阔叶红松林下幼苗、幼树定植生境散射辐射特征

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 145-156.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305007

阔叶红松林下幼苗、幼树定植生境散射辐射特征

杜昕¹(), 董雪¹, 谷会岩¹^,², 陈祥伟¹^,²^,^*()

1.森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室,东北森林资源培育国家林业和草原局重点实验室,东北林业大学林学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040
2.黑龙江凉水森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,黑龙江伊春 153000

收稿日期:2023-05-07 修回日期:2024-03-06 出版日期:2024-11-30 发布日期:2024-12-10
通讯作者: *陈祥伟(chenxwnefu@163.com),教授。
作者简介:
杜昕(1608898299@qq.com)。
基金资助:
科技基础资源调查专项(2021FY100702);林业公益性行业科研专项(201404303)

Diffuse radiation environment of regeneration seedlings and saplings under a broadleaved-Korean pine forest

DU Xin¹(), DONG Xue¹, GU Huiyan¹^,², CHEN Xiangwei¹^,²^,^*()

1. Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Northeastern Forest Silviculture, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2. Liangshui National Key Field Observation and Research Station for Forest Ecosystem, Yichun 153000, China

Received:2023-05-07 Revised:2024-03-06 Online:2024-11-30 Published:2024-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】为探明阔叶红松林下常见乔木树种更新幼苗、幼树的光强需求,分析了各树种更新对林下光强的响应差异,进而为阔叶红松林及相关生态系统的科学经营提供支持。【方法】以凉水国家级自然保护区内4块阔叶红松林调查样地林下红松(Pinus koraiensis)、红皮云杉(Picea koraiensis)、臭冷杉(Abies nephrolepis)、春榆(Ulmus davidiana)、色木槭(Acer pictum)、青楷槭(Acer tegmentosum)、花楷槭(Acer ukurunduense)、紫椴(Tilia amurensis)、水曲柳(Fraxinus mandshurica)9种常见乔木更新的幼苗、幼树为研究对象,在个体水平上计算各株更新幼苗、幼树定植生境的加权进界邻体散射荫蔽度(WINDSD),计算各树种幼苗、幼树定植生境的WINDSD平均值、标准差及分布倾向度。以Mann-Whitney U检验分析各树种幼树、幼苗定植生境的WINDSD与阔叶红松林下均匀布设样点间的差异显著性及同种树种幼苗与幼树定植生境WINDSD间的差异显著性;同时,以蒙特卡罗法检验各类乔木更新幼苗、幼树种群定植生境与阔叶红松林下同等规模的随机分布种群定植生境的WINDSD分布倾向度间的差异显著性。【结果】阔叶红松林下均匀布设样点的WINDSD均值与标准差分别为0.538及0.213,分布倾向度为1.069。红松、红皮云杉、臭冷杉、春榆、色木槭、青楷槭、花楷槭、紫椴、水曲柳9种乔木树种的更新幼树、幼苗中,仅有春榆幼树及水曲柳幼树定植生境的WINDSD平均值与分布倾向度小于林下均匀布设样点。基于均值与分布倾向度共同判断,红松、红皮云杉、臭冷杉及紫椴更新幼树定植生境中的散射辐射强度弱于更新幼苗定植生境;春榆、色木槭、青楷槭、花楷槭、水曲柳更新幼树定植生境的散射辐射强度强于更新幼苗定植生境。蒙特卡罗检验与Mann-Whitney U检验共同显示,红松、红皮云杉、臭冷杉、春榆、色木槭、青楷槭、水曲柳更新幼苗定植生境的WINDSD显著大于阔叶红松林下均匀布设样点,花楷槭、紫椴更新幼苗定植生境的WINDSD与林下均匀布设样点无显著差异;红松、红皮云杉、臭冷杉更新幼树定植生境的WINDSD显著大于阔叶红松林下均匀布设样点,而其余树种更新幼树定植生境的WINDSD与林下均匀布设样点无显著差异。Mann-Whitney U检验显示,9种乔木树种中春榆、色木槭幼树定植生境WINDSD与对应树种更新幼苗定植生境WINDSD间的差异达到显著水平(P<0.05)。【结论】阔叶红松林主要乔木更新幼苗及幼树倾向分布于林下光强较弱的区域内。相较于更新幼苗,更新幼树定植的生境内光强总体上相对更强。不同树种更新对林下光强差异的响应有所不同,红松、红皮云杉、臭冷杉幼苗与幼树定植生境的光强差异不明显,而春榆、色木槭、青楷槭幼树定植生境的光照强度明显强于对应树种幼苗的定植生境。

关键词: 阔叶红松林, 森林天然更新, 光照强度, 加权进界邻体散射荫蔽度, 蒙特卡罗检验

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aims to determine the light intensity requirements for the regeneration of seedlings and saplings in mixed broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forests. Additionally, it seeks to investigate how the regeneration of different tree species responds to variations in light intensity. This research guides the scientific management and conservation efforts of broadleaved-Korean pine forests and their ecosystems.【Method】The research focused on nine common tree species: Pinus koraiensis, Picea koraiensis, Abies nephrolepis, Ulmus davidiana, Acer pictum, Acer tegmentosum, Acer ukurunduense, Tilia amurensis, and Fraxinus mandshurica, across four plots in the Liangshui National Nature Reserve. The weighted inside-boundary neighbor diffuse shading degree (WINDSD) was computed for the planting habitats of each seedling and sapling. The mean, standard deviation, and distribution tendency degree of WINDSD were calculated for the planting habitats of each tree species’ seedlings and saplings. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to identify significant differences in WINDSD among the planting habitats of each tree species and uniformly distribute sample points beneath the broadleaved-Korean pine forest canopy. The analysis is extended to compare the differences in WINDSD among the planting habitats of seedlings and saplings for each tree species. Additionally, the Monte Carlo method was utilized to ascertain significant differences in the distribution tendency degree of WINDSD between the planting habitats of seedlings and saplings for various tree species populations and a random distribution population of equivalent size for each tree species.【Result】The analysis revealed that the mean and standard deviation of WINDSD for the uniformly distributed sample points of the broadleaved-Korean pine forest were 0.538 and 0.213, respectively, with a distribution tendency degree of 1.069. Among the seedlings and saplings of the nine tree species studied, only Ulmus japonica and Fraxinus mandshurica saplings exhibited a lower average value and distribution tendency degree of WINDSD compared to the uniformly distributed sample points in the forest. The analysis also indicated that the diffuse radiation intensity within the saplings’ planting habitats for Pinus koraiensis, Picea koraiensis, Abies nephrolepis, and Tilia davidiana was weaker compared to those designated for seedling regeneration. The Monte Carlo and Mann-Whitney U tests highlighted that the WINDSD in the planting habitats of seedlings for Pinus koraiensis, Picea koraiensis, Abies nephrolepis, Ulmus davidiana, Acer pictum, Acer tegmentosum, and Fraxinus mandshurica was significantly higher than that of the uniformly distributed sample points. In contrast, the WINDSD values for the planting habitats of Acer ukurunduense and Tilia amurensis seedlings did not significantly differ from those of the uniformly distributed sample points in the forest. For saplings, the WINDSD values in the planting habitats of Pinus koraiensis, Picea koraiensis, and Abies nephrolepis were significantly higher compared to the uniformly distributed sample points, whereas those for the saplings of other species did not significantly differ. Additionally, the Mann-Whitney U test indicated significant differences in WINDSD between the planting habitats of saplings and seedlings for Ulmus japonica and Acer mono (P<0.05).【Conclusion】The findings suggest that seedlings and saplings of the primary tree species in the broadleaved-Korean pine forest are usually found in areas with weaker light on the forest floor. Compared to seedlings, saplings tend to establish in habitats with slightly stronger light intensity. Different tree species exhibit varied responses to light intensity variations under the forest canopy. The differences in light intensity between habitats for seedlings and saplings are not pronounced for Pinus koraiensis, Picea koraiensis, and Abies nephrolepis, whereas the light intensity in the sapling habitats of Ulmus davidiana, Acer pictum, and Acer tegmentosum is significantly higher than in their seedling regeneration areas.

Key words: broadleaved-Korean pine forest, natural forest regeneration, light intensity, weighted inside-boundary neighbor diffuse shading degree (WINDSD), Monte Carlo test

中图分类号:

S711
S754

杜昕,董雪,谷会岩,等. 阔叶红松林下幼苗、幼树定植生境散射辐射特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 145-156.

DU Xin, DONG Xue, GU Huiyan, CHEN Xiangwei. Diffuse radiation environment of regeneration seedlings and saplings under a broadleaved-Korean pine forest[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(6): 145-156.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305007.

图/表 7

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

图4

表3

参考文献 45

[1]	王新程. 环境科学大辞典[M].2版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2008.
	WANG X C. Environmental science dictionary[M].2nd ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2008.
[2]	黄一鑫, 程艳霞. 森林光环境对4种乔木幼树光合和光谱反射特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(22):9121-9129.
	HUANG Y X, CHENG Y X. Photosynthetic characteristics and spectral reflectance characteristics of four natural tree saplings under forest light environment[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(22):9121-9129.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202105171289.
[3]	刘子宣, 贾存, 秦志强, 等. 华北落叶松林下光环境对白扦幼树生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(6):111-117.
	LIU Z X, JIA C, QIN Z Q, et al. Effects of light conditions on the growth of understory Picea meyeri sapling in Larix principis-rupprechtii forest[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(6):111-117.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201909032.
[4]	WILKENS J F, WAGNER S. Empirical survival model for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in response to interactive resource gradients and (a-) biotic conditions within an experimental canopy gap study[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2021,499:119627.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119627.
[5]	XUE W X, GUO Q J, ZHU J, et al. Research on the effects of light intensity and seeding density on the seed germination and seedling growth of Liriodendron chinense[J]. J Agric Chem Environ, 2022, 11(1):24-41.DOI: 10.4236/jacen.2022.111003.
[6]	RITTER E, DALSGAARD L, EINHORN K S. Light,temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 206(1/2/3):15-33.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.08.011.
[7]	COATES K D, BURTON P J. A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives[J]. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 99(3):337-354.DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00113-8.
[8]	ROUVINEN S, KOUKI J. Tree regeneration in artificial canopy gaps established for restoring natural structural variability in a Scots pine stand[J]. Silva Fenn, 2011, 45(5):1079-1091.DOI: 10.14214/sf.88.
[9]	SCHEIRE A. Functional traits of lianas: trait coordination and how they shape species light and nutrient niches[D]. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2019.
[10]	LONG W X, ZANG R G, SCHAMP B S, et al. Within and among-species variation in specific leaf area drive community assembly in a tropical cloud forest[J]. Oecologia, 2011, 167(4):1103-1113.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2050-9.
[11]	LAURANS M, MARTIN O, NICOLINI E, et al. Functional traits and their plasticity predict tropical trees regeneration niche even among species with intermediate light requirements[J]. J Ecol, 2012, 100(6):1440-1452.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02007.x.
[12]	GROGAN J, LANDIS R M, ASHTON M S, et al. Growth response by big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) advance seedling regeneration to overhead canopy release in southeast Pará,Brazil[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2005, 204(2/3):399-412.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.013.
[13]	MUHAMED H, TOUZARD B, LE BAGOUSSE-PINGUET Y, et al. The role of biotic interactions for the early establishment of oak seedlings in coastal dune forest communities[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 297:67-74.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.023.
[14]	刘从, 田甜, 李珊, 等. 中国木本植物幼苗生长对光照强度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2):518-527.
	LIU C, TIAN T, LI S, et al. Growth response of Chinese woody plant seedlings to different light intensities[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(2):518-527.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201611012221.
[15]	徐化成. 中国红松天然林[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001.
	XU H C. Natural forests of Pinus koraiensis in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2001.
[16]	吴刚. 长白山红松阔叶混交林林冠空隙树种更新动态规律的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(5):2-5.
	WU G. Regeneration dynamics of tree species in gaps of Korean pine broad leaved mixed forest in Changbai Mountains[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 1998, 9(5):2-5.DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/15/12/025.
[17]	国庆喜. 阔叶红松林林冠斑块特征及其与林木更新的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(12):1541-1543.
	GUO Q X. Characteristics of canopy patches related to natural regeneration of broad-leaved Korean pine forest[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2002, 13(12):1541-1543.
[18]	刘妍妍, 金光泽, 李凤日. 典型阔叶红松林林隙对幼苗建立的影响[J]. 科学通报, 2014, 59(24):2396-2406.
	LIU Y Y, JIN G Z, LI F R. Influence of forest gaps on seedling establishment in a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine(Pinus koraiensis) forest in Xiao Hinggan Mountains[J]. Chin Sci Bull, 2014, 59(24):2396-2406.
[19]	JIN G Z, TIAN Y, ZHAO F, et al. The pattern of natural regeneration by canopy gap size in the mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest of Xiaoxing’an Mountains, China[J]. J Korean For Soc, 2007, 96: 227-234.
[20]	JIN G Z, LIU Y Y, LIU S, et al. Effect of gaps on species diversity in the naturally regenerated mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest of the Xiaoxing’an Mountains,China[J]. J Ecol Environ, 2007, 30(4):325-330.DOI: 10.5141/jefb.2007.30.4.325.
[21]	董莉莉, 张慧东, 毛沂新, 等. 间伐对红松Pinus koraiensis针阔混交林冠层结构及林下植被的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2017, 48(2):159-165.
	DONG L L, ZHANG H D, MAO Y X, et al. Influence of thinning on canopy structure and understory vegetation of coniferous-broad leaved Pinus koraiensis mixed forest[J]. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2017, 48(2):159-165.
[22]	FRAZER G W, CANHAM C D, LERTZMAN K P. Gap light analyzer (GLA) Version 2.0: users manual and program documentation[R]. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, 1999.
[23]	刘赫男, 张洪玲, 朱红蕊. 1961—2010年黑龙江省太阳能资源特征分析与评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2013, 29(4):89-93.
	LIU H N, ZHANG H L, ZHU H R. Analysis and assessment of solar energy resource in Heilongjiang Province from 1961 to 2010[J]. J Meteor Environ, 2013, 29(4):89-93.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2013.04.014.
[24]	杜昕, 董雪, 谷会岩, 等. 基于易测林木因子的林下太阳辐射模拟(Ⅰ)——林下散射辐射模拟[J/OL]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),[2024-06-03]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1161.s.20240603.1546.002.
	DU X, DONG X, GU H Y, et al. Simulation of understory solar radiation based on easily measurable tree factors (Ⅰ): understory diffuse radiation simulation[J/OL]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),[2024-06-03]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1161.s.20240603.1546.002.
[25]	罗耀华, 陈庆诚, 张鹏云. 兴隆山阴暗针叶林空间格局及其利用光能的对策[J]. 生态学报, 1984, 4(1):10-20.
	LUO Y H, CHEN Q C, ZHANG P Y. The spatial pattern of coniferous forest in Xinglongshan Mountain and its strategies in using sun light energy[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1984, 4(1):10-20.
[26]	魏殿生. 全国森林培育技术标准汇编:造林经营卷[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
[27]	惠刚盈. 结构化森林经营原理[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
	HUI G Y. Principles of structure-based forest management[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2016.
[28]	杜昕, 董雪, 谷会岩, 等. 基于分层 Voronoi 图的阔叶红松林叶面积指数的垂直与短程水平空间分布研究[J/OL]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),[2023-11-17]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1161.S.20231117.0856.002.
	DU X, DONG X, GU H Y, et al. A study of the vertical and short-range horizontal spatial distribution of leaf area index in broadleaved-Korean pine forest based on stratified Voronoi diagrams[J/OL]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed),[2023-11-17]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1161.S.20231117.0856.002.
[29]	王献溥. 小群聚(小群落)的概念及其在研究针叶、落叶阔叶混交林结构时的应用[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1963(S1):51-68.
	WANG X P. The concept of small community and its application in studying the structure of coniferous and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 1963(S1):51-68.
[30]	孙龙, 国庆喜. 生态学基础[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2013.
	SUN L, GUO Q X. Ecological basis[M]. Beijing: China Building Material Industry Publishing House, 2013.
[31]	张炜平, 王根轩. 植物邻体间的正相互作用[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(19):5371-5380.
	ZHANG W P, WANG G X. Positive interactions in plant communities[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(19):5371-5380.
[32]	王丽霞. 阔叶红松混交林林隙大小、土壤水分以及光照对植物的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013.
	WANG L X. Effects of gap size,soil moisture and light on plants in broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2013.
[33]	白淑菊, 陶大立, 靳月华. 长白山常绿针叶树越冬期间光合能力的抑制[J]. 应用生态学报, 1995, 6(2):138-142.
	BAI S J, TAO D L, JIN Y H. Inhibition of photosynthetic capacity of evergreen conifers in Changbai Mountain during overwintering[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 1995, 6(2):139-142.
[34]	田悦颖. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林林隙特征及其更新研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2007.
	TIAN Y Y. Gap characteristics and regeneration of broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2007.
[35]	ZHANG X J, WANG S L. Joint control of plant ecological strategy by climate,regeneration mode,and ontogeny in northeastern Chinese forests[J]. Ecol Evol, 2021, 11(11):6703-6715.DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7522.
[36]	金明月. 季节及树龄对东北阔叶树种叶性状及其权衡的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2019.
	JIN M Y. Effects of season and tree age on leaf characteristics and trade-offs of broad-leaved trees in northeast China[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2019.DOI: 10.27009/d.cnki.gdblu.2019.000348.
[37]	孙金伟, 姚付启, 张振华. 红松和紫椴叶片暗呼吸及其光抑制性在幼、成树间的差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5):1463-1468.
	SUN J W, YAO F Q, ZHANG Z H. Differences of leaf dark respiration and light inhibition between saplings and mature trees of Pinus koraiensis and Tilia amurensis[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(5):1463-1468.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.008.
[38]	王树力, 武敬辉, 史永纯. 红松种群天然更新及幼年生长与林分结构关系的研究[J]. 吉林林学院学报, 1998(1):8-12.
	WANG S L, WU J H, SHI Y C. Study on the relationship between natural regeneration,juvenile growth and stand structure of Korean pine population[J]. J Jilin For Univ, 1998(1):8-12.
[39]	贺丹妮, 杨华, 温静, 等. 长白山云冷杉针阔混交林不同林隙下幼苗幼树密度及空间分布[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6):1916-1922.
	HE D N, YANG H, WEN J, et al. Density and spatial distribution of seedlings and saplings in different gap sizes of a spruce-fir mixed stand in Changbai Mountains,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31(6):1916-1922.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202006.004.
[40]	周光. 林下红松生存策略与季节光环境驱动机制[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019.
	ZHOU G. Survival strategy of Korean pine under forest and driving mechanism of seasonal light environment[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019.DOI: 10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2019.000156.
[41]	王乾. 川西亚高山森林生态系统辐射传输研究[D]. 成都: 中国科学院研究生院(成都生物研究所), 2006.
	WANG Q. Study on radiation transmission of alpine forest ecosystem in western Sichuan[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu Institute of Biology,Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2006.
[42]	李秋果, 卞英捷, 梁照, 等. 匍匐翦股颖品种(系)的坪用性状与耐热性评价[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2023, 46(6):1096-1106.
	LI Q G, BIAN Y J, LIANG Z, et al. Evaluation of turf characteristics and heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass cultivars(strains)[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2023, 46(6):1096-1106.DOI: 10.7685/jnau.202210010.
[43]	ZENNER E K, PECK J E, HOBI M L. Development phase convergence across scale in a primeval European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2020,460:117889.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117889.
[44]	王伯荪. 植被的镶嵌体系[J]. 生态科学, 1998, 17(2):3-9.
	WANG B S. Mosaic system of vegetation[J]. Ecol Sci, 1998, 17(2):3-9.
[45]	梁星云. 长白山阔叶红松林演替系列主要树种叶片功能性状与化学计量学研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017.
	LIANG X Y. Study on leaf functional characters and chemometrics of main tree species in succession series of broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

230

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	6	0	0	224

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	215	15
比例	93%	7%

摘要

628

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	628

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	18	610
比例	3%	97%

本文评价

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

通信地址：南京市龙蟠路南京林业大学《南京林业大学学报》编辑部
电子邮件：njlyzrb@vip.163.com
联系电话：025-85428247
邮政编码：210037
备案号：苏ICP备-010872

样地 plot	坡位 slope position	坡度/ (°) slope	海拔/m altitude	土壤类型 soil type	土壤含水率/% soil water content	林分密度/ (株·hm^-2) stand density	平均胸径/cm average DBH	蓄积量/ (m³·hm^-2) volume	树种蓄积组成 stock composition of tree species
1	下坡	11	340	暗棕色森林土	92.2±8.3	612	20.24	261	5红2冷1水1云+椴+枫+色-榆
2	下坡	12	340	暗棕色森林土	95.6±5.6	716	17.74	309	5红2冷1云1色+榆+椴-水-枫
3	中坡	13	400	暗棕色森林土	82.0±6.2	774	17.97	344	7红1云1色+冷+椴+水-榆-枫
4	中坡	15	395	暗棕色森林土	91.2±11.9	768	17.38	248	5红1白1水1色1冷1榆+椴

树种 tree species	幼苗seedling				幼树sapling
树种 tree species	均值 mean	标准差 SD	分布倾向度 distribution tendency degree	样本数 number	均值 mean	标准差 SD	分布倾向度 distribution tendency degree	样本数 number
红松 Pinus koraiensis	0.596	0.167	1.175	129	0.609	0.185	1.195	54
红皮云杉 Picea koraiensis	0.640	0.194	1.265	23	0.650	0.135	1.273	48
臭冷杉 Abies nephrolepis	0.585	0.157	1.155	636	0.597	0.175	1.170	96
春榆 Ulmus davidiana	0.648	0.171	1.271	110	0.532	0.243	1.051	63
色木槭 Acer pictum	0.642	0.185	1.257	948	0.552	0.233	1.090	423
青楷槭 Acer tegmentosum	0.607	0.198	1.197	724	0.563	0.251	1.110	123
花楷槭 Acer ukurunduense	0.576	0.189	1.148	95	0.571	0.205	1.124	78
紫椴 Tilia amurensis	0.575	0.174	1.139	105	0.602	0.202	1.173	60
水曲柳 Fraxinux mandshurica	0.578	0.194	1.142	461	0.501	0.230	1.010	9

树种 tree species	幼苗与均匀点 seedling-evenly		幼树与均匀点 sapling-evenly		幼苗与幼树 seeding-sapling		幼苗数量 seedling number	幼树数量 sapling number
树种 tree species	检验统计量W	P	检验统计量W	P	检验统计量W	P	幼苗数量 seedling number	幼树数量 sapling number
红松Pinus koraiensis	97 670	0.007	39 434	0.031	3 609	0.701	129	54
红皮云杉Picea koraiensis	14 848	0.027	29 776	<0.001	546	0.951	23	48
臭冷杉Abies nephrolepis	499 427	<0.001	72 974	0.022	31 573	0.588	636	96
春榆Ulmus japonica	67 649	<0.001	55 154	0.920	2 584	0.005	110	63
色木槭Acer mono	605 911	<0.001	356 160	0.147	157 484	<0.001	948	423
青楷槭Acer tegmentosum	521 081	<0.001	97 927	0.701	41 746	0.268	724	123
花楷槭Acer ukurunduense	75 471	0.103	62 825	0.194	3 670	0.917	95	78
紫椴Tilia amurensis	86 747	0.275	45 408	0.061	3 412	0.377	105	60
水曲柳Fraxinus mandshurica	368 716	0.002	8 543	0.693	1 726	0.388	461	9

阔叶红松林下幼苗、幼树定植生境散射辐射特征

Diffuse radiation environment of regeneration seedlings and saplings under a broadleaved-Korean pine forest

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 45

相关文章 11

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	孔鑫, 王爱英, 郝广友, 宁秋蕊, 王淼, 殷笑寒, 周永姣. 水曲柳幼苗水力结构和光合生理对光强梯度变化的耦合响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 83-91.
[2]	杨永超, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 王美娟, 石金永, 潘磊. 模拟氮磷沉降和凋落物处理对两种林型红松林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 57-66.
[3]	韩玉娜, 张瑜, 金光泽. 腐烂等级、径级对阔叶红松林木质残体含水率和密度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 133-140.
[4]	王建平, 王纪章, 周静, 贺通, 李萍萍. 光照对农林植物生长影响及人工补光技术研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 215-222.
[5]	宋蕾,林尤伟,金光泽. 模拟氮沉降对典型阔叶红松林土壤微生物群落特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(05): 7-12.
[6]	陈镜园,毕连柱,宋国华,张伟,王全波,刘妍妍,金光泽. 小兴安岭丰林阔叶红松林木质物残体的贮量特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(06): 76-84.
[7]	李路瑶,孟庆繁,李燕,高文韬. 信息化合物诱芯对阔叶红松林混交中天牛科昆虫的诱集效果[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(04): 113-118.
[8]	李彦,周晓东,方升佐,邓波,尚旭岚,杨万霞. 光照和种源对青钱柳叶三萜类化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(05): 52-58.
[9]	李雪蕾,丁兴萃,张闪闪,章志远,蔡函江,郑友苗. 不同光强下麻竹笋不同部位苦涩味物质含量的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(03): 161-166.
[10]	熊欢,郭素娟,彭晶晶,邹锋,李广会,吕文君,谢鹏. 树体结构对板栗冠层光照分布和果实产量及品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(02): 68-74.
[11]	安慧君,张韬. 聚集指数边界效应的校正方法与应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2005, 29(03): 57-60.