徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202301003

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 171-178.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202301003

徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化

隋夕然¹(), 李军², 陈娟², 华军², 沈谦², 杨洪胜², 何前程², 李由², 王伟², 彭冶³, 葛之葳⁴, 张增信¹^,^*()

1.南京林业大学林草学院、水土保持学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037
2.徐州市云龙湖风景名胜区管理委员会,江苏徐州 221018
3.南京林业大学生命科学学院,江苏南京 210037
4.南京林业大学生态与环境学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2023-01-03 修回日期:2023-11-10 出版日期:2025-01-30 发布日期:2025-01-21
通讯作者: * 张增信(nfuzhang@163.com),教授。
作者简介:
隋夕然(sxr1554086@163.com)。
基金资助:
徐州市科技项目(KC21148);2024年江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(KYCX24_1258);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

Species diversity changes of Platycladus orientalis community at different succession stages in Xuzhou City

SUI Xiran¹(), LI Jun², CHEN Juan², HUA Jun², SHEN Qian², YANG Hongsheng², HE Qiancheng², LI You², WANG Wei², PENG Ye³, GE Zhiwin⁴, ZHANG Zengxin¹^,^*()

1. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,College of Forestry and Grassland, College of Soil and Water Conservation,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China
2. Xuzhou Yunlong Lake Scenic Area Management Committee, Xuzhou 221018,China
3. College of Life Science, Nanjing Foresty University, Nanjing 210037, China
4. College of Ecology and Environment,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2023-01-03 Revised:2023-11-10 Online:2025-01-30 Published:2025-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究徐州市典型石灰岩山地侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)人工林不同演替阶段植物群落组成及物种多样性,揭示物种替代和群落结构变化的规律。【方法】采用空间代替时间变化法及典型样地调查法,揭示徐州市4个不同演替阶段(灌草丛、针叶林、针阔混交林、阔叶林)的侧柏人工林群落特征及影响因素。【结果】①所调查的样地共有植物种类105种,隶属于58科96属,各演替阶段所出现的物种数分别为灌草丛14科18属20种、针叶林33科49属51种、针阔混交林43科59属64种、阔叶林27科44属45种;②不同演替阶段植物群落物种重要值方面,乔木层中侧柏的重要值均居于首位,灌木层中构树(Broussonetia papyrifera)的重要值均居于首位并呈现先下降再升高的趋势;草本层4个不同的演替阶段中,重要值分别位居首位的物种为马兜铃(Aristolochia debilis)、茅莓(Rubus parvifolius)、白英(Solanum lyratum)、常春藤(Hedera nepalensis);③不同演替阶段植物群落Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Margalef丰富度指数、Pielou均匀度指数和Simpson优势度指数变化趋势较为一致,均随着演替的正向发展均呈现先上升后下降的趋势,其中,多样性指数在针阔混交林阶段达到峰值;④物种多样性指数与环境因子的相关性分析结果显示,郁闭度、坡位和坡向与徐州石灰岩山地侧柏人工林演替过程中物种多样性的变化关系密切,其中郁闭度与群落Shannon-Wiener多样性指数相关性最为显著(P<0.05)。【结论】徐州石灰岩山地侧柏人工林物种多样性在针阔混交林阶段达到最高值,其中郁闭度、坡位和坡向对物种多样性发挥着关键影响作用,研究结果可为该地区近自然林分改造与经营提供理论依据。

关键词: 徐州石灰岩山地, 侧柏人工林, 植物群落, 群落演替, 物种多样性, 林分改造

Abstract:

【Objective】This study explored the composition and diversity of plant communities at different succession stages of Platycladus orientalis in typical limestone mountainous areas of Xuzhou City, and revealed changes in species substitution and community structure.【Method】The community characteristics and influencing factors of P. orientalis in four different succession stages: shrub grassland, coniferous forest, coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest, and broadleaf forest were analyzed using a space-for-time substitution method and typical sample plot surveys. 【Result】 (1) A total of 105 plant species across the sample plots, representing 58 families and 96 genera. Species diversity across succession stages included: 14 families, 18 genera, and 20 species in shrub grasslands; 33 families, 49 genera, and 51 species in coniferous forests; 43 families, 59 genera, and 64 species in coniferous-broadleaf mixed forests; and 27 families, 44 genera, and 45 species in broadleaf forests. (2) Regarding importance values of plant species in different succession stages, P. orientalis consistently ranked first in the tree layer, while Broussonetia papyrifera ranked first in the shrub layer, showing a pattern of initial decline followed by an increase. In the herbaceous layer, the species with the highest importance values across the four succession stages were Aristolochia debilis, Rubus parvifolius, Solanum lyratum, and Hedera nepalensis. (3) The Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Margalef richness index, Pielou evenness index, and Simpson dominance index of community followed a similar trend, initially increasing and then decreasing as succession progressed. The diversity index peaked in the coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest stage. (4) The correlation analysis between plant diversity indices and environmental factors indicated that species diversity changes during the succession of P. orientalis forests in Xuzhou’s limestone mountains were significantly correlated with canopy density, slope position, and slope aspect, with canopy density having the greatest influence on the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (P< 0.05). 【Conclusion】 The plant diversity in P. orientalis forests in Xuzhou’s limestone mountainous area peaked during the coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest stage. The study identified canopy closure, slope position, and slope orientation as key factors influencing plant diversity. These findings provide theoretical bases for the transformation and management of near-natural forest stands in the region.

Key words: limestone hill region of Xuzhou, Platycladus orientalis plantation, plant community, community succession, plant diversity, forest improvement

中图分类号:

S718.5

隋夕然,李军,陈娟,等. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.

SUI Xiran, LI Jun, CHEN Juan, HUA Jun, SHEN Qian, YANG Hongsheng, HE Qiancheng, LI You, WANG Wei, PENG Ye, GE Zhiwin, ZHANG Zengxin. Species diversity changes of Platycladus orientalis community at different succession stages in Xuzhou City[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 49(1): 171-178.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202301003.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

图3

侧柏人工林不同演替阶段植物物种重要值侧柏Platycladus orientalis;朴树Celtis sinensis;秤锤树Sinojackia xylocarpa;构树Broussonetia papyrifera;柘Maclura tricuspidata;桑树Morus alba;刺槐Robinia pseudoacacia;臭椿Ailanthus altissima;牡荆Vitex negundo;女贞Ligustrum lucidum;苦楝Melia azedarach;栾树Koelreuteria paniculata;雪松Cedrus deodara;卫矛Euonymus alatus;冻绿Rhamnus utilis;枳树Citrus trifoliata;堇菜Viola arcuata;酸枣Ziziphus jujuba;地锦Euphorbia humifusa;南天竺Nandina domestica;忍冬Lonicera japonica;榆树Ulmus pumila;黄栌Cotinus coggygria;商陆Phytolacca acinosa;丁香Syringa oblata;花椒Zanthoxylum bungeanum;麦冬Ophiopogon japonicus;火炬树Rhus typhina;胡枝子Lespedeza bicolor;茅莓Rubus parvifolius;中华卷柏Selaginella sinensis;木防己Cocculus orbiculatus;算盘子Glochidion puberum;求米草Oplismenus undulatifolius;牛筋草Eleusine indica;酢浆草Oxalis corniculata;天名精Carpesium abrotanoides;野茉莉Styrax japonicus;艾草Artemisia argyi;淡竹叶Lophatherum gracile;蛇莓Duchesnea indica;葎草Humulus scandens;茜草Rubia cordifolia;地榆Sanguisorba officinalis;萝藦Cynanchum rostellatum;半夏Pinellia ternata;木蓝Indigofera tinctoria;一年蓬Erigeron annuus;薄荷Mentha canadensis;楤木Aralia elata;溲疏Deutzia scabra;梧桐Firmiana simplex;木槿Hibiscus syriacus;杜仲Eucommia ulmoides;蜡梅Chimonanthus praecox;紫花地丁Viola philippica;天葵Semiaquilegia adoxoides;田麻Corchoropsis crenata;假还阳参Crepidiastrum lanceolatum;爬山虎Parthenocissus tricuspidata;龙牙草Agrimonia pilosa;马蹄莲Zantedeschia aethiopica;牛膝Achyranthes bidentata;天胡荽Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides;香附子Cyperus rotundus;烟管头草Carpesium cernuum;泽苔草Caldesia parnassifolia;苦荬菜lxeris polycephala;枣树Ziziphus jujuba;蒲公英Taraxacum mongolicum;鸢尾Iris tectorum;地胆草Elephantopus scaber;木贼Equisetum hyemale;鸡矢藤Paederia foetida;马兜铃Aristolochia debilis;铁线莲Clematis florida;石楠Photinia serratifolia;沿阶草Ophiopogon bodinieri;羊乳Codonopsis lanceolata;苎麻Boehmeria nivea;糙叶树Aphananthe aspera;桂树Osmanthus fragrans;黄檀Dalbergia hupeana;山茶花Camellia japonica;车前草Plantago asiatica;马兰Kalimeris indica;窃衣Torilis scabra;乌蔹莓Causonis japonica。"

图3

图4

表2

参考文献 24

[1]	郑心炫, 张增可, 林华贞, 等. 平潭岛不同演替阶段植被群落物种多样性特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(3):66-73.
	ZHENG X X, ZHANG Z K, LIN H Z, et al. Species diversity characteristics of vegetation communities in different succession stages in Pingtan Island[J]. For Resour Manag, 2019(3):66-73.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.03.012.
[2]	何斌, 李青, 刘勇. 黔西北地区不同演替阶段植物群落结构与物种多样性特征[J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(8):1029-1038.
	HE B, LI Q, LIU Y. Community structure and species diversity at different vegetation successional stages in northwest Guizhou[J]. Guihaia, 2019, 39(8):1029-1038.DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201811036.
[3]	何惠琴, 伍自力, 孙海龙. 四川盆地道路沿线岩石坡面植被演替不同阶段群落动态特征分析[J]. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 39(3):414-420.
	HE H Q, WU Z L, SUN H L. Plant community dynamics of vegetation succession stages on roadside rock steep slope in Sichuan Basin,China[J]. J Sichuan Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2016, 39(3):414-420.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8395.2016.03.020.
[4]	房用, 梁玉, 王月海, 等. 济南石灰岩山地植被特征及其对植被优化配置的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2008, 43(1):8-13,19.
	FANG Y, LIANG Y, WANG Y H, et al. The vegetation characteristics of limestone mountains in Jinan and their application to the optimal disposition of vegetation[J]. J Shandong Univ (Nat Sci), 2008, 43(1):8-13,19.
[5]	梁燕, 葛忠强, 李宗泰, 等. 鲁中石灰岩山地不同密度侧柏人工林林分生长特征研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2019, 46(5):37-43.
	LIANG Y, GE Z Q, LI Z T, et al. Study on growth characteristics of Platycladus orientalis plantation with different stand densities in limestone mountainous region of central Shandong[J]. Hunan For Sci Technol, 2019, 46(5):37-43.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2019.05.007.
[6]	李小倩, 杨吉华, 魏晓明. 鲁中南石灰岩山地针阔混交林土壤理化性状及水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(1):208-211,230.
	LI X Q, YANG J H, WEI X M. Soil physical and chemical properties and hydrological effects of coniferous and broadleaved mixed forest in limestone mountains[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2016, 30(1):208-211,230.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.01.038.
[7]	刘晓丽, 张孝春, 刘艺衫, 等. 皖北石灰岩山地不同植被恢复模式对植物群落物种组成及多样性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(5):845-852.
	LIU X L, ZHANG X C, LIU Y S, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on the species composition and diversity of plant communities in the limestone mountains in northern Anhui Province[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2020, 37(5):845-852.DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2019-0475.
[8]	宁晨东. 北京山区侧柏和油松林下多样性与典型物种的分布及预测[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2021.DOI: 10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2021.000556.
	NING C D. Diversity and distribution and prediction of typical species under Platycladus orientalis and Pinus tabulaeformis forests in Beijing mountainous area[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021.DOI: 10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2021.000556.
[9]	宁晨东, 周利军, 齐实, 等. 京津风沙源区草地生态修复技术评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(1):126-136.
	NING C D, ZHOU L J, QI S, et al. Assessment of grassland ecological restoration technologies in Beijing-Tianjin sandstorm source area[J]. J Northwest A F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 50(1):126-136.DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2022.01.015.
[10]	潘存德. 新疆山地天然林及其群落演替与更新[J]. 新疆林业, 2020(5):8-14.
	PAN C D. Succession and regeneration of natural forests and their communities in mountainous areas of Xinjiang[J]. For Xinjiang, 2020(5):8-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3522.2020.05.004.
[11]	葛成立, 林文涛, 周永, 等. 徐州石灰岩山地人工促进侧柏纯林演替的树种选择研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2015, 42(2):19-25.
	GE C L, LIN W T, ZHOU Y, et al. Study on tree species selection for artificially promoting the succession of Platycladus orientalis pure forest in limestone mountain area of Xuzhou[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2015, 42(2):19-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2015.02.005.
[12]	汤茜, 尤海梅, 王梦君. 徐州市人工侧柏林的群落结构及物种多样性分析[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2006, 5(2):168-172.
	TANG Q, YOU H M, WANG M J. Study on the community structure and species diversity of the Platycladus orientalis plantation forests in Xuzhou[J]. J Huaiyin Teach Coll (Nat Sci Ed), 2006, 5(2):168-172.DOI: 10.16119/j.cnki.issn1671-6876.2006.02.019.
[13]	冯广, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 等. 鄂西南亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林的自然恢复动态及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(8):1-9.
	FENG G, AI X R, YAO L, et al. Dynamics of natural restoration of subtropical evergreen-deciduous broadleaved mixed forests in southwest Hubei Province and influencing factors[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2016, 52(8):1-9.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160801.
[14]	孙鸿烈. 中国资源科学百科全书[M]. 东营: 石油大学出版社, 2000.
	SUN H L. China encyclopedia of resources science[M]. Dongying: Petroleum University Publishing House, 2000.
[15]	杜鹏飞, 李明文. 黑龙江平山自然保护区不同演替阶段植物群落物种多样性研究[J]. 林业科技, 2020, 45(4):32-37.
	DU P F, LI M W. Study on the species diversity of plant communities at different succession stages in Heilongjiang Pingshan nature reserve[J]. For Sci Technol, 2020, 45(4):32-37.DOI: 10.19750/j.cnki.1001-9499.2020.04.010.
[16]	王凯博, 陈美玲, 秦娟, 等. 子午岭植被自然演替中植物多样性变化及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(10):2089-2096.
	WANG K B, CHEN M L, QIN J, et al. Plant species diversity and the relation with soil properties in natural succession process in Ziwuling area[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2007, 27(10):2089-2096.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2007.10.025.
[17]	韩晓丽. 文峪河上游河岸带森林植物群落演替和林下土壤细菌群落组成与多样性研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2020.
	HAN X L. Study on the succession of forest plant community and the composition and diversity of soil bacterial community in the upper reaches of Wenyu River[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2020.DOI: 10.27285/d.cnki.gsxnu.2020.000010.
[18]	王世雄, 王孝安, 李国庆, 等. 陕西子午岭植物群落演替过程中物种多样性变化与环境解释[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(6):1638-1647.
	WANG S X, WANG X A, LI G Q, et al. Species diversity and environmental interpretation in the process of community succession in the Ziwu Mountain of Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(6):1638-1647.
[19]	赵鹏, 屈建军, 徐先英, 等. 长江源区沙化高寒草地植被群落特征及其与地形因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3):1030-1040.
	ZHAO P, QU J J, XU X Y, et al. Study on the characteristics of sandy alpine grasslands and its relationship between plant distribution and microtopography in the source regions of Yangtze River[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(3):1030-1040.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201712272334.
[20]	赵燕波, 张丹桔, 张健, 等. 不同郁闭度马尾松人工林林下植物多样性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016, 22(6):1048-1054.
	ZHAO Y B, ZHANG D J, ZHANG J, et al. Understory vegetation diversity of Pinus massoniana plantations with various canopy density[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2016, 22(6):1048-1054.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2016.04052.
[21]	ODUM E P. The strategy of ecosystem development[J]. Science, 1969, 164(3877):262-270.DOI: 10.1126/science.164.3877.262.
[22]	庞学勇, 刘庆, 刘世全, 等. 川西亚高山云杉人工林土壤质量性状演变[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(2):261-267.
	PANG X Y, LIU Q, LIU S Q, et al. Changes of soil fertility quality properties under subalpine spruce plantation in western Sichuan[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2004, 24(2):261-267.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.02.014.
[23]	张鑫, 胡海波, 吴秋芳, 等. 基于挂网喷播绿化的岩质边坡植物多样性及影响因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(3):131-138.
	ZHANG X, HU H B, WU Q F, et al. Plant diversity and influencing factors of rocky slope based on net-suspended spray seeding[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(3):131-138.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708035.
[24]	曾慕琳. 多山城市遗存山体形态特征对其植物多样性的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022.
	ZENG M L. Influence of morphological characteristics of mountain remains in mountainous cities on their plant diversity[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2022.DOI: 10.27047/d.cnki.ggudu.2022.000660.

演替阶段 succession stage	植被型 vegetation type	植被亚型 vegetation subtype	植物群落 plant community	物种组成 species composition
灌草丛shrubs and grasses	落叶阔叶灌丛	暖性落叶阔叶灌丛	石灰岩山地落叶阔叶灌丛	14科18属20种
针叶林coniferous forest	温性针叶林	温性常绿针叶林	侧柏林	33科49属51种
			雪松林
针阔混交林 coniferous broad- leaved mixed forest	次生针阔叶混交林	东部地区次生针阔叶混交林	侧柏-构树	43科59属64种
			侧柏-构树-栾树
			侧柏-柘树-枣树
			侧柏-构树-柘树
			侧柏-枣树
			侧柏-构树-女贞
			侧柏-桑树
阔叶林 broad-leaved forest	温性常绿阔叶林	典型落叶阔叶林	构树林	27科44属45种
			刺槐林
	竹林(混生于各类常绿阔叶林中)^[14]		暖性竹林	丘陵竹林

演替阶段 succession stage	多样性指数 diversity index	环境因子 environment factor
演替阶段 succession stage	多样性指数 diversity index	海拔 elevation	坡向 aspect	坡度 slope	坡位 position	郁闭度 canopy
灌草丛阶段GC	Shannon-Wiener	0.659	0.159	0.119	0.398	-0.778^*
	Margalef	0.522	-0.182	-0.113	0.479	-0.562
	Pielou	-0.302	-0.044	-0.316	-0.606	-0.538
	Simpson	0.818^*	0.494	0.471	0.482	-0.825^*
针叶林阶段CF	Shannon-Wiener	0.248	0.326	0.120	0.310	-0.392
	Margalef	0.257	0.280	-0.078	0.504	-0.726^*
	Pielou	-0.748^*	-0.259	-0.675^*	-0.426	-0.160
	Simpson	-0.036	0.091	0.030	0.196	-0.326
针阔混交林阶段CB	Shannon-Wiener	0.177	0.681^*	-0.015	0.674^*	-0.746^*
	Margalef	0.509	0.465	0.396	0.246	0.299
	Pielou	-0.523	0.645	0.400	0.053	0.055
	Simpson	0.215	0.418	0.033	0.808^**	-0.858^**
阔叶林阶段BF	Shannon-Wiener	0.171	0.688^*	0.272	-0.086	0.444
	Margalef	-0.227	-0.405	-0.097	0.269	-0.503
	Pielou	0.244	0.641	0.461	0.190	-0.088
	Simpson	-0.733^*	-0.622	-0.293	-0.274	0.524

徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化

Species diversity changes of Platycladus orientalis community at different succession stages in Xuzhou City

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	范明阳, 胡萌, 杨园, 方炎明. 中国东部地区马尾松与黄山松群落分类及群落结构和物种多样性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 47-58.
[2]	周永晟, 徐子恒, 袁发银, 尚旭岚, 孙操稳, 方升佐. 亚热带3个地点青钱柳群落特征比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 29-35.
[3]	吴思思, 鲁小珍, 王馨悦, 葛之葳. 两种类型人为干扰对城市风景林植物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 128-134.
[4]	伊贤贵,丁晖,方炎明,叶要清,陈水飞,王旭,从睿,张开文,李垚,王贤荣. 基于固定样地的黄山不同海拔森林群落物种多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(01): 149-155.
[5]	费菲，肖文娅，刁娇娇，管云云，关庆伟. 林窗尺度对侧柏人工林植物多样性的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(05): 72-78.
[6]	王晓宇,盛晟,孔进,王莹莹,张小伟,刘茂松. 河流植物群落下底泥中碳氮磷和重金属富集效应分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(02): 20-26.
[7]	薛岑,刘茂松,康昕,郑阿宝,侯嫦英,关庆伟,徐驰. 苏南丘陵山区典型次生森林群落的点格局分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(02): 107-112.
[8]	魏强,凌雷,张广忠,柴春山,王多锋,陶继新,薛睿. 兴隆山森林群落不同演替阶段优势乔木种群结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(05): 59-66.
[9]	张凯旋,商侃侃,达良俊. 上海环城林带不同植物群落土壤质量综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(03): 71-77.
[10]	莫福燕,徐正会,宋扬,李春良,和秋菊. 喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(03): 85-90.
[11]	姚和金,赵建华,姚宏昌,万光龙,叶飞. 白三叶草对马尼拉草坪杂草群落及其多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(04): 75-80.
[12]	李瑞霞,凌宁,郝俊鹏,闵建刚,陈信力,关庆伟. 林龄对侧柏人工林碳储量以及细根形态和生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 21-27.
[13]	陈静,王玉军,武丙琳,鲁庆彬. 清凉峰旅游区鸟类多样性及季节变动[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(03): 37-42.
[14]	张程,彭重华,刘晖,曹铁如. 湘西北长果安息香群落区系组成与特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(03): 144-148.
[15]	汪辉,吕康芝. 以群落为单元的城市森林生态公园植被规划[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(02): 137-141.