斑皮柠檬桉种源树高生长稳定性评价

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202304041

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 67-74.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202304041

斑皮柠檬桉种源树高生长稳定性评价

陈升侃¹, 郭东强¹, 邓紫宇¹, 唐庆兰¹, 廖长琨², 杨植旺², 朱原立³, 李昌荣¹^,^*()

1.广西壮族自治区林业科学研究院,国家林业和草原局中南速生材繁育实验室,广西优良用材林资源培育重点实验室,广西南宁 530002
2.广西壮族自治区国有三门江林场,广西柳州 545006
3.广西壮族自治区国有七坡林场,广西南宁 530225

收稿日期:2023-04-30 接受日期:2023-06-23 出版日期:2025-03-30 发布日期:2025-03-28
通讯作者: *李昌荣(andyharry@126.com),正高级工程师。
作者简介:
陈升侃(chenshengkan@126.com),正高级工程师。
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金项目(2021GXNSFBA196003);广西优良用材林资源培育重点实验室课题(2020-A-01-02)

Stability evaluation on tree height for introduced provenances of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata

CHEN Shengkan¹, GUO Dongqiang¹, DENG Ziyu¹, TANG Qinglan¹, LIAO Changkun², YANG Zhiwang², ZHU Yuanli³, LI Changrong¹^,^*()

1. Key Laboratory of Central South Fast-growing Timber Cultivation of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Superior Timber Trees Resource Cultivation, Guangxi Forestry Research Institute, Nanning 530002, China
2. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Sanmenjiang State-Owned Forestry Farm, Liuzhou 545006, China
3. Guangxi State-Owned Qipo Forest Farm, Nanning 530225, China

Received:2023-04-30 Accepted:2023-06-23 Online:2025-03-30 Published:2025-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】对引种至广西的斑皮柠檬桉(Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata)种源进行适应性和稳定性评价,为斑皮柠檬桉的选择和推广提供理论依据。【方法】对建立在南宁、玉林和柳州的6年生斑皮柠檬桉种源试验林进行树高测定,分析其树高生长和保存率,以评价种源的生长适应性;通过主效可加互作可乘(AMMI)模型和基因型主效应加基因型与环境互作(GGE)双标图分析种源的稳定性,划分适宜推广区域,筛选优良引种种源。【结果】斑皮柠檬桉6年生时所有种源的树高均值达13.0 m,各种源存活率为21.23%~54.81%。树高在种源间存在极显著差异,种源与地点的交互作用显著,有必要进一步进行分解,AMMI模型分析结果显示有1个互作效应主成分轴达到极显著水平,解释了79.9%的互作效应。根据稳定性的定量指标(D_i),10个种源的稳定性由大到小排序依次为19694、19691、20883、19664、20396、20756、20787、20753、19665和19666号,其中20883、20756和19694号种源为速生稳定型种源。GGE双标图分析结果显示,3个试验点可划分为2个立地环境区,南宁和玉林试验点划分为同一立地环境区,柳州试验点单独划分为一个立地环境区,20883号种源为所有引种至广西种源的最优种源。【结论】斑皮柠檬桉引种至广西后在各试验点表现出良好的生长适应性,对种源进行选择可获得较好的改良效果;20883、20756和19694号种源适宜在南宁和玉林试验点立地环境相似的地区推广,20787号种源适宜在柳州试验点立地环境相似的地区推广。

关键词: 斑皮柠檬桉, 种源, 适应性, 稳定性

Abstract:

【Objective】This study evaluates the adaptability and stability of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata (CCV) provenances introduced to Guangxi, China, providing a theoretical basis for their selection and extension. 【Method】The tree height of six-year-old CCV specimens established in Nanning, Yulin and Liuzhou was measured. An analysis of tree height and survival for each provenance was conducted to assess growth adaptability. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model and genotype main effect plus genotype-environment interaction (GGE) biplot were employed to analyze the stability of provenances, classify suitable extension areas, and identify superior provenances. 【Result】The average tree height of all CCV provenances in sixth years was 13.0 m, with individual provenance survival rates ranging from 21.23% to 54.81%. Significant differences were observed in tree height among provenances, and the interaction with the site was also significant, suggesting a need for further decomposition of the interaction effect. The AMMI model results indicated that one interaction principal component axis achieved a significant level, accounting for 79.9% of the interaction effect. The stability D_i index for each provenance was calculated, revealing the following order of stability ranking: 19694, 19691, 20883, 19664, 20396, 20756, 20787, 20753, 19665 and 19666. Provenances 20883, 20756 and 19694 were identified as fast-growing and stable. The GGE biplot demonstrated that the three trial sites could be divided into two ecological regions, with Nanning and Yulin falling within one region and Liuzhou representing the other. Provenance 20883 emerged as the most suitable provenance for introduction to Guangxi. 【Conclusion】The CCV provenances introduced to Guangxi exhibited strong growth adaptability. The selection of provenances can significantly enhance planting outcomes. Provenances 20883, 20756 and 19694 are recommended for Nanning and Yulin, while provenance 20787 is suitable for Liuzhou.

Key words: Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata, provenance, adaptability, stability

中图分类号:

S722

陈升侃,郭东强,邓紫宇,等. 斑皮柠檬桉种源树高生长稳定性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 67-74.

CHEN Shengkan, GUO Dongqiang, DENG Ziyu, TANG Qinglan, LIAO Changkun, YANG Zhiwang, ZHU Yuanli, LI Changrong. Stability evaluation on tree height for introduced provenances of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 49(2): 67-74.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202304041.

图/表 7

表1

表2

表3

表4

图1

表5

图2

参考文献 32

[1]	CLARKE B, MCLEOD I, VERCOE T. Trees for farm forestry:22 promising species, 09-015, Project No CSF-56A[R]. Canberra: RIRDC, 2009.
[2]	SHEPHERD M, HENSON M, LEE D J. Revisiting genetic structuring in spotted gums (genus Corymbia section Maculatae) focusing on C. maculata,an early diverged,insular lineage[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2012, 8(1):137-147.DOI: 10.1007/s11295-011-0428-9.
[3]	LEE D J, HUTH J R, OSBORNE D O, et al. Selecting hardwood taxa for wood and fibre production in Queensland’s subtropics[J]. Aust For, 2010, 73(2):106-114.DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2010.10676316.
[4]	BRAWNER J T, MEDER R, DIETERS M, et al. Selection of Corymbia citriodora for pulp productivity[J]. South For a J For Sci, 2012, 74(2):121-131.DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2012.701418.
[5]	刘天颐, 刘纯鑫, 林元震, 等. 桉树伞房属4个种在广东清新的早期生长表现[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2009, 30(4):61-64.
	LIU T Y, LIU C X, LIN Y Z, et al. Growth performance of the four species from genus Corymbia in Qingxin County[J]. J South China Agric Univ, 2009, 30(4):61-64.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2009.04.014.
[6]	刘宇, 徐焕文, 尚福强, 等. 3个地点白桦种源试验生长稳定性分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(5):50-57.
	LIU Y, XU H W, SHANG F Q, et al. Growth stability of Betula platyphylla provenances from three sites[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2016, 38(5):50-57.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20150463.
[7]	赵兴堂, 夏德安, 曾凡锁, 等. 水曲柳生长性状种源与地点互作及优良种源选择[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(3):140-147.
	ZHAO X T, XIA D A, ZENG F S, et al. Provenances by sites interaction of growth traits and provenance selection of Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2015, 51(3):140-147.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150318.
[8]	程玲, 张心菲, 张鑫鑫, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的林木多地点试验分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3):87-93.
	CHENG L, ZHANG X F, ZHANG X X, et al. Forestry multi-environment trial analysis based on BLUP and GGE biplot[J]. J Northwest A F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 46(3):87-93.DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2018.03.011.
[9]	李金花. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的黑杨派无性系生长性状基因型与环境互作效应[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(6):64-73.
	LI J H. Genotype by environment interaction for growth traits of clones of Populus section aigeiros based on BLUP and GGE biplot[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2021, 57(6):64-73.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210607.
[10]	徐焕文, 刘宇, 李志新, 等. 5年生白桦杂种子代多点稳定性分析及优良家系选择[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(12):24-31.
	XU H W, LIU Y, LI Z X, et al. Analysis of the stability and superiority of five-year-old birch crossbreed families based on a multi-site test[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2015, 37(12):24-31.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20140466.
[11]	乔转运, 王军辉, 顾万春, 等. 桤木种源区域试验的AMMI模型分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2005, 39(2):171-177.
	QIAO Z Y, WANG J H, GU W C, et al. AMMI model analysis on regional alder provenance trials of alnas Cremastogyne[J]. J Henan Agric Univ, 2005, 39(2):171-177.DOI: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2005.02.012.
[12]	郑聪慧, 张鸿景, 王玉忠, 等. 基于BLUP和GGE双标图的华北落叶松家系区域试验分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8):73-83.
	ZHENG C H, ZHANG H J, WANG Y Z, et al. An analysis of a regional trial of Larix principis-rupprechtii families based on BLUP and GGE biplot[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(8):73-83.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190809.
[13]	LEE D J, HUTH J R, BRAWNER J T, et al. Comparative performance of Corymbia hybrids and parental species in subtropical Queensland and implications for breeding and deployment[J]. Silvae Genet, 2009, 58(1/2/3/4/5/6):205-212.DOI: 10.1515/sg-2009-0026.
[14]	LAN J, RAYMOND C A, SMITH H J, et al. Variation in growth and Quambalaria tolerance of clones of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata planted on four contrasting sites in north-eastern NSW[J]. Aust For, 2011, 74(3):205-217.DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2011.10676364.
[15]	刘天颐, 刘纯鑫, 孔凡启, 等. 伞房属四个树种在广东的早期生长表现[J]. 广东林业科技, 2009, 25(1):32-36.
	LIU T Y, LIU C X, KONG F Q, et al. The growth performance of 4 Corymbia species in Guangdong Province[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2009, 25(1):32-36.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2015.06.007.
[16]	孔凡启, 祝文娟, 刘天颐, 等. 伞房属4个树种/亚种在广东德庆的早期生长表现[J]. 桉树科技, 2016, 33(3):12-18.
	KONG F Q, ZHU W J, LIU T Y, et al. Early growth performance of four Corymbia species in Deqing County[J]. Eucalypt Sci Technol, 2016, 33(3):12-18.DOI: 10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2016.03.004.
[17]	周维, 卢翠香, 杨中宁, 等. 6年生大花序桉不同种源木材纤维特性的差异分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2016, 45(2):29-34.
	ZHOU W, LU C X, YANG Z N, et al. Genetic variation in fiber characteristics of 9 provenances of Eucalyptus cloeziana[J]. J West China For Sci, 2016, 45(2):29-34.DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2016.02.005.
[18]	杨汉波, 郭洪英, 陈炙, 等. 引种桉树种源生长性状的遗传变异及早期评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(6):109-114,177.
	YANG H B, GUO H Y, CHEN Z, et al. Genetic variation and early evaluation on the growth traits of provenances of Eucalyptus[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2019, 34(6):109-114,177.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.06.17.
[19]	JOHNSON I G, CARNEGIE A J, HENSON M. Growth,form and Quambalaria shoot blight tolerance of spotted gum in northeastern new South Wales,Australia[J]. Silvae Genet, 2009, 58(1/2/3/4/5/6):180-191.DOI: 10.1515/sg-2009-0024.
[20]	郭东强, 邓紫宇, 郑永邓, 等. 桉树伞房属4个树种在广西的早期病害调查[J]. 桉树科技, 2017, 34(4):47-52.
	GUO D Q, DENG Z Y, ZHENG Y D, et al. Investigation of leaf and stem diseases on four Corymbia species in Guangxi[J]. Eucalypt Sci Technol, 2017, 34(4):47-52.DOI: 10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2017.04.010.
[21]	CHEN S K, CHEN J B, YI G M, et al. Genetic parameters for growth and Quambalaria shoot blight resistance in Corymbia citriodora subsp.variegata[J]. Euphytica, 2021, 217(6):124.DOI: 10.1007/s10681-021-02848-2.
[22]	王军辉, 顾万春, 李斌, 等. 桤木优良种源/家系的选择研究:生长的适应性和遗传稳定性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(3):59-66.
	WANG J H, GU W C, LI B, et al. Study on selection of Alnus cremastogyne provenance/family: analysis of growth adaptation and genetic stability[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2000, 36(3):59-66.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20000311.
[23]	沈熙环. 油松、华北落叶松良种选育实践与理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
	SHEN X H. Selection and breeding of Pinus tabulaeformis and Larix principis-rupprechtii:practice and theory[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
[24]	徐化成. 油松地理变异与种源选择[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992.
	XU H C. Pinus tabulaeformis geographic variation and provenance selection[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. 1992.
[25]	KULEJ M. Adaptation of larch (Larix decidua) of Polish provenances under mountainous conditions of Beskid Sadecki (southern Poland)[J]. J For Sci, 2004, 50(12):559-565.DOI: 10.17221/4657-jfs.
[26]	HUNG T D, BRAWNER J T, LEE D J, et al. Genetic variation in growth and wood-quality traits of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata across three sites in south-east Queensland,Australia[J]. South For a J For Sci, 2016, 78(3):225-239.DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2016.1183095.
[27]	LUO J, ZHOU G, WU B, et al. Genetic variation and age-age correlations of Eucalyptus grandisat Dongmen Forest Farm in Southern China[J]. Aust For, 2010, 73(2):67-80.DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2010.10676312.
[28]	李昌荣, 郭东强, 李建凡, 等. 大花序桉种源/家系生长性状和树干通直度及基本密度的评价与选择[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(12):2734-2740.
	LI C R, GUO D Q, LI J F, et al. Evaluation and selection for growth traits,stem straightness and basic density of Eucalyptus cloeziana provenances/families[J]. J South Agric, 2019, 50(12):2734-2740.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2019.12.15.
[29]	廖柏勇, 刘丽婷, 莫晓勇, 等. 10年生粗皮桉种源家系选择分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2011, 32(4):72-77,81.
	LIAO B Y, LIU L T, MO X Y, et al. The selection analysis of 10-year-old Eucalyptus pellita provenance and family[J]. J South China Agric Univ, 2011, 32(4):72-77,81.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2011.04.016.
[30]	吴世军, 徐建民, 李光友, 等. 滇中南巨桉种源/家系年度变异分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(23):60-64.
	WU S J, XU J M, LI G Y, et al. Genetic variation and selection for provenances and families of Eucalyptus grandis among ages[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2018, 34(23):60-64.
[31]	DICKINSON G R, LEE D J, HUTH J R. Early plantation growth and tolerance to Ramularia shoot blight of provenances of three spotted gum taxa on a range of sites in Queensland[J]. Aust For, 2004, 67(2):122-130.DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2004.10676215.
[32]	BRAWNER J T, LEE D J, HARDNER C M, et al. Relationships between early growth and Quambalaria shoot blight tolerance in Corymbia citriodora progeny trials established in Queensland,Australia[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2011, 7(4):759-772.DOI: 10.1007/s11295-011-0372-8.

种源 provenance	种源地 origin state	纬度(S) latitude	经度(E) longitude	海拔/m altitude	种源号 No.
Monto	QLD	24°49'	150°56'	475	19694
Mount Moffat	QLD	24°53'	147°59'	1 000	19666
Saddler Springs	QLD	25°06'	148°04'	700	19665
Murphy Range	QLD	25°17'	149°11'	420	19691
Mount Perry	QLD	25°19'	151°42'	130	20756
Gympie	QLD	26°00'	152°39'	113	20883
Barakula State Forest	QLD	26°16'	150°32'	300	19664
Esk	QLD	27°17'	152°18'	300	20753
Paddys Land	NSW	30°06'	152°10'	1 100	20396
SSO Barclays Deniliquin	NSW	35°01'	145°13'	100	20787

气候因子 climatic factor	玉林 Yulin	南宁 Nanning	柳州 Liuzhou
纬度latitude(N)	22°33'	22°40'	24°30'
经度longitude(E)	109°51'	108°20'	109°30'
海拔/m altitude	320	200	132
坡度/(°) slope	25	16	10
年均气温/℃ mean annual temperature	21.5	21.6	20.5
年均降雨量/mm annual rainfall	1 462	1 304	1 490
年均相对湿度/% average relative humidity	79	80	82
土壤类型soil type	沙壤土	赤红壤	红壤

种源号 provenance No.	树高均值/m mean tree height	保存率/% survival rate
种源号 provenance No.	树高均值/m mean tree height	南宁 Nanning	玉林 Yulin	柳州 Liuzhou	均值 mean
19664	11.7	42.55	38.27	29.69	36.84
19665	10.2	32.29	29.90	12.23	24.81
19666	11.2	19.89	28.46	15.34	21.23
19691	10.8	38.89	36.99	21.09	32.32
19694	14.4	50.00	64.44	50.00	54.81
20396	12.7	40.15	50.00	46.29	45.48
20753	13.3	46.83	50.48	47.92	48.41
20756	14.5	45.59	53.92	47.87	49.13
20787	15.1	23.44	47.17	36.98	35.86
20883	15.7	40.19	52.66	55.66	49.50
均值mean	13.0	37.98	45.23	36.31	39.84

变异来源 source	自由度 df	平方和 SS	均方 MS	F	方差分量占比/% variance component proportion
种源 provenance	9	748.19	83.13	37.786^***	50.4
地点 site	2	131.98	65.99	29.995^**	8.9
地点内重复 replication within sites	20	141.46	7.073	3.215^***	9.5
种源×地点交互效应 provenance × site interaction	18	71.39	3.97	1.805^*	4.8
交互效应主成分1 IPCA1 international principal component axis 1	10	72.45	7.25	3.295^***	79.9
交互效应主成分2 IPCA2 international principal component axis 1	8	18.19	2.27	1.032	20.1
误差 residual	177	390.16	2.20

序号 number	种源号 provenance No.	主成分1 / IPCA1 principal component 1	主成分2 / IPCA2 principal component 2	D_i	D_i位次 rank	树高位次 height rank
1	19664	0.205 0	-0.553 3	0.986 4	4	7
2	19665	-0.730 6	-0.101 6	2.911 9	9	10
3	19666	1.205 4	0.349 6	4.813 8	10	8
4	19691	-0.053 2	-0.204 5	0.294 5	2	9
5	19694	0.043 2	0.247 2	0.301 1	1	4
6	20396	-0.209 8	-0.216 0	0.863 2	5	6
7	20753	-0.712 7	-0.096 9	2.840 5	8	5
8	20756	-0.263 1	0.653 1	1.234 9	6	3
9	20787	0.590 7	-0.529 1	2.411 5	7	2
10	20883	-0.074 8	0.451 5	0.540 9	3	1

斑皮柠檬桉种源树高生长稳定性评价

Stability evaluation on tree height for introduced provenances of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	杨袁木, 李娜, 陈新宇, 徐放, 潘文, 张卫华. 红锥种源与无性系的材性变异研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 41-50.
[2]	王佳兴, 闫平玉, 孙佰飞, 刘劲宏, 冯可乐, 张含国. 长白落叶松自由授粉家系生长变异及优良家系早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(5): 81-89.
[3]	张曦文, 陈旭, 吴军, 孙国飞, 吴力国, 赵长海, 代伟昭, 刘桂丰. 彩叶桦新品种幼龄期生长适应性早期分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 124-130.
[4]	魏静, 谭星, 王昌盛, 闫瑞, 李林珂, 宁月, 刘芸. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[5]	欧阳, 欧阳芳群, 孙猛, 王超, 王军辉, 安三平, 王丽芳, 许娜, 王猛. 欧洲云杉无性系幼龄生长节律、年度和密度互作效应及选择策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[6]	李雨晗, 丁彦芬, 张畅为. 南京外秦淮河优势草本植物生态位和种间联结性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 203-210.
[7]	盖军鹏, 陈东升, 贾炜玮, 王政. 基于种源和气候效应的日本落叶松树高生长模型研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 51-60.
[8]	孙荣喜, 潘昕昊, 仲小茹, 李桂盛. 不同种源米槠种子形态特征与营养成分变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 27-34.
[9]	肖汉文, 刘清山, 田如男. 开花植物延迟自交的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 233-239.
[10]	胡兴峰, 吴帆, 孙晓波, 陈厚平, 殷安政, 季孔庶. 38年生马尾松种源生长及材性联合分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 203-212.
[11]	王冰, 张鹏杰, 张秋良. 不同林型兴安落叶松林土壤团聚体及其有机碳特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 15-24.
[12]	田力, 徐骋炜, 尚旭岚, 洑香香. 青钱柳药用优良单株评价与选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 21-28.
[13]	洪舟, 吴培衍, 张金文, 王维辉, 许丽鸿, 申巍, 徐大平. 漳州地区交趾黄檀幼龄期生长表现及适应性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 118-124.
[14]	张卓然, 唐晓岚. 环太湖地区历史村落的环境适应性及特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 17-24.
[15]	杨海燕, 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 张春红, 黄正金, 王小敏, 赵慧芳, 李维林. 蓝莓新品种‘寨选7号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 227-228.