青钱柳二倍体和四倍体叶特征比较研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305024

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 76-84.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305024

所属专题：专题报道Ⅱ：乡村振兴视域下药用树种青钱柳培育研究

• 专题报道Ⅱ：乡村振兴视域下药用树种青钱柳培育研究（执行主编李维林、方升佐） • 上一篇下一篇

青钱柳二倍体和四倍体叶特征比较研究

刘夏岚¹(), 宋子琪¹, 胡凤荣², 尚旭岚¹^,^*()

1.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学林草学院, 江苏南京 210037
2.南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2023-05-23 修回日期:2023-06-19 出版日期:2024-07-30 发布日期:2024-08-05
通讯作者: *尚旭岚(shangxulan@njfu.edu.cn),副教授。
作者简介:
刘夏岚(68465983@qq.com)。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31971642);国家自然科学基金项目(32271959);江苏省重点研发计划(现代农业)重点项目(BE2019388)

A comparative study on leaf characters between diploid and tetraploid of Cyclocarya paliurus

LIU Xialan¹(), SONG Ziqi¹, HU Fengrong², SHANG Xulan¹^,^*()

1. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry and Grassland, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2023-05-23 Revised:2023-06-19 Online:2024-07-30 Published:2024-08-05

1. 青钱柳二倍体和四倍体叶特征比较研究.zip(1616KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】比较青钱柳(Cyclocarya paliurus)二倍体和四倍体叶表型特征、解剖结构和气孔特征等方面的差异,旨在获得不同倍性青钱柳叶片特征的基础数据。【方法】以青钱柳二倍体和四倍体苗木为材料,对32项叶片特征指标进行测定,并进行独立样本t检验、相关性分析和主成分分析。【结果】除中部小叶的最大叶宽位置和锯齿宽度在倍性间无显著差异外,其余30项叶特征在倍性间均达到显著或极显著差异。其中,四倍体小叶数量极显著少于二倍体,而复叶面积和比叶质量极显著大于二倍体;四倍体顶端小叶和中部小叶的叶长、叶宽和叶面积极显著大于二倍体,而叶形指数极显著小于二倍体;四倍体锯齿密度极显著小于二倍体;四倍体叶片厚度、上表皮厚度、下表皮厚度、栅栏组织厚度和海绵组织厚度均极显著大于二倍体,而栅海比和紧密度极显著小于二倍体;四倍体气孔长度和气孔宽度极显著大于二倍体,而气孔密度极显著小于二倍体。相关性分析结果表明,青钱柳表型特征与解剖结构和气孔特征各指标间存在广泛而显著的相关关系。主成分分析提取了反映两种倍性青钱柳叶特征差异的指标,分别为小叶叶宽、小叶面积、叶形指数、海绵组织厚度、气孔长度、栅栏组织厚度和紧密度。【结论】青钱柳二倍体和四倍体的叶特征存在显著差异,小叶叶宽、小叶面积和叶形指数等叶表型特征可用于青钱柳二倍体和四倍体初筛。

关键词: 青钱柳, 多倍体, 表型特征, 解剖结构, 气孔特征

Abstract:

【Objective】To compare the differences in leaf phenotypes characters, anatomical structures and stomatal characteristics between diploid and tetraploid Cyclocarya paliurus, we obtained data on the leaf characteristics of C. paliurus with different ploidy.【Method】Diploid and tetraploid seedlings of C. paliurus were used as study materials, and 32 leaf traits were measured. Independent samples t-tests, a correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were conducted.【Result】There were no significant differences between diploid and tetraploid seedlings for sawtooth width and the position of the maximum leaf width of the middle leaflet. For the other 30 leaf traits, there were significant or extremely significant differences between diploid and tetraploid seedlings. Among them, the number of leaflets of tetraploids was significantly less than that of diploids, while the area and specific leaf weight of compound leaves of tetraploids were significantly greater than those of diploids. The length, width and area of the terminal and middle leaflets of tetraploids were significantly greater than those of diploids, while the leaf shape index was significantly smaller than that of diploids. The sawtooth density of tetraploids was significantly smaller than that of diploids. The leaflet thickness, the upper epidermis thickness, lower epidermis thickness, palisade tissue thickness, and sponge tissue thickness of tetraploids were all significantly higher than those of diploids, while the ratio of palisade tissue to sponge tissue and cell tense ratio were significantly smaller than those of diploids. The stomatal length and width of tetraploids were significantly greater than those of diploids, while the stomatal density was significantly smaller than that of diploids. The correlation analysis results indicated that there were broad and significant correlations between the phenotypic characteristics, anatomical structure, and stomatal characteristics of C. paliurus. The indicators reflecting the differences of leaf characteristics between diploid and tetraploid C. paliurus were extracted by a PCA, including leaflet width, leaflet area, leaf shape index, sponge tissue thickness, stomatal length, palisade tissue thickness and cell tense ratio.【Conclusion】There were significant differences in leaf traits between diploid and tetraploid C. paliurus, and leaf phenotypic characteristics, such as leaflet width, leaflet area, and leaf shape index, can be used for the preliminary screening of diploid and tetraploid C. paliurus.

Key words: Cyclocarya paliurus, polyploid, phenotypic characters, anatomical structure, stomatal characteristics

中图分类号:

S722

刘夏岚,宋子琪,胡凤荣,等. 青钱柳二倍体和四倍体叶特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 76-84.

LIU Xialan, SONG Ziqi, HU Fengrong, SHANG Xulan. A comparative study on leaf characters between diploid and tetraploid of Cyclocarya paliurus[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(4): 76-84.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305024.

图/表 11

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

图3

表4

图4

图5

表5

表6

参考文献 35

[1]	WOOD T E, TAKEBAYASHI N, BARKER M S, et al. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(33):13875-13879.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811575106.
[2]	GUO W, YANG J, SUN X D, et al. Divergence in eco-physiological responses to drought mirrors the distinct distribution of Chamerion angustifolium cytotypes in the Himalaya-Hengduan mountains region[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7:1329.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01329.
[3]	袁静, 周冰莹. 植物叶缘锯齿发育调控的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26):24-31.
	YUAN J, ZHOU B Y. The regulation of leaf margin serration development in plants:a review[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 37(26):24-31.
[4]	晁亚琮, 武荣花, 蒋卉, 等. 同源多倍体化对植物侧生器官形态建成影响的研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(5):1-6.
	CHAO Y C, WU R H, JIANG H, et al. Research progress on effect of autopolyploid on plant lateral organ morphogenesis[J]. J Henan Agric Sci, 2021, 50(5):1-6.DOI: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2021.05.001.
[5]	方升佐. 青钱柳产业发展历程及资源培育研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):115-126.
	FANG S Z. A review on the development history and the resource silviculture of Cyclocarya paliurus industry[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(6):115-126.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206019.
[6]	方升佐, 尚旭岚, 洑香香. 青钱柳种子生物学研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2017.
	FANG S Z, SHANG X L, FU X X. Seed biology of Cyclocarya paliurus[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2017.
[7]	XIA X C, MAO D X, DAI H M, et al. Effect of Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharides on streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats[J]. J Tradit Chin Med, 2020, 40(6):956-964.DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2020.06.007.
[8]	肖岩, 马博稷, 李冰涛, 等. 青钱柳醇提物中化学成分的UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS分析[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28(16):196-204.
	XIAO Y, MA B J, LI B T, et al. Analysis of chemical constituents in ethanol extract of Cyclocarya paliurus dried leaves by UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae, 2022, 28(16):196-204.DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20212051.
[9]	WANG Y R, CUI B S, HAN S W, et al. New dammarane triterpenoid saponins from the leaves of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Asian Nat Prod Res, 2018, 20(11):1019-1027.DOI: 10.1080/10286020.2018.1457653.
[10]	陈絮蒙, 王雅靖, 陈靓, 等. 青钱柳活性物质及其代谢调节作用的研究与应用进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023, 49(12):336-344.
	CHEN X M, WANG Y J, CHEN L, et al. Research and application progress of active substances and their metabolic regulatory effects of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2023, 49(12):336-344.DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.035077.
[11]	聂小华, 吴聪聪, 林胜利, 等. 青钱柳中活性物质及其功能特性研究进展[J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2022, 50(2):222-227.
	NIE X H, WU C C, LIN S L, et al. Advance on active compounds and functional properties of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Technol, 2022, 50(2):222-227.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4303.2022.02.017.
[12]	田力, 徐骋炜, 尚旭岚, 等. 青钱柳药用优良单株评价与选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):21-28.
	TIAN L, XU C W, SHANG X L, et al. Evaluation and selection on superior individuals for medicinal use of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(1):21-28.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202002018.
[13]	徐展宏, 朱莹, 金慧颖, 等. 不同叶色青钱柳叶片色素、多酚含量及光合特性的差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(2):103-110.
	XU Z H, ZHU Y, JIN H Y, et al. Variations in the contents of leaf pigments and polyphenols and photosynthesis traits in Cyclocarya paliurus with different leaf colors[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(2):103-110.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202105048.
[14]	吴玲利, 韩航, 曾艳玲, 等. 青钱柳组织培养及快速繁殖[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(1):61-68.
	WU L L, HAN H, ZENG Y L, et al. Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2019, 55(1):61-68.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2018.0360.
[15]	QU Y Q, SHANG X L, ZENG Z Y, et al. Whole-genome duplication reshaped adaptive evolution in a relict plant species,Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 2023:S1672 -S0229(23)00033-5.DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2023.02.001.
[16]	MAO X, FU X X, HUANG P, et al. Heterodichogamy,pollen viability,and seed set in a population of polyploidy Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal) Iljinskaja (Juglandaceae)[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(4):347.DOI: 10.3390/f10040347.
[17]	QU Y Q, WANG Q, YU Y H, et al. Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome between tetraploidy and diploidy of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja[J]. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour, 2021, 6(9):2669-2671.DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1964402.
[18]	熊中人. 中国花楸属复叶组植物叶特征及其分类学意义[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2019.
	XIONG Z R. Leaf characters of Sorbus section Sorbus from China and their taxonomic significance[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2019.DOI: 10.27242/d.cnki.gnjlu.2019.000029.
[19]	郭燕, 张树航, 李颖, 等. 燕山板栗种质资源叶片表型性状多样性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8):1673-1688.
	GUO Y, ZHANG S H, LI Y, et al. Diversity analysis of leaves phenotypic traits of Yanshan chestnut[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2022, 49(8):1673-1688.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0760.
[20]	曹林青, 钟秋平, 邹玉玲, 等. 油桐种质资源叶片结构变异及与环境因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4):95-102.
	CAO L Q, ZHONG Q P, ZOU Y L, et al. Leaf structure variations and relationship with environmental fators among germplasm resources of Vernicia fordii[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2023, 47(4):95-102.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108020.
[21]	郭素娟, 武燕奇. 板栗叶片解剖结构特征及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(9):51-59.
	GUO S J, WU Y Q. Leaf anatomical structure characteristics and drought resistance of Chinese chestnut[J]. J Northwest A F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 46(9):51-59.DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2018.09.007.
[22]	孙清荣, 孙美娟, 孙洪雁, 等. 梨(Pyrus communis L.)多倍体新种质表型变异多样性研究[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(1):1-7.
	SUN Q R, SUN M J, SUN H Y, et al. Diversity of phenotypic variation of polyploid plants new germplasm in pear(Pyrus communis L.)[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2016, 33(1):1-7.DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150042.
[23]	陶抵辉. 植物多倍体的研究与应用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2010(7):22-27.
	TAO D H. Studies and application on plant polyploids[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2010(7):22-27.DOI: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2010.07.015.
[24]	唐军荣, 李斌, 朱丽娜, 等. 滇杨多倍体苗期叶片形态及光合生理比较分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(1):103-109.
	TANG J R, LI B, ZHU L N, et al. Analysis on leaf morphology and photosynthesis physiology of polyploidized Populus yunnanensis seedlings[J]. For Res, 2016, 29(1):103-109.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2016.01.015.
[25]	刘金霞, 刘盼, 米娜瓦尔·亚森, 等. 南疆地区枣二倍体及其同源四倍体表型性状比较[J]. 西北农业学报, 2022, 31(5):595-602.
	LIU J X, LIU P, Minavar Y S, et al. Comparison of phenotypic characters between diploid and autotetraploid of Chinese jujube in southern Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agric Boreali Occidentalis Sin, 2022, 31(5):595-602.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2022.05.008.
[26]	温国, 孙皓浦, 党江波, 等. 多倍体与二倍体枇杷叶片特征及抗旱性初步分析[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(8):968-979.
	WEN G, SUN H P, DANG J B, et al. A preliminary study on leaf characteristics and drought resistance of polyploid and diploid loquat[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2019, 36(8):968-979.DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20190082.
[27]	祁传磊, 靳春莲, 李开隆, 等. 不同倍性大青杨的光合特性及叶片解剖结构比较[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2010, 46(9):917-922.
	QI C L, JIN C L, LI K L, et al. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics and leaf anatomy structure of different ploidy Populus ussuriensis Kom[J]. Plant Physiol Commun, 2010, 46(9):917-922.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2010.09.022.
[28]	张源源, 郭涵, 袁红章, 等. 橡胶树不同倍性的气孔性状差异研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(3):389-394.
	ZHANG Y Y, GUO H, YUAN H Z, et al. Stomatal differences among diploid,triploid and tetraploid in rubber tree[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2017, 38(3):389-394.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2017.03.001.
[29]	余文迪, 刘娟旭, 余义勋, 等. 桂中报春苣苔四倍体诱导及鉴定[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2023:1-12.(2023-02-10). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230210.1133.004.html.
	YU W D, LIU J X, YU Y X, et al. Induction and identification of tetraploid in Primulina guizhongensis[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed, 2023:1-12.(2023-02-10). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230210.1133.004.html.
[30]	李娟娟, 邓伟, 许泽楠, 等. 黄连木多倍体诱导及鉴定[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50(10):18-22.
	LI J J, DENG W, XU Z N, et al. Induction and identification of polyploid from Pistacia chinensis[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2022, 50(10):18-22.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2022.10.004.
[31]	张石虎, 古敏, 周玮, 等. 黄梁木多倍体离体诱导及其性状变异[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(7):2372-2383.
	ZHANG S H, GU M, ZHOU W, et al. In vitro induction of polyploid and its traits variation of Neolamarckia cadamba[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2022, 20(7):2372-2383.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.020.002372.
[32]	徐鹏飞, 杨艳红, 张毓婷, 等. 毛竹四倍体诱导及初步鉴定[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(8):55-62.
	XU P F, YANG Y H, ZHANG Y T, et al. Induction and preliminary identification of tetraploid in Phyllostachys edulis[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2020, 56(8):55-62.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200807.
[33]	郗连连, 李嘉宝, 朱凯琳, 等. 花楸属3种植物的基因组大小与叶气孔特征分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2020, 38(1):32-38.
	XI L L, LI J B, ZHU K L, et al. Variation in genome size and stomatal traits among three Sorbus species[J]. Plant Sci J, 2020, 38(1):32-38.DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2020.10032.
[34]	徐斌, 彭莉霞, 杨会肖, 等. 杜鹃红山茶叶片主要性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(5):730-734.
	XU B, PENG L X, YANG H X, et al. Genetic diversity analysis for leaf main traits of Camellia azalea[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2015, 35(5):730-734.DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.05.015.
[35]	林祺英, 李芳, 蔡汝鹏, 等. 海南荔枝资源叶片性状多样性分析[J]. 热带生物学报, 2023, 14(6):628-635.
	LIN Q Y, LI F, CAI R P, et al. Diversity analysis of leaf traits of litchi genetic resources in Hainan[J]. J Trop Biol, 2023, 14(6):628-635.DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20220126.

倍性ploidy	复叶面积/cm² CLA	比叶质量 /(g·cm^-2) SLW	小叶数/枚 LN
二倍体diploid	219.54±16.67(7.59)	0.002 7±0.000 3(10.12)	12.83±1.47^**(11.43)
四倍体tetraploid	394.62±96.92^**(24.56)	0.004 2±0.001 1^**(26.94)	10.17±0.89(8.72)

性状 trait	顶端小叶 terminal leaflet		中部小叶 middle leaflet
性状 trait	二倍体diploid	四倍体tetraploid	二倍体diploid	四倍体tetraploid
叶长/cm LL	10.56±1.46(13.83)	14.72±2.20^**(14.94)	10.08±0.87(8.61)	13.42±1.90^**(14.15)
叶宽/cm LW	4.05±0.61(15.12)	6.54±0.97^**(14.86)	3.35±0.30(8.98)	5.20±0.55^**(10.5)
叶形指数 LSI	2.63±0.32^**(12.06)	2.27±0.28(12.51)	3.02±0.23^**(7.51)	2.58±0.30(11.55)
小叶面积/cm² LA	25.65±6.66(25.98)	59.70±17.07^**(28.59)	20.89±2.33(11.15)	47.22±12.13^**(25.68)
最大叶宽位置 MLWP	0.86±0.12^**(14.43)	0.48±0.05(9.59)	0.58±0.31(53.81)	0.51±0.03(5.18)
锯齿密度 /(个·cm^-1)SD	7.02±1.08^**(15.39)	4.60±0.79(17.11)	5.32±0.82^**(15.36)	3.89±0.70(18.05)
锯齿宽度/mm SWW	1.64±0.21(12.54)	2.70±0.41^**(15.22)	2.42±0.45(18.56)	2.60±0.63(24.1)
锯齿深度/mm SWD	0.59±0.09^**(15.19)	0.42±0.08(18.94)	0.30±0.07(22.27)	0.49±0.22^**(45.97)
锯齿与叶缘间角度/(°) LSA	78.75±8.80(11.17)	106.52±11.91^**(11.18)	75.06±7.59(10.11)	88.1±7.63^**(8.66)

倍性 ploidy	组织厚度/μm tissue thickness					栅海比 P/S	紧密度 CTR	疏松度 SR
倍性 ploidy	叶片 LT	上表皮 UE	下表皮 LE	栅栏组织 PT	海绵组织 ST	栅海比 P/S	紧密度 CTR	疏松度 SR
二倍体 diploid	43.00±4.82 (11.21)	5.98±0.67 (11.28)	3.78±0.68 (18)	19.72±2.62 (13.29)	13.52±2.28 (16.89)	1.49±0.25^** (16.62)	0.46±0.04^* (7.94)	0.31±0.03 (9.68)
四倍体 tetraploid	56.24±8.17^** (14.53)	6.71±1.08^** (16.07)	5.46±0.97^** (17.8)	24.39±5.72^** (23.46)	19.68±3.39^** (17.23)	1.25±0.30 (23.99)	0.43±0.06 (14.22)	0.35±0.04^** (10.83)

倍性 ploidy	气孔长度/μm SL	气孔宽度/μm SW	气孔密度 / (个·mm^-2)STD
二倍体 diploid	15.62±1.21 (7.72)	10.68±0.94 (8.77)	657.1±105.52^** (16.06)
四倍体 tetraploid	20.27±1.39^** (6.85)	13.43±1.46^** (10.85)	361.27±90.25 (24.98)

性状 trait	主成分 principal component
性状 trait	PC₁	PC₂
复叶面积 CLA	0.873	0.297
比叶质量 SLW	0.652	-0.282
小叶数量 LN	-0.770	0.050
顶端小叶叶长 TLL	0.859	0.389
顶端小叶叶宽 TLW	0.917	-0.039
顶端小叶叶形指数 TLSI	-0.519	0.634
顶端小叶面积 TLA	0.908	0.195
顶端小叶最大叶宽位置 TMLWP	-0.883	0.209
顶端小叶锯齿密度 TSD	-0.796	0.104
顶端小叶锯齿宽度 TSWW	0.839	-0.102
顶端小叶锯齿深度 TSWD	-0.655	0.142
顶端小叶锯齿与叶缘间的角度 TLSA	0.764	-0.183
中部小叶叶长 MLL	0.848	0.436
中部小叶叶宽 MLW	0.959	0.014
中部小叶叶形指数 MLSI	-0.594	0.628
中部小叶面积 MLA	0.922	0.225
中部小叶锯齿密度 MSD	-0.728	-0.072
中部小叶锯齿深度 MSWD	0.614	0.390
中部小叶锯齿与叶缘间的角度 MLSA	0.588	-0.183
特征值(λ)eigen value	11.676	1.708
贡献率 /% contribution rate	61.455	8.991
累计贡献率 /% cumulative contribution rate	61.455	70.446

青钱柳二倍体和四倍体叶特征比较研究

A comparative study on leaf characters between diploid and tetraploid of Cyclocarya paliurus

RichHTML

PDF

详细数据

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[2]	张伟溪, 丁密, 苏晓华, 李爱平, 王小江, 余金金, 李政宏, 黄秦军, 丁昌俊. 小叶杨×欧洲黑杨杂交F₁代生长及叶片解剖结构杂种优势分析与抗旱性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 46-58.
[3]	叶雨艳, 丁访军, 吴鹏, 周华, 李源永, 周汀, 崔迎春. 喀斯特原生林9个树种水力学性状与解剖结构对树干液流的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 111-120.
[4]	刘小芳, 岳喜良, 方升佐, 李晴, 孙昕. 氮磷配施对青钱柳生长及叶生物活性物质含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 57-66.
[5]	刘莉, 瞿印权, 余延浩, 王倩, 洑香香. 青钱柳全基因组SSR位点分析及多态性引物开发[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 67-75.
[6]	张赞培, 谷月营, 尚旭岚, 王纪, 方升佐. 自然低温下23个青钱柳家系耐寒性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 85-92.
[7]	宋子琪, 卞国良, 林峰, 胡凤荣, 尚旭岚. 流式细胞仪鉴定青钱柳倍性方法的建立及其应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 61-68.
[8]	王纪, 方升佐. 不同抗褐化剂对青钱柳愈伤组织酶活性和生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 167-174.
[9]	黄梓良, 徐子恒, 孙操稳. 青钱柳种子雨的季节动态及土壤种子库特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 18-26.
[10]	金点坤, 吕卓, 王曙光, 龙昊, 张冲, 王声翰. 6种竹子叶器官的解剖结构比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 109-120.
[11]	向丽, 尹佟明, 陈赢男. 南京地区簸箕柳雌、雄花序建成动态观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 154-162.
[12]	李建挥, 李柏海, 吴思政, 柏文富, 禹霖, 聂东伶, 严佳文, 熊颖, 向祖恒, 彭先凤. 湘西地区核桃坚果表型特征及多样性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 171-179.
[13]	陈赢男, 韦素云, 曲冠正, 胡建军, 王军辉, 尹佟明, 潘惠新, 卢孟柱, 康向阳, 李来庚, 黄敏仁, 王明庥. 现代林木育种关键核心技术研究现状与展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 1-9.
[14]	方升佐. 青钱柳产业发展历程及资源培育研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 115-126.
[15]	徐展宏, 朱莹, 金慧颖, 孙操稳, 方升佐. 不同叶色青钱柳叶片色素、多酚含量及光合特性的差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 103-110.

性状 trait	主成分 principal components
性状 trait	PC₁	PC₂
叶片厚度 LT	0.798	0.538
上表皮厚度 UE	0.512	-0.045
下表皮厚度 LE	0.848	0.059
栅栏组织厚度 PT	0.426	0.872
海绵组织厚度 ST	0.921	0.162
栅海比 P/S	-0.659	0.725
紧密度 CTR	-0.505	0.848
疏松度 SR	0.729	-0.546
气孔长度 SL	0.882	0.117
气孔宽度 SW	0.798	0.136
气孔密度 STD	-0.754	-0.154
特征值(λ)eigen value	5.850	2.679
贡献率/% contribution rate	53.178	24.354
累计贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate	53.178	77.532