国土空间视角下长三角城市群自然保护地连通性评估与生态修复重点区域识别

刘琪琪; 刘媛媛; 唐晓岚

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307038

刘琪琪, 刘媛媛, 唐晓岚

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 227-234.

PDF(7578 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(7578 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 227-234. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307038

研究论文

国土空间视角下长三角城市群自然保护地连通性评估与生态修复重点区域识别

刘琪琪 ¹^,² ,
刘媛媛 ¹ ,
唐晓岚 ¹^,³^,^*

作者信息 +

Assessment of natural protected areas connectivity and identification of key ecological restoration areas in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from the perspective of territorial spatial planning

LIU Qiqi ¹^,² ,
LIU Yuanyuan ¹ ,
TANG Xiaolan ¹^,³^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】在城市化进程迅速推进的背景下,构建自然保护地(NPAs)生态安全格局(ESP)对于提升自然保护地的连通性以及推动国土空间生态修复实践具有重要的参考价值。【方法】以长江三角洲(简称长三角)城市群为研究区域,基于生态系统服务价值,结合形态学空间格局分析法(MSPA)与现有自然保护地数据识别生态源地。运用层次分析法(AHP)构建综合阻力面,并利用最小累积阻力模型(MCR)提取生态廊道,从而构建“生态源地-综合阻力面-生态廊道”模式的生态安全格局。系统评估研究区自然保护地的连通性特征,进而识别并划定国土空间生态修复的重点区域。【结果】在长三角城市群自然保护地共识别出145个生态源地,提取323条生态廊道和34条潜在生态廊道;同时,识别出1个低水平生态安全区、179个生态夹点和35个生态障碍点。【结论】研究揭示了长三角城市群自然保护地连通性面临的主要困境,提出了国土空间背景下提升自然保护地连通性与优化生态修复重点区域的策略。具体建议:推动跨区域生态廊道建设,聚焦生态修复重点区域,实施差异化分区修复措施。研究结果可为长三角城市群自然保护地连通性的提升与区域生态修复工作提供科学、可行的参考。

Abstract

【Objective】In the context of rapid urbanization, establishing an ecological security pattern (ESP) for natural protected areas (NPAs) is crucial for enhancing connectivity and guiding territorial spatial ecological restoration practices.【Method】Taking the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration (YRDUA) as the study area, ecological sources were identified based on ecosystem service value by integrating morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) with data on existing NPAs. A comprehensive resistance surface was constructed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and ecological corridors were extracted via the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model. There by constructing an ESP with the model of “Ecological sources-Resistance surface-Ecological corridors”. Connectivity characteristics of NPAs were systematically assessed to pinpoint key areas for territorial spatial ecological restoration. 【Result】The study identified 145 ecological sources, 323 ecological corridors, and 34 potential corridors. Critical restoration targets included one low-security zone, 179 ecological pinch points, and 35 ecological barriers. 【Conclusion】This research reveals significant connectivity challenges among NPAs in the YRDUA and proposes connectivity enhancement strategies within territorial spatial planning: (1) Breaking administrative boundaries to promote cross-regional ecological corridor development. (2) Implementing differentiated restoration in priority zones. These findings provide scientific support for optimizing NPA connectivity and regional ecological restoration.

导出引用

刘琪琪, 刘媛媛, 唐晓岚. 国土空间视角下长三角城市群自然保护地连通性评估与生态修复重点区域识别[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2025, 49(5): 227-234 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307038

LIU Qiqi, LIU Yuanyuan, TANG Xiaolan. Assessment of natural protected areas connectivity and identification of key ecological restoration areas in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from the perspective of territorial spatial planning[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(5): 227-234 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202307038

中图分类号： X826;TU98

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]

彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 等. 过程耦合与空间集成:国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1):3-13.

PENG

, LYU

D N

, DONG

J Q

, et al. Processes coupling and spatial integration:characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1):3-13.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102.

本文引用 [1]

[2]	赵智聪, 杨锐. 论国土空间规划中自然保护地规划之定位[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(8):5-11. ZHAO Z C, YANG R. On the positioning of protected area planning in national spatial planning[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(8):5-11.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2019.08.0005. 本文引用 [1]

[3]

FERRARO

P J

, HANAUER

M M

. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(11):4332-4337.DOI:10.1073/pnas.1307712111.

本文引用 [1]

[4]	LIU Q, HANG T, WU Y, et al. Unveiling differences in biodiversity conservation efficiency across multi-level ecological networks under future climate change scenarios[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 169: 112933. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112933. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	姜虹, 彭建. 自然保护地连通网络构建与优化的方法及前瞻[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(9):2176-2190. JIANG H, PENG J. Methods and prospects for the construction and optimization of protected area connectivity network[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(9):2176-2190.DOI:10.11821/dlxb202409002. 本文引用 [1]

[6]

黄俊达, 黄金玲, 陈超劲. 以自然保护地为主体的广州市域生态网络构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1):247-254.

HUANG

J D

, HUANG

J L

, CHEN

C J

. Construction of ecological network with protected areas as the main region in Guangzhou City,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(1):247-254.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202401.023.

本文引用 [1]

[7]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3):407-419. PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3):407-419.DOI:10.11821/dlyj201703001. 本文引用 [1]

[8]

杨学龙, 叶秀英, 赵小敏, 等. 基于MSPA与MCR的生态廊道构建及优化研究:以南昌市新建区为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2023, 42(3):85-91.

YANG

X L

, YE

X Y

, ZHAO

X M

, et al. Study on construction and optimization of ecological corridor based on MSPA and MCR:a case study of Xinjian District in Nanchang City[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2023, 42(3):85-91.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2023.03.014.

本文引用 [1]

[9]

唐晓岚, 王忆梅, 周孔飞. 基于生态安全格局的山岳型风景区景观资源保护利用研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(2):178-186.

TANG

X L

, WANG

Y M

, ZHOU

K F

. Protection and utilization of landscape resources in mountainous scenic areas based on ecological security patterns[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47(2):178-186.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202102002.

本文引用 [1]

[10]

范春苗, 王志泰, 汤娜, 等. 基于形态学空间格局和空间主成分的贵阳市中心城区生态网络构建[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16):6620-6632.

FAN

C M

, WANG

Z T

, TANG

, et al. Construction of ecological network in downtown of Guiyang City based on morphologically spatial pattern and spatially principal component analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(16):6620-6632.DOI:10.5846/stxb202012213241.

本文引用 [1]

[11]

贾艳艳, 唐晓岚, 任宇杰. 长江流域安徽段生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空演变及其关联分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(3):31-40.

JIA

Y Y

, TANG

X L

, REN

Y J

. Spatial-temporal evolution and correlation analyses of ecosystem service values and landscape ecological risks in Anhui section of the Yangtze River basin[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(3):31-40.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202108033.

本文引用 [1]

[12]	赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 王效科, 等. 中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(4):443-452. ZHAO T Q, OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, et al. Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial surface water system in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(4):443-452.DOI:10.11849/zrzyxb.2003.04.008. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5):911-919. XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5):911-919. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2008.05.019. 本文引用 [1]

[15]

赵永华, 张玲玲, 王晓峰. 陕西省生态系统服务价值评估及时空差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10):2662-2672.

ZHAO

Y H

, ZHANG

L L

, WANG

X F

. Assessment and spatiotemporal difference of ecosystem services value in Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(10):2662-2672. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0377.

本文引用 [1]

[16]

杨立焜, 周婧楠, 孙道成, 等. 基于面向未来生态保护的全域生态安全格局构建:以开封为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(9):33-39.

YANG

L K

, ZHOU

J N

, SUN

D C

, et al. The construction of a regional ecological security pattern based on future-oriented ecological protection:Kaifeng City as an example[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(9):33-39.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2022.09.015.

本文引用 [1]

[17]

LIU

X J

, LIU

D F

, ZHAO

H Z

, et al. Exploring the spatio-temporal impacts of farmland reforestation on ecological connectivity using circuit theory:a case study in the agro-pastoral ecotone of north China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9):1419-1435.DOI:10.1007/s11442-020-1790-z.

本文引用 [1]

[18]	杨青, 刘耕源, 杨志峰. 气候变化和土地利用变化驱动下的生物多样性系统分析新框架[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(3):871-884. YANG Q, LIU G Y, YANG Z F. A new framework for biodiversity system analysis driven by climate change and land use change[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(3):871-884.DOI:10.20103/j.stxb.202211173328. 本文引用 [1]

[19]

马坤, 陈颖晖, 唐晓岚, 等. 基于受威胁物种保护的长江中游流域自然保护地空间优化研究[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(12):3115-3129.

, CHEN

Y H

, TANG

X L

, et al. Research on spatial optimization of protected areas based on threatened species protection in the middle Yangtze River basin[J]. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(12):3115-3129.DOI:10.11821/dlyj020230396.

本文引用 [1]

[20]	NEWBOLD T, HUDSON L N, HILL S L L, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2015, 520(7545):45-50.DOI:10.1038/nature14324. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	LIU X Y, WEI M, ZENG J. Simulating urban growth scenarios based on ecological security pattern:a case study in Quanzhou,China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(19):7282.DOI:10.3390/ijerph17197282. 本文引用 [1]

[22]

孙丽慧, 刘浩, 汪丁, 等. 基于生态系统服务与生态环境敏感性评价的生态安全格局构建研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(11):2508-2517.

SUN

L H

, LIU

, WANG

, et al. Research on ecological security pattern construction based on the evaluation of ecosystem services and eco-environmental sensitivity[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(11):2508-2517.DOI:10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.10.11.

本文引用 [1]

[23]	CREGO R D, WELLS H B M, NDUNG’U K S, et al. Moving through the mosaic:identifying critical linkage zones for large herbivores across a multiple‐use African landscape[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36(5):1325-1340.DOI:10.1007/s10980-021-01232-8. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	赵广英, 宋聚生. “三区三线” 划定中的规划逻辑思辨[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(8):13-19,58. ZHAO G Y, SONG J S. The analysis of planning logic in the demarcation of “three zones and three lines”[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(8):13-19,58.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2020.08.003. 本文引用 [1]

[25]

杨文越, 徐子豪, 叶泓妤, 等. 粤港澳大湾区道路基础设施对生态网络的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1653-1660.

YANG

W Y

, XU

Z H

, YE

H Y

, et al. Impact of road infrastructure on the ecological network in the Guangdong-Hong kong-Macao Greater Bay area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(6): 1653-1660. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.025.

本文引用 [1]

[26]

付励强, 邹红菲, 马建章, 等. 中国自然保护地的区域性联合保护机制和发展策略分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(5):1-6,156.

L Q

, ZOU

H F

, MA

J Z

, et al. Analysis on regional joint protection mechanism and development strategy of protected areas in China[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2019( 5):1-6,156.DOI:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.05.001.

本文引用 [1]

[27]

姚鸿文, 王世红, 朱程昊, 等. 钱江源-百山祖国家公园生态补偿机制与标准研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(5):21-27.

YAO

H W

, WANG

S H

, ZHU

C H

, et al. Research on the ecological compensation mechanism and standards for Qianjiangyuan-Baishanzu National Park[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(5):21-27.

本文引用 [1]

[28]	于文轩, 冯瀚元. 生态文明视域下自然保护地法治体系的完善[J]. 城市与环境研究, 2024, 11(1):41-51. YU W X, FENG H Y. The improvement of the rule of law of natural protected areas from the perspective of ecological civilization[J]. Urban and Environmental Studies, 2024, 11(1):41-51. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	李笑兰. 推动国家公园模式与社会组织的实践案例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(8): 12-14. LI X L. Promoting the national park model and case studies of social organization practices[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(8): 12-14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2018.08.006. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	刘琪琪, 唐晓岚, 刘媛媛. 韩国国立公园管理经验对中国国家公园制度的启示与借鉴[J]. 自然保护地, 2024, 4(3): 26-40. LIU Q Q, TANG X L, LIU Y Y. Experience in managing national parks in the Republic of Korea: implications and references for the national park system in China[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2024, 4(3): 26-40. 本文引用 [1]