张家口崇礼区主要植物叶片理化性质及燃烧性分析

牟韵洁, 高德民, 龙腾腾, 郭在军, 牛海峰

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6) : 239-244.

PDF(1789 KB)
PDF(1789 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6) : 239-244. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202303033
研究论文

张家口崇礼区主要植物叶片理化性质及燃烧性分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of the physicochemical properties and flammability of the plant leaves of typical plants in Chongli District of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】对河北省张家口市崇礼区8类典型植物叶片的理化性质和燃烧性进行分析,为当地森林火险评估和可持续经营提供参考。【方法】基于张家口市崇礼区典型地表植被类型的分布状况以及自然条件,以白桦 (Betula platyphylla)、油松(Pinus tabuliformis)、落叶松(Larix gmelinii)、榛(Corylus heterophylla)、灌杂、草本类、山杏(Prunus sibirica)、樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)8类植物叶片作为研究对象,选取植被覆盖率较高的纯林地段采集植物叶片并测定其理化性质,采用主成分分析法评价8类植物叶片的燃烧性,并利用聚类分析法对8类植物叶片的燃烧等级进行划分。【结果】8类植物叶片的燃烧性大小由强到弱顺序依次为樟子松、白桦、草本类、山杏、榛、油松、落叶松、灌杂。通过主成分分析与聚类分析将8类植物叶片划分为3个等级,分别为:可燃、较易燃、易燃。落叶松、油松、灌杂属于可燃等级,白桦、榛、草本类、山杏属于较易燃等级,樟子松属于易燃等级。【结论】落叶松、油松、灌杂燃烧性最弱,火灾危险性最低;樟子松燃烧性最强,火灾危险性最高,需特别关注和防范。研究结果为张家口市崇礼区森林火灾发生预报、生物防火以及营林用火等方面提供重要依据。

Abstract

【Objective】This study analyzed the physicochemical and combustion characteristics of the leaves of eight typical plants in Chongli District of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, the study aimed to provide insights for assessing the risk of local forest fires and their sustainable management.【Method】Based on the distribution patterns of the typical land surface types and natural conditions in Chongli District of Zhangjiakou City, eight plant species, including Betula platyphylla, Pinus tabuliformis, Larix gmelinii, Corylus heterophylla, shrubs, herbs, Prunus sibirica, and P. sylvestris var. mongolica were selected as the research objects. Leaves were collected from pure forest segments with high vegetation coverage, and their physicochemical properties were determined. The combustion characteristics of the leaves of these eight plant species were determined by principal component analysis. The leaves were additionally categorized based on their combustion levels by cluster analysis.【Result】The combustion intensity of the leaves ranged from strongest to weakest in the following order: P. sylvestris var. mongolica, B. platyphylla, herbs, P. sibirica, C. heterophylla, P. tabuliformis, L. gmelinii, and shrubs. The leaves were classified into three categories by principal component analysis and cluster analysis, namely, the highly combustible, moderately combustible, and most easily combustible groups. The highly combustible category included L. gmelinii, P. tabuliformis, and scrub plants. The moderately combustible category comprised B. platyphylla, C. heterophylla, herbs, and P. sibirica, while the most easily combustible category included P. sylvestris var. mongolica.【Conclusion】 L. gmelinii, P. tabuliformis, and shrub plants exhibited the lowest combustion propensity, thus posing as minimal wildfire hazards. Conversely, the combustion propensity of P. sylvestris var. mongolica was highest, indicating an elevated risk of wildfires. Therefore, targeted attention and preventive measures are imperative for controlling wildfires in Chongli District. The findings provide crucial evidence for predicting forest fires in Chongli District of Zhangjiakou City, and advocates the implementation of measures such as biological fire prevention and controlled burning during forestry operation.

关键词

植物叶片 / 理化性质 / 燃烧性 / 森林火险 / 聚类分析 / 主成分分析 / 张家口市崇礼区

Key words

plant leaves / physicochemical properties / combustion characteristics / forest fire risk / cluster analysis / principal component analysis / Chongli District, Zhangjiakou City

引用本文

导出引用
牟韵洁, 高德民, 龙腾腾, . 张家口崇礼区主要植物叶片理化性质及燃烧性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024, 48(6): 239-244 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202303033
MU Yunjie, GAO Demin, LONG Tengteng, et al. Analysis of the physicochemical properties and flammability of the plant leaves of typical plants in Chongli District of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(6): 239-244 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202303033
中图分类号: S762   

参考文献

[1]
SANNIGRAHI S, PILLA F, BASU B, et al. Examining the effects of forest fire on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production in India using remote sensing approaches[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020,725:138331.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331.
[2]
GUO M, LI J, YU F B, et al. Estimation of post-fire vegetation recovery in boreal forests using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) data[J]. Int J Wildland Fire, 2021, 30(5):365-337.DOI: 10.1071/WF20162.
[3]
KIRDYANOV A V, SAURER M, SIEGWOLF R, et al. Long-term ecological consequences of forest fires in the continuous permafrost zone of Siberia[J]. Environ Res Lett, 2020, 15(3):034061.DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7469.
[4]
袁有宏. 森林防火的重要性及技术措施探析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(3):134,139.
YUAN Y H. Analysis on the importance and technical measures of forest fire prevention[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(3):134,139.
[5]
王秋华. 森林火灾燃烧过程中的火行为研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010.
WANG Q H. Study on fire behaviors in forest burning[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2010.
[6]
FREJAVILLE T, CURT T, CARCAILLET C. Bark flammability as a fire-response trait for subalpine trees[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2013,4:466.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00466.
[7]
DE MAGALHÃES R M Q, SCHWILK D W. Leaf traits and litter flammability:evidence for non-additive mixture effects in a temperate forest[J]. J Ecol, 2012, 100(5):1153-1163.DOI: 10.2307/23257537.
[8]
刘家豪, 辛颖, 薛伟, 等. 基于热重分析的帽儿山地区6种乔木燃烧性研究[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (1): 54-62.
LIU J H, XIN Y, XUE W, et al. Study on the combustibility of 6 kinds of arbors in Maoershan area based on thermogravimetric analysis[J]. For Eng, 2023, 39(1):54-62.
[9]
王昆伦, 蒋婷, 侯小菲, 等. 昆明地区17种园林竹鲜叶的燃烧性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(5):963-970.
WANG K L, JIANG T, HOU X F, et al. Combustibility of fresh leaves of 17 species of garden bamboo in Kunming[J]. J Zhejiang A & F Univ, 2020, 37(5):963-970.DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190612.
[10]
张运生, 舒立福, 闫想想, 等. 广西4种乔木树叶的燃烧性差异研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4):195-200.
ZHANG Y S, SHU L F, YAN X X, et al. A study on flammability differences among four arbor species leaves in Guangxi[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(4):195-200.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006037.
[11]
苏文静, 张思玉, 何诚, 等. 昆明地区9种藤本植物活叶片的燃烧性[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(6):120-123.
SU W J, ZHANG S Y, HE C, et al. Combustion characteristics of live leaves of 9 lianas species in Kunming,Yunnan Province[J]. For Resour Manag, 2017(6):120-123.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.06.021.
[12]
盛东晨, 徐家琛, 王雷. 呼和浩特市16种园林草本植物的燃烧性研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(3):88-99.
SHENG D C, XU J C, WANG L. A study on combustibility of 16 garden herbs in Hohhot[J]. J Shanxi Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 41(3):88-99.DOI: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202101019.
[13]
张德顺, 吴雪, 陈陆琪瑶, 等. 上海市常见26种园林树种燃烧性评价[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(10):1399-1406.
ZHANG D S, WU X, CHEN L Q Y, et al. Combustibility evaluation of 26 landscape tree species in Shanghai[J]. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci), 2021, 49(10):1399-1406.DOI: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.21026.
[14]
POPOVIC Z, BOJOVIC S, MARKOVIC M, et al. Tree species flammability based on plant traits:a synthesis[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2021,800:149625.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149625.
[15]
鲁绍伟, 余新晓, 刘凤芹, 等. 北京八达岭林场森林燃烧性及防火措施研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(3):109-114.
LU S W, YU X X, LIU F Q, et al. Forest fuel combustibility and methods for fire prevention at the Badaling Forestry Center,Beijing[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2006, 28(3):109-114.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2006.03.019.
[16]
王昆伦, 侯小菲, 蒋婷, 等. 昆明地区12种园林绿化树种鲜叶燃烧性比较[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(6):97-100,107.
WANG K L, HOU X F, JIANG T, et al. A comparison of fresh leaves combustibility of 12 landscaping tree species in Kunming area[J]. For Resour Manag, 2019( 6):97-100,107.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.06.017.
[17]
李国辉, 张桥蓉, 马瑞杰, 等. 施肥对滇中地区4种主要易燃树种叶燃烧性的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2022, 38 (4): 18-25.
LI G H, ZHANG Q R, MA R J, et al. Effects of fertilization on needles flammability of 4 main flammable tree species in central Yunnan[J]. For Eng, 2022, 38 (4): 18-25.
[18]
李连强, 牛树奎, 陶长森, 等. 妙峰山油松林分结构与地表潜在火行为相关性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(1):73-81.
LI L Q, NIU S K, TAO C S, et al. Correlations between stand structure and surface potential fire behavior of Pinus tabuliformis forests in Miaofeng Mountain of Beijing[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(1):73-81.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180304.
[19]
SANTACRUZ-GARCÍA A C, BRAVO S, CORRO F, et al. A comparative assessment of plant flammability through a functional approach:the case of woody species from Argentine Chaco region[J]. Austral Ecol, 2019, 44(8):1416-1429.DOI: 10.1111/aec.12815.
[20]
宋叙言, 沈江. 基于主成分分析和集对分析的生态工业园区生态绩效评价研究:以山东省生态工业园区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(3):546-554.
SONG X Y, SHEN J. The ecological performance of eco-industrial parks in Shandong based on principal component analysis and set pair analysis[J]. Resour Sci, 2015, 37(3):546-554.
[21]
陶长森, 牛树奎, 陈羚, 等. 妙峰山林场主要针叶林冠层特征及潜在火行为[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(5):82-89.
TAO C S, NIU S K, CHEN L, et al. Canopy characteristics and potential crown fire behavior of main coniferous forest in Miaofeng Mountain Forest Farm in Beijing[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(5):82-89.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170408.
[22]
梁瀛, 张思玉, 努尔古丽, 等. 天山中部林区主要树种理化性质及燃烧性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(12):101-105.
LIANG Y, ZHANG S Y, Nuerguli, et al. Physical and chemical properties and combustibility of main wood species in the central part of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(12):101-105.
[23]
张今奇, 周梅, 赵鹏武, 等. 内蒙古大兴安岭东麓5种典型树种燃烧性[J]. 温带林业研究, 2021, 4(1):27-33.
ZHANG J Q, ZHOU M, ZHAO P W, et al. Combustibility of five typical tree species in the eastern foot of great Xing’an Mountains,Inner Mongolia[J]. J Temp For Res, 2021, 4(1):27-33.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4900.2021.01.005.
[24]
魏建珩, 赵恒, 高仲亮, 等. 毛乌素沙地主要树种燃烧性研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2021, 40(11):1676-1681.
WEI J H, ZHAO H, GAO Z L, et al. Study on the combustibility of main tree species in Mu us sandy land[J]. Fire Sci Technol, 2021, 40(11):1676-1681.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2021.11.026.
[25]
李国辉, 张桥蓉, 王昆伦, 等. 土壤有效磷含量对滇中地区主要森林木本植物枝叶燃烧性的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2021, 50(6):76-82.
LI G H, ZHANG Q R, WANG K L, et al. Effects of soil available phosphorus content on burnability of branches and leaves of main forest woody plants in central Yunnan[J]. J West China For Sci, 2021, 50(6):76-82.DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2021.06.011.
[26]
苗庆林, 田晓瑞. 多气候情景下大兴安岭森林燃烧性评估[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(10):109-116.
MIAO Q L, TIAN X R. Assessment of burn probability assessment in Daxinganling under multi-climatic scenarios[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2016, 52(10):109-116.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161014.
[27]
NOLAN R H, BLACKMAN C J, DE DIOS V R, et al. Linking forest flammability and plant vulnerability to drought[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(7):779.DOI: 10.3390/f11070779.
[28]
LANDESMANN J, TIRIBELLI F, PARITSIS J, et al. Increased fire severity triggers positive feedbacks of greater vegetation flammability and favors plant community-type conversions[J]. J Veg Sci, 2021, 32(1):e12936.DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12936.
[29]
张传波, 李卫国, 王晶, 等. 波段反射率和植被指数结合的作物生长季农田土壤水分估测[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(1):111-118.
ZHANG C B, LI W G, WANG J, et al. Estimation of soil moisture in farmland during crop growth season by combining spectral reflectance and vegetation index[J]. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2022, 38 (1): 111-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.013.

基金

张家口市崇礼区森林智慧防火项目(2020SLZHFH-2)

编辑: 王国栋
PDF(1789 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/