中国柳树遗传育种研究进展

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209035

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 51-63.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209035

所属专题：南京林业大学120周年校庆特刊

中国柳树遗传育种研究进展

何旭东(), 隋德宗, 王红玲, 黄瑞芳, 郑纪伟, 王保松()

江苏省林业科学研究院,国家林业和草原局柳树工程技术研究中心,江苏省农业种质资源保护与利用平台柳树资源圃,江苏南京 211153

收稿日期:2022-09-18 修回日期:2022-10-17 出版日期:2022-11-30 发布日期:2022-11-24
通讯作者: 王保松
基金资助:
江苏省林业科学研究院自主科研项目(ZZKY202101);国家林业和草原局重点研发项目(GLM[2021]83)

Research progresses of willow genetic breeding in China

HE Xudong(), SUI Dezong, WANG Hongling, HUANG Ruifang, ZHENG Jiwei, WANG Baosong()

Jiangsu Academy of Forestry, Willow Engineering Technology Research Center of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Willow Nursery of the Jiangsu Provincial Platform for Conservation and Utilization of Agricultural Germplasm, Nanjing 211153, China

Received:2022-09-18 Revised:2022-10-17 Online:2022-11-30 Published:2022-11-24
Contact: WANG Baosong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

柳树是我国重要的乡土树种,具有数量众多、分布广泛、变异丰富、生长迅速、易于繁殖等特点,可作为园林景观、速生用材、生态防护、生物质能源、生物修复、柳编工艺等多功能树种。柳树具有广泛而重要的生态与经济价值。近年来,我国柳树研究发展迅速,通过常规育种选育了一大批良种和新品种,在遗传学与基因组学方面也取得重大进展,在国际上处于领先地位。笔者从柳树的分类与分布、种质资源收集与保存、重要性状评价、遗传改良、分子遗传学等方面对近60年来我国柳树遗传育种的研究进展进行了系统总结,并分析了目前我国柳树遗传育种工作中存在的问题,展望了今后的重点研究方向,旨在进一步提高我国柳树遗传育种工作的水平,也为其他木本植物的遗传育种研究提供有益参考。

关键词: 柳树, 遗传变异, 分子标记, 全基因组, 生物质能源, 生物修复

Abstract:

Willows are a prominent group of native tree species in China, mainly due to the large quantities, wide distribution, abundant variation, fast growing and easy propagating. Willows have extensive and critical ecological and economic values as multi-functional tree species that serve for landscape planting, ecological protection, bioremediation and as an important wood source for timber, bioenergy and weaving. In recent years, willow research has developed rapidly in China. A large number of improved varieties or new varieties have been selected through conventional breeding, and major breakthroughs in genetics and genomics made China as a world leader in these fields. In this paper, we systematically summarize the progresses of willow mainly focused on taxonomy and distribution, germplasm collection, conservation as well as evaluation, genetic improvement, and molecular genetics around 60 years in China. Meanwhile, we analyzed the problems on genetic breeding at present and discussed the major prospects in future in order to promote the level of willow research in China, provide useful information for genetic breeding research of other woody plants.

Key words: willow, genetic variation, molecular marker, whole genome, bioenergy, bioremediation

中图分类号:

何旭东,隋德宗,王红玲,等. 中国柳树遗传育种研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 51-63.

HE Xudong, SUI Dezong, WANG Hongling, HUANG Ruifang, ZHENG Jiwei, WANG Baosong. Research progresses of willow genetic breeding in China[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(6): 51-63.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209035.

参考文献 144

[1]	涂忠虞. 柳树育种与栽培[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社,1982.
	TU Z Y. Willow breeding and cultivation[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press,1982.
[2]	王保松, 施士争. 中国柳树种质资源[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2018.
	WANG B S, SHI S Z. Actinidia germplasm resources in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2018.
[3]	中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志: 第20卷第二分册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984: 81-380.
[4]	HOU J, YE N, DONG Z Y, et al. Major chromosomal rearrangements distinguish willow and poplar after the ancestral “salicoid” genome duplication[J]. Genome Biol Evol, 2016, 8(6):1868-1875.DOI:10.1093/gbe/evw127.
[5]	涂忠虞, 潘明建. 乔木柳四个无性系的选育与利用[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1987, 14(3):1-23.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J. The breeding and the utilization of four willow’s clones[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1987, 14(3):1-23.
[6]	王宝松, 涂忠虞, 潘明建, 等. 柳树矿柱材优良无性系选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1998, 25(3):1-5.
	WANG B S, TU Z Y, PAN M J, et al. The selection of willow excellent clones for pitwoot[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1998, 25(3):1-5.
[7]	涂忠虞, 潘明建, 张日连, 等. 柳树速生无性系J1-75及J4-75的选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1983, 10(1):1-8.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J, ZHANG R L, et al. Breeding of fast-growing willow clones J1-75 and J4-75[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1983, 10(1):1-8.
[8]	王宝松, 潘明建, 郭群, 等. 乔木柳纸浆用材优良无性系选育[J], 江苏林业科技, 2002, 29(4): 1-8.
	WANG B S, PAN M J, GUO Q, et al. Selection of willow excellent clones for pulpwood[J]. J of Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2002, 29(4): 1-8.
[9]	李景涛, 唐国梁, 段春玲, 等. ‘鲁选8号’等3个速生柳优良无性系选育[J]. 山东林业科技, 2017, 47(3):18-25.
	LI J T, TANG G L, DUAN C L, et al. Breeding of three excellent clones of fast-growing willow ‘Luxuan No.8’[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2017, 47(3):18-25.
[10]	诸葛强, 张博, 黄敏仁, 等. 植物近等基因系培育及在林木遗传改良上的应用探讨[J]. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(6):754-759.
	ZHUGE Q, ZHANG B, HUANG M R, et al. Progress in the selection of plant near isogenic lines and its application in the genetic improvement of forest trees[J]. For Res, 2003, 16(6):754-759.
[11]	任宪威. 树木学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,1997.
	REN X Q. Dendrology[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House,1997.
[12]	贾会霞, 吴立栓, 胡建军, 等. 柳树种质资源遗传多样性和亲缘关系的CE-AFLP分析[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6):37-44.
	JIA H X, WU L S, HU J J, et al. Genetic diversity and genetic relationship of Salix germplasms revealed by CE-AFLP analysis[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2013, 49(6):37-44.
[13]	于振旭, 秦光华, 宋玉民, 等. 旱柳野生种质资源收集及多样性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(10):67-76.
	YU Z X, QIN G H, SONG Y M, et al. Collection and genetic diversity analysis of wild germplasm in Salix matsudana[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(10):67-76.DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170330.
[14]	郑纪伟, 孙冲, 周洁, 等. 基于EST-SSR标记的欧洲红皮柳遗传变异分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2016, 43(6):6-11,37.
	ZHENG J W, SUN C, ZHOU J, et al. Analysis of genetic variation of Salix purpurea based on EST-SSR markers[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2016, 43(6):6-11,37.
[15]	王源秀, 徐立安, 黄敏仁. 杞柳和簸箕柳候选杂交亲本SSR指纹分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(2):1-5.
	WANG Y X, XU L A, HUANG M R. Analysis of fingerprinting of Salix intagra Thunb.and Salix suchowensis Cheng using microsatellite(SSR) markers[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2008, 32(2):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2008.02.001.
[16]	JIA H X, YANG H F, SUN P, et al. De novo transcriptome assembly,development of EST-SSR markers and population genetic analyses for the desert biomass willow,Salix psammophila[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6:39591.DOI:10.1038/srep39591.
[17]	HUANG J T, ZHOU Y X, YIN L H, et al. Climatic controls on sap flow dynamics and used water sources of Salix psammophila in a semi-arid environment in northwest China[J]. Environ Earth Sci, 2015, 73(1):289-301.DOI:10.1007/s12665-014-3505-1.
[18]	WU J, NYMAN T, WANG D C, et al. Phylogeny of Salix subgenus Salix s.l.(Salicaceae):delimitation,biogeography,and reticulate evolution[J]. BMC Evol Biol, 2015, 15:31.DOI:10.1186/s12862-015-0311-7.
[19]	WANG Y, JIAO Z Y, ZHENG J W, et al. Population genetic diversity and structure of an endangered Salicaceae species in northeast China:Chosenia arbutifolia (Pall.) A.skv[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(9):1282.DOI:10.3390/f12091282.
[20]	王源秀, 徐立安, 黄敏仁. 柳树遗传学研究现状与前景[J]. 植物学通报, 2008, 25(2):240-247.
	WANG Y X, XU L A, HUANG M R. Research progress on Salix genetics[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008, 25(2):240-247.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2008.02.014.
[21]	郑纪伟, 教忠意, 王保松, 等. 柳树新品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2020, 47(2):1-5,56.
	ZHENG J W, JIAO Z Y, WANG B S, et al. Construction of fingerprint for new Salix varieties[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2020, 47(2):1-5,56.
[22]	何旭东, 郑纪伟, 孙冲, 等. 33个杨柳品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2):35-42.
	HE X D, ZHENG J W, SUN C, et al. Construction of fingerprints for 33 varieties in Salicaceae[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2021, 45(2):35-42.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2021.08048.
[23]	王宝松, 涂忠虞, 郭群, 等. 柳树杂种木材基本密度的遗传变异[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1997, 24(1):22-26.
	WANG B S, TU Z Y, GUO Q, et al. Genetic variation of wood basic density of willow hybrids[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1997, 24(1):22-26.
[24]	潘明建, 涂忠虞, 郭群, 等. 柳树纤维性状遗传变异的研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1997, 24(1):14-21.
	PAN M J, TU Z Y, GUO Q, et al. A study on fibre genetic variation of willow[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1997, 24(1):14-21.
[25]	涂忠虞, 潘明建, 郭群, 等. 柳树造纸及矿柱用材优良无性系选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1997, 24(1):1-6,21.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J, GUO Q, et al. The selection of willow excellent clones for pulp and pitwood[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1997, 24(1):1-6,21.
[26]	郭群, 涂忠虞, 潘明建, 等. 工业用材柳树新无性系生长、干形及适应性比较研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1997, 24(1):7-13.
	GUO Q, TU Z Y, PAN M J, et al. A comparative study on new willow clones growth,truncal form and adaptation for industrial usage[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1997, 24(1):7-13.
[27]	张继明, 张彩军, 郭俊. 柳树杂交育种研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2001, 27(2):9-13.
	ZHANG J M, ZHANG C J, GUO J. Cross-breeding of Salix L[J]. Inn Mong For Sci & Technol, 2001, 27(2):9-13.
[28]	安守芹, 乌云塔娜, 周凤娴, 等. 沙柳优良无性系选择[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2001, 22(1): 49-54.
	AN S Q, WU Y T N, ZHOU F X, et al. Selection of excellent clones[J]. J Inn Mongola Inst Agric Animal Husb, 2001, 22(1):49-54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3575.2001.01.010.
[29]	韩杰峰, 王宝松, 潘明建, 等. 乔木柳无性系木材基本密度株内变异的研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2001, 28(1): 14-18.
	HAN J F, WANG B S, PAN M J, et al. Studies on variation within tree of wood density in arbor willow clones[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2001, 28(1): 14-18.
[30]	于兆英, 常朝阳. 水土保持林和能源林的优良树种:柳树抗旱性能的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1989, 3(4):83-87.
	YU Z Y, CHANG C Y. Study on drought-resistence nature of willow: a fine tree species for soil and water conservation and energy[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 1989, 3(4):83-87.DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.1989.04.011.
[31]	董建芳, 李春红, 刘果厚, 等. 内蒙古6种沙生柳树叶片解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(3):480-484.
	DONG J F, LI C H, LIU G H, et al. Analysis of drought resistance by leaf anatomical structure of six species of sandy willows[J]. J Desert Res, 2009, 29(3):480-484.
[32]	杨斌, 石培贤. 柳树叶组织蒸腾强度及离体叶片水分自然散失速度测定分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2006, 21(5):22-25.
	YANG B, SHI P X. The determination analysis on transpiration intensity and natural dissipation speed of detached leaf moisture in willow[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2006, 21(5):22-25.
[33]	杨甲定, 赵哈林, 张铜会. 黄柳与垂柳的耐热性和耐旱性比较研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(1):42-47.
	YANG J D, ZHAO H L, ZHANG T H. A comparative study on heat and drought tolerance between Salix gordejevii and Salix babylonica[J]. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2005, 29(1):42-47.
[34]	王贞红, 张文辉, 何景峰, 等. 瑞典能源柳无性系保护酶活性对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(2):21-23,35.
	WANG Z H, ZHANG W H, HE J F, et al. Water adaptation and responses of cell defense enzyme to young seedling of different clones of Salix under the water stress[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2008, 23(2):21-23,35.
[35]	CHEN J H, SUN H, YANG Y P. Comparative morphology of leaf epidermis of Salix (Salicaceae) with special emphasis on sections Lindleyanae and Retusae[J]. Bot J Linn Soc, 2008, 157(2):311-322.
[36]	顾佳清, 张智奇, 周音, 等. 树种耐水湿筛选研究综述[J]. 上海农业学报, 2004, 20(4):66-69.
	GU J Q, ZHANG Z Q, ZHOU Y, et al. Review on screening of waterlogging tolerant trees[J]. Acta Agric Shanghai, 2004, 20(4):66-69.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3924.2004.04.019.
[37]	王宝松, 潘明建, 郭群, 等. 柳树杂种及无性系耐水性遗传变异的研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2000, 27(5):1-6.
	WANG B S, PAN M J, GUO Q, et al. Study on genetic variation of tolerance to water stress of willow hybrids and clones[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2000, 27(5):1-6.
[38]	赵竑绯, 赵阳, 张驰, 等. 模拟淹水对杞柳生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3):898-906.
	ZHAO H F, ZHAO Y, ZHANG C, et al. Effect of flooding stress on growth and photosynthesis characteristics of Salix integra[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(3):898-906.
[39]	张建锋, 孙启祥, MAKES CHIN F. 盐胁迫对柳树新无性系苗木生长和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(3):125-129.
	ZHANG J F, SUN Q X, MAKESCHIN F. Effect of salinity stress on soil enzymes activity and growth of 2 new willow clones[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2005, 19(3):125-129.DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2005.03.031.
[40]	隋德宗. 盐胁迫对柳树无性系幼苗生长影响的研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2006.SUI D Z.
	Effect of salt on growth of willow clones seedling[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2006.
[41]	隋德宗, 王保松, 施士争. 盐胁迫对5个柳树无性系幼苗根系生长发育的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2007, 34(4):5-8.
	SUI D Z, WANG B S, SHI S Z. Effects of salt stress on root growth of 5 willow clones seedling[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2007, 34(4):5-8.
[42]	陈建建. 柳树种质资源收集及抗盐碱性评价[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
	CHEN J J. Willow germplasm collection and saline-alkali evaluation[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015.
[43]	王伟伟, 乔志攀, 何旭东, 等. 灌木柳种质资源的耐盐性变异[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2016, 43(6):15-19.
	WANG W W, QIAO Z P, HE X D, et al. Variation of salt tolerance of shrub germplasm resources[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2016, 43(6):15-19.
[44]	李小艳. 七种柳树对NaCl盐胁迫的生长生理响应[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
	LI X Y. The growth and physiological response of several willows to NaCl salt stress[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018.
[45]	季永华. 海滨湿地杨树、柳树新无性系苗期耐盐性研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2005, 32(4):1-4.
	JI Y H. Research of the seedling salt-tolerance of new poplar and willow clones on the seashore marsh[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2005, 32(4):1-4.
[46]	李敏, 张健, 李玉娟, 等. 盐胁迫对柳L0911生理指标的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2012, 24(8):56-58.
	LI M, ZHANG J, LI Y J, et al. Effects of salt stress on physiological indexes of osier variety L0911[J]. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2012, 24(8):56-58.DOI:10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2012.08.017.
[47]	刘铎, 丛日春, 党宏忠, 等. 柳树幼苗渗透调节物质对中、碱性钠盐响应的差异性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(9):1531-1535.
	LIU D, CONG R C, DANG H Z, et al. Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on plant physiology of willow[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2014, 23(9):1531-1535.DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.09.024.
[48]	韩彪, 解孝满, 董昕, 等. 盐胁迫对柳树无性系幼苗生理生态特性的影响[J]. 山东林业科技, 2013, 43(3):9-12.
	HAN B, XIE X M, DONG X, et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of willow clones seedling[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2013, 43(3):9-12.
[49]	周鹏, 方炎明, 孙婷, 等. 2种灌木柳叶片细胞膜相稳定性及抗氧化酶活性对NaCl胁迫的响应[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2014, 41(2):1-5.
	ZHOU P, FANG Y M, SUN T, et al. Membrane stability and antioxidant enzyme activity in the leaves of two clones of shrub willow in response to salinity stress[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2014, 41(2):1-5.
[50]	李子英, 丛日春, 杨庆山, 等. 盐碱胁迫对柳树幼苗生长和渗透调节物质含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8511-8517.
	LI Z Y, CONG R C, YANG Q S, et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth and osmotic adjustment substances in willow seedlings[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(24):8511-8517.DOI:10.5846/stxb201611082263.
[51]	周鹏, 张敏. 盐胁迫对灌木柳体内离子分布的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(1):7-11,26.
	ZHOU P, ZHANG M. Effects of salt stress on ionic distribution of shrub willow[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2017, 37(1):7-11,26.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.01.002.
[52]	施士争, 隋德宗, 王红玲, 等. 灌木柳速生无性系的耐盐性选择研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(4):72-77.
	SHI S Z, SUI D Z, WANG H L, et al. Selection for fine shrub willow clones with high biomass and salt-tolerance[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2010, 25(4):72-77.
[53]	周鹏, 陈庆生, 张敏, 等. 灌木柳叶PSⅡ对盐胁迫的响应及耐盐性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(9):98-101,106.
	ZHOU P, CHEN Q S, ZHANG M, et al. Responses of PSⅡ of shrub willow to salt stress and its salt-tolerance[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2014, 42(9):98-101,106.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20140721.002.
[54]	SUI D Z, WANG B S, SHI S Z, et al. Changes of protein expression during leaves of shrub willow clones in response to salt stress[J]. Acta Physiol Plant, 2015, 37(3):51.DOI:10.1007/s11738-015-1811-1.
[55]	李敏, 张健, 王奎山, 等. 耐盐柳树BADH基因克隆及表达分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(3):485-489.
	LI M, ZHANG J, WANG K S, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of BADH gene from salt-tolerant Salix[J]. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2013, 29(3):485-489.
[56]	聂莉莉, 张越, 刘仲齐. 盐胁迫对柳树幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2010, 16(3):20-23.
	NIE L L, ZHANG Y, LIU Z Q. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of willow seedlings[J]. Tianjin Agric Sci, 2010, 16(3):20-23.
[57]	张珏, 吴小芹, 施士争, 等. 溃疡病侵染对6个柳树无性系丙二醛及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2008, 35(6):9-12.
	ZHANG J, WU X Q, SHI S Z, et al. Effect of canker on malonaldehyde and its related enzyme activities of among the six willow clones[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2008, 35(6):9-12.
[58]	张珏, 施士争, 吴小芹, 等. 柳树无性系抗溃疡病接种试验[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2010, 37(1):13-17,39.
	ZHANG J, SHI S Z, WU X Q, et al. Preliminary screening of anti-ulcer willow clones by inoculation test[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2010, 37(1):13-17,39.
[59]	张寰. 柳树抗天牛序列及其机制研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2003.
	ZHANG H. Study on the sequence and mechanisms of willow resistance to longihorn beetles[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2003.
[60]	高悦, 解春霞, 刘云鹏, 等. 花绒寄甲对柳树光肩星天牛的防治效果及寄生能力[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2013, 33(5):104-106.
	GAO Y, XIE C X, LIU Y P, et al. Study on parasitic efficiency of releasing Dastarcus helophoroides to control Anoplophora glabripennis in park willows[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2013, 33(5):104-106.
[61]	郭佳惠, 教忠意, 何旭东, 等. 基于层次分析法对柳树观赏性及适应性的综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(6):169-176.
	GUO J H, JIAO Z Y, HE X D, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of ornamental characteristics and adaptability of willows based on analytic hierarchy processes[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(6):169-176.
[62]	费英杰. 柳树优良无性系在北京地区的观赏和用材价值评价[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2014.
	FEI Y J. The ornamental and timber value evaluation of willow excellent clones in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014.
[63]	刘丽, 李振坚, 翟飞飞, 等. 基于叶、枝特性的柳树苗期观赏性评判[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(6):926-932.
	LIU L, LI Z J, ZHAI F F, et al. Ornamental judge of willow based on leaf and branch characteristics[J]. For Res, 2016, 29(6):926-932.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2016.06.019.
[64]	王伟伟, 何旭东, 郑纪伟, 等. 盐碱地柳树生物能源林专用品种的选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018, 45(6):1-7.
	WANG W W, HE X D, ZHENG J W, et al. Breeding of special varieties of willow bio-energy forest in saline-alkali soil[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2018, 45(6):1-7.
[65]	贾会霞. 绵毛柳遗传图谱构建及生物能源性状的QTLs定位[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
	JIA H X. Construction of genetic map and QTLs analysis of bioenegry traits in Salix erioclada[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2013.
[66]	施士争, 潘明建, 张珏, 等. 高生物量灌木柳无性系的选育研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(2):61-66.
	SHI S Z, PAN M J, ZHANG J, et al. Selection of shrub willow clones with high biomass[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2010, 25(2):61-66.
[67]	汪有良, 王保松, 施士争, 等. 柳树种苗修复水体环境镉污染的研究[J]. 林业科技开发, 2008, 22(4):46-49.
	WANG Y L, WANG B S, SHI S Z, et al. Study on phytoremediation of cadmium contaminated water-body by willow seedlings in solution culture[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2008, 22(4):46-49.
[68]	汪有良, 王保松, 施士争, 等. 乔木型柳树无性系镉积累特性研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2008, 35(2):1-4.
	WANG Y L, WANG B S, SHI S Z, et al. Cadmium absorption characters of arbor willow (Salix sp.) in solution culture[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2008, 35(2):1-4.
[69]	汪有良, 王保松, 施士争. 乔木型柳树杂种无性系对镉的吸收和积累特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(2):135-138.
	WANG Y L, WANG B S, SHI S Z. Research on cadmium absorption characters of arbor willows[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 35(2):135-138.
[70]	汪有良, 王宝松, 施士争. 灌木型柳树镉吸收积累性状的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(2):105-110.
	WANG Y L, WANG B S, SHI S Z. Cadmium absorption characters of bush willow[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2011, 26(2):105-110.
[71]	黄瑞芳, 王红慧, 王红玲, 等. 灌木型柳树杂种无性系铅的积累特性及其遗传变异[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2020, 47(6):28-33,41.
	HUANG R F, WANG H H, WANG H L, et al. Lead accumulation characteristics and genetic variation of shrub willow hybrid clones[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2020, 47(6):28-33,41.
[72]	黄瑞芳, 王红玲, 施士争. 7个灌木柳无性系铅富集能力比较[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2020, 47(1):11-16,22.
	HUANG R F, WANG H L, SHI S Z. Accumulation ability comparison of 7 hydroponically cultivated shrub Salix species to heavy metal Pb[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2020, 47(1):11-16,22.
[73]	黄瑞芳, 王红玲, 施士争. 灌木柳树无性系铅积累特性及其与生物量的关系研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2020, 47(5):32-36.
	HUANG R F, WANG H L, SHI S Z. Lead accumulation and its relationship with biomass of shrub willow clones[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2020, 47(5):32-36.
[74]	涂忠虞, 潘明建, 张日连, 等. 杂种柳树的雌雄间性现象[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1981, 8(4):5-8.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J, ZHANG R L, et al. Intersex phenomenon of hybrid willow[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1981, 8(4):5-8.
[75]	涂忠虞, 潘明建, 樊丛梅, 等. 柳属与朝鲜柳属远缘杂交的研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1984, 11(2):1-9.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J, FAN C M, et al. Study on the distant hybridization between Salix and Chosenia[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1984, 11(2):1-9.
[76]	涂忠虞, 黄敏仁. 阔叶树遗传改良[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1991:167-179.
	TU Z Y, HUANG M R. Genetic improvement of broadleaf trees[M]. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House, 1991:167-179.
[77]	徐涵, 李文铀. 小叶杨×旱柳属间杂交实验胚胎学研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1990, 3(1):29-37.
	XU H, LI W D. Experimental study on the embryology of the interrgeneric cross between Populus simonii and Salix matsudana[J]. For Res, 1990, 3(1):29-33,103.
[78]	何旭东, 郑纪伟, 王宇, 等. 柳树种质核DNA含量的流式测定[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2021, 48(1):1-6.
	HE X D, ZHENG J W, WANG Y, et al. Evaluation of nuclear DNA content in willow germplasm by flow cytometry[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2021, 48(1):1-6.
[79]	王源秀, 江聪, 徐立安. 柳树花粉生活力分析[J]. 林业科技开发, 2007, 21(1):28-30.
	WANG Y X, JIANG C, XU L A. Analysis of the pollen viability of Salix[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2007, 21(1):28-30.
[80]	张明照. 旱柳生殖生物学特性研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2014:36-39.
	ZHANG M Z. The characteristics of reproductive biology of Salix matsudana Koidz[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014:36-39.
[81]	王伟伟, 姚玲, 何开跃, 等. 不同柳树花粉离体培养及活力测定方法比较研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2018, 45(4):1-7.
	WANG W W, YAO L, HE K Y, et al. Comparative study on in vitro pollen germination and viability evaluation of different willow species[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2018, 45(4):1-7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2018.04.001.
[82]	ZHANG S L, FERNANDO D. Structural,histochemical,and protein analysis of male reproductive development in willow[J]. Sex Plant Reprod, 2005, 18(1):37-46.DOI:10.1007/s00497-005-0249-9.
[83]	何旭东, 姚伶, 郑纪伟, 等. 一种灌木柳花粉保存方法:CN104351170A[P]. 2015-02-18.
	HE X D, YAO L, ZHENG J W, et al. Shrub willow pollen preservation method:CN104351170A[P]. 2015-02-18.
[84]	何旭东, 姚伶, 周洁, 等. 一种柳树花粉超低温保存方法:CN104206378A[P]. 2014-12-17.
	HE X D, YAO L, ZHOU J, et al. Willow pollen ultralow-temperature storage method:CN104206378A[P]. 2014-12-17.
[85]	李建新, 刘建军, 许庆标, 等. 柳树新品种JH30、JH19选育研究[J]. 乡村科技, 2019(4): 82-83,85.
[86]	郭群, 董德友, 闻朝鲜, 等. 长江中下游滩地柳树无性系造林对比试验[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019, 46(4):27-32.
	GUO Q, DONG D Y, WEN Z X, et al. Comparative experiment on afforestation of willow clones in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River beach[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2019, 46(4):27-32.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.04.006.
[87]	涂忠虞, 潘明建, 张绍宏. 垂柳×爆竹柳的变异及无性系选择[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1988, 4:1-7.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J, ZHANG S H. Variation on Salix babylonica × fragilis and selection of excellent clones[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science&Technology, 1988, 4: 1-7.
[88]	李峰, 朱弘, 言关珍, 等. 垂爆109柳和旱布329柳生长动态研究[J]. 防护林科技, 1996, 27(2): 19-21.
	LI F, ZHU H, YAN G Z, et al. Research on growth dynamics of Salix × ‘Chuibao109’ and Salix matsudana × Salix bulkingensis[J]. Prot For Sci Technol, 1996, 27(2): 19-21.
[89]	李振洲, 马盈慧, 黄雪峰, 等. 干旱沙地垂爆B80柳造林试验[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2009, 35(2):29-31.
	LI Z Z, MA Y H, HUANG X F, et al. Forestation of I. babyiyionicd × S. fragizis in arid sandy land[J]. J Inn Mong For Sci Technol, 2009, 35(2):29-31.
[90]	王彦, 刘保东, 付喜臣. 新品种柳树在盐碱地上造林试验[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2002, 31(6):17-20.
	WANG Y, LIU B D, FU X C. Forestation test of new variety willow in alkali-saline land[J]. J Jilin For Sci Technol, 2002, 31(6):17-20.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7129.2002.06.004.
[91]	秦光华, 宋玉民, 乔玉玲, 等. 柳树新品种‘鲁柳3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(S2):2839-2840.
	QIN G H, SONG Y M, QIAO Y L, et al. A new willow cultivar ‘Luliu 1’[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2018, 45(S2):2839-2840.DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0809.
[92]	秦光华, 宋玉民, 乔玉玲, 等. 柳树新品种‘鲁柳2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(S2):2841-2842.
	QIN G H, SONG Y M, QIAO Y L, et al. A new willow cultivar ‘Luliu 2’[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2018, 45(S2):2841-2842.DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0808.
[93]	秦光华, 宋玉民, 乔玉玲, 等. 柳树新品种‘鲁柳3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(S2):2843-2844.
	QIN G H, SONG Y M, QIAO Y L, et al. A new willow cultivar ‘Luliu 3’[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2018, 45(S2):2843-2844.DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0809.
[94]	卢振宇, 杨欢, 焦传礼, 等. 盐柳2号的选育及扦插育苗技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021(9):307-309.
	LU Z Y, YANG H, JIAO C L, et al. Breeding and cutting seedling raising techniques of willow No.2[J]. Bull Agric Sci Technol, 2021(9):307-309.
[95]	卢振宇, 焦传礼, 刘世杰, 等. 仁居柳2号的选育及育苗栽培管理技术[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021(4):310-312.
	LU Z Y, JIAO C L, LIU S J, et al. Breeding,seedling cultivation and management techniques of Renliu 2[J]. Bull Agric Sci Technol, 2021(4):310-312.
[96]	涂忠虞, 郭群, 王宝松, 等. 金丝垂柳的选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1996, 23(4):1-5.
	TU Z Y, GUO Q, WANG B S, et al. The selection of Salix × aureo pendula[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1996, 23(4):1-5.
[97]	涂忠虞, 潘明健, 郭群, 等. 银芽柳的选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2000, 27(2):1-11.
	TU Z Y, PAN M J, GUO Q, et al. The selection of Salix × agyrobractealis[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2000, 27(2):1-11.
[98]	涂忠虞, 潘惠新, 潘明建. 簸杞柳Jw8-26及杞簸柳Jw9-6新无性系选育[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1989, 16(4):1-8.
	TU Z Y, PAN H X, PAN M J. The breeding of new willow’s clones with jw8-26 and jw9-6[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 1989, 16(4):1-8.
[99]	潘明建. 柳树的遗传改良及栽培技术[J]. 林业科技开发, 2004, 18(3):3-7.
	PAN M J. Genetic improvement and cultivation techniques of willow[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2004, 18(3):3-7.
[100]	TUSKAN G A, DIFAZIO S, JANSSON S, et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray)[J]. Science, 2006, 313: 1596. DOI: 10.1126/science.1128691.
[101]	DAI X G, HU Q J, CAI Q L, et al. The willow genome and divergent evolution from poplar after the common genome duplication[J]. Cell Res, 2014, 24(10):1274-1277.DOI:10.1038/cr.2014.83.
[102]	WEI S Y, YANG Y H, YIN T M. The chromosome-scale assembly of the willow genome provides insight into Salicaceae genome evolution[J]. Horticulture Research, 2020, 7:45. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-020-0268-6.
[103]	CHEN J H, HUANG Y, BRACHI B, et al. Genome-wide analysis of Cushion willow provides insights into alpine plant divergence in a biodiversity hotspot[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10:5230.DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-13128-y.
[104]	ZHANG J, YUAN H W, LI Y J, et al. Genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of allotetraploid Salix matsudana Koidz[J]. Hortic Res, 2020, 7:201.DOI:10.1038/s41438-020-00424-8.
[105]	HE L, JIA K H, ZHANG R G, et al. Chromosome-scale assembly of the genome of Salix dunnii reveals a male-heterogametic sex determination system on chromosome 7[J]. Mol Ecol Resour, 2021, 21(6):1966-1982.DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.13362.
[106]	DAI X G, ZHU T W, LI X P, et al. Gene discovery and marker resource development by transcriptome sequencing from a short-rotation coppice willow,Salix suchowensis[J]. Plant Breed, 2017, 136(2):279-286.DOI:10.1111/pbr.12458.
[107]	HE X D, ZHENG J W, SERAPIGLIA M, et al. Development, characterization and cross-amplification of eight EST-derived microsatellites in Salix[J]. Silvae Genetica, 2014, 63(3): 113-115.
[108]	TIAN X Y, ZHENG J W, JIAO Z Y, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and EST-SSR marker development in Salix babylonica and S. suchowensis[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2019, 15(1):9.DOI:10.1007/s11295-018-1315-4.
[109]	郑纪伟, 周洁, 王保松, 等. 基于RNA-seq的两种柳树转录组微卫星特征比较分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(5):1558-1566.
	ZHENG J W, ZHOU J, WANG B S, et al. Comparison of microsatellites characteristics of two Salix transcriptome based on RNA-seq[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2019, 17(5):1558-1566.DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.017.001558.
[110]	HE X D, ZHENG J W, ZHOU J, et al. Characterization and comparison of EST-SSRs in Salix,Populus,and Eucalyptus[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2015, 11(1):820.DOI:10.1007/s11295-014-0820-3.
[111]	刘恩英, 王源秀, 徐立安, 等. 基于SSR和SRAP标记的簸箕柳×绵毛柳遗传框架图[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(5): 23-30.
	LIU E Y, WANG Y X, XU L A, et al. A genetic frame map of Salix suchowensis × S. erioclada based on SSR and SRAP markers[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(5): 23-30. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110504.
[112]	ZHANG J, YUAN H W, LI M, et al. A high-density genetic map of tetraploid Salix matsudana using specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq)[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(6):e0157777.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0157777.
[113]	教忠意, 田雪瑶, 郑纪伟, 等. 灌木柳耐盐SNP位点的快速鉴定与标记开发[J/OL]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), (2022-05-16)[2022-05-16].http://kns.cnki.net. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202111025.
	JIAO Z Y, TIAN X Y, ZHENG J W, et al. Rapid identification and marker development of SNP loci for salt tolerance in shrub willow[J/OL]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), (2022-05-16)[2022-05-16].http://kns.cnki.net. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202111025.
[114]	LIU G Y, YANG Q S, GAO J F, et al. Identify of fast-growing related genes especially in height growth by combining QTL analysis and transcriptome in Salix matsudana (Koidz)[J]. Front Genet, 2021, 12:596749.DOI:10.3389/fgene.2021.596749.
[115]	LIU J J, YIN T M, YE N, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the differentially expressed genes in the male and female shrub willows (Salix suchowensis)[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4):e60181.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0060181.
[116]	YANG J L, LI K, ZHENG W, et al. Characterization of early transcriptional responses to cadmium in the root and leaf of Cd-resistant Salix matsudana Koidz[J]. BMC Genom, 2015, 16(1):705.DOI:10.1186/s12864-015-1923-4.
[117]	NAN G X, ZHANG Y, LI S, et al. NaCl stress-induced transcriptomics analysis of Salix linearistipularis (syn Salix mongolica)[J]. J Biol Res-Thessaloniki, 2016, 23(1):1.DOI:10.1186/s40709-016-0038-7.
[118]	RAO G D, ZENG Y F, SUI J K, et al. De novo transcriptome analysis reveals tissue-specific differences in gene expression in Salix arbutifolia[J]. Trees, 2016, 30(5):1647-1655.DOI:10.1007/s00468-016-1397-2.
[119]	SHI X, SUN H J, CHEN Y T, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and expression analysis of cadmium (Cd) transport and detoxification related genes in Cd-accumulating Salix integra[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7:1577.DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.01577.
[120]	ZHANG Y X, HAN X J, CHEN S S, et al. Selection of suitable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR gene expression analysis in Salix matsudana under different abiotic stresses[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7:40290.DOI:10.1038/srep40290.
[121]	ZHOU J, HUANG J, TIAN X Y, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic changes in the salt stress response in Salix[J]. J For Res, 2020, 31(5):1851-1862.DOI:10.1007/s11676-019-00941-w.
[122]	RAO G D, SUI J K, ZENG Y F, et al. De novo transcriptome and small RNA analysis of two Chinese willow cultivars reveals stress response genes in Salix matsudana[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10):e109122.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0109122.
[123]	ZHAO Y J, LIU X Y, GUO R, et al. Comparative genomics and transcriptomics analysis reveals evolution patterns of selection in the Salix phylogeny[J]. BMC Genomics, 2019, 20(1):253.DOI:10.1186/s12864-019-5627-z.
[124]	HE X D, WANG Y, ZHENG J W, et al. Full-length transcriptome characterization and comparative analysis of Chosenia arbutifolia[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(4):543.DOI:10.3390/f13040543.
[125]	ZHANG Q W, TANG S H, LI J Q, et al. Integrative transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses provide insight into the long-term submergence response mechanisms of young Salix variegata stems[J]. Planta, 2021, 253(5):88.DOI:10.1007/s00425-021-03604-5.
[126]	周洁, 宋雪晴, 何旭东, 等. 柳树SjMIPS基因的克隆及其表达分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2016, 43(6):1-5.
	ZHOU J, SONG X Q, HE X D, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of MIPS gene from Salix under salt stress[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2016, 43(6):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2016.06.001.
[127]	周洁, 黄婧. 柳树几丁质酶基因SlChi的克隆和功能验证[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(24):8013-8021.
	ZHOU J, HUANG J. Cloning and functional identification of chitinase gene SlChi in Salix[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2018, 16(24):8013-8021.DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.016.008013.
[128]	田雪瑶, 周洁, 王保松, 等. 柳树NAC基因的克隆与表达模式分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):119-124.
	TIAN X Y, ZHOU J, WANG B S, et al. Cloning and expression pattern analysis of NAC genes in Salix[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2020, 44(1):119-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201905031.
[129]	ZHOU F W, CHEN Y N, WU H T, et al. Genome-wide comparative analysis of R2R3 MYB gene family in Populus and Salix and identification of male flower bud development-related genes[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12:721558.DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.721558.
[130]	RAO G D, ZENG Y F, HE C Y, et al. Characterization and putative post-translational regulation of α-and β-tubulin gene families in Salix arbutifolia[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6:19258.DOI:10.1038/srep19258.
[131]	BI C W, XU Y Q, YE Q L, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of WRKY gene family in Salix suchowensis[J]. PeerJ, 2016, 4:e2437.DOI:10.7717/peerj.2437.
[132]	冯凯, 侯静, 戴晓港, 等. 簸箕柳SPL基因家族分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(2):55-62.
	FENG K, HOU J, DAI X G, et al. Analyzing the SPL gene family in Salix suchowensis[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 41(2):55-62.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.02.009.
[133]	JIA H, ZHANG J, LI J, et al. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of a desert willow,Salix psammophila,reveals the function of hub genes SpMDP1 and SpWRKY33 in drought tolerance[J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2019, 19(1):356.DOI:10.1186/s12870-019-1900-1.
[134]	丁一, 徐启江. 被子植物成花诱导和性别决定机制的研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(1):19-36.
	DING Y, XU Q J. Progress on floral induction and sex determination in angiosperm[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2014, 50(1):19-36.DOI:10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2014.01.013.
[135]	HOU J, YE N, ZHANG D F, et al. Different autosomes evolved into sex chromosomes in the sister genera of Salix and Populus[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5:9076.DOI:10.1038/srep09076.
[136]	LAURON-MOREAU A, PITRE F E, ARGUS G W, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of American willows (Salix L.,Salicaceae)[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):e0121965.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121965.
[137]	BERLIN S, TRYBUSH S O, FOGELQVIST J, et al. Genetic diversity,population structure and phenotypic variation in European Salix viminalis L[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2014, 10(6):1595-1610.DOI:10.1007/s11295-014-0782-5.
[138]	GOUKER F E, DIFAZIO S P, BUBNER B, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of native,naturalized,and cultivated Salix purpurea[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2019, 15(3):47.DOI:10.1007/s11295-019-1359-0.
[139]	WARD J L, WU Y Q, HARFLETT C, et al. Miyabeacin: a new cyclodimer presents a potential role for willow in cancer therapy[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10:6477.DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-63349-1.
[140]	HANLEY S J, KARP A. Genetic strategies for dissecting complex traits in biomass willows (Salix spp.)[J]. Tree Physiol, 2013, 34(11):1167-1180.DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpt089.
[141]	CARLSON C H, GOUKER F E, CROWELL C R, et al. Joint linkage and association mapping of complex traits in shrub willow (Salix purpurea L.)[J]. Ann Bot, 2019, 124(4):701-715.DOI:10.1093/aob/mcz047.
[142]	HALLINGBÄCK H R, FOGELQVIST J, POWERS S J, et al. Association mapping in Salix viminalis L.(Salicaceae)-identification of candidate genes associated with growth and phenology[J]. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy, 2016, 8(3):670-685.DOI:10.1111/gcbb.12280.
[143]	WARD S P, SALMON J, HANLEY S J, et al. Using Arabidopsis to study shoot branching in biomass willow[J]. Plant Physiol, 2013, 162(2):800-811.DOI:10.1104/pp.113.218461.
[144]	SALMON J, WARD S P, HANLEY S J, et al. Functional screening of willow alleles in a rabidopsis combined with QTL mapping in willow (Salix) identifies SxMAX4 as a coppicing response gene[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2014, 12(4):480-491.DOI:10.1111/pbi.12154.

中国柳树遗传育种研究进展

Research progresses of willow genetic breeding in China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 144

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	欧阳, 欧阳芳群, 孙猛, 王超, 王军辉, 安三平, 王丽芳, 许娜, 王猛. 欧洲云杉无性系幼龄生长节律、年度和密度互作效应及选择策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[2]	教忠意, 田雪瑶, 郑纪伟, 王保松, 何开跃, 何旭东. 灌木柳耐盐SNP位点的快速鉴定与标记开发[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 107-113.
[3]	王文月, 张振, 金国庆, 孙林山, 邱勇斌, 周志春, 杨涛. 两地点8年生柏木生长性状家系变异及选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 42-48.
[4]	陈赢男, 韦素云, 曲冠正, 胡建军, 王军辉, 尹佟明, 潘惠新, 卢孟柱, 康向阳, 李来庚, 黄敏仁, 王明庥. 现代林木育种关键核心技术研究现状与展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 1-9.
[5]	贾庆彬, 刘庚, 赵佳丽, 李奎友, 孙文生. 红松半同胞家系生长性状变异分析与优良家系选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 109-116.
[6]	吕锋, 解孝满, 韩彪, 鲁仪增, 王磊, 董昕, 王艳, 陆璐, 刘莉, 宗绍宁, 李文清. 基于SSR标记的麻栎天然群体遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 109-116.
[7]	程强, 赵丽娟. 柳树痂囊腔菌的基因组测序和比较基因组分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 143-150.
[8]	何旭东, 郑纪伟, 孙冲, 何开跃, 王保松. 33个杨柳品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 35-42.
[9]	洪舟, 吴培衍, 张金文, 王维辉, 许丽鸿, 申巍, 徐大平. 漳州地区交趾黄檀幼龄期生长表现及适应性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 118-124.
[10]	陈文文, 吴怀通, 陈赢男. SPL家族基因复制及功能分化分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 55-66.
[11]	王云鹏, 张蕊, 周志春, 华斌, 黄少华, 马丽珍, 范辉华. 10年生木荷生长和材性性状家系变异及选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 85-92.
[12]	张晓艳, 季新月, 王雷, 张绮纹, NERVO Giuseppe, 李金花. 不同地点黑杨派无性系生长性状变异及其与叶片性状相关分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 65-73.
[13]	刘玉鑫, 颜开义, 何伟, 潘惠新. 美洲黑杨无性系木材纤维性状遗传变异[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 67-74.
[14]	洪舟, 杨曾奖, 张宁南, 郭俊誉, 刘小金, 崔之益, 徐大平. 越南黄花梨种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 25-30.
[15]	田雪瑶, 周洁, 王保松, 何开跃, 何旭东. 柳树NAC基因的克隆与表达模式分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 119-124.