林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征

董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1) : 179-186.

PDF(2080 KB)
PDF(2080 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1) : 179-186. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305027
研究论文

林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征

作者信息 +

Variations in the leaf construction cost of Phyllostachys edulis and other dominant tree species during understory vegetation succession

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究疏于管理(近自然)状态下毛竹(Phyllostachys edulis)林中毛竹和优势树种叶片建成成本适应性机制及其变化规律,为毛竹林的科学管理及竹产业可持续发展提供参考。【方法】以近自然状态林下植被演替0、9、21年毛竹林为对象,运用单因素、Duncan方差分析和冗余分析法(RDA),分析1度、2度立竹和不同胸径木荷(Schima superba)、东南石栎(Lithocarpus harlandii)、苦槠(Castanopsis sclerophylla)等优势树种的叶片功能性状、碳、氮元素含量(质量分数)和热值等差异,并对立竹和优势树种叶片建成成本与功能性状的关系进行分析,探讨毛竹林中优势树种的能量利用和生长适应策略。【结果】随林下植被的演替,毛竹林中立竹和优势树种叶片功能性状发生变化,存在优势树种种间差异和立竹年龄差异,不同径级优势树种中木荷、东南石栎主要是比叶面积变化,而立竹主要是氮含量变化,优势树种木荷、东南石栎叶片比叶面积明显变小,林下植被演替9年毛竹林立竹的叶片氮含量显著小于演替21年毛竹林和毛竹纯林的含量;对不同径级的优势树种叶片单位面积建成成本产生明显影响,主要表现为大、中胸径木荷、东南石栎和大胸径苦槠叶片单位面积建成成本显著增大,而中、小胸径苦槠则相反。1度立竹叶片单位面积建成成本以演替9年毛竹林显著大于演替21年毛竹林和毛竹纯林的,立竹和优势树种的单位质量建成成本总体上无明显变化。冗余分析(RDA)表明,比叶面积是影响优势树种叶片建成成本的主要指标,比叶面积、去灰分热值是影响立竹叶片建成成本的主要指标。相关性分析表明,优势树种、立竹叶片比叶面积与单位面积建成成本均呈显著负相关,优势树种叶片去灰分热值与单位面积建成成本呈显著正相关。【结论】随林下植被演替的进行,优势树种和立竹在林分中逐渐发生“角色”转变。优势树种和立竹能够通过调节叶片功能性状、建成成本及其之间的关系来改变资源获取与投入策略,以适应林下植被演替引起的生境变化。

Abstract

【Objective】 The area of bamboo forests dominated by Phyllostachys edulis in the primary production region is expanding continually due to inadequate management strategies or abandonment, which poses as a serious challenge to the sustainable development of China’s regional bamboo industry and environmental conservation. Negligence or abandonment leads to a positive succession of vegetation in the understory of bamboo forests; however, the adaptive mechanisms and variations in the leaf construction costs of P. edulis and dominant tree species remain unclear.【Method】This study investigated bamboo forests undergoing vegetation succession in the understory at 0, nine and 21 years following neglect or abandonment using One-way ANOVA, Duncan analysis of variance, and redundancy analysis (RDA). The one-and two-degree bamboo plants and dominant tree species, including Schima superba, Lithocarpus harlandii, and Castanopsis sclerophylla, were studied herein. The leaf functional traits, element contents, and calorific values were analyzed, and the association between significant differences in leaf construction costs and the functional traits of Moso bamboo and dominant tree species was determined to explore the energy utilization and growth adaptation strategies of bamboo and dominant tree species. 【Result】The progression of vegetation succession in the understory altered the leaf functional traits of Moso bamboo and dominant tree species, indicating inter-species differences among the dominant tree species and age-related variations in Moso bamboo. The dominant tree species of different diameter classes were mainly S. superba and L. harlandii, with changed in specific leaf area (SLA), while bamboo mainly showed changes in nitrogen content (Nmass), The SLA of S. superba and L. harlandii decreased significantly, while the Nmass of bamboo plants in the 9-year successional bamboo forest was significantly lower than that of bamboo plants in the 21-year successional forest and pure bamboo forest. Understory vegetation succession significantly affected the leaf carbon concentration per unit area (CCarea) of the dominant tree species across different diameter classes, which was especially evident in the increased foliar CCarea of the large and medium diameter S. superba and L. harlandii trees; however, a reverse trend was observed for the medium and small diameter C. sclerophylla trees. The foliar CCarea of the one-degree bamboo plants in the nine-year successional bamboo forests was significantly higher than that in the 21-year successional bamboo forest the pure bamboo forest. Overall, the leaf carbon concentration per unit mass (CCmass) of bamboo and the dominant tree species did not differ significantly. The results of RDA indicated that SLA is a primary indicator that influenced leaf construction costs in dominant tree species, while both the SLA and ash free caloric value (AFCV) were the major indicators that influenced leaf construction costs in bamboo. The correlation analysis revealed that the SLA and CCarea were significantly negatively correlated in both bamboo and the dominant tree species, while AFCV and CCarea were significantly positively correlated in the dominant tree species, but incorrelate to bamboo. Altogether, the findings revealed that dominant tree species and bamboo adapt to changes in resource acquisition and investment strategies during understory succession by adjusting the leaf functional traits, construction costs, and their interrelationships. 【Conclusion】The succession of understory vegetation gradually shifts the roles of dominant tree species and Moso bamboo in forest stands. Dominant tree species and Moso bamboo can adapt to habitat changes caused by the succession of understory vegetation by adjusting the leaf functional traits, construction costs, and their relationships to modify resource acquisition and investment strategies. This study advances the understanding of the dynamics of bamboo forest ecosystems, and provides a scientific basis for the development of effective management and conservation strategies.

关键词

毛竹 / 优势树种 / 林下植被演替 / 叶片建成成本 / 资源分配

Key words

Phyllostachys edulis / dominant tree species / understory vegetation succession / leaf construction cost / resource investment strategy

引用本文

导出引用
董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, . 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(1): 179-186 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305027
DONG Yawen, CHEN Shuanglin, XIE Yanyan, et al. Variations in the leaf construction cost of Phyllostachys edulis and other dominant tree species during understory vegetation succession[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(1): 179-186 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305027
中图分类号: S718;S792   

参考文献

[1]
汪亚芳, 刘宗悦, 张宝刚, 等. 入侵毛竹皆伐对亚热带森林土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5):1233-1239.
WANG Y F, LIU Z Y, ZHANG B G, et al. Effects of the removal of invasive Moso bamboo on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities in subtropical forests[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2022, 33(5):1233-1239.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.015.
[2]
殷家扬. 弃营年限对毛竹林生态系统林分结构因子和各碳库碳分配格局的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2020.
YIN J Y. Effects of abandonment years on stand structure factors and carbon distribution patterns of carbon pools in a Moso bamboo forest ecosystem[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2020.DOI:10.27756/d.cnki.gzjlx.2020.000286.
[3]
WILLIAMS K, PERCIVAL F, MERINO J. Estimation of tissue construction cost from heat of combustion and organic nitrogen content[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1987, 10(9):725-734.DOI:10.1111/1365-3040.ep11604754.
[4]
董周焱, 柏新富, 侯玉平, 等. 胶东滨海8种树木叶片热值、建成成本及其适应能力[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(3):8-15.
DONG Z Y, BAI X F, HOU Y P, et al. Leaf calorific value of 8 tree species in the coastal areas of Jiaodong and cost of construction of leaf biomass and its adaptability[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2015, 51(3):8-15.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150302.
[5]
宋莉英, 彭长连, 彭少麟. 华南地区3种入侵植物与本地植物叶片建成成本的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(4):378-384.
SONG L Y, PENG C L, PENG S L. Comparison of leaf construction costs between three invasive species and three native species in south China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2009, 17(4):378-384.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09077.
[6]
CAPLAN J S, WHEATON C N, MOZDZER T J. Belowground advantages in construction cost facilitate a cryptic plant invasion[J]. AoB Plants, 2014(6): plu020.DOI:10.1093/aobpla/plu020.
[7]
P’YANKOV V I, IVANOV L A, LAMBERS H. Plant construction cost in the boreal species differing in their ecological strategies[J]. Russ J Plant Physiol, 2001, 48(1):67-73.DOI:10.1023/A:1009002715572.
[8]
朱志敏, 李艳, 吕金枝, 等. 翅果油树及其群落中7种优势木本种类的叶性特征比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2017, 26(1):107-109.
ZHU Z M, LI Y, LYU J Z, et al. Comparison on leaf traits of Elaeagnus mollis and seven dominant woody species in its community[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2017, 26(1):107-109.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.
[9]
韦伊, 刘慧, 贺鹏程, 等. 南亚热带不同演替阶段森林优势树种叶片构建成本与机械抗性的协同关系[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2022, 30(4):483-491.
WEI Y, LIU H, HE P C, et al. Coordination between leaf construction cost and mechanical resistance of dominant woody species in subtropical forests at different successional stages[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2022, 30(4):483-491.
[10]
OSUNKOYA O O, BAYLISS D, PANETTA F D, et al. Leaf trait co-ordination in relation to construction cost,carbon gain and resource-use efficiency in exotic invasive and native woody vine species[J]. Ann Bot, 2010, 106(2):371-380.DOI:10.1093/aob/mcq119.
[11]
HEBERLING J M, FRIDLEY J D. Resource-use strategies of native and invasive plants in eastern north American forests[J]. New Phytol, 2013, 200(2):523-533.DOI:10.1111/nph.12388.
[12]
陈新微, 李慧燕, 刘红梅, 等. 入侵种银胶菊和三叶鬼针草与本地种气体交换特性的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18):5732-5740.
CHEN X W, LI H Y, LIU H M, et al. Comparison of gas exchange characteristics between invasive Parthenium hysterophorus and Bidens pilosa and co-occurring native Cirsium setosum (Asteraceae)[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(18):5732-5740.DOI:10.5846/stxb201504290889.
[13]
王睿芳, 冯玉龙. 叶物候、构建消耗和偿还时间对入侵植物碳积累的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5):2568-2577.
WANG R F, FENG Y L. The effects of leaf phenology,construction cost and payback time on carbon accumulation in invasive plants[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(5):2568-2577.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.046.
[14]
NAVAS M L, ROUMET C, BELLMANN A, et al. Suites of plant traits in species from different stages of a Mediterranean secondary succession[J]. Plant Biol, 2010, 12(1):183-196.DOI:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00208.x.
[15]
陈莹婷, 许振柱. 植物叶经济谱的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(10):1135-1153.
CHEN Y T, XU Z Z. Review on research of leaf economics spectrum[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(10):1135-1153.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00108.
[16]
孙浩哲, 王襄平, 张树斌, 等. 阔叶红松林不同演替阶段凋落物产量及其稳定性的影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6):594-605.
SUN H Z, WANG X P, ZHANG S B, et al. Abiotic and biotic modulators of litterfall production and its temporal stability during the succession of broad-leaf and Korean pine mixed forest[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(6):594-605.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2020.0372.
[17]
DAEHLER C. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants:implications for conservation and restoration[J]. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2003, 34(1):126-137.DOI:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403.
[18]
NAGEL J M, GRIFFIN K L. Can gas-exchange characteristics help explain the invasive success of Lythrum salicaria?[J]. Biol Invasions, 2004, 6(1):101-111.DOI:10.1023/B:BINV.0000010125.93370.32.
[19]
吴陶红, 龙翠玲, 熊玲, 等. 喀斯特森林不同生长型植物叶片功能性状变异及其适应特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2023, 29(5):1043-1049.
WU T H, LONG C L, XIONG L, et al. Variation and adaptation of leaf functional traits of different growth type in Karst forests[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental, 2023, 29(5):1043-1049.DOI:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2022.06032.
[20]
CUI E Q, WENG E S, YAN E R, et al. Robust leaf trait relationships across species under global environmental changes[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1):2999.DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16839-9.
[21]
胡耀升, 么旭阳, 刘艳红. 长白山森林不同演替阶段比叶面积及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(5):1480-1487.
HU Y S, YAO X Y, LIU Y H. Specific leaf area and its influencing factors of forests at different succession stages in Changbai Mountains[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(5):1480-1487.DOI:10.5846/stxb201310132459.
[22]
莫惟轶, 王瑞丽, 高慧蓉, 等. 黄土高原不同植被带内草地植物叶片解剖性状的变异规律[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(3):1135-1146.
MO W Y, WANG R L, GAO H R, et al. Variation in leaf anatomical traits of grassland plants in different vegetation zones on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(3):1135-1146.DOI:10.5846/stxb202110072767.
[23]
黄双杰, 曹梦珍, 陈凌芝, 等. 氮素胁迫条件下茶树根系发育及生长素的响应[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2023, 39(3):814-821.
HUANG S J, CAO M Z, CHEN L Z, et al. Auxin response and tea plant roots formation regulated by nitrogen stress[J]. Jiangsu J of Agri Sci, 2023, 39(3):814-821.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.023.
[24]
于均屹, 徐立清, 张勇, 等. 光照和地下竞争对林冠下人工更新紫椴苗木形态和生物量分配的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (4): 38-47.
YU J Y, XU L Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of light and underground competition on seedling morphology and biomass allocation of Tilia amurensis artificially regenerated under forest canopy[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(4):38-47.
[25]
王常顺, 汪诗平. 植物叶片性状对气候变化的响应研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(2):206-216.
WANG C S, WANG S P. A review of research on responses of leaf traits to climate change[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(2):206-216.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0020.
[26]
魏海霞, 霍艳玲, 周忠科, 等. 唐古特白刺叶功能性状沿气候梯度的变异特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(20):8343-8351.
WEI H X, HUO Y L, ZHOU Z K, et al. Variations in leaf traits of Nitraria tangutorum along a climatic gradient[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(20):8343-8351.DOI:10.5846/stxb202108272405.
[27]
宋长江, 孙旭东, 蔺雪莹, 等. 基于随机森林的帽儿山珍贵硬阔叶树种适宜性分布[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (3): 64-72.
SONG C J, SUN X D, LIN X Y, et al. Suitability distribution of precious hardwood species in Maoershan based on random forest model[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(3):64-72.
[28]
MASON C M, DONOVAN L A. Does investment in leaf defenses drive changes in leaf economic strategy? a focus on whole-plant ontogeny[J]. Oecologia, 2015, 177(4):1053-1066.DOI:10.1007/s00442-014-3177-2.
[29]
张晓龙, 吴梦迪, 吴秋堂, 等. 克隆植物对异质生境的适应对策研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(10):4255-4266.
ZHANG X L, WU M D, WU Q T, et al. Reviewing the adaptation strategies of clonal plants to heterogeneous habitats[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(10):4255-4266.DOI:10.5846/stxb202009212451.
[30]
葛俊, 邢福. 克隆植物对种间竞争的适应策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(6):587-596.
GE J, XING F. A review of adaptive strategies of clonal plants to interspecific competition[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(6):587-596.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00587.

基金

浙江省重点研发计划(2020C02008)

编辑: 王国栋
PDF(2080 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/