78个北美海棠品种果实表型多样性分析

许剑峰, 张往祥, 朱玲玲, 江皓, 孙甜甜, 郁万文

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 165-173.

PDF(1783 KB)
PDF(1783 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 165-173. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309004
研究论文

78个北美海棠品种果实表型多样性分析

作者信息 +

Phenotypic diversity analysis of fruit traits of 78 north American crabapple cultivars

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究北美海棠品种资源果实表型的多样性和变异特点,为合理利用北美海棠品种资源、定向培育观赏海棠新品种提供理论参考。【方法】对78个北美海棠品种果实的7个数量性状和16个质量性状进行采集和整理,并进行多样性、相关性、主成分和聚类等分析。【结果】7个数量性状中单果质量变异系数最大,为105.34%;果形指数变异系数最小,为9.65%。16个质量性状共检测到64个变异类型,其中果实形状、成熟果色、果肉颜色变异范围较大。Shannon-Wiener信息指数(H)和Simpson多样性指数(D)变化范围分别是0.363~2.002和0.167~0.842。相关性分析结果表明,果实多数性状之间存在显著或极显著相关。主成分分析将23个果实性状转化为7个主成分,累计贡献率达71.756%,基本上可以反映北美海棠果实表型性状的绝大部分特征信息。基于果实表型性状聚类分析,在欧氏距离为21.5时,可将78个北美海棠品种分为3个类群。其中,第I类群可用于选育果大,果实整齐度好的品种;第Ⅱ类群可用于选育果色艳丽,观赏价值较高的观果品种;第Ⅲ类群可选育小果、果量多的品种。【结论】北美海棠品种资源果实表型存在丰富的多样性,果实大小、果色等性状是区分北美海棠品种的重要性状。研究结果可为海棠果实的观赏性状育种提供一定科学参考。

Abstract

【Objective】The study aimes to investigate the diversity and variation in fruit phenotypic traits among North American crabapple cultivars, and provide theoretical support for the rational use of existing crabapple cultivar resources and the breeding of new cultivars. 【Method】A total of 78 North American crabapple cultivars were investigated for seven quantitative traits and 16 qualitative traits related to fruit characteristics. Data collected were subjected to diversity analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and cluster analysis. 【Result】Among the seven quantitative traits, the variation coefficient of fruit weight was the largest, being 105.34%, and which of the fruit shape index was the smallest, being 9.65%. A total of 64 variant types were detected for the 16 qualitative traits, among which fruit shape, fruit color and flesh color had a wider range of variation. The Shannon-Wiener index (H) ranged from 0.363 to 2.002, and the Simpson index (D) varied between 0.167 and 0.842, further confirming high phenotypic diversity. Correlation analysis revealed significant or highly significant relationships among most fruit traits. The principal component analysis found seven principal components with a cumulative contribution rate of 71.756%, reflecting most of the information on the phenotypic traits of crabapples. The 78 cultivars were divided into three groups at the Euclidean distance of 21.5. The first group comprises cultivars suitable for breeding large-fruited types with high uniformity; the second group includes accessions with brightly colored fruits and high ornamental value, ideal for ornamental fruit breeding; and the third group consists of genotypes bearing small but abundant fruits, useful for developing prolific small-fruited varieties. 【Conclusion】North American crabapple cultivars showed rich fruit phenotypic diversity; fruit size and color were important traits to distinguish cultivars. These findings offer practical insights and scientific support for ornamental trait-oriented breeding in crabapple, facilitating the efficient selection and utilization of germplasm for developing new varieties with desired fruit characteristics.

关键词

北美海棠 / 品种资源 / 果实性状 / 表型多样性

Key words

north American crabapple / cultivar resource / fruit traits / phenotypic diversity

引用本文

导出引用
许剑峰, 张往祥, 朱玲玲, . 78个北美海棠品种果实表型多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(5): 165-173 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309004
XU Jianfeng, ZHANG Wangxiang, ZHU Lingling, et al. Phenotypic diversity analysis of fruit traits of 78 north American crabapple cultivars[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(5): 165-173 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309004
中图分类号: S687.9   

参考文献

[1]
张往祥, 范俊俊, 杨萍, 等. ‘紫王子’海棠半同胞家系苗期表型特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):33-40.
ZHANG W X, FAN J J, YANG P, et al. Analysis of phenotypic characteristics of the Malus ‘Purple Prince’ half-sib progenies at the seedling stage[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(6):33-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708012.
[2]
张全全, 张龙, 李丽娟, 等. 观赏海棠自由授粉子代花色特征及选优[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(8):56-59,77.
ZHANG Q Q, ZHANG L, LI L J, et al. Selection of color characteristics of free pollinated progeny of ornamental crabapple[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2021, 49(8):56-59,77.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2021.08.011.
[3]
HÖFER M, ALI MOHAMED SAAD ELDIN ALI M, SELLMANN J, et al. Phenotypic evaluation and characterization of a collection of Malus species[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2014, 61(5):943-964.DOI: 10.1007/s10722-014-0088-3.
[4]
邹云. 海棠种质资源描述规范和数据标准的制定[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2019. DOI: 10.27625/d.cnki.gzlky.2019.000253.
ZOU Y. Formulation of crabapple genetic resources description norms and data standards[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2019.
[5]
何梅, 胡玉安, 武启飞, 等. 北美海棠6品种在南方地区的引种研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(6):73-82.
HE M, HU Y A, WU Q F, et al. Study on the growth adaptability of north American crabapple introduced to southern China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2019, 43(6):73-82.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903021.
[6]
张往祥, 张龙, 江皓, 等. 观赏海棠新品种‘洛可可女士’[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2019, 43(4): 203-204.
ZHANG W X, ZHANG L, JIANG H, et al. A new ornamental crabapple cultivar ‘Luokeke Nüshi’[J]. Journal of Nanjing Fore-stry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2019, 43(4): 203-204 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201905001.
[7]
王瑞敏, 沈瑒, 陈颖, 等. ‘高原之火’北美海棠叶片组培快繁再生体系[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(7):23-28,39.
WANG R M, SHEN Y, CHEN Y, et al. Rapid tissue culture propagation regeneration system of leaves in Malus ‘Prairfire’[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2020, 48(7):23-28,39.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2020.07.005.
[8]
吴晓星, 刘凤栾, 房义福, 等. 36个欧美观赏海棠品种(种)应用价值的综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):93-98.
WU X X, LIU F L, FANG Y F, et al. A comprehensive evaluation on application value of 36 Euro-American ornamental crabapples[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(1):93-98.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.001.
[9]
刘胜男, 彭洁, 王瑞博, 等. 30种北美海棠表型多样性分析与观赏性综合评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2025, 23(13):4440-4449.
LIU S N, PENG J, WANG R B, et al. Phenotypic diversity analysis and comprehensive appreciation evaluation of 30 north American crabapples[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2025, 23(13):4440-4449.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.023.004440.
[10]
王向光. 观赏海棠不同品种表型性状分析[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2018.
WANG X G. Phenotypic analysis of different varieties of ornamental crabapple[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2018.
[11]
纪艳军, 董聚苗, 张国君, 等. 海棠不同品种果实观赏性状分析[J]. 河北林果研究, 2015, 30(3):260-263.
JI Y J, DONG J M, ZHANG G J, et al. Fruit characteristics of different ornamental crabapple varieties[J]. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2015, 30(3):260-263.DOI: 10.13320/j.cnki.hjfor.2015.0061.
[12]
陈含, 王东升, 白冰, 等. 21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(3):117-126.
CHEN H, WANG D S, BAI B, et al. Phenotypic diversity of 21 Hibiscus cultivars[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(3):117-126.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103038.
[13]
张悦, 索玉静, 孙鹏, 等. 柿种质资源果实形态多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7):1473-1490.
ZHANG Y, SUO Y J, SUN P, et al. Analysis on fruit morphological diversity of persimmon germplasm resources[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7):1473-1490. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0520.
[14]
XIN Y H, WU Y X, QIAO B, et al. Evaluation on the phenotypic diversity of Calamansi (Citrus microcarpa) germplasm in Hainan island[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12:371.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03775-x.
[15]
许军, 何梅, 胡玉安, 等. 观赏海棠研究进展[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):553-560.
XU J, HE M, HU Y A, et al. Advances in the research on and expectation of ornamental crabapple[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 40(3):553-560.DOI: 10.13836/j.jjau.2018072.
[16]
ZHOU T, NING K, ZHANG W X, et al. Phenotypic variation of floral organs in flowering crabapples and its taxonomic significance[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2021, 21(1):503.DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03227-8.
[17]
张往祥, 范俊俊, 谢寅峰, 等. 海棠花粉电镜图谱[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018.
ZHANG W X, FAN J J, XIE Y F, et al. An illustrated electron microscopic study of crabapple pollen[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.
[18]
张学超, 任海龙, 唐式敏, 等. 伊犁天山160份野苹果种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(6):1521-1530.
ZHANG X C, REN H L, TANG S M, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in 160 germplasm resources of Malus sieversii (Ledeb.) M.roem.from Tianshan in Ili[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(6):1521-1530.DOI: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20210415002.
[19]
吴如健, 万继锋, 韦晓霞, 等. 橄榄种质资源果实表型性状多样性分析及其数量分类研究[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(5):797-805.
WU R J, WAN J F, WEI X X, et al. Fruit character diversity analysis and numerical classification of Chinese olive germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 32(5):797-805.DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150129.
[20]
王彦荣, 南志标, 孙建华, 等. 草地早熟禾新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南初报[J]. 草业科学, 2003, 20(12):58-67.
WANG Y R, NAN Z B, SUN J H, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness,uniformity,and stability of new varieties of Poa pratensis in China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2003, 20(12):58-67.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.12.018.
[21]
王昆, 刘凤之, 曹玉芬, 等. 苹果种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
WANG K, LIU F Z, CAO Y F. Descriptors and data standard for apple[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005.
[22]
芮文婧, 王晓敏, 张倩男, 等. 番茄353份种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(3):561-570.
RUI W J, WANG X M, ZHANG Q N, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 353 tomato germplasm resources by phenotypic traits[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2018, 45(3):561-570. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2017-0274.
[23]
胡文舜, 陈秀萍, 郑少泉. 龙眼EST-SSR标记开发及无患子科5个属种质遗传多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(7):1359-1372.
HU W S, CHEN X P, ZHENG S Q. EST-SSR markers developed from Dimocarpus longan and their application in genetic diversity analysis of five genera of Sapindaceae[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46(7):1359-1372. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0753.
[24]
刘艺平, 倪梦辉, 吴芳芳, 等. 荷花花器官性状与SSR标记的关联分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1):103-115.
LIU Y P, NI M H, WU F F, et al. Association analysis of organ traits with SSR markers in lotus(Nelumbo nucifera)[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1):103-115. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0919.
[25]
杨磊, 贾平平, 靳娟, 等. 118个枣品种表型性状多样性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2023, 32(1):50-60.
YANG L, JIA P P, JIN J, et al. Analysis on phenotypic trait diversity of 118 Ziziphus jujuba cultivars[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2023, 32(1):50-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2023.01.06.
[26]
董聚苗, 刘月, 李扬森, 等. 74个观赏海棠品种的遗传多样性及指纹图谱构建[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(5):30-35.
DONG J M, LIU Y, LI Y S, et al. Fingerprints establisment and genetic diversity of 74 ornamental crabapple varieties[J]. Seed, 2022, 41(5):30-35.DOI: 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2022.05.030.
[27]
刘胜男. 观赏海棠表型多样性分析与评价[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27117/d.cnki.ghenu.2022.000031.
LIU S N. Analysis and evaluation of phenotypic diversity of ornamental crabapple[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2022.DOI: 10.27117/d.cnki.ghenu.2022.000031.
[28]
王璐. 36份观赏海棠的倍性分析与表型多样性评价[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2022. DOI: 10.27741/d.cnki.ghbkj.2022.000109.
WANG L. Ploidy analysis and phenotypic diversity evaluation of 36 ornamental crabapple[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2022. DOI: 10.27741/d.cnki.ghbkj.2022.000109.
[29]
张斌斌, 蔡志翔, 沈志军, 等. 观赏桃种质资源表型性状多样性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11):2406-2420.
ZHANG B B, CAI Z X, SHEN Z J, et al. Diversity analysis of phenotypic characters in germplasm resources of ornamental peaches[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11):2406-2420.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.013.
[30]
秦宇, 郝瑞鑫, 李若晴, 等. 山楂种质资源表型性状多样性分析及评价[J]. 果树学报, 2022, 39(10):1759-1773.
QIN Y, HAO R X, LI R Q, et al. Diversity analysis of phenotypic characters in germplasm resources of hawthorn[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2022, 39(10):1759-1773.DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20220102.
[31]
林存学, 杨晓华, 刘海荣. 东北寒地96份李种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(10):1917-1929.
LIN C X, YANG X H, LIU H R. Genetic diversity analysis of 96 plum germplasm resources by phenotypic traits in northeast cold area[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(10):1917-1929. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0982.
[32]
张莹, 曹玉芬, 霍宏亮, 等. 基于花表型性状的梨种质资源多样性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(7):1245-1256.
ZHANG Y, CAO Y F, HUO H L, et al. Research on diversity of pear germplasm resources based on flowers phenotype traits[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43(7):1245-1256. DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0936.
[33]
魏晓羽, 刘红, 瞿辉, 等. 158份春兰种质资源的表型多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(2):398-411.
WEI X Y, LIU H, QU H, et al. Phenotypic diversity analysis of 158 Cymbidium goeringii germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(2):398-411.DOI: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20211027001.
[34]
冯园园, 李清莹, 黄均华, 等. 25个彩叶桂无性系(品种)的数量分类研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):107-115.
FENG Y Y, LI Q Y, HUANG J H, et al. Numerical classification of 25 color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans clones (cultivars)[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Scien-ces Edition), 2021, 45(1):107-115.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911045.
[35]
陈恒新. 山东海棠品种分类与资源利用研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2007.
CHEN H X. Research on the cultivars classification and resources utilization of crabapple (Malus spp.) in Shandong[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2007.
[36]
刘月. 观赏海棠叶花果表型变异及果实宿存相关的乙烯、脱落酸和ACO1基因研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2020.DOI: 10.27741/d.cnki.ghbkj.2020.000020.
LIU Y. Phenotypic variation of ornamental crabapple and persistent fruit of abscisic acid,ethylene,ACO1 gene[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2020.DOI: 10.27741/d.cnki.ghbkj.2020.000020.

基金

江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目(LYKJ[2024]03)

编辑: 吴祝华
PDF(1783 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/