罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309015

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 245-254.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309015

罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素

孔凡斌¹^,²(), 金晨涛¹, 徐彩瑶¹^,^*()

1.浙江农林大学浙江省乡村振兴研究院/“千万工程”研究院,浙江农林大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州 311300
2.南京林业大学数字林业与绿色发展研究院,南京林业大学经济管理学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2023-09-10 修回日期:2024-02-21 出版日期:2025-01-30 发布日期:2025-01-21
通讯作者: * 徐彩瑶(caiyao@126.com),副教授。
作者简介:
孔凡斌(kongfanbin@aliyun.com),教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42071283);国家自然科学基金项目(42371294);国家自然科学基金项目(42301328)

Changes in the coupling coordination relationship between ecosystem services and residents’ well-being and its influencing factors in the Luoxiao Mountain area

KONG Fanbin¹^,²(), JIN Chentao¹, XU Caiyao¹^,^*()

1. Rural Revitalization Academy of Zhejiang Province/Green Rural Revival Program Academy, College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2. Institute of Digital Forestry and Green Development, College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2023-09-10 Revised:2024-02-21 Online:2025-01-30 Published:2025-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】厘清生态资源富集的原集中连片特困地区生态系统服务供给水平与居民福祉水平之间耦合协调关系变化及其关键影响因素,为类似特定地区制定依托生态资源实现共同富裕的发展规划和政策提供科学依据。【方法】以江西、湖南交界处罗霄山原集中连片特困地区为研究对象,构建居民福祉水平的评价指标体系,借助InVEST模型计算生态系统服务供给水平,采用耦合协调度模型和计量回归模型分析罗霄山地区2000—2020年生态系统服务供给水平与居民福祉水平耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素。【结果】①罗霄山地区的水源涵养、土壤保持与固碳服务供给水平均缓慢下降且呈不同空间分布态势。②居民福祉水平呈上升态势,增幅达181%。③水源涵养、土壤保持以及固碳服务供给水平与居民福祉水平耦合协调关系均呈下降趋势。④人均耕地面积、规模以上工业企业个数和社会福利院床位数对罗霄山地区的生态系统服务供给水平与居民福祉水平的耦合协调关系变化有正向影响。【结论】在生态资源富集的特定地区,应建立健全生态系统服务及产品价值产业转化机制,大力发展规模以上生态工业产业,并依托生态资源优势做大做强,积极吸收当地居民就业,带动居民收入持续增长,以此改善两个系统的协调关系。

关键词: 生态系统服务供给, 居民福祉水平, InVEST模型, 耦合协调, 罗霄山地区

Abstract:

【Objective】 In order to clarify the coupling coordination relationship between the ecosystem services provision level and well-being level of residents, along with its key influencing factors in ecological resource-rich, former concentrate contiguous special hardship areas, a scientific basis is provided for these areas to formulate development plans and policies aimed at realizing common prosperity based on ecological resources. 【Method】 An evaluation index system for residents’ well-being level was constructed by focusing on the former concentrated contiguous special hardship areas in the Luoxiao Mountain area as the research subject. The ecosystem services provision level was determined using the InVEST model, and the coupling coordination relationship between the ecosystem services provision level and residents’ well-being level, as well as its influencing factors during the period from 2000 to 2020 in the Luoxiao Mountain area, was analyzed utilizing the coupling coordination degree model and econometric regression model. 【Result】 (1) The water conservation, soil conservation, and carbon sequestration services in the Luoxiao Mountain area were slowly decreasing and exhibit varying spatial distributions. (2) The residents’ well-being level increased by 181%. (3) The supply levels of water conservation, soil conservation, and carbon sequestration services, along with the population’s well-being, show a coupling coordination relationship, although with a downward trend. (4) Per capita cultivated land area, the number of industrial enterprises above a large scale, and the number of beds in social welfare centers positively influenceed changes in the coupling coordination relationship between the ecosystem services provision level and the well-being level of residents in the Luoxiao Mountain area. 【Conclusion】A robust mechanism for the industrial transformation of ecosystem services and product values should be established. Ecological industrial enterprises above scale must be vigorously developed, capitalizing on ecological resource advantages. Local residents should be actively employed, contributing to the sustained growth of their incomes to enhance the coordinated relationship between the two systems.

Key words: ecosystem services provision, residents’ well-being level, InVEST model, coupling coordination, Luoxiao Mountains area

中图分类号:

S718
F323

孔凡斌,金晨涛,徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.

KONG Fanbin, JIN Chentao, XU Caiyao. Changes in the coupling coordination relationship between ecosystem services and residents’ well-being and its influencing factors in the Luoxiao Mountain area[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 49(1): 245-254.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309015.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

参考文献 42

[1]	黄承伟. 论乡村振兴与共同富裕的内在逻辑及理论议题[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(6):1-9.
	HUANG C W. On the internal logic and theoretical issues of rural revitalization and common prosperity[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2021, 21(6):1-9.DOI: 10.19714/j.cnki.1671-7465.2021.0084.
[2]	张晓宁, 李晓丹, 年丽丽, 等. 基于文献计量的草地生态系统水源涵养功能研究现状[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6):35-49.
	ZHANG X N, LI X D, NIAN L L, et al. A bibliometric evaluation of the status of the water conservation function of grassland ecosystems[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2022, 31(6):35-49.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021160.
[3]	杨雪婷, 邱孝枰, 徐云, 等. 典型山区生态系统服务对居民福祉影响的空间差异及动态特征:以川西山区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19):7555-7567.
	YANG X T, QIU X P, XU Y, et al. Spatial heterogeneity and dynamic features of the ecosystem services influence on human wellbeing in the west Sichuan Mountain areas[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(19):7555-7567.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202005261347.
[4]	COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387:253-260.DOI: 10.1038/387253a0.
[5]	REID W V, MOONEY H A, CROPPER A, et al. Ecosystems and human well-being-Synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[6]	景海超, 刘颖慧, 贺佩, 等. 青藏高原典型区生态系统服务空间异质性及其影响因素:以那曲市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(7):2657-2673.
	JING H C, LIU Y H, HE P, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and it’s influencing factors in typical areas of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:a case study of Nagqu City[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(7):2657-2673.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202104140965.
[7]	XU Z H, WEI H J, FAN W G, et al. Relationships between ecosystem services and human well-being changes based on carbon flow: a case study of the Manas River basin,Xinjiang,China[J]. Ecosyst Serv, 2019, 37:100934.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100934.
[8]	PEDERSEN E, WEISNER S E B, JOHANSSON M. Wetland areas’ direct contributions to residents’ well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 646:1315-1326.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.236.
[9]	YANG S Q, ZHAO W W, PEREIRA P, et al. Socio-cultural valuation of rural and urban perception on ecosystem services and human well-being in Yanhe watershed of China[J]. J Environ Manage, 2019, 251:109615.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109615.
[10]	YEE S H. Contributions of ecosystem services to human well-being in Puerto Rico[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(22):1-38.DOI: 10.3390/su12229625.
[11]	ZHANG Z P, XIA F Q, YANG D G, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics in ecosystem service value and its interaction with human activities in Xinjiang,China[J]. Ecol Indic, 2020, 110:105826.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105826.
[12]	戚丽萍, 栾兆擎, 魏勉, 等. 基于土地利用的江苏省各市生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4):200-208.
	QI L P, LUAN Z Q, WEI M, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service values in Jiangsu Province based on land-use change[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2023, 47(4):200-208.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109012.
[13]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1740-1746.
	XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resour Sci, 2015, 37(9):1740-1746.
[14]	李昂, 杨琰瑛, 师荣光, 等. 居民福祉及其与生态系统服务的关系研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5):948-957.
	LI A, YANG Y Y, SHI R G, et al. Research progress on human well-being and its relationship with ecosystem services[J]. J Agric Resour Environ, 2022, 39(5):948-957.DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2021.0372.
[15]	郑德凤, 王燕燕, 曹永强, 等. 基于生态系统服务的生态福祉分类与时空格局:以中国地级及以上城市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(6):1110-1122.
	ZHENG D F, WANG Y Y, CAO Y Q, et al. Classification and spatiotemporal patterns of ecological well-being based on ecosystem services:taking China’s prefecture-level and above cities for example[J]. Resour Sci, 2020, 42(6):1110-1122.DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.06.09.
[16]	柳冬青, 张金茜, 巩杰, 等. 陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度-生态系统服务-人类福祉时空关系研究:以安定区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2):637-648.
	LIU D Q, ZHANG J Q, GONG J, et al. Spatial and temporal relations among land-use intensity, ecosystem services,and human well-being in the Longzhong Loess Hilly region:a case study of the Anding District,Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(2):637-648.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201712042187.
[17]	张继飞, 邓伟, 朱昌丽, 等. 岷江上游生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关联及其动态特征[J]. 山地学报, 2017, 35(3):388-398.
	ZHANG J F, DENG W, ZHU C L, et al. Spatial relationship and its dynamic features of ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the upper reaches of Minjiang River[J]. Mt Res, 2017, 35(3):388-398.DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000235.
[18]	冯伟林, 李树茁, 李聪. 生态系统服务与人类福祉:文献综述与分析框架[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(7):1482-1489.
	FENG W L, LI S Z, LI C. Overview and frame work for ecosystem services and human well-being[J]. Resour Sci, 2013, 35(7):1482-1489.
[19]	杨莉, 甄霖, 李芬, 等. 黄土高原生态系统服务变化对人类福祉的影响初探[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5):849-855.
	YANG L, ZHEN L, LI F, et al. Impacts of ecosystem services change on human well-being in the Loess Plateau[J]. Resour Sci, 2010, 32(5):849-855.
[20]	刘家根, 黄璐, 严力蛟. 生态系统服务对人类福祉的影响:以浙江省桐庐县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(5):1687-1697.
	LIU J G, HUANG L, YAN L J. Influence of ecosystem services on human well-being:a case study of Tonglu County,Zhejiang Province,China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(5):1687-1697.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201611272422.
[21]	周昱辰, 尹丹, 黄庆旭, 等. 基于生态系统服务参与式制图的 “三生” 空间优化建议:以白洋淀流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(8):1988-2003.
	ZHOU Y C, YIN D, HUANG Q X, et al. Spatial optimization based on ecosystem services and the participatory mapping:a case study in Baiyangdian watershed[J]. J Nat Resour, 2022, 37(8):1988-2003.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220805.
[22]	乔旭宁, 张婷, 杨永菊, 等. 渭干河流域生态系统服务的空间溢出及对居民福祉的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(3):533-544.
	QIAO X N, ZHANG T, YANG Y J, et al. Spatial flow of ecosystem services and impacts on human well-being in the Weigan River basin[J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(3):533-544.DOI: 10.18402/resci.2017.03.15.
[23]	徐建英, 王清, 魏建瑛. 卧龙自然保护区生态系统服务福祉贡献评估:当地居民的视角[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(20):7348-7358.
	XU J Y, WANG Q, WEI J Y. Assessment of the contribution to human well-being by ecosystem services in Wolong Natural Reserve from the perspective of local communities[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(20):7348-7358.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201708241525.
[24]	代光烁, 娜日苏, 董孝斌, 等. 内蒙古草原人类福祉与生态系统服务及其动态变化:以锡林郭勒草原为例[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(9):2422-2430.
	DAI G S, NA R S, DONG X B, et al. The dynamic change of herdsmen well-being and ecosystem services in grassland of Inner Mongolia:take Xilinguole League as example[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34(9):2422-2430.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306071421.
[25]	李南洁, 曹国勇, 何丙辉, 等. 农户福祉与生态系统服务变化关系研究:以重庆市武陵—秦巴连片特困区为例[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(7):136-142.
	LI N J, CAO G Y, HE B H, et al. On the relationship between the change in farmer wellbeing and ecosystem services: a case study of Wuling-Qinba contiguous destitute areas in Chongqing[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 39(7):136-142.DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.07.021.
[26]	孔凡斌, 徐彩瑶, 陈胜东, 等. 中国生态扶贫共建共享机制研究[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022.
	KONG F B, XU C Y, CHEN S D, et al. Study on co-construction and sharing mechanism of ecological poverty alleviation in China[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2022.
[27]	任娟, 赵雪雁, 徐省超, 等. 黄河中游地区生态系统服务的时空演变及权衡与协同关系研究[J]. 地球环境学报, 2022, 13(4):477-490.
	REN J, ZHAO X Y, XU S C, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution,tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in the middle Yellow River[J]. J Earth Environ, 2022, 13(4):477-490.DOI: 10.7515/JEE222019.
[28]	燕玲玲, 巩杰, 徐彩仙, 等. 子午岭地区土壤保持服务时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):188-197.
	YAN L L, GONG J, XU C X, et al. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of soil conservation service in Ziwuling area[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 35(1):188-197.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.01.028.
[29]	刘迎春, 高显连, 付超, 等. 基于森林资源清查数据估算中国森林生物量固碳潜力[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(11):4002-4010.
	LIU Y C, GAO X L, FU C, et al. Estimation of carbon sequestration potential of forest biomass in China based on National Forest Resources Inventory[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(11):4002-4010.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201805071016.
[30]	李文青, 赵雪雁, 杜昱璇, 等. 秦巴山区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合关系的时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(10):2522-2540.
	LI W Q, ZHAO X Y, DU Y X, et al. Spatio-temporal changes of the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and residents’ well-being in Qinba Mountains area[J]. J Nat Resour, 2021, 36(10):2522-2540.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211006.
[31]	李魁明, 姚罗兰, 石云, 等. 黄河流域城乡居民福祉测度及其时空演变[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(11):222-229.
	LI K M, YAO L L, SHI Y, et al. Estimate well-being of urban and rural residents in the Yellow River basin and its spatial-temporal evolution[J]. Ecol Econ, 2022, 38(11):222-229.
[32]	林珊珊, 徐康宁. 长江经济带高质量发展的时空差异与演变特征:兼与其他重大战略区域的比较[J]. 南京社会科学, 2022(9):44-54.
	LIN S S, XU K N. Spatial-temporal difference and evolution rule of high-quality development in the Yangtze River economic belt:comparison with other major strategic regions[J]. Nanjing J Soc Sci, 2022(9):44-54.DOI: 10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2022.09.005.
[33]	申云, 尹业兴, 钟鑫. 共同富裕视域下我国农村居民生活质量测度及其时空演变[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 43(2):103-114.
	SHEN Y, YIN Y X, ZHONG X. The measurement of the quality of life of rural residents in China and its temporal and spatial evolution from the perspective of common prosperity[J]. J Southwest Minzu Univ (Humanit Soc Sci), 2022, 43(2):103-114.
[34]	霍冉, 徐向阳, 高俊莲, 等. 煤炭资源型城市生态系统服务空间特征及其与居民福祉关系[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(1):31-39.
	HUO R, XU X Y, GAO J L, et al. Spatial patterns of ecosystem services and their relationships with residents’ well-being of coal resource-based cities[J]. Chin J Soil Sci, 2020, 51(1):31-39.DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2020.01.05.
[35]	吴隽宇, 江伟康, 黄钰婷. 粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值时空演变研究[J]. 南方建筑, 2022(6):52-61.
	WU J Y, JIANG W K, HUANG Y T. Spatial-temporal changes of ecosystem service value in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area[J]. South Archit, 2022(6):52-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2022.06.007.
[36]	赵雪雁, 杜昱璇, 李花, 等. 黄河中游城镇化与生态系统服务耦合关系的时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1):131-147.
	ZHAO X Y, DU Y X, LI H, et al. Spatio-temporal changes of the coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services in the middle Yellow River[J]. J Nat Resour, 2021, 36(1):131-147.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210109.
[37]	徐晶园, 圣倩倩, 王伟希, 等. 南京典型城市道路植物多样性与土壤因子的耦合关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(6):119-126.
	XU J Y, SHENG Q Q, WANG W X, et al. Modeling the degree of coupling relationship between plant community diversity and soil properties on typical urban roads in Nanjing[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(6):119-126.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006063.
[38]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1):149-158.
	YUE W Z, HOU L, XIA H X, et al. Territorially ecological restoration zoning and optimization strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia,China:based on the balance of ecosystem service supply and demand[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2022, 33(1):149-158.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.024.
[39]	肖沁霖, 肖黎明. 居民福祉视角下城市生态治理效率的溢出效应:基于长三角城市群的检验[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(5):149-155.
	XIAO Q L, XIAO L M. Spillover effect of urban ecological governance efficiency from the perspective of human well-being:based on the test of the Yangtze River delta urban agglomerations[J]. Areal Res Dev, 2021, 40(5):149-155.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2021.05.025.
[40]	陶晓燕, 吴战勇, 李晓方, 等. 煤炭资源枯竭城市转型发展绩效测度及障碍因子分析:以焦作市为例[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(4):94-100.
	TAO X Y, WU Z Y, LI X F, et al. Analysis of performance measurement and obstacle factors in transformation and development of coal-exhausted cities:a case study of Jiaozuo City[J]. Ecol Econ, 2022, 38(4):94-100.
[41]	朱慧劼, 姚兆余. 多学科视野下的农村养老:理论分析与路径探究:人口老龄化与农村养老服务体系建设高层论坛综述[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(3):177-184.
	ZHU H J, YAO Z Y. Old-age care in rural areas from a multidisciplinary perspective:theoretical analysis and path exploration: the symposium on population aging and the construction of rural old-age care service system[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2022, 22(3):177-184.DOI: 10.19714/j.cnki.1671-7465.2022.0043.
[42]	张宜红. 集中连片特困地区农户对生态补偿扶贫的满意度及其影响因素研究:基于罗霄山片区3县的调研[J]. 生态经济, 2021, 37(12):128-134,169.
	ZHANG Y H. Study on the satisfaction of households to ecological compensation for poverty alleviation and its influencing factors in concentrated poverty-stricken areas:based on a survey of 3 counties in Luoxiao Mountain area[J]. Ecol Econ, 2021, 37(12):128-134,169.

一级指标 sub-system	二级指标 specific indicator	权重 weight	表征意义 symbolic meaning
收入income	农民纯收入	0.14	研究区整体收入水平
	城镇居民收入	0.10
物质需求material needs	肉类人均占有量	0.11	研究区最基本的物质需求
	蔬菜人均占有量	0.11
精神文化apiritual culture	大学学历以下学生数占总在校人数比	0.14	最基础的精神文化水平, 反映基层教育事业发展的规模
	人均粮食产量	0.05	研究区安全与健康水平,分别反映粮食安全情况、医疗设施水平和生态安全水平
安全与健康safety and health	每万人医院、卫生院床位数	0.20
	森林覆盖率	0.15

生态系统服务供给 ecosystem services provision	居民福祉水平 residents’ well-being level	不同年份D值 D values for different years
生态系统服务供给 ecosystem services provision	居民福祉水平 residents’ well-being level	2000	2005	2010	2015	2020
水源涵养 water conservation	收入	0.467	0.453	0.589	0.576	0.499
	物质需求	0.543	0.513	0.468	0.473	0.497
	精神文化	0.587	0.503	0.481	0.512	0.506
	安全与健康	0.536	0.493	0.487	0.467	0.521
土壤保持 soil conservation	收入	0.422	0.433	0.595	0.579	0.496
	物质需求	0.478	0.487	0.472	0.473	0.479
	精神文化	0.517	0.466	0.469	0.497	0.485
	安全与健康	0.481	0.463	0.472	0.448	0.500
固碳服务 carbon sequestration service	收入	0.471	0.480	0.646	0.619	0.554
	物质需求	0.548	0.543	0.516	0.510	0.550
	精神文化	0.592	0.532	0.527	0.547	0.560
	安全与健康	0.540	0.522	0.535	0.499	0.577

变量 variable	耦合协调关系 level of coupling relationship		随机效应 stochastic effect
变量 variable	系数 coefficient	标准误 SE	系数 coefficient	标准误 SE
lnX₁	0.209^*	0.116	0.113	0.110
lnX₂	-0.087	0.080	-0.083^*	0.046
lnX₃	0.075^*	0.042	0.072^*	0.043
lnX₄	-0.047	0.047	-0.061	0.047
lnX₅	-0.172	0.173	-0.119	0.173
lnX₆	0.090	0.114	0.058	0.102
lnX₇	0.063^**	0.030	0.060^**	0.003
常数项constant	-3.884^***	0.913	-2.263^***	0.730

罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素

Changes in the coupling coordination relationship between ecosystem services and residents’ well-being and its influencing factors in the Luoxiao Mountain area

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 42

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	吕程翔, 胡秀艳, 武洋, 殷齐琪, 张志飞, 秦文栋, 王君櫹, 周生路. 基于供需可达性空间耦合的生态优化分区和管控研究——以常州市金坛区为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 210-216.
[2]	杨宇萍, 陈彩虹, 佘济云, 林楚璇, 肖芬, 陈楚琳. 多情景模拟下县域生境质量时空演变预测——以桃源县为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 201-209.
[3]	赵晓雨, 王益明, 何旭, 刘小燕, 张佳敏, 邓懿, 冯耀, 初磊, 张增信. 基于InVEST模型的无锡市生境质量变化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(5): 165-172.
[4]	张莹, 王让会, 刘春伟, 周丽敏. 祁连山自然保护区生境质量模拟及预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 135-144.
[5]	杨宇萍, 胡文敏, 贾冠宇, 李果, 李毅. 基于InVEST与ANN-CA模型的环洞庭湖区土地利用碳储量情景模拟[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 175-184.
[6]	朱志洪, 周本智, 王懿祥, 祁军, 李爱博, 黄润霞. 近30年千岛湖流域产水量时空变化及其影响因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 111-119.
[7]	张育诚, 韩念龙, 胡珂, 于淼, 黎兴强. 海南岛中部山区土地利用变化对碳储量时空分异的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 115-122.
[8]	李潇, 杨加猛, 陈禹衡, 毛岭峰, 葛之葳. 基于土地利用变化的江苏盐城湿地自然保护区生境质量评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 169-176.
[9]	李朝洪,赵晓红. 黑龙江省森工国有林区生态建设与经济转型协调发展研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 144-152.
[10]	范立红,朱建华,李奇,冯源,肖文发. 三峡库区土地利用/覆被变化对碳储量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(04): 53-60.
[11]	韩会庆,罗绪强,游仁龙,罗晓珊,陈瑶. 基于InVEST模型的贵州省珠江流域水质净化功能分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(05): 87-92.