南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 45-56.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202304022
孙一鸣1(), 贾黎明1,*(
), 祝维1, 朱静伟1, 曲冠博1, 古丽米热·依力哈木1, 周欧1, 王亚飞1, 张国庆2
收稿日期:
2023-04-19
接受日期:
2024-08-03
出版日期:
2025-03-30
发布日期:
2025-03-28
通讯作者:
*贾黎明(jlm@bjfu.edu.cn),教授。作者简介:
孙一鸣(sunym0002@163.com)。
基金资助:
SUN Yiming1(), JIA Liming1,*(
), ZHU Wei1, ZHU Jingwei1, QU Guanbo1, Gulimire·Yilihamu 1, ZHOU Ou1, WANG Yafei1, ZHANG Guoqing2
Received:
2023-04-19
Accepted:
2024-08-03
Online:
2025-03-30
Published:
2025-03-28
摘要:
【目的】研究2年生毛白杨(Populus tomentosa)细根对树种组成和林分密度的分布及适应策略,为杨树人工林初植以及混交配置提供参考。【方法】以3 m×3 m、3 m×6 m、6 m×6 m等3种林分株行距(密度)的2年生毛白杨‘北林1号’(P. tomentosa×P. bolleana)×(P. alba×P. glandulosa)纯林及其与刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)混交林(林分株行距3 m×6 m)为研究对象,采用根钻法取根样,垂直方向上取样深度为150 cm,每10 cm为1层;混交林与林分株行距为3 m×6 m和6 m×6 m纯林取样点分别在距树10、30、50、100、150、200、250和300 cm处,林分株行距为3 m×3 m纯林取样点在10、30、50、100、150 cm处,共取得1 305个根样。随后对根样进行扫描和烘干处理,并称干质量,得到不同树种组成和林分株行距下不同深度和水平距离的细根形态指标和生物量数据。【结果】①树种组成对细根生物量密度无显著影响,对根长密度和根表面积密度有显著影响。垂直方向上,混交林和纯林中的毛白杨细根变化趋势未发生变化,均随着土壤深度的增加而减少。水平方向上,纯林细根生物量密度主要聚集在水平距树[0,10) cm,混交林内毛白杨细根生物量密度则主要聚集在[0,50) cm。二维分布上,混交林内毛白杨的细根密集分布区更深,水平分布相对均匀,水平侧根更加舒展。②林分株行距对细根生物量密度无显著影响,高密度林分的根长密度、根表面积密度和平均直径显著大于其他两种密度林分的。垂直方向上,株行距3 m×3 m林分的细根生物量密度在[50,60) cm土层显著高于其他两种林分的(P<0.05),并随着林分密度的增大,林木逐渐向下层土壤分配更多的细根;株行距3 m×6 m和6 m×6 m林分的细根生物量密度随着土壤深度的增加而逐渐减小,而株行距3 m×3 m林分的细根生物量密度在[0,60) cm土层逐渐增多,呈单峰分布。水平方向上,在距树150 cm处,株行距3 m×3 m林分的根长密度和根表面积密度显著大于其他两种密度林分的。二维分布上,株行距3 m×3 m林分的细根密集分布区更深,株行距3 m×6 m林分的细根水平伸展更远。【结论】混交使毛白杨根长密度与根表面积密度显著降低。垂直方向上,随着林分密度的增大,林木细根逐渐向下伸长,向下层土壤分配比例增多;水平方向上,高密度林分细根生物量密度随着距树距离的增加而减小的趋势逐渐明显。树种组成和林分密度对2年生毛白杨幼龄林细根生物量密度影响均不显著,但株行距3 m×3 m纯林林分的根长密度和根表面积密度显著大于混交林和其他两种密度林分。3 m×3 m高林分密度毛白杨纯林的细根生长最旺盛,通过形态可塑性而非改变生物量充分利用土壤水养条件,在幼龄期相比混交林和其他密度林分内毛白杨更能有效地利用土壤资源。
中图分类号:
孙一鸣,贾黎明,祝维,等. 毛白杨幼龄林细根对树种组成和林分密度的响应初探[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(2): 45-56.
SUN Yiming, JIA Liming, ZHU Wei, ZHU Jingwei, QU Guanbo, Gulimire·Yilihamu , ZHOU Ou, WANG Yafei, ZHANG Guoqing. Preliminary study on the response of fine roots in young Populus tomentosa forests to variations in species composition and stand density[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 49(2): 45-56.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202304022.
表1
树种组成与土壤深度、水平距离影响细根生物量密度和形态指标的方差分析"
变异来源 source of variation | 细根生物量 密度 fine root biomass density | 根长密度 root length density | 根表面积 密度 root surface area density | 根平均直径 root average diameter |
---|---|---|---|---|
树种组成 tree species composition | 0.103 | * | * | 0.083 |
土壤深度 soil depth | ** | ** | ** | 0.322 |
水平距离 horizontal distance | ** | ** | ** | ** |
树种组成×土壤深度 tree species composition × soil depth | 0.503 | 0.613 | 0.668 | 0.391 |
树种组成×水平距离 tree species composition × horizontal distance | ** | ** | ** | ** |
表2
林分密度与土壤深度、水平距离影响细根生物量密度与形态指标方差分析"
变异来源 source of variation | 细根生物量密度 fine root biomass density | 根长密度 root length density | 根表面积密度 root surface area density | 根平均直径 root average diameter | 比根长 specific root length | 根组织密度 root tissue density |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
林分密度stand density | 0.055 | ** | ** | ** | 0.828 | 0.131 |
土壤深度soil depth | ** | ** | ** | 0.105 | 0.862 | 0.570 |
水平距离horizontal distance | ** | ** | ** | ** | 0.659 | 0.436 |
林分密度×土壤深度stand density × soil depth | 0.643 | 0.643 | 0.674 | 0.704 | 0.959 | 0.508 |
林分密度×水平距离stand density × horizontal distance | 0.760 | 0.809 | 0.795 | * | 0.331 | 0.490 |
[1] | ZENG W X, XIANG W H, FANG J P, et al. Species richness and functional-trait effects on fine root biomass along a subtropical tree diversity gradient[J]. Plant Soil, 2020, 446(1):515-527.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04369-3. |
[2] | VERMA A K, GARKOTI S C, SINGH S, et al. Fine root production and nutrient dynamics in relation to stand characteristics of chir pine mixed banj oak forests in central Himalaya[J]. Flora, 2021,279:151808.DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2021.151808. |
[3] | THOMAS A, MARRON N, BONAL D, et al. Leaf and tree water-use efficiencies of Populus deltoides × P.nigra in mixed forest and agroforestry plantations[J]. Tree Physiol, 2022, 42(12):2432-2445.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpac094. |
[4] | KHOLDAENKO Y A, BELOKOPYTOVA L V, ZHIRNOVA D F, et al. Stand density effects on tree growth and climatic response in Picea obovata Ledeb.plantations[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2022,519:120349.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120349. |
[5] | 张景路, 张绘芳, 高健, 等. 基于林分生长模型的天山云杉碳汇潜力估测[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2023, 39(6):1332-1340. |
ZHANG J L, ZHANG H F, GAO J, et al. Estimation of carbon sequestration potential of Tianshan spruce based on stand growth model[J]. Jiangsu J Agri Sci, 2023, 39 (6): 1332-1340. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.06.008. | |
[6] | BRASSARD B W, CHEN H Y H, BERGERON Y, et al. Differences in fine root productivity between mixed and single-species stands[J]. Funct Ecol, 2011, 25(1):238-246.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01769.x. |
[7] | JOSHI R K, CHANDRA G S. Influence of Nepalese alder on soil physico-chemical properties and fine root dynamics in white oak forests in the central Himalaya,India[J]. CATENA, 2021,200:105140.DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.105140. |
[8] | ZWETSLOOT M J, GOEBEL M, PAYA A, et al. Specific spatio-temporal dynamics of absorptive fine roots in response to neighbor species identity in a mixed beech-spruce forest[J]. Tree Physiol, 2019, 39(11):1867-1879.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpz086. |
[9] | ZENG W X, XIANG W H, ZHOU B, et al. Positive tree diversity effect on fine root biomass:via density dependence rather than spatial root partitioning[J]. Oikos, 2021, 130(1):1-14.DOI: 10.1111/oik.07777. |
[10] | 谢玲芝, 李俊楠, 王韶仲, 等. 林分密度对水曲柳人工林吸收根生物量和根长密度的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(9):1-5. |
XIE L Z, LI J N, WANG S Z, et al. Influence of stem density on absorptive root biomass and length density in Fraxinus mandshurica plantation[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2014, 42(9):1-5.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20140721.017. | |
[11] | 邵森. 择伐对太岳山油松林表层细根生物量和土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 46(6):654-658. |
SHAO S. Effect of selective logging on the surface fine root biomass and soil nutrient of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Taiyue Mountain[J]. J Fujian Agric For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 46(6):654-658.DOI: 10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2017.06.009. | |
[12] | 张东来, 张玲. 阔叶红松林不同演替系列土壤可溶性有机碳含量及影响因素[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40 (2): 10-16. |
ZHANG D L, ZHANG L. Soluble organic carbon content and influencing factors in different succession series of broad-leaved Korean pine forests[J]. Forest Engineering, 2024, 40(2):10-16. | |
[13] | 莫雅芳, 王家妍, 陈亮, 等. 不同混交模式对桉树人工林生长及植物多样性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(5):1185-1192. |
MO Y F, WANG J Y, CHEN L, et al. Effects of different mixed models on growth and plant diversity in Eucalyptus plantations[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2022, 35(5):1185-1192.DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2022.5.026. | |
[14] | 龚益广, 徐明锋, 谢正生, 等. 杉木混交林的土壤生态化学计量及其林分结构影响因子研究[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2022, 38(1):18-27. |
GONG Y G, XU M F, XIE Z S, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry in Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forests and influencing factors of stand structure[J]. For Environ Sci, 2022, 38(1):18-27. | |
[15] | 王媚臻, 毕浩杰, 金锁, 等. 林分密度对云顶山柏木人工林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(3):981-988. |
WANG M Z, BI H J, JIN S, et al. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil physicochemical properties of a Cupressus funebris plantation in Yunding Mountain[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(3):981-988.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201803170528. | |
[16] | 李树宝, 张丽娜, 王树森, 等. 森林经营方式对不同林龄落叶松林枯落物及土壤水源涵养能力的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (2): 12-21. |
LI S B, ZHANG L N, WANG S S, et al. Effects of forest management methods on litter and soil water conservation capacity of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation of different ages[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(2):12-21. | |
[17] | YANG Y S, CHEN G S, LIN P, et al. Fine root distribution,seasonal pattern and production in four plantations compared with a natural forest in Subtropical China[J]. Ann For Sci, 2004, 61(7):617-627.DOI: 10.1051/forest:2004062. |
[18] | PREGITZER K S, KING J S, BURTON A J, et al. Responses of tree fine roots to temperature[J]. N Phytol, 2000, 147(1):105-115.DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00689.x. |
[19] | MCCORMACK M L, GUO D L. Impacts of environmental factors on fine root lifespan[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2014,5:205.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00205. |
[20] | FRESCHET G T, PAGÈS L, IVERSEN C M, et al. A starting guide to root ecology:strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification,sampling,processing and trait measurements[J]. New Phytol, 2021, 232(3):973-1122.DOI: 10.1111/nph.17572. |
[21] | LI W, SHI Y F, ZHU D D, et al. Fine root biomass and morphology in a temperate forest are influenced more by the nitrogen treatment approach than the rate[J]. Ecol Indic, 2021,130:108031.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108031. |
[22] | WANG Z Q, GUO D L, WANG X R, et al. Fine root architecture,morphology,and biomass of different branch orders of two Chinese temperate tree species[J]. Plant Soil, 2006, 288(1):155-171.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-006-9101-8. |
[23] | FUJII K, MAKITA N, KAMARA M, et al. Plasticity of pine tree roots to podzolization of boreal sandy soils[J]. Plant Soil, 2021, 464(1/2):209-222.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-021-04928-7. |
[24] | 赵方明. 不同类型油松林细根生物量的时空分布研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2020(2):11-13. |
ZHAO F M. Temporal and spatial distribution of fine root biomass in different types of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Prot For Sci Technol, 2020(2):11-13.DOI: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2020.02.004. | |
[25] | 陈光水, 杨玉盛, 何宗明, 等. 树木位置和胸径对人工林细根水平分布的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(5):1007-1011. |
CHEN G S, YANG Y S, HE Z M, et al. Effects of proximity of stems and tree diameters on fine root density in plantations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25(5):1007-1011.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.05.010. | |
[26] | 李帅锋, 贾呈鑫卓, 杨利华, 等. 林分密度对思茅松人工林根系生物量空间分布的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(11):2265-2272. |
LI S F, JIA C X Z, YANG L H, et al. The effect of stand density on the spatial distribution of root biomass of Pinus kesiya var.langbianensis plantation[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2017, 37(11):2265-2272.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2017.11.2265. | |
[27] | 高祥, 丁贵杰, 翟帅帅, 等. 不同林分密度马尾松人工林根系生物量及空间分布研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(6):71-75. |
GAO X, DING G J, ZHAI S S, et al. Spatial distribution of root biomass of Pinus massoniana plantations under different planting densities[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2014, 34(6):71-75.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2014.06.020. | |
[28] | LEUSCHNER C, HERTEL D, SCHMID I, et al. Stand fine root biomass and fine root morphology in old-growth beech forests as a function of precipitation and soil fertility[J]. Plant Soil, 2004, 258(1):43-56.DOI: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016508.20173.80. |
[29] | LEI P F, SCHERER-LORENZEN M, BAUHUS J. The effect of tree species diversity on fine-root production in a young temperate forest[J]. Oecologia, 2012, 169(4):1105-1115.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2259-2. |
[30] | LEI P F, SCHERER-LORENZEN M, BAUHUS J. Belowground facilitation and competition in young tree species mixtures[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 265:191-200.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.033. |
[31] | DI N, LIU Y, MEAD D J, et al. Root-system characteristics of plantation-grown Populus tomentosa adapted to seasonal fluctuation in the groundwater table[J]. Trees, 2018, 32(1):137-149.DOI: 10.1007/s00468-017-1619-2. |
[32] | YAN X L, JIA L M, DAI T F. Fine root morphology and growth in response to nitrogen addition through drip fertigation in a Populus × euramericana “Guariento” plantation over multiple years[J]. Ann For Sci, 2019, 76(1):1-12.DOI: 10.1007/s13595-019-0798-y. |
[33] | XI B Y, WANG Y, JIA L M, et al. Characteristics of fine root system and water uptake in a triploid Populus tomentosa plantation in the north China plain:implications for irrigation water management[J]. Agric Water Manag, 2013, 117:83-92.DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.006. |
[34] | DOMISCH T, FINÉR L, DAWUD S M, et al. Does species richness affect fine root biomass and production in young forest plantations?[J]. Oecologia, 2015, 177(2):581-594.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3107-3. |
[35] | GERMON A, GUERRINI I A, BORDRON B, et al. Consequences of mixing Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis trees on soil exploration by fine-roots down to a depth of 17 m[J]. Plant Soil, 2018, 424(1):203-220.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3428-1. |
[36] | FREDERICKSEN T S, ZEDAKER S M. Fine root biomass,distribution,and production in young pine-hardwood stands[J]. New Forest, 1995, 10(1):99-110.DOI: 10.1007/BF00034178. |
[37] | PINHEIRO R C, DE DEUS J C, NOUVELLON Y, et al. A fast exploration of very deep soil layers by Eucalyptus seedlings and clones in Brazil[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 366:143-152.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.012. |
[38] | 梅莉, 王政权, 韩有志, 等. 水曲柳根系生物量、比根长和根长密度的分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(1):1-4. |
MEI L, WANG Z Q, HAN Y Z, et al. Distribution patterns of Fraxinus mandshurica root biomass,specific root length and root length density[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17(1):1-4. | |
[39] | 席本野. 杨树根系形态、分布、动态特征及其吸水特性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(12):37-49. |
XI B Y. Morphology,distribution,dynamic characteristics of poplar roots and its water uptake habits[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(12):37-49.DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190400. | |
[40] | LAI Z R, ZHANG Y Q, LIU J B, et al. Fine-root distribution,production,decomposition,and effect on soil organic carbon of three revegetation shrub species in northwest China[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 359:381-388.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.025. |
[41] | STEELE S J, GOWER S T, VOGEL J G, et al. Root mass,net primary production and turnover in aspen,jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba,Canada[J]. Tree Physiol, 1997, 17(8/9):577-587.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.577. |
[42] | PERSSON H. Spatial distribution of fine-root growth,mortality and decomposition in a young Scots pine stand in central Sweden[J]. Oikos, 1980, 34(1):77.DOI: 10.2307/3544552. |
[43] | 杨玉盛, 陈光水, 何宗明, 等. 杉木观光木混交林细根的分布[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2002, 10(2):111-117. |
YANG Y S, CHEN G S, HE Z M, et al. Distribution of fine roots in a mixed Cunninghamia lanceolata-Tsoongiodendron odorum plantation[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2002, 10(2):111-117.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2002.02.003. | |
[44] | DOUGLAS G B, MCIVOR I R, POTTER J F, et al. Root distribution of poplar at varying densities on pastoral hill country[J]. Plant Soil, 2010, 333(1):147-161.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0331-4. |
[45] | KROON H D. Ecology.How do roots interact?[J]. Science, 2007, 318(5856):1562-1563.DOI: 10.1126/science.1150726. |
[46] | KOU L, GUO D L, YANG H, et al. Growth,morphological traits and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots respond differently to nitrogen addition in a slash pine plantation in subtropical China[J]. Plant Soil, 2015, 391(1):207-218.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2420-x. |
[47] | HE Y L, LI G D, XI B Y, et al. Fine root plasticity of young Populus tomentosa plantations under drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation in the north China Plain[J]. Agric Water Manag, 2022,261:107341.DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107341. |
[48] | ZHANG X, XING Y J, YAN G Y, et al. Effects of precipitation change on fine root morphology and dynamics at a global scale:a meta-analysis[J]. Can J Soil Sci, 2019, 99(1):1-11.DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2018-0114. |
[49] | APHALO P J, BALLARE C L. On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions[J]. Funct Ecol, 1995, 9(1):5.DOI: 10.2307/2390084. |
[50] | KRAMER-WALTER K R, LAUGHLIN D C. Root nutrient concentration and biomass allocation are more plastic than morphological traits in response to nutrient limitation[J]. Plant Soil, 2017, 416(1):539-550.DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3234-9. |
[51] | 田宇明, 王庆成. 初植密度对10年生水曲柳人工林生物量及根系的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(7):102-107. |
TIAN Y M, WANG Q C. Influence of planting density on biomass accumulation and root growth of manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) in 10-year-old plantation stands[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(7):102-107. | |
[52] | ATKINSON D. The use of soil resources in high density planting systems[J]. Acta Hortic, 1978(65):79-90.DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1978.65.12. |
[53] | HENDRICK R L, PREGITZER K S. The relationship between fine root demography and the soil environment in northern hardwood forests[J]. Écoscience, 1997, 4(1):99-105.DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1997.11682383. |
[54] | 耿玉清, 单宏臣, 谭笑, 等. 人工针叶林林冠空隙土壤的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24(4):16-19. |
GENG Y Q, SHAN H C, TAN X, et al. Soils in forest gaps in artificial coniferous forests[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2002, 24(4):16-19.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.04.004. | |
[55] | 贺曰林, 李广德, 席本野, 等. 2年生毛白杨细根生长,分布及形态特征对滴灌水氮耦合的响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(4):1-11. |
HE Y L, LI G D, XI B Y, et al. Response of 2-year-old poplar root growth, distribution and morphological characteristics to the coupling of drip irrigation water and nitrogen[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2022, 44(4):1-11. DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200413. | |
[56] | ISABELLA B, De W H A, ARNE S, et al. Stand age and fine root biomass, distribution and morphology in a Norway spruce chronosequence in southeast Norway[J]. Tree Physiology, 2008(5):773-784.DOI:10.1093/treephys/28.5.773. |
[57] | WANG Z, GUO D, WANG X, et al. Fine root architecture, morphology, and biomass of different branch orders of two Chinese temperate tree species[J]. Plant & Soil, 2006, 288(1/2):155-171.DOI:10.1007/s11104-006-9101-8. |
[58] | NOGUCHI K, NAGAKURE J, KANEKO S. Biomass and morphology of fine roots of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) after 3 years of nitrogen fertilization[J].Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013, 4:347.DOI:10.3389/fpls.2013.00347. |
[1] | 丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 90-98. |
[2] | 韩新宇, 高露双, 秦莉, 庞荣荣, 刘鸣谦, 朱一泓, 田益雨, 张金. 林分密度对兴安落叶松径向生长-气候关系的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 182-190. |
[3] | 李建华, 夏虹露, 唐卫平, 黄晗. 亚热带典型森林类型可燃物载量分配特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(5): 57-64. |
[4] | 路文燕, 董灵波, 田园, 汪莎杉, 曲宣怡, 魏巍, 刘兆刚. 基于树种组成的大兴安岭天然林主要树种树高-胸径曲线研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4): 157-165. |
[5] | 黄梓良, 徐子恒, 孙操稳. 青钱柳种子雨的季节动态及土壤种子库特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(2): 18-26. |
[6] | 俞子承, 凌聪, 陈赢男, 李淑娴, 尹佟明, 李小平. 雄性二倍体毛白杨再生体系的构建和遗传转化的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1): 187-196. |
[7] | 王润松, 孙源, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4): 123-129. |
[8] | 王福根, 卫星杓, 赵国春, 贾黎明. 无患子细根形态及垂直分布特征对配方施肥措施的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4): 58-66. |
[9] | 罗碧珍, 胡海清, 罗斯生, 魏书精, 吴泽鹏, 刘菲. 林火干扰对广东马尾松林土壤有机碳密度及其活性有机碳的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5): 132-140. |
[10] | 陈俊华, 周大松, 牛牧, 别鹏飞, 谢天资, 赵润, 慕长龙. 川中丘陵区4种乡土阔叶树细根性状对比研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1): 31-38. |
[11] | 董玉峰, 朱婉芮, 丁昌俊, 黄秦军, 王华田, 李善文, 王延平. 杨树不同根序细根形态对酚酸的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1): 39-46. |
[12] | 王琪, 于水强, 王维枫, 詹龙飞, 王静波. 不同密度和植株配置形状的杨树人工林细根生物量特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1): 179-185. |
[13] | 贾全全,罗春旺,刘琪璟,刘丽婷,李俊清. 不同林分密度油松人工林生物量分配模式[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(06): 87-92. |
[14] | 燕亚飞,田野,方升佐1,2Symbolj@@,宋浩,囤兴建1,2,4. 不同密度杨树人工林的外源无机氮输入及土壤无机氮库研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(04): 69-74. |
[15] | 任百林,徐锡增,方升佐. 杨树人工林生长与收获系统模型构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(05): 1-5. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||