
喀斯特地貌不同生境青篱柴叶片功能性状特征研究
王美权, 关庆伟, 黄宗胜, 袁在翔, 赵家豪
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1) : 162-170.
喀斯特地貌不同生境青篱柴叶片功能性状特征研究
Study on the characteristics of leaf functional traits of Tirpitzia sinensis in different habitats of Karst landform
【目的】探讨喀斯特不同石质生境中的青篱柴(Tirpitzia sinensis)叶片功能性状特征,为喀斯特地区植物生长适应性机理研究提供理论依据。【方法】以高倾角-短迹长-少转折-多连接-高密度-聚集型(Ⅰ)、中倾角-中迹长-多转折-中连接-中密度-均匀型(Ⅱ)、低倾角-长迹长-中转折-少连接-低密度-随机型(Ⅲ)3种石质生境中的典型优势灌木青篱柴为研究对象,采用单因素方差分析和相关性分析,研究其叶片功能性状对不同岩石裂隙网络结构和土壤理化性质的响应。【结果】不同石质生境的裂隙土壤养分和含水率在类型Ⅰ中最高、类型Ⅱ次之、类型Ⅲ最低,pH呈相反趋势,其中类型Ⅲ的土壤养分显著低于类型Ⅰ(P<0.05),土壤pH和含水率无显著差异。不同石质生境的叶片化学性状差异显著(P<0.05),而结构性状差异较小,叶片养分浓度和比叶面积在类型Ⅰ中最高、类型Ⅱ次之、类型Ⅲ最低,叶干物质含量呈相反趋势,叶片氮磷质量比和叶片厚度在类型Ⅱ中最高、类型Ⅲ次之、类型Ⅰ最低。岩石裂隙倾角和连接度是影响土壤理化性质的主要因子,土壤有机碳、全氮、速效氮、速效磷含量是影响叶片化学性状和叶面积的主要因子,而岩石裂隙网络结构中仅有连接度对其影响显著。总体上3种石质生境的叶片氮磷质量比大于16,表明青篱柴生长受磷限制,且生长速率低于同地带喀斯特其他灌木,均选择了较为保守的营养投资适应策略。【结论】岩石裂隙网络结构主要通过直接影响土壤理化性质进而间接影响叶片功能性状,其中叶片化学性状相比结构性状的可塑性更高;青篱柴在类型Ⅲ的石质生境中最易受到养分胁迫,进而在叶片功能性状上表现出了明显的耐贫瘠特征。
【Objective】This study aims to investigate the characteristics of leaf functional traits in Tirpitzia sinensis across different Karst fissure networks, and provide a theoretical basis for understanding plant growth adaptability mechanisms in Karst areas.【Method】In this study, we selected typical dominant shrub habitats of T. sinensis with various rock fissure characteristics: high dip angle, short track length, fewer turns, multiple connections, high density, and aggregation type (type Ⅰ); moderate dip angle, moderate track length, multiple turns, moderate connections, moderate density, and uniform type (type Ⅱ); and low dip angle, long track length, moderate turns, fewer connections, low density, and random type (type Ⅲ). We investigated the response of leaf functional traits to different rock fissure networks and soil physicochemical properties using One-way analysis of variance and correlation analysis. 【Result】The nutrient and water contents of fissure soil were the highest in type Ⅰ rocky habitats, followed by type Ⅱ, and the lowest in type Ⅲ, while soil pH showed an opposite trend. Soil nutrients in type Ⅲ were significantly lower than in type Ⅰ (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in soil pH or water content. Significant differences were found in leaf chemical traits among different rocky habitats (P < 0.05), but not in structural traits. Leaf nutrient concentration and specific leaf area were highest in type Ⅰ, followed by type Ⅱ and the lowest in type Ⅲ, with leaf dry matter content showing the opposite trend. Leaf N/P mass ratios and leaf thickness were the highest in type Ⅱ, followed by type Ⅲ, and the lowest in type Ⅰ. The dip angle and connectivity of rock fissures were the main factors affecting soil physicochemical properties. Soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, and available phosphorus content were the primary factors influencing leaf chemical traits and leaf area, which were significantly affected by the connectivity of the rock fissure network. The leaf nitrogen/phosphorus mass ratio was higher than 16 across the three rocky habitats, which indicated that T. sinensis growth was phosphorus-limited. Compared with other Karst shrubs in the same area, the growth rates of T. sinensis in the three rocky habitats were slower, reflecting a more conservative nutritional investment strategy. 【Conclusion】The rock fissure network indirectly affects leaf functional traits primarily by altering soil physicochemical properties, with leaf chemical traits showing greater plasticity than structural traits. In type Ⅲ rocky habitats, T. sinensis is most susceptible to nutrient stress, demonstrating pronounced tolerance to nutrient-poor conditions in its leaf functional traits.
石质生境 / 岩石裂隙网络结构 / 土壤理化性 / 叶片功能性状
rocky habitat / rock fracture network structure / soil physicochemical property / leaf functional trait
[1] |
刘晓娟, 马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学(生命科学), 2015, 45(4): 325-339.
|
[2] |
赖媛, 张玲玲, 郭英荣, 等. 武夷山不同海拔杜鹃和黄山松叶片功能性状的变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 1988-1996.
|
[3] |
刘文倩, 李家湘, 龚俊伟, 等. 柯-青冈常绿阔叶林优势树种叶片性状变异及适应策略[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(17): 7256-7265.
|
[4] |
冯家宝, 范顺祥, 侯煜飞, 等. 河北省森林草原区草本植物叶功能性状种间和种内变异[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(1): 23-28.
|
[5] |
盘远方, 陈兴彬, 姜勇, 等. 桂林岩溶石山灌丛植物叶功能性状和土壤因子对坡向的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(5): 1581-1589.
|
[6] |
周汀, 崔迎春, 叶雨艳, 等. 不同小生境下典型喀斯特森林植物叶片功能性状特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(10): 129-140.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
习新强, 赵玉杰, 刘玉国, 等. 黔中喀斯特山区植物功能性状的变异与关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 1000-1008.
|
[9] |
张仕豪, 熊康宁, 张俞, 等. 不同等级石漠化地区植物群落物种多样性及优势种叶片性状对环境因子的响应[J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(8): 1069-1080.
|
[10] |
吴陶红, 龙翠玲, 熊玲, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同演替阶段植物叶片功能性状与土壤因子的关系[J]. 广西植物, 2023, 43(3): 463-472.
|
[11] |
周运超, 王世杰, 卢红梅. 喀斯特石漠化过程中土壤的空间分布[J]. 地球与环境, 2010, 38(1): 1-7.
|
[12] |
王美权, 黄宗胜. 木本植物对喀斯特石质生境岩石形态结构的适应性[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(21): 7749-7761.
|
[13] |
符裕红, 张代杰, 项蛟, 等. 喀斯特不同地下生境剖面植物根系拓扑结构特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 865-874.
|
[14] |
朱守谦. 喀斯特森林生态研究-Ⅲ[M]. 贵阳: 贵州科技出版社, 2003.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
韩春秀. 岩体结构面特性研究及计算机模拟分析[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2006.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Soil Science. Analysis of soil physico-chemical properties[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1978.
|
[21] |
严友进. 喀斯特石漠化区浅层岩溶裂隙及其土壤主要生态功能研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019.
|
[22] |
赵楚, 盛茂银, 白义鑫, 等. 喀斯特石漠化地区不同土地利用类型土壤氮磷有效性及其环境影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1383-1392.
|
[23] |
宋希娟, 王克林, 刘淑娟, 等. 桂西北喀斯特地区不同土地利用方式土壤的有机碳含量及养分特征[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(6): 655-659.
|
[24] |
岑龙沛, 严友进, 戴全厚, 等. 喀斯特不同土地利用类型裂隙土壤有机碳及磷素赋存特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21): 7567-7575.
|
[25] |
孙向阳. 土壤学[M]. 中国林业出版社, 2005.
|
[26] |
田静, 盛茂银, 汪攀, 等. 西南喀斯特土地利用变化对植物凋落物-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(9): 4278-4286.
|
[27] |
符裕红, 彭琴, 李安定, 等. 喀斯特石灰岩产状地下生境的土壤质量[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2017, 37(3): 353-359.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
熊玲, 龙翠玲, 廖全兰, 等. 茂兰喀斯特森林木本植物叶的功能性状及其相互关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2022, 28(1): 152-159.
|
[30] |
刘宏伟, 王微, 左娟, 等. 中梁山石灰岩山地30种主要植物叶片性状研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 39(9): 50-55.
|
[31] |
刘金环, 曾德慧,
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
符裕红, 喻理飞, 黄宗胜, 等. 岩溶区根系地下生境优势植物及其养分利用特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(12): 2337-2345.
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
李钰, 赵成章, 董小刚, 等. 高寒草地狼毒枝-叶性状对坡向的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 3145-3151.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |