
基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究
Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment
【目的】分析城市滨水公园场所依恋的特殊性,探讨影响城市滨水公园活力的因素,厘清城市滨水空间活力的作用机制。【方法】通过区分游赏者的场所依恋度,建立城市滨水公园社会连接分析框架。以南京滨江4个典型滨水公园为研究对象,通过问卷调查(n=392),采用t检验、方差分析和卡方检验分析变量间的相关性。【结果】①游赏者与自然连接的认知结构存在差异,高依恋度游赏者认同与水生态环境相关的自然体验,中、低依恋度游赏者认同休闲活动的环境体验;②游赏者的社交联结在认同感高的场所更易建立;③游赏者开展日常性/偶然性游憩活动的行为差异取决于是否将河流看成个体/社区的一部分。【结论】社会连接是分析城市滨水活力的具体指征,是城市滨水游赏者使用滨水环境的一种状态。提升城市滨水空间活力,需要充分考虑游赏者对河流景观的环境态度和游憩行为差异。将场所依恋分析方法应用到城市滨水社会连接研究中,可以增加对城市滨水活力机制的解释深度,为城市滨水活力研究带来新路径。
【Objective】In this study, the particularity of place attachment(PA) to urban waterfront parks was explained. By distinguishing the degree of visitors’ place attachment, the influencing factors of the vitality of urban waterfront parks were discussed, and the mechanism of waterfront space vitality was clarified.【Method】An analytical framework for social connectivity of urban waterfront park was built. Four typical riverside parks along the Yangtze River, Nanjing, were selected as case studies. Information was collected through a questionnaire survey (n=392) and the “t-test”, variance analysis, and Chi-square test were used to analyze the correlation among variables. The overall objectives were to (1) analyze the particularity of place attachment of urban waterfront parks, and (2) explore the social connectivity factors of urban waterfront parks.【Result】(1) There were differences in cognitive structure of visitors connected to nature. Visitors with high place attachment values identified with natural experiences of water ecology, whereas those with medium/low place attachment values identified with environmental experiences of leisure experiences. (2) Visitors were more likely to form social bonding in places with high place identities. (3) The differences in recreation behavior of visitors in daily/occasional recreation activities depended on whether the river was regarded as part of the individual/community.【Conclusion】 Social connectivity is a specific indicator of urban waterfront vitality and also a state of the visitor using the urban waterfront environment. To enhance the vitality of urban waterfront, it is necessary to fully consider the differences in visitors’ environmental attitudes and recreational behavior towards the waterfront landscape. By applying the place attachment analysis method to the research of social connectivity of urban waterfront, the depth of interpretation of urban waterfront vitality mechanism can be increased, which could provide new insights for the study of urban waterfront vitality.
河流滨水景观 / 城市滨水活力 / 社会连接 / 场所依恋 / 感知与认同 / 南京市
river waterfront landscape / urban waterfront vitality / social connectivity / place attachment(PA) / perception and identity / Nanjing City
[1] |
迈克尔·格罗福, 张韬. 顺水而为:武汉长江主轴滨水公园[J]. 景观设计学, 2020, 8(3):130-145.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
黄雯雯, 林广思. 城市绿地健康影响机制的理论和实证研究综述[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(2):1-10.
|
[4] |
阎姝伊, 郑曦. 促进身心健康:社区公共空间对社会凝聚力影响研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(2):117-124.
|
[5] |
韩咏淳, 王世福, 邓昭华. 滨水活力与品质的思辨、实证与启示:以广州珠江滨水区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2021(4):104-111.
|
[6] |
王世福, 覃小玲, 邓昭华. 环境行为学视角下城市滨水空间活力协调度研究[J]. 热带地理, 2021, 41(5):1009-1022.
|
[7] |
刘颂, 赖思琪. 基于多源数据的城市公共空间活力影响因素研究:以上海市黄浦江滨水区为例[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(3):75-81.
|
[8] |
史宜, 李婷婷, 杨俊宴. 基于手机信令数据的城市滨水空间活力研究:以苏州金鸡湖为例[J]. 风景园林, 2021, 28(1):31-38.
|
[9] |
王伟强, 马晓娇. 基于多源数据的滨水公共空间活力评价研究:以黄浦江滨水区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020(1):48-56.
|
[10] |
陈春娣, 贾振毅, 吴胜军, 等. 基于文献计量法的中国景观连接度应用研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10):3243-3255.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
达婷. 城市滨水区再开发的生态、社会功能及文脉三维连接性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(3):129-134.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
黄向, 保继刚,
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
陶承洁, 吴岚. 新形势下的南京滨江空间活力提升策略[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019, 34(11):83-89.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
林广思, 吴安格, 蔡珂依. 场所依恋研究:概念、进展和趋势[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(10):63-66.
|
[30] |
陈浩, 肖玲. 场所依恋量表在城市公园中的测量及其应用[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 47(5):140-146.
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
杨维忠, 张甜. SPSS统计分析入门与应用精解:视频教学版[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2022.
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |