基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212019

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 227-235.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212019

基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究

达婷¹(), 李琰²

1.北京林业大学园林学院,北京 100083
2.南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,江苏南京 210044
3.College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley CA94704

收稿日期:2022-12-11 修回日期:2023-02-01 出版日期:2023-11-30 发布日期:2023-11-23
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(52078041)

Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment

DA Ting¹(), LI Yan², G Mathias Kondolf¹^,³

1. School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2. School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
3. College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley CA94704, USA

Received:2022-12-11 Revised:2023-02-01 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分析城市滨水公园场所依恋的特殊性,探讨影响城市滨水公园活力的因素,厘清城市滨水空间活力的作用机制。【方法】通过区分游赏者的场所依恋度,建立城市滨水公园社会连接分析框架。以南京滨江4个典型滨水公园为研究对象,通过问卷调查(n=392),采用t检验、方差分析和卡方检验分析变量间的相关性。【结果】①游赏者与自然连接的认知结构存在差异,高依恋度游赏者认同与水生态环境相关的自然体验,中、低依恋度游赏者认同休闲活动的环境体验;②游赏者的社交联结在认同感高的场所更易建立;③游赏者开展日常性/偶然性游憩活动的行为差异取决于是否将河流看成个体/社区的一部分。【结论】社会连接是分析城市滨水活力的具体指征,是城市滨水游赏者使用滨水环境的一种状态。提升城市滨水空间活力,需要充分考虑游赏者对河流景观的环境态度和游憩行为差异。将场所依恋分析方法应用到城市滨水社会连接研究中,可以增加对城市滨水活力机制的解释深度,为城市滨水活力研究带来新路径。

关键词: 河流滨水景观, 城市滨水活力, 社会连接, 场所依恋, 感知与认同, 南京市

Abstract:

【Objective】In this study, the particularity of place attachment(PA) to urban waterfront parks was explained. By distinguishing the degree of visitors’ place attachment, the influencing factors of the vitality of urban waterfront parks were discussed, and the mechanism of waterfront space vitality was clarified.【Method】An analytical framework for social connectivity of urban waterfront park was built. Four typical riverside parks along the Yangtze River, Nanjing, were selected as case studies. Information was collected through a questionnaire survey (n=392) and the “t-test”, variance analysis, and Chi-square test were used to analyze the correlation among variables. The overall objectives were to (1) analyze the particularity of place attachment of urban waterfront parks, and (2) explore the social connectivity factors of urban waterfront parks.【Result】(1) There were differences in cognitive structure of visitors connected to nature. Visitors with high place attachment values identified with natural experiences of water ecology, whereas those with medium/low place attachment values identified with environmental experiences of leisure experiences. (2) Visitors were more likely to form social bonding in places with high place identities. (3) The differences in recreation behavior of visitors in daily/occasional recreation activities depended on whether the river was regarded as part of the individual/community.【Conclusion】 Social connectivity is a specific indicator of urban waterfront vitality and also a state of the visitor using the urban waterfront environment. To enhance the vitality of urban waterfront, it is necessary to fully consider the differences in visitors’ environmental attitudes and recreational behavior towards the waterfront landscape. By applying the place attachment analysis method to the research of social connectivity of urban waterfront, the depth of interpretation of urban waterfront vitality mechanism can be increased, which could provide new insights for the study of urban waterfront vitality.

Key words: river waterfront landscape, urban waterfront vitality, social connectivity, place attachment(PA), perception and identity, Nanjing City

中图分类号:

TU985

达婷,李琰. 基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 227-235.

DA Ting, LI Yan, G Mathias Kondolf. Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(6): 227-235.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202212019.

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

参考文献 38

[1]	迈克尔·格罗福, 张韬. 顺水而为:武汉长江主轴滨水公园[J]. 景观设计学, 2020, 8(3):130-145.
	GROVE M, ZHANG T. Forged by floods:Wuhan Yangtze Riverfront Park[J]. Landsc Archit Front, 2020, 8(3):130-145.
[2]	SEN A, NAGENDRA H. Local community engagement,environmental placemaking and stewardship by migrants:a case study of lake conservation in Bengaluru,India[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2020, 204:103933.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103933.
[3]	黄雯雯, 林广思. 城市绿地健康影响机制的理论和实证研究综述[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(2):1-10.
	HUANG W W, LIN G S. The mechanism of urban green space affecting public health and its emotional progress[J]. J Hum Settl West China, 2021, 36(2):1-10.DOI: 10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20210201.
[4]	阎姝伊, 郑曦. 促进身心健康:社区公共空间对社会凝聚力影响研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(2):117-124.
	YAN S Y, ZHENG X. Promotes physical and mental health:the impact of community public space on social cohesion[J]. Urban Dev Stud, 2021, 28(2):117-124.
[5]	韩咏淳, 王世福, 邓昭华. 滨水活力与品质的思辨、实证与启示:以广州珠江滨水区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2021(4):104-111.
	HAN Y C, WANG S F, DENG Z H. Critique,empirical study,and implications of the vitality and quality of urban central waterfront:a case study of Guangzhou[J]. Urban Plan Forum, 2021(4):104-111.DOI: 10.16361/j.upf.202104015.
[6]	王世福, 覃小玲, 邓昭华. 环境行为学视角下城市滨水空间活力协调度研究[J]. 热带地理, 2021, 41(5):1009-1022.
	WANG S F, QIN X L, DENG Z H. Vitality coordination degree at the urban waterfront from the perspective of environmental behavior studies[J]. Trop Geogr, 2021, 41(5):1009-1022.DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003393.
[7]	刘颂, 赖思琪. 基于多源数据的城市公共空间活力影响因素研究:以上海市黄浦江滨水区为例[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(3):75-81.
	LIU S, LAI S Q. Influence factors of urban public space vitality based on multi-source data:a case study of Huangpu River waterfront area of Shanghai[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 28(3):75-81.DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.03.0075.07.
[8]	史宜, 李婷婷, 杨俊宴. 基于手机信令数据的城市滨水空间活力研究:以苏州金鸡湖为例[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(1):31-38.
	SHI Y, LI T T, YANG J Y. Research on urban waterfront space vitality based on mobile phone signaling data: a case study of Jinji Lake in Suzhou[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 28(1):31-38.DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.01.0031.08.
[9]	王伟强, 马晓娇. 基于多源数据的滨水公共空间活力评价研究:以黄浦江滨水区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020(1):48-56.
	WANG W Q, MA X J. Vitality assessment of waterfront public space based on multi-source data:a case study of the Huangpu River waterfront[J]. Urban Plan Forum, 2020(1):48-56.DOI: 10.16361/j.upf.202001007.
[10]	陈春娣, 贾振毅, 吴胜军, 等. 基于文献计量法的中国景观连接度应用研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10):3243-3255.
	CHEN C D, JIA Z Y, WU S J, et al. A bibliometric review of Chinese studies on the application of landscape connectivity[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(10):3243-3255.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201602290341.
[11]	PRINGLE C. What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important?[J]. Hydrol Process, 2003, 17(13):2685-2689.DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5145.
[12]	MERRIAM G. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern[C]//BRANDT J,AGGER P. Proceedings of the 1st seminar of the international association of landscape ecology. Roskilde: Roskilde University Centre,1984.
[13]	BENNETT C T, BUCHAN J L, LETOURNEAU N, et al. A realist synthesis of social connectivity interventions during transition to parenthood:the value of relationships[J]. Appl Nurs Res, 2017, 34:12-23.DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.11.004.
[14]	达婷. 城市滨水区再开发的生态、社会功能及文脉三维连接性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(3):129-134.
	DA T. Analyses on three-dimensional connectivity of eco-social function-context of urban waterfront redevelopment[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013, 37(3):129-134.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.023.
[15]	MAYER F S, FRANTZ C M. The connectedness to nature scale:a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2004, 24(4):503-515.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
[16]	JUNKER B, BUCHECKER M, MÜLLER-BÖKER U. Objectives of public participation:which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations?[J]. Water Resour Res, 2007, 43(10):W10438.DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005584.
[17]	SEIDL R, STAUFFACHER M. Evaluation of river restoration by local residents[J]. Water Resour Res, 2013, 49(10):7077-7087.DOI: 10.1002/2013WR013988.
[18]	ZYLSTRA M J, KNIGHT A T, ESLER K J, et al. Connectedness as a core conservation concern:an interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice[J]. Springer Sci Rev, 2014, 2(1):119-143.DOI: 10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3.
[19]	KONDOLF G M, PINTO P J. The social connectivity of urban rivers[J]. Geomorphology, 2017, 277:182-196.DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.028.
[20]	DA T, XU Y J. Evaluation on connectivity of urban waterfront redevelopment under hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment[J]. Ocean Coast Manag, 2016, 132:101-110.DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.08.014.
[21]	LEWICKA M. Place attachment:how far have we come in the last 40 years?[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2011, 31(3):207-230.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001.
[22]	黄向, 保继刚, WALL G. 场所依赖(place attachment):一种游憩行为现象的研究框架[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(9):19-24.
	HUANG X, BAO J G, WALL G. Place attachment:a conceptual framework for understanding recreational behavior[J]. Tour Tribune, 2006, 21(9):19-24.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2006.09.009.
[23]	HIDALGO M C, HERNÁNDEZ B. Place attachment:conceptual and empirical questions[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2001, 21(3):273-281.DOI: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0221.
[24]	SCANNELL L, GIFFORD R. Defining place attachment:a tripartite organizing framework[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2010, 30(1):1-10.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
[25]	MADGIN R, BRADLEY L, HASTINGS A. Connecting physical and social dimensions of place attachment:what can we learn from attachment to urban recreational spaces?[J]. J Hous Built Environ, 2016, 31(4):677-693.DOI: 10.1007/s10901-016-9495-4.
[26]	BUDRUK M, WILHEM S S A, SCHNEIDER I E, et al. Crowding and experience-use history:a study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists[J]. Environ Manage, 2008, 41(4):528-537.DOI: 10.1007/s00267-007-9059-1.
[27]	陶承洁, 吴岚. 新形势下的南京滨江空间活力提升策略[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019, 34(11):83-89.
	TAO C J, WU L. Strategies for promoting the vitality of Nanjing riverside space under the new policy situation[J]. Mod Urban Res, 2019, 34(11):83-89.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2019.11.012.
[28]	WILLIAMS D R, PATTERSON M E, ROGGENBUCK J W, et al. Beyond the commodity metaphor:examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place[J]. Leis Sci, 1992, 14(1):29-46.DOI: 10.1080/01490409209513155.
[29]	林广思, 吴安格, 蔡珂依. 场所依恋研究:概念、进展和趋势[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(10):63-66.
	LIN G S, WU A G, CAI K Y. Research on place attachment:concept,progress and trend[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(10):63-66.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.10.0063.
[30]	陈浩, 肖玲. 场所依恋量表在城市公园中的测量及其应用[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 47(5):140-146.
	CHEN H, XIAO L. Measurement and application of place attachment scale in urban park[J]. J South China Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 47(5):140-146.DOI: 10.6054/j.jscnun.2015.01.006.
[31]	TOSUN C. Host perceptions of impacts[J]. Ann Tour Res, 2002, 29(1):231-253.DOI: 10.1016/s0160-7383(01)00039-1.
[32]	杨维忠, 张甜. SPSS统计分析入门与应用精解:视频教学版[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2022.
	YANG W Z, ZHANG T. Introduction and application of SPSS statistical analysis:video teaching edition[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2022.
[33]	SCANNELL L, GIFFORD R. The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2017, 51:256-269.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.001.
[34]	DE DOMINICIS S, FORNARA F, GANUCCI C U, et al. We are at risk,and so what?Place attachment,environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2015, 43:66-78.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010.
[35]	LEWICKA M. Ways to make people active:the role of place attachment,cultural capital,and neighborhood ties[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2005, 25(4):381-395.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.004.
[36]	KYLE G T, MOWEN A J, TARRANT M. Linking place preferences with place meaning:an examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2004, 24(4):439-454.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.001.
[37]	DAVENPORT M A, ANDERSON D H. Getting from sense of place to place-based management:an interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change[J]. Soc Nat Resour, 2005, 18(7):625-641.DOI: 10.1080/08941920590959613.
[38]	BAKAR E A A, UJANG N, AZIZ F A. Place attachment towards waterfront in Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia[J]. Alam Cipta, 2016, 9(2):33-44.

样本点 sample site	信度分析 Cronbach’s α reliability analysis			相关性分析 correlation analysis
样本点 sample site	PA	PI	PD	R	显著性sig.
鱼嘴FWP	0.902	0.840	0.817	0.327	**
青奥NHIYCP	0.886	0.814	0.814	0.477	***
绿博园NCGEG	0.883	0.809	0.736	0.367	***
万景园WP	0.853	0.823	0.795	0.415	**
总体total	0.923	0.836	0.820	0.369	***

基本情况 demographic characteristics	类别 category	比例/% proportion	PA		PI		PD
基本情况 demographic characteristics	类别 category	比例/% proportion	均值 mean	标准差 SD	均值 mean	标准差 SD	均值 mean	标准差 SD
性别 gender	男性male	48.62	3.568	0.640	3.752	0.688	3.359	0.729
	女性female	51.38	3.431	0.563	3.634	0.610	3.202	0.681
年龄组 age	<18	9.68	3.431	0.432	3.633	0.439	3.229	0.575
	[18,29]	40.55	3.338	0.628	3.568	0.677	3.108	0.680
	[30,45]	33.18	3.636	0.546	3.829	0.546	3.443	0.651
	[46,60]	13.13	3.591	0.624	3.779	0.618	3.404	0.708
	>60	3.46	3.987	0.711	4.147	0.682	3.827	0.803
同行人员 accompany	夫妻/情侣couple/lovers	12.21	3.494	0.730	3.717	0.723	3.272	0.828
	家人family member	32.95	3.549	0.572	3.752	0.571	3.345	0.659
	朋友friend	29.72	3.370	0.578	3.609	0.606	3.130	0.658
	同事colleague	4.38	3.489	0.629	3.579	0.618	3.400	0.680
	独自alone	20.74	3.622	0.597	3.804	0.649	3.440	0.666
居住地点 residential location	周边小区close to the park	33.41	3.651	0.607	3.817	0.653	3.486	0.67
	中心城区downtown area	40.32	3.506	0.549	3.715	0.547	3.296	0.642
	其他城区other parts of cities	10.60	3.333	0.621	3.574	0.697	3.091	0.645
	其他城市from other cities	15.67	3.287	0.660	3.553	0.647	3.021	0.764
访问频率 visiting frequency	第一次来或很少来first time/rarely	31.80	3.226	0.651	3.480	0.668	2.972	0.742
	节假日/周末holiday/weekend	35.94	3.517	0.533	3.721	0.566	3.314	0.599
	1次/周	5.76	3.584	0.367	3.864	0.472	3.304	0.388
	2~4次/周	15.44	3.743	0.562	3.881	0.597	3.606	0.639
	每天都来everyday	11.06	3.863	0.517	4.008	0.541	3.717	0.574

社会维度 socio- demographic variables	场所依恋维度 place attachment dimension	R
社会维度 socio- demographic variables	场所依恋维度 place attachment dimension	t检验 t-test	相关性 correlation	方差分析(F) ANOVA
性别 gender	PA	2.440^*
	PI	1.972^*
	PD	2.554^*
年龄组 age	PA		0.246^**
	PI		0.206^**
	PD		0.235^**
同行人员 accompany	PA			3.073^*
	PI			1.781^ns
	PD			4.007^**

场所依恋测量项目 place attachment item	总体统计特征(n=392) general descriptive statistics analyses				分公园均值及差异度分析 mean and differential analyses
场所依恋测量项目 place attachment item	均值 mean	标准差 SD	偏度 skewness	中位数 median	鱼嘴 FWP (n=83)	青奥 NHIYCP (n=119)	绿博园 NCGEG (n=133)	万景园 WP (n=57)	方差分析 ANOVA F	显著性 sig.
PA	3.484	0.633	0.021	3.500	3.531	3.383	3.496	3.602	1.846	ns
PI	3.692	0.646	-0.074	3.600	3.740	3.681	3.662	3.719	0.293	ns
PI₁	3.745	0.810	-0.170	4.000	3.687	3.798	3.722	3.772	0.371	ns
PI₂	3.798	0.817	-0.348	4.000	3.964	3.773	3.729	3.772	1.515	ns
PI₃	3.599	0.843	-0.084	4.000	3.687	3.487	3.617	3.667	1.137	ns
PI₄	3.599	0.840	-0.044	4.000	3.651	3.538	3.586	3.684	0.518	ns
PI₅	3.719	0.866	-0.398	4.000	3.711	3.807	3.654	3.702	0.664	ns
PD	3.277	0.713	0.040	3.200	3.323	3.0857	3.329	3.484	4.960	**
PD₁	3.349	0.903	0.152	3.000	3.373	3.193	3.376	3.579	2.498	ns
PD₂	3.360	0.965	-0.018	3.000	3.446	3.202	3.368	3.544	1.994	ns
PD₃	2.814	0.969	0.397	3.000	2.783	2.647	2.940	2.912	2.166	ns
PD₄	3.574	0.921	-0.396	4.000	3.759	3.319	3.594	3.789	5.383	**
PD₅	3.286	0.916	-0.054	3.000	3.253	3.067	3.368	3.596	4.990	**

场所依恋测量项目 place attachment items	居住地点均值与差异度 mean and differential analyses of residential locations
场所依恋测量项目 place attachment items	周边小区 (n=119) close to the park	中心城区 (n=170) downtown	其他城区 (n=42) other parts of the city	其他城市 (n=61) other cities	F	显著性 sig.
PA	3.639	3.504	3.305	3.264	6.505	***
PI	3.803	3.711	3.543	3.521	3.543	^*
PI₄	3.798	3.606	3.476	3.279	5.686	***
PD	3.476	3.296	3.067	3.007	7.904	***
PD₁	3.622	3.329	3.286	3.082	5.706	***
PD₂	3.546	3.400	3.071	3.049	5.063	**
PD₄	3.798	3.676	3.190	3.164	10.385	***
PD₅	3.563	3.259	3.143	2.918	7.677	***

基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究

Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 38

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	徐振, 李鸣珂, 陈妍, 周珍琦. 基于在线地图的南京市主城区大型公园绿地骑行可达范围评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 219-226.
[2]	陈明, 刘亮. 采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.
[3]	崔志华, 吕言洁, 杨昕雨. 南京市都市区声景观的城乡梯度演变分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 199-206.
[4]	费文君, 赵梦琴. 基于MSPA的南京市绿色基础设施网络构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 50-56.
[5]	徐晶园, 圣倩倩, 王伟希, 刘聪哲, 祝遵凌. 南京典型城市道路植物多样性与土壤因子的耦合关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 119-126.
[6]	崔志华,杨昕雨. 基于GIS的南京市中山陵景区核心区域声景观评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 121-127.
[7]	王彦超,朱一丹,徐丹丹. 基于Landsat 8影像的南京市热岛效应对植物物候的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 99-105.
[8]	张俊叶,俞菲,杨靖宇,俞元春1. 南京城市林业土壤多环芳烃累积特征及其与黑炭的相关性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 75-80.
[9]	郝德君,胡海桃,陈娟,陈瑞旭,凌梦沁,陈梦义. 南京市早春访花昆虫种类及其行为研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 33-38.
[10]	杨英宝;江南;苏伟忠. 南京城市景观空间格局的变化分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 28(06): 39-42.
[11]	陈彩虹;胡锋;李辉信. 南京市城乡交错带的景观生态问题与优化对策[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2000, 24(S1): 17-23.