南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 37-44.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202211034
• 专题报道Ⅱ: 乡村振兴视域下特色林果培育专题(执行主编 李维林 方升佐) • 上一篇 下一篇
陶涛1(), 刘耀辉2, 薛中俊4, 高越2, 袁璐鸿2, 郑芬5, 吴炜3,*(), 黄界颍2,*()
收稿日期:
2022-11-28
修回日期:
2023-03-05
出版日期:
2024-03-30
发布日期:
2024-04-08
通讯作者:
*吴炜(59830729@qq.com),助理研究员,博士,负责组织联络,参与样品采集和数据分析,提出论文修改意见。作者简介:
陶涛(2269635691@qq.com),副教授。
基金资助:
TAO Tao1(), LIU Yaohui2, XUE Zhongjun4, GAO Yue2, YUAN Luhong2, ZHENG Fen5, WU Wei3,*(), HUANG Jieying2,*()
Received:
2022-11-28
Revised:
2023-03-05
Online:
2024-03-30
Published:
2024-04-08
摘要:
【目的】 对黟县7株香榧(Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’)优株坚果的主要物理性质和主要成分含量进行比较,分析黟县香榧品质情况,为香榧良种选育与开发利用提供理论依据。【方法】 选取安徽黟县7个香榧种质,测定其表型特征、矿物元素、营养成分及脂肪酸组成等29个物理、化学性质指标,对所测数据进行关联、聚类分析。【结果】 香榧的表型性状及内在品质各指标差异显著(P<0.05)。粗蛋白质质量分数变化范围为6.67%~14.69%;粗脂肪质量分数为36.20%~55.51%,其中多不饱和脂肪酸平均质量分数最高的是亚油酸47.81%,其次是金松酸12.20%;全钾(TK)质量分数为0.77%~1.39%,不同优株间主要矿物元素差异极显著(P<0.05)。【结论】 黟县7株香榧优株中,外观偏长圆形的诸暨一号和浙江细榧粗蛋白质含量相比偏圆形的高产木榧、和尚榧、叶里笑、米榧和大圆榧高,而偏圆形的香榧种仁油脂酸价更低,油脂的品质更好;可将酸价、核形指数、油酸含量作为筛选香榧优株的优选指标。
中图分类号:
陶涛,刘耀辉,薛中俊,等. 7株香榧优株坚果表型性状与品质特性的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 37-44.
TAO Tao, LIU Yaohui, XUE Zhongjun, GAO Yue, YUAN Luhong, ZHENG Fen, WU Wei, HUANG Jieying. Studies on the phenotypic traits and quality characteristics of seven superior tree nuts of Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(2): 37-44.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202211034.
表1
7株香榧优株种质物理性质比较"
优株 superior tree | 种核seed nucleus | 种仁seed kernel | 种壳厚度/mm seed shell thickness | 核形指数 fruit shape index | 仁形指数 kernel shape index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
纵径/mm longitudinal diameter | 横径/mm transverse diameter | 纵径/mm longitudinal diameter | 横径/mm transverse diameter | 质量/g mass | |||||||
ZJXF | 25.89±0.51 a | 12.58±0.38 d | 21.58±0.64 b | 9.27±0.21 d | 0.98±0.18 e | 0.52±0.03 d | 2.06±0.02 b | 2.34±0.04 b | |||
ZJYH | 26.88±1.24 a | 11.63±0.67 e | 25.53±1.25 a | 10.27±0.68 cd | 2.22±0.21 b | 0.68±0.02 bc | 2.34±0.02 a | 2.52±0.04 a | |||
GCMF | 21.89±0.19 b | 15.12±0.26 b | 17.83±0.21 c | 10.98±0.02 bc | 1.84±0.02 c | 0.52±0.02 d | 1.45±0.01 d | 1.63±0.01 d | |||
MF | 22.78±0.26 b | 14.98±0.44 bc | 18.00±0.16 c | 9.69±0.48 d | 1.69±0.04 c | 1.03±0.07 a | 1.52±0.03 c | 1.88±0.07 c | |||
HSF | 20.67±0.16 c | 14.93±0.26 bc | 16.45±0.26 d | 11.76±0.59 b | 1.42±0.14 d | 0.67±0.09 bc | 1.39±0.04 e | 1.42±0.07 e | |||
YLX | 19.68±0.59 c | 14.18±0.36 c | 14.71±0.63 e | 11.12±0.17 bc | 1.45±0.09 d | 0.63±0.03 c | 1.39±0.01 e | 1.33±0.06 e | |||
DYF | 26.82±0.73 a | 18.45±0.70 a | 22.23±0.56 b | 13.88±1.30 a | 1.68±0.10 a | 0.75±0.04 b | 1.46±0.02 d | 1.64±0.14 d | |||
F | 67.135** | 64.320** | 106.254** | 17.718** | 56.217** | 36.046** | 917.780** | 124.256** |
表2
7株香榧优株种仁主要营养成分及油脂品质指标含量比较"
优株 superior tree | 主要营养成分/%main nutrient components | IC50/ (mg·mL-1) | 过氧化值/ (mmol·kg-1) peroxide value | 酸价/(mg·g-1) acid value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
粗脂肪 crude fat | 粗蛋白质 crude protein | 总糖 total sugar | ||||
ZJXF | 39.72±0.72 cd | 13.39±0.57 a | 4.15±0.17 c | 1.11±0.11 d | 4.15±0.17 a | 0.34±0.17 b |
ZJYH | 55.51±0.41 a | 14.69±0.75 a | 0.70±0.07 f | 5.67±0.23 b | 0.70±0.07 d | 0.66±0.07 a |
GCMF | 36.20±1.34 e | 6.67±0.23 e | 2.92±0.22 d | 1.25±0.05 d | 0.08±0.01 e | 0.13±0.22 c |
MF | 42.68±0.55 b | 10.13±0.26 d | 6.84±0.43 a | 32.91±0.78 a | 0.08±0.01 e | 0.08±0.43 d |
HSF | 38.45±1.39 d | 9.94±0.45 d | 4.96±0.21 b | 1.58±0.05 d | 2.27±0.05 b | 0.09±0.21 d |
YLX | 40.87±2.41 bc | 11.42±0.44 c | 1.18±0.02 e | 2.70±0.11 c | 1.18±0.02 c | 0.13±0.02 c |
DYF | 43.10±0.95 b | 10.13±0.25 d | 2.88±0.25 d | 2.81±0.09 c | 2.20±0.15 b | 0.15±0.25 c |
F | 72.561** | 98.159** | 264.210** | 4 046.176** | 769.129** | 936.744** |
表3
7株香榧优株种仁主要矿物元素含量比较"
优株superior tree | 全磷质量分数/% TP mass concentration | 全钾质量分数/% TK mass concentration | 锌含量/(mg·kg-1) content of Zn | 铁含量/(mg·kg-1) content of Fe | 锰含量/(mg·kg-1) content of Mn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZJXF | 0.30±0.02 a | 0.99±0.02 d | 30.66±0.40 c | 45.35±0.69 b | 65.72±1.16 a |
ZJYH | 0.27±0.01 bc | 1.20±0.05 b | 27.58±0.49 d | 31.82±0.91 d | 12.31±0.56 c |
GCMF | 0.26±0.01 d | 1.09±0.11 c | 26.75±0.27 d | 58.74±0.73 a | 12.03±0.40 c |
MF | 0.25±0.01 d | 1.39±0.03 a | 19.20±0.68 e | 31.75±0.87 d | 8.89±0.19 d |
HSF | 0.28±0.01 b | 1.24±0.01 b | 27.41±0.84 d | 40.95±1.12 c | 12.00±0.34 c |
YLX | 0.27±0.01 bc | 0.77±0.03 e | 42.63±0.47 a | 29.08±1.21 e | 17.51±1.47 b |
DYF | 0.27±0.00 bc | 1.27±0.01 b | 36.28±0.44 b | 22.95±1.06 f | 11.60±0.63 c |
F | 8.833** | 56.052** | 581.033** | 477.298** | 1 927.521** |
表4
Analysis of fatty acid composition in crude fat of seeds of seven superior tree species of Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’ 单位:%"
优株 superior tree | PA | SA | OA | LA | LIA | AA | EA | S10S13EA | S11S13EA | AUA | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZJXF | 8.64±0.05 b | 2.71±0.15 b | 25.20±0.14 b | 47.33±0.55 b | 0.51±0.05 c | 0.16±0.01 b | 0.52±0.04 c | 0.70±0.07 bc | 2.00±0.18 de | 12.26±0.22 de | ||||||||||
ZJYH | 7.74±0.02 e | 2.88±0.21 b | 35.97±0.22 a | 41.04±0.83 c | 0.38±0.04 d | 0.13±0.01 d | 0.59±0.02 bc | 0.75±0.06 abc | 1.79±0.18 e | 8.55±0.19 f | ||||||||||
GCMF | 9.57±0.07 a | 2.76±0.15 b | 20.03±0.09 f | 48.18±1.08 b | 0.67±0.05 ab | 0.15±0.01 bc | 0.62±0.04 b | 0.81±0.04 a | 2.73±0.18 c | 13.93±0.02 a | ||||||||||
MF | 7.41±0.01 f | 2.39±0.14 c | 20.53±0.1 f | 50.49±1.14 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 0.12±0.01 d | 0.73±0.06 a | 0.80±0.07 ab | 3.09±0.19 b | 13.14±0.03 b | ||||||||||
HSF | 7.82±0.01 d | 3.34±0.21 a | 22.13±0.03 d | 49.81±1.21 a | 0.70±0.02 ab | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.61±0.03 b | 0.82±0.07 a | 2.27±0.20 d | 12.00±0.04 e | ||||||||||
YLX | 7.42±0.02 f | 2.25±0.12 c | 23.61±0.26 c | 48.06±0.65 b | 0.52±0.05 c | 0.13±0.01 d | 0.71±0.08 a | 0.73±0.05 abc | 3.60±0.15 a | 12.57±0.01 cd | ||||||||||
DYF | 8.08±0.04 c | 2.16±0.03 c | 21.36±0.78 e | 49.75±0.41 a | 0.62±0.05 b | 0.14±0.02 cd | 0.72±0.06 a | 0.69±0.02 c | 3.62±0.21 a | 12.97±0.71 bc | ||||||||||
F | 1 457.977** | 22.110** | 854.787** | 39.236** | 21.942** | 12.825** | 8.271* | 2.707 | 49.147** | 106.790** |
表6
7株香榧优株种质主要营养成分及矿物元素含量间的相关分析"
指标index | CF | CP | TS | IC50 | POV | AV | TP | TK | Zn | Fe | Mn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP | 0.728 | 1 | |||||||||
TS | -0.454 | -0.335 | 1 | ||||||||
IC50 | 0.152 | -0.050 | 0.633 | 1 | |||||||
POV | -0.204 | 0.402 | 0.079 | -0.480 | 1 | ||||||
AV | 0.830* | 0.786* | -0.556 | -0.206 | 0.093 | 1 | |||||
TP | -0.107 | 0.498 | -0.127 | -0.631 | 0.937** | 0.299 | 1 | ||||
TK | 0.236 | -0.160 | 0.573 | 0.563 | -0.244 | -0.041 | -0.409 | 1 | |||
Zn | -0.074 | 0.159 | -0.661 | -0.628 | 0.333 | -0.045 | 0.340 | -0.742 | 1 | ||
Fe | -0.529 | -0.444 | 0.147 | -0.276 | -0.014 | -0.087 | 0.154 | -0.165 | -0.358 | 1 | |
Mn | -0.193 | 0.440 | 0.069 | -0.291 | 0.802* | 0.243 | 0.831* | -0.425 | 0.143 | 0.281 | 1 |
表7
7株香榧优株种质物理性质与种仁主要内含物含量的相关分析"
指标index | SNLD | SND | SKLD | KD | KQ | SST | NSI | KSI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF | 0.595 | -0.423 | 0.737 | -0.110 | 0.477 | 0.258 | 0.728 | 0.656 |
CP | 0.518 | -0.654 | 0.586 | -0.369 | -0.117 | -0.023 | 0.812* | 0.701 |
TS | -0.174 | 0.250 | -0.302 | -0.223 | -0.337 | 0.547 | -0.334 | -0.111 |
IC50 | -0.048 | 0.043 | -0.091 | -0.369 | 0.026 | 0.903** | -0.084 | 0.117 |
POV | 0.315 | -0.061 | 0.190 | 0.033 | -0.399 | -0.418 | 0.224 | 0.182 |
AV | 0.661 | -0.700 | 0.819* | -0.338 | 0.169 | -0.242 | 0.955** | 0.853* |
TP | 0.261 | -0.339 | 0.221 | -0.123 | -0.493 | -0.632 | 0.395 | 0.287 |
TK | 0.353 | 0.328 | 0.339 | 0.156 | 0.466 | 0.681 | 0.007 | 0.190 |
Zn | -0.101 | 0.184 | -0.159 | 0.469 | 0.064 | -0.451 | -0.183 | -0.375 |
Fe | -0.26 | -0.264 | -0.201 | -0.384 | -0.458 | -0.58 | -0.005 | 0.033 |
Mn | 0.297 | -0.421 | 0.200 | -0.478 | -0.633 | -0.487 | 0.448 | 0.456 |
表8
7株香榧优株种质品质影响因子的主成分分析"
指标 index | 主成分principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
种核纵径seed nucleus longitudinal diameter | 0.686 | -0.366 | -0.072 | 0.585 |
种核横径seed nucleus transverse diameter | -0.697 | -0.403 | -0.334 | 0.469 |
种仁纵径seed kernel longitudinal diameter | 0.815 | -0.334 | 0.038 | 0.455 |
种仁横径seed kernel transverse diameter | -0.331 | -0.480 | -0.558 | 0.293 |
种仁质量seed kernel mass | 0.049 | -0.811 | -0.076 | 0.347 |
种壳厚度seed shell thickness | -0.331 | -0.593 | 0.632 | 0.096 |
核形指数nuclear shape index | 0.962 | 0.015 | 0.187 | 0.035 |
仁形指数kernel shape index | 0.856 | -0.001 | 0.318 | 0.225 |
粗脂肪crude fat | 0.735 | -0.589 | 0.288 | -0.141 |
粗蛋白质crude protein | 0.832 | -0.169 | 0.015 | -0.254 |
总糖total sugar | -0.490 | 0.264 | 0.516 | 0.442 |
IC50 | -0.305 | -0.329 | 0.789 | 0.028 |
过氧化值peroxide value | 0.316 | 0.368 | -0.546 | 0.288 |
酸价acid value | 0.973 | -0.123 | 0.104 | -0.075 |
TP | 0.505 | 0.517 | -0.516 | 0.102 |
TK | -0.079 | -0.320 | 0.613 | 0.664 |
Zn | 0.002 | -0.206 | -0.884 | -0.413 |
Fe | -0.057 | 0.845 | 0.092 | 0.159 |
Mn | 0.413 | 0.553 | -0.321 | 0.122 |
棕榈酸palmitic acid | 0.009 | 0.543 | -0.252 | 0.457 |
硬脂酸stearic acid | 0.313 | 0.635 | 0.352 | 0.019 |
油酸oleic acid | 0.926 | -0.226 | 0.117 | -0.228 |
亚油酸linoleic acid | -0.851 | 0.011 | -0.214 | 0.323 |
亚麻酸linolenic acid | -0.718 | 0.469 | 0.510 | 0.061 |
花生酸arachidic acid | 0.107 | 0.910 | 0.126 | 0.050 |
二十碳一烯酸eicosaenoic acid | -0.676 | -0.426 | 0.239 | -0.518 |
顺-10,顺-13-二十碳二烯酸cis-10, cis-13-eicosadienoic acid | -0.074 | 0.591 | 0.686 | -0.370 |
顺-11,顺-13-二十碳二烯酸cis-11, cis-13-eicosadienoic acid | -0.789 | -0.448 | -0.258 | -0.246 |
金松酸auropic acid | -0.836 | 0.345 | -0.136 | 0.162 |
特征根eigenvalue | 10.540 | 6.431 | 4.923 | 2.931 |
累计贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate | 36.344 | 58.521 | 75.498 | 85.604 |
[1] | 黎章矩, 程晓建, 戴文圣, 等. 香榧品种起源考证[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2005(4): 443-448. |
LI Z J, CHENG X J, DAI W S, et al. Origin of Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2005(4): 443-448. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2005.04.018. | |
[2] | SAEED M K, DENG Y, ZAHIDE P, et al. Studies on the chemical constituents of Torreya grandis Fort. Ex Lindl[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2007(7): 269-273. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2007.269.273. |
[3] | 王向阳, 修丽丽. 香榧的营养和功能成分综述[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2005, 26(2): 20-22. |
WANG X Y, XIU L L. A review of the nutritional and functional components of Torreya[J]. Food Research and Development, 2005, 26(2): 20-22.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2005.02.007. | |
[4] | PATRICIA M, SUHAILA M, NOORDIN M M, et al. Antioxidant activities and phenolics content of eight species of seaweeds from north Borneo[J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2008(20): 367-373. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-007-9264-6. |
[5] | 吴剑权, 戴丽玲. 黟县香榧产业现状及发展建议[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(2): 55-57. |
WU J Q, DAI L L. Current situation and development suggestion of Torreya in Yi County[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021(2): 55-57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2021.02.024. | |
[6] | 程晓建, 黎章矩, 戴文圣, 等. 榧树种质资源调查与评价[J]. 果树学报, 2009, 26(5): 654-658. |
CHENG X J, LI Z J, DAI W S, et al. Investigation and evaluation of Torreya grandis germplasm resource[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2009, 26(5): 654-658. DOI: CNKI:SUN:GSKK.0.2009-05-016. | |
[7] | 王衍彬, 刘本同, 秦玉川, 等. 不同品种香榧种子油脂肪酸及香味物质组成分析[J]. 中国油脂, 2016, 41(2): 101-105. |
WANG Y B, LIU B T, QIN Y C, et al. Compositions of fatty acid and flavor compounds in different cultivars of Torrey grandis seed oil[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2016, 41(2): 101-105. | |
[8] | 任少华, 龙成昌, 王陈, 等. 香榧及其优质高产栽培技术探讨[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(19): 72-74. |
REN S H, LONG C C, WANG C, et al. Discussion on Torreya grandis and its high-quality and high-yield cultivation techniques[J]. Contemporary Horticulture, 2021, 44(19): 72-74. DOI: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2021.19.028. | |
[9] | 胡绍泉, 求鹏英, 杜轶君, 等. 绍兴市售香榧坚果品质研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(3): 102-106. |
HU S Q, QIU P Y, DU Y J, et al. Study on the quality of Torreya nut on the market in Shaoxing[J]. South China Fruits, 2016, 45(3): 102-106. DOI: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20150701. | |
[10] | 程诗明, 闵会, 康志雄, 等. 香榧天然群体遗传多样性分析与评价研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2014, 34(4): 11-16. |
CHENG S M, MIN H, KANG Z X, et al. Genetic diversity of different populations in Torreya grandis cv. Merrillii[J]. Jour of Zhejiang for Sci & Tech, 2014, 34(4): 11-16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2014.04.003. | |
[11] | 武栋. 安徽徽州榧树种群内种子理化性质的分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2012. |
WU D. Analysis of physico-chemical properties of the seeds from anatural Torreya population in Hui zhou, Anhui[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2012. | |
[12] | WANG Y P, YAO X H, YANG L, et al. Effects of harvest time on the yield, quality and active substance of Torreya grandis nut and its oil:oils and fats[J]. Journal of Oleo Science, 2021, 70(2):175-184.DOI: org/10.5650/jos.ess20155. |
[13] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社. 2000: 285-287. |
BAO S D. Soil agrochemical analysis[M]. 3th ed. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000: 285-287. | |
[14] | 赵粼, 张星海, 虞培力. 香榧子超临界萃取物的气相色谱-质谱分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(1): 186-188. |
ZHAO L, ZHANG X H, YU P L. Analysis of volatile components extracted from Torreya grandis with supercritical fluid extraction by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 52(1): 186-188. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2013.01.053. | |
[15] | 严睿文. ICP-AES 法测定黄山香榧中17种元素[J]. 安徽大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(3): 76-78. |
YAN R W. Detemination of seventeen elements in Huangshan Chinese torreya by ICP-AES[J]. Journal of Anhui University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 31(3): 76-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2162.2007.03.021. | |
[16] | LARRAURI J A, NCHEZ-MORENO C S, SAURA-CALIXTO F. Effects of temperature on the free radical scavenging capacity of extracts from red and white grape pomace peels[J]. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, 1998(16): 2694-2697. DOI: org/10.1021/jf980017p. |
[17] | WANG X Q, LIANG X Q, ZHAO J, et al. Cultivar characterization of tea seed oils by their aetive components andantioxidant capacity[J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2014, 91(4): 629-639. DOI: org/10.1007/s11746-013-2397-7. |
[18] | DUDONNE S, VITRAC X, COUTIERE P, et al. Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009(57):1768-1774. DOI: org/10.1021/jf803011r. |
[19] | 叶珊, 王为宇, 周敏樱, 等. 不同采收成熟度和堆沤方式对香榧种子堆沤后熟品质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(11): 43-51. |
YE S, WANG W Y, ZHOU M Y, et al. Effects of different harvest maturity and after-ripening ways on the harvested quality of Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii'seeds[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2017, 53(11): 43-51. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20171105. | |
[20] | 李兴飞, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等. 香榧坚果生物活性成分与抗氧化研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(7): 341-345. |
LI X F, GAO H Y, CHEN H J, et al. Recent advances in research on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Torreya grandis[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(7): 341-345. | |
[21] | LASEKAN O, ALFI K, ABBAS K. Volatile compounds of roasted and steamed malaysian tropical almond nut (Terminalia catappa L.)[J]. International Journal of Food Properties, 2012, 15(5): 1120-1132. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2010.514086. |
[22] | 唐丽. 矿物质元素与人体健康[J]. 新疆职业大学学报, 2002, 10(4): 94-96. |
TANG L. Mineral elements and human health[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Vocational University, 2002, 10(4): 94-96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9549.2002.04.038. | |
[23] | 蔡永立, 王希华, 宋永昌. 中国东部亚热带青冈果实形态变异的研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, (4): 581-586. |
CAI Y L, WANG X H, SONG Y C. Variation of fruit size and its shape of Cylcobalanopsis glauca in theeastern subtropical zone, China[J]. Acta Eco Sin, 1999(4): 581-586. DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/16/12/025. | |
[24] | 戴文圣, 黎章矩, 曹福亮, 等. 香榧林地土壤及其种子矿物元素含量分析[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2006, 26(2): 14-18. |
DAI W S, LI Z J, CAO F L, et al. Mineral elements in Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’ seeds and their forestland soils[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2006, 26(2): 14-18.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2006.02.004. | |
[25] | ENDO Y, OSADA Y, KIMURA F, et al. Effects of Japanese torreya (Torreya nucifera) seed oil on lipid metabolism in rats[J]. Nutrition, 2006, 22(5): 553-558.DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2005.08.012. |
[26] | ENDO Y, TSUNOKAKE K, IKEDA I. Effects of nonmethy-leneinterrupted polyunsaturated fatty acid, sciadonic (all-cis-5,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid) on lipid metabolism in rats[J]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2009, 73(3): 577-581.DOI: 10.1271/bbb.80646. |
[27] | BERGER A, MONNARD I, BAUR M, et al. Epidermal anti-inflammatory properties of 5,11,14 20:3:effects on mouse ear edema, PGE 2 levels in cultured keratinocytes, and PPAR activation[J]. Lipids in Health and Disease, 2002(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-1-5. |
[28] | HE Z, ZHU H, LI W, et al. Chemical components of cold pressed kernel oils from different Torreya grandis cultivars[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016(209): 196-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.053. |
[1] | 王一涵, 刘姣姣, 金沛权, 李书情, 魏建芬, 郭朋, 尚富德. 基于表型性状和SNP标记构建桂花主要品种资源的分子身份证[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(4): 12-24. |
[2] | 李秉钧, 刘聘, 韩永振, 荣俊冬, 陈礼光, 郑郁善. 福建省福建柏人工林立地指数表的编制与应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 191-198. |
[3] | 赵晓龙, 沈家怡, 刘涛, 吴家胜, 胡渊渊. 当年和越年生香榧叶片的光合效率及抗氧化特性的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 45-50. |
[4] | 魏溪杏, 胡渊渊, 朱光夏, 喻卫武, 张祖瑛, 吴家胜, 宋丽丽. 不同脱蒲时间对香榧种仁特征性香气和营养成分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 51-60. |
[5] | 程文强, 徐阳, 吴开云, 赵献民, 龚榜初. 3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4): 61-72. |
[6] | 樊瑶羽薇, 仁增朗加, 董建梅, 任媛, 葛大朋, 招雪晴, 苑兆和. 西藏野生石榴果实重要性状与综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4): 73-80. |
[7] | 宋泽君, 李培培, 袁斓方, 郭小兰, 王德炉. 土壤含水率对蓝莓叶片生理及果实品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(3): 147-156. |
[8] | 张赟齐, 董宁光, 郝艳宾, 陈永浩, 张俊佩, 侯智霞, 苏淑钗, 吴佳庆, 齐建勋. 109份丰产核桃单株坚果表型多样性分析及性状评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(3): 87-96. |
[9] | 麻周德, 张焕朝, 曹福亮, 乔禹凡, 李守科, 赵祥树. 叶面喷施中微肥对文冠果的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(2): 95-100. |
[10] | 唐敏, 杨开宇, 张赛男, 陈利英, 刘洋, 张雪梅, 齐国辉. 硒对核桃种仁抗氧化酶活性及果实品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5): 127-134. |
[11] | 张庆源, 田野, 王淼, 翟政, 周诗朝. 美洲黑杨与青杨杂交F1代苗期表型性状的分化及其类型划分[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5): 40-48. |
[12] | 王艳娜, 孟学成, 赵荻, 吴家胜, 宋丽丽, 胡渊渊, 张祖瑛, 喻卫武. 四个香榧品种种仁炒制加工后香气物质分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(3): 169-176. |
[13] | 王晓娟, 马光良, 陈洪, 李呈翔, 张丽. 不同覆盖措施对梁山慈竹出笋和竹笋适口性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(2): 143-149. |
[14] | 季琳琳, 陈素传, 吴志辉, 常君, 陶汝鹏, 周米生, 蔡新玲. 山核桃果实主要经济性状和养分含量的差异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1): 131-137. |
[15] | 苑兆和, 陈立德, 张心慧, 赵玉洁. 果树分子育种研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4): 1-12. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||