钱江源-百山祖国家公园生态补偿机制与标准研究

姚鸿文; 王世红; 朱程昊; 李佐晖; 程凌宏; 练吉禾; 林杰

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309044

姚鸿文, 王世红, 朱程昊, 李佐晖, 程凌宏, 练吉禾, 林杰

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5) : 21-27.

PDF(1433 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1433 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5) : 21-27. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309044

专题报道:自然保护地森林生态系统研究

钱江源-百山祖国家公园生态补偿机制与标准研究

姚鸿文 ¹ ,
王世红 ² ,
朱程昊 ¹ ,
李佐晖 ¹^,^* ,
程凌宏 ³ ,
练吉禾 ⁴ ,
林杰 ⁵

作者信息 +

Research on the ecological compensation mechanism and standards for Qianjiangyuan-Baishanzu National Park

YAO Hongwen ¹ ,
WANG Shihong ² ,
ZHU Chenghao ¹ ,
LI Zuohui ¹^,^* ,
CHENG Linghong ³ ,
LIAN Jihe ⁴ ,
LIN Jie ⁵

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】建立完善的生态补偿机制与标准,为国家公园建设提供持续稳定的资金保障。【方法】以钱江源-百山祖国家公园为例,从森林生态系统调节服务功能和机会成本损失两方面入手,计算钱江源-百山祖国家公园范围内外的省级公益林调节服务价值和机会成本损失价值,分析范围内外两项价值差异,并在此基础上提出钱江源-百山祖国家公园生态补偿标准。【结果】研究区内省级以上公益林调节服务功能单位面积价值量为45 672.53元/(hm²·a),比范围外高13 306.25元/(hm²·a),以此作为生态补偿标准上限;木材经营收益、竹林经营收益和林下经济经营收益构成的机会成本损失价值为1 564.48元/(hm²·a),以此作为生态补偿标准下限,相比当前补偿最高标准[723.00元/(hm²·a)]仍有841.48元/(hm²·a)的差距。【结论】当前钱江源-百山祖国家公园实施的生态补偿标准和本研究测算结果仍有较大的差距,未来应该结合钱江源-百山祖国家公园实际发展需求,逐步逐年提高补偿标准。

Abstract

【Objective】The study aims to establish a sound ecological compensation standard, which will provide a sustainable and stable financial guarantee for the construction of national parks. 【Method】 Taking the Qianjiangyuan-Baishanzu National Park as an example, this study calculated the upper and lower range of the national park compensation standard by comparing the difference values of provincial public welfare forests inside and outside the national park with regulating services and opportunity cost losses. 【Result】 Considering the value of forest ecosystem regulation services and opportunity cost losses comprehensively, the value of provincial public welfare forests within the national park reached 47 237.01 yuan/(hm²·a).Among them, the value of provincial public welfare forests regulating service function was 45 672.53 yuan/(hm²·a), which was 13 306.25 yuan/(hm²·a) higher than outside the scope, and the value of each regulating service was higher than that outside the implementation area. The opportunity cost loss of public welfare forests within the national park was 1 564.48 yuan/(hm²·a), which still showed a gap of 841.48 yuan/(hm²·a) compared with the current highest compensation standard of 723 yuan/(hm²·a) of the provincial public welfare forests. 【Conclusion】 At present, there was still a large gap between the ecological compensation standard implemented in Qianjiangyuan-Baisanzu National Park and that calculated based on the regulating service unit area and opportunity cost. In the future, we suggest that the compensation standard be gradually increased year by year, taking into account the actual development needs of the National Park.

导出引用

姚鸿文, 王世红, 朱程昊, 等. 钱江源-百山祖国家公园生态补偿机制与标准研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2024, 48(5): 21-27 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309044

YAO Hongwen, WANG Shihong, ZHU Chenghao, et al. Research on the ecological compensation mechanism and standards for Qianjiangyuan-Baishanzu National Park[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(5): 21-27 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202309044

中图分类号： S757.2

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	SALZMAN J, BENNETT G, CARROLL N, et al. The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services[J]. Nat Sustain, 2018, 1: 136-144. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	VAN HECKEN G, BASTIAENSEN J. Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view[J]. Environ Sci Policy, 2010, 13(8): 785-792. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.006. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	董海宾, 刘思博, BOLORMAA D, 等. 基于CiteSpace的国内生态补偿研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(20): 8521-8529. DONG H B, LIU S B, BOLORMAA D, et al. Study on domestic ecological compensation based on CiteSpace[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(20): 8521-8529. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202109082529. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	LUNDBERG L, PERSSON U M, ALPIZAR F, et al. Context matters: exploring the cost-effectiveness of fixed payments and procurement auctions for PES[J]. Ecol Econ, 2018, 146: 347-358. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.021. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	李晓光, 苗鸿, 郑华, 等. 生态补偿标准确定的主要方法及其应用[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8): 4431-4440. LI X G, MIAO H, ZHENG H, et al. Main methods for setting ecological compensation standard and their application[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(8): 4431-4440. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.08.050. 本文引用 [2]

[6]	吴乐, 孔德帅, 靳乐山. 中国生态保护补偿机制研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 1-8. WU L, KONG D S, JIN L S. Research on the progress of the eco-compensation mechanism in China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(1): 1-8. DOI:10.5846/stxb201808281842. 本文引用 [2]

[7]	夏云娇, 王俊华. 国家公园生态补偿地方立法的特点和不足及其完善[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(2): 35-41. XIA Y J, WANG J H. Local legislation on ecological compensation in National Parks: characteristics,deficiencies and countermeasures[J]. Saf Environ Eng, 2020, 27(2): 35-41. DOI: 10.13578/j.cnki.issn.1671-1556.2020.02.005. 本文引用 [1]

[8]

刘富国, 李姣, 汪杰, 等. 南山国家公园生态补偿标准研究: 基于生态系统服务功能价值和机会成本[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2019, 46(5): 9-16.

LIU

F G

, LI

, WANG

, et al. Research on ecological compensation standard of Nanshan National Park: based on ecosystem service value and opportunity cost[J]. Hunan For Sci Technol, 2019, 46(5): 9-16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2019.05.002.

本文引用 [2]

[9]	赵淼峰, 黄德林. 国家公园生态补偿主体的建构研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2019, 26(1): 26-34, 41. ZHAO M F, HUANG D L. Construction of ecological compensation subject in National Parks[J]. Saf Environ Eng, 2019, 26(1): 26-34, 41. DOI: 10.13578/j.cnki.issn.1671-1556.2019.01.004. 本文引用 [2]

[10]	闫海明, 张瑜, 李炜, 等. 生态补偿标准估算方法研究进展[J]. 河北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5): 533-540. YAN H M, ZHANG Y, LI W, et al. Review of methods to estimate the ecological compensation standard[J]. J Hebei Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2022, 46(5): 533-540. DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.nse.202205011. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	王振波, 于杰, 刘晓雯. 生态系统服务功能与生态补偿关系的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(6): 17-22. WANG Z B, YU J, LIU X W. Research on the relationship between ecosystem services and ecological compensation[J]. China Popul Resour Environ, 2009, 19(6): 17-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.06.004. 本文引用 [1]

[12]

武萍, 张慧. 三江源国家公园生态补偿适度标准评估: 基于生态系统服务价值供给的视角[J]. 青海社会科学, 2022(1): 50-58.

, ZHANG

. Evaluation of appropriate criteria for ecological compensation in Sanjiangyuan National Park: based on the supply of ecosystem service value[J]. Qinghai Soc Sci, 2022(1): 50-58. DOI: 10.14154/j.cnki.qss.2022.01.009.

本文引用 [1]

[13]	柳荻, 胡振通, 靳乐山. 生态保护补偿的分析框架研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 380-392. LIU D, HU Z T, JIN L S. Review on analytical framework of eco-compensation[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(2): 380-392. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201605281028. 本文引用 [1]

[14]

吴娜, 宋晓谕, 康文慧, 等. 不同视角下基于InVEST模型的流域生态补偿标准核算: 以渭河甘肃段为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(7): 2512-2522.

, SONG

X Y

, KANG

W H

, et al. Standard of payment for ecosystem services in a watershed based on InVEST model under different standpoints: a case study of the Weihe River in Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(7): 2512-2522. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201704130664.

本文引用 [1]

[15]	谭秋成. 关于生态补偿标准和机制[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(6): 1-6. TAN Q C. Eco-compensation standard and mechanism[J]. China Popul Resour Environ, 2009, 19(6): 1-6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.06.001. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	李屹峰, 罗玉珠, 郑华, 等. 青海省三江源自然保护区生态移民补偿标准[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 764-770. LI Y F, LUO Y Z, ZHENG H, et al. Standard of payments for ecosystem services in Sanjiangyuan Natural Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(3): 764-770. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201205280785. 本文引用 [1]

[17]

王昊天, 陈珂, 王玲. 基于机会成本法的退耕还林生态补偿标准: 以辽西北生态脆弱区为例[J]. 沈阳大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(2): 176-181.

WANG

H T

, CHEN

, WANG

. Eco-compensation standard of sloping land conversion program based on opportunity cost method: taking ecological vulnerable region of northwestern Liaoning as an example[J]. J Shenyang Univ (Soc Sci), 2020, 22(2): 176-181. DOI: 10.16103/j.cnki.21-1582/c.2020.02.010.

本文引用 [1]

[18]

戴家远, 胡淑恒, 张贝尔, 等. 基于机会成本和生态系统服务价值核算的生态补偿标准研究: 以新安江流域为例[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(21): 152-157.

DAI

J Y

, HU

S H

, ZHANG

B E

, et al. Study on ecological compensation standard based on opportunity cost and ecosystem service value accounting: a case study of Xin’an River Basin[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2021, 60(21): 152-157. DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2021.21.033.

本文引用 [2]

[19]	姚鸿文, 陶吉兴, 杜群, 等. 浙江省森林生态服务功能评估与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(4): 13-17. YAO H W, TAO J X, DU Q, et al. Evaluation and analysis of forest ecosystem services in Zhejiang Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2012, 36(4): 13-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2012.04.003. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	国家林业和草原局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	浙江省发展和改革委员会. 生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术规范—陆域生态系统:DB33/T 2274—2020[S]. 杭州: 浙江省市场监督管理局, 2020. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	李少宁. 江西省暨大岗山森林生态系统服务功能研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2007. LI S N. Study on forest ecosystem services in Jiangxi Province and Dagangshan[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2007. 本文引用 [1]

[23]

刘玉莉, 江洪, 周国模, 等. 安吉毛竹林水汽通量变化特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(17): 4900-4909.

LIU

Y L

, JIANG

, ZHOU

G M

, et al. Water vapor flux variation characteristic and the relationship with its environment factors in Phyllostachys edulis forest in Anji[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34(17): 4900-4909. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201301050025.

[24]	唐小燕. 钱江源典型森林类型地表径流和土壤侵蚀特征研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2012. TANG X Y. Characteristics of runoff and soil erosion of typical forest types in the source of Qiantang River[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University, 2012. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	袁位高, 江波, 葛永金, 等. 浙江省重点公益林生物量模型研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2009, 29(2): 1-5. YUAN W G, JIANG B, GE Y J, et al. Study on biomass model of key ecological forest in Zhejiang Province[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2009, 29(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2009.02.001. 本文引用 [3]

[26]	浙江省林业科学研究院. 浙江省公益林建设与效益评价技术报告[R]. 杭州: 浙江省林业科学研究院, 2021. Zhejiang Academy of Forestry Sciences. Technical report on the construction and benefit evaluation of public welfare forests in Zhejiang Province[R]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Academy of Forestry Science, 2021. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	国家发展和改革委员会, 国家统计局. 生态产品总值核算规范[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2023. National Development and Reform Commission, National Bureau of Statistics. Technical specification for gross ecosystem product accounting[M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2023. 本文引用 [2]

[28]	陶吉兴, 杜群, 季碧勇. 浙江森林碳汇功能监测[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014. TAO J X, DU Q, JI B Y. The forest carbon sequestration function monitoring in Zhejiang[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2014. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	国家林业局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:LY/T 1721—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. National Forestry Adnimistration. Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services in China: LY/T 1721—2008[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008. 本文引用 [1]