhou Natural Resources and Planning Bureau, Yangzhou 225200, China
3. School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2022-09-07 Revised:2024-01-20 Online:2024-11-30 Published:2024-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】基于生态服务供需可达性,探究生态系统与社会经济系统的空间耦合,为国土空间规划中的生态空间优化和分区管控提供定量依据。【方法】以常州市金坛区为研究区,首先评估其生态服务价值并计算生态服务供需比,利用改进潜能模型得到生态供给可达性进而评价生态供需协调度;其次叠加生态服务供需比和供需协调度得到生态优化区;最后借助PLUS模型进行情景模拟,根据两类情形下生态供给能力响应差异提出各分区管控策略。【结果】研究区内生态供需耦合空间分异明显,可划分为供需协调保护区、供需匹配保育区、供需拮抗培育区、供需损益补偿区4类生态优化区,面积占比分别为47.3%、18.8%、23.1%、10.8%,供需管控实施重点分别为:继续保护增强生态服务供给能力,维护生态供需优质协调状态;保护培育区内生态服务供给能力,继续提升生态供需协调匹配程度;大力提升区内生态供给的质和量;严禁生态占用和破坏。供需管控情形下研究区生态服务供给能力得到优化提升,相较于自然发展情形提升15.6%。【结论】基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区,能更有效地把握区域生态供需空间分异和管控实施重点。

关键词: 生态优化分区, 国土空间规划, 可达性, 生态服务供需, 耦合协调, PLUS模型, 常州市金坛区

Abstract:

【Objective】Territorial spatial planning is crucial for building ecological civilization, with ecological space optimization and zoning management serving as the foundation for effective planning.【Method】The study area was Jintan District in Changzhou City. First, we evaluated ecological service values and calculated the ecological service supply-demand ratio. We then assessed the ecological supply-demand coordination degree using an improved potential model to determine ecological supply accessibility. Next, we superimposed the ecological service supply-demand ratio and coordination degree to identify ecological optimization zones. Scenario simulations were conducted with the PLUS model, and control strategies were proposed based on the differences in ecological supply capacity responses between the scenarios.【Result】The study area showed significant spatial variation in ecological supply and demand coupling. We identified four types of ecological optimization zones: supply and demand coordination protection zone (47.3%), supply and demand matching conservation zone (18.8%), supply and demand antagonism cultivation zone (23.1%), and supply and demand loss and gain compensation zone (10.8%). The focus of supply and demand control should be: continuing to protect and enhance ecological service supply capacity, maintaining the coordination of supply and demand quality; protecting and cultivating regional ecological service supply capacity, and improving supply and demand coordination; significantly increasing the quality and quantity of regional ecological supply; and strictly prohibiting ecological occupation and destruction. The supply and demand control scenario improved ecological service supply capacity by 15.6% compared with the natural development scenario.【Conclusion】Ecological optimization zoning based on spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility effectively addresses regional ecological supply and demand differentiation and prioritizes control implementation.

Key words: ecological optimization zoning, territorial spatial planning, accessibility, supply and demand of ecological services, coupling coordination, PLUS model, Jintan District of Changzhou City

中图分类号:

X321

吕程翔,胡秀艳,武洋,等. 基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 210-216.

LÜ Chengxiang, HU Xiuyan, WU Yang, YIN Qiqi, ZHANG Zhifei, QIN Wendong, WANG Junxiao, ZHOU Shenglu. Ecological optimization zoning and management based on the spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility in Jintan District,Changzhou City[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(6): 210-216.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209018.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 24

[1]	陈阳, 岳文泽, 张亮, 等. 国土空间规划视角下生态空间管制分区的理论思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(8):1-9.
	CHEN Y, YUE W Z, ZHANG L, et al. Theoretical thinking on ecological space zoning from the perspective of territorial space planning[J]. China Land Sci, 2020, 34(8):1-9.DOI:10.11994/zgtdkx.20200730.100813.
[2]	郭天威, 陆春锋, 王君櫹, 等. 基于三生空间耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化——以扬州市为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):133-142.
	GUO T W, LU C F, WANG J X, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on the coupling of ecological-production-living spaces: taking Yangzhou City as an example[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(5):133-142.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004045.
[3]	彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13):4562-4572.
	PENG J, YANG Y, XIE P, et al. Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong Province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(13):4562-4572.DOI:10.5846/stxb201601020007.
[4]	BURKHARD B, KROLL F, NEDKOV S, et al. Mapping ecosystem service supply,demand and budgets[J]. Ecol Indic, 2012, 21:17-29.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
[5]	ZHANG L Q, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern:a case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,China[J]. Urban Ecosyst, 2017, 20(3):701-714.DOI:10.1007/s11252-016-0629-y.
[6]	马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(7):1277-1289.
	MA L, LIU H, PENG J, et al. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2017, 72(7):1277-1289.DOI:10.11821/dlxb201707012.
[7]	白杨, 王敏, 李晖, 等. 生态系统服务供给与需求的理论与管理方法[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17):5846-5852.
	BAI Y, WANG M, LI H, et al. Ecosystem service supply and demand: theory and management application[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(17):5846-5852.DOI: 10.5846 /stxb201606121124.
[8]	王宏亮, 高艺宁, 王振宇, 等. 基于生态系统服务的城市生态管理分区——以深圳市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23):8504-8515.
	WANG H L, GAO Y N, WANG Z Y, et al. Urban ecological management division based on ecosystem services:a case study of Shenzhen City[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(23):8504-8515.DOI:10.5846/stxb202004090852.
[9]	韩增林, 刘澄浩, 闫晓露, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需匹配与耦合协调的生态管理分区——以大连市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(22):9064-9075.
	HAN Z L, LIU C H, YAN X L, et al. Coupling coordination and matches in ecosystem services supply-demand for ecological zoning management:a case study of Dalian[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(22):9064-9075.DOI:10.5846/stxb202103220757.
[10]	张晓玲, 吕晓. 国土空间用途管制的改革逻辑及其规划响应路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6):1261-1272.
	ZHANG X L, LYU X. Reform logic of territorial space use regulation and the response path of land spatial planning[J]. J Nat Resour, 2020, 35(6):1261-1272.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200601.
[11]	KROLL F, MÜLLER F, HAASE D, et al. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(3):521-535.DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008.
[12]	张金光, 赵兵. 基于可达性的城市公园选址及布局优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):151-158.
	ZHANG J G, ZHAO B. Location and layout optimization of urban parks based on accessibility[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):151-158.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201710022.
[13]	管青春, 郝晋珉, 许月卿, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的农业生态管理分区[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(7):1359-1373.
	GUAN Q C, HAO J M, XU Y Q, et al. Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Resour Sci, 2019, 41(7):1359-1373.DOI:10.18402/resci.2019.07.16.
[14]	BARÓ F, PALOMO I, ZULIAN G, et al. Mapping ecosystem service capacity,flow and demand for landscape and urban planning:a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57:405-417.DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006.
[15]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1740-1746.
	XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resour Sci, 2015, 37(9):1740-1746. DOI:1007-7588(2015)09-1740-07.
[16]	COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecol Econ, 1998, 25(1):3-15.DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2.
[17]	胡和兵, 刘红玉, 郝敬锋, 等. 城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(8):2565-2576.
	HU H B, LIU H Y, HAO J F, et al. Spatio-temporal variation in the value of ecosystem services and its response to land use intensity in an urbanized watershed[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(8):2565-2576.DOI:10.5846/stxb201201100048.
[18]	李佳鸣, 冯长春. 基于土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值及其改善效果研究——以内蒙古自治区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13):4741-4750.
	LI J M, FENG C C. Ecosystem service values and ecological improvement based on land use change: a case study of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous region[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(13):4741-4750.DOI:10.5846/stxb201806301440.
[19]	WILLIAMS S D, HANSEN K, SMITHEY M, et al. Using social determinants of health to link health workforce diversity,care quality and access,and health disparities to achieve health equity in nursing[J]. Public Health Rep, 2014, 129(Suppl 2):32-36.DOI: 10.1177/00333549141291S207.
[20]	LUO W, WANG F H. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment:synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region[J]. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 2003, 30(6):865-884.DOI:10.1068/b29120.
[21]	王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3):793-810.
	WANG S J, KONG W, REN L, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China[J]. J Nat Resour, 2021, 36(3):793-810.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210319.
[22]	张雪飞, 王传胜, 李萌. 国土空间规划中生态空间和生态保护红线的划定[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(10):2430-2446.
	ZHANG X F, WANG C S, LI M. Demarcating ecological space and ecological protection red line under the framework of territory spatial planning[J]. Geogr Res, 2019, 38(10):2430-2446.DOI: 10.11821/dlyj02017122.
[23]	LIANG X, GUAN Q F, CLARKE K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model:a case study in Wuhan,China[J]. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 2021,85:101569.DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569.
[24]	王子尧, 黄楚梨, 李倞, 等. 耦合InVEST-HFI-PLUS模型的生态分区规划与动态评估——以博尔塔拉蒙古自治州为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(14):5789-5798.
	WANG Z Y, HUANG C L, LI L, et al. Ecological zoning planning and dynamic evaluation coupled with Invest-HFI-Plus model:a case study in Bortala Mongolian autonomous prefecture[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(14):5789-5798.DOI:10.5846/stxb202108202319.

一级分类 first class	二级分类 second class	耕地 cropland	园地 garden plot	林地 forest	草地 grassland	水域 water body	其他用地 other land
供给服务 provisioning service	食物生产	3.315	1.270	1.010	0.380	1.000	0.195
	原料生产	0.735	2.280	2.320	0.560	0.250	0.295
	水资源供给	-3.915	1.220	1.200	0.310	16.590	0.165
调节服务 regulating service	气体调节	2.670	7.755	7.630	1.970	0.770	1.040
	气候调节	1.395	21.835	22.830	5.210	3.210	2.655
	净化环境	0.405	6.785	6.690	1.720	41.910	1.015
	水文调节	4.485	15.110	14.940	3.820	143.000	2.015
支持服务 supporting service	土壤保持	1.560	9.445	9.290	2.400	0.950	1.265
	维持养分循环	0.465	0.715	0.710	0.180	0.070	0.095
	生物多样性	0.510	8.590	8.460	2.180	7.530	1.150
文化服务cultural service	美学景观	0.225	3.775	3.710	0.960	10.570	0.505

基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例

Ecological optimization zoning and management based on the spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility in Jintan District,Changzhou City

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 24

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	张晓瑞, 何雨, 董洁云. 基于村庄发展潜力评价的景观格局研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 155-164.
[2]	张莹, 王让会, 刘春伟, 周丽敏. 祁连山自然保护区生境质量模拟及预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 135-144.
[3]	杨赫, 米锋. 社会经济地位下城市绿地可达性对居民心理健康的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 248-256.
[4]	张育诚, 韩念龙, 胡珂, 于淼, 黎兴强. 海南岛中部山区土地利用变化对碳储量时空分异的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 115-122.
[5]	许浩, 黄婷, 刘伟, 王浩. 长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 294-303.
[6]	赵梦蕾, 姚正阳, 毛达. 基于i2SFCA的新乡市主城区公园绿地空间步行可达性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 227-232.
[7]	李朝洪,赵晓红. 黑龙江省森工国有林区生态建设与经济转型协调发展研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 144-152.
[8]	张金光,赵兵. 基于可达性的城市公园选址及布局优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 151-158.
[9]	严军. 城市广场的物质环境建构[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 28(01): 61-65.