“双循环”背景下嵌入全球价值链对出口林产品质量的影响

熊立春; 张智国; 程宝栋; 王凤婷; 徐晨莹

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310017

熊立春, 张智国, 程宝栋, 王凤婷, 徐晨莹

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 242-251.

PDF(1435 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1435 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 242-251. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310017

研究论文

“双循环”背景下嵌入全球价值链对出口林产品质量的影响

熊立春 ¹^,² ,
张智国 ¹ ,
程宝栋 ³ ,
王凤婷 ¹^,² ,
徐晨莹 ⁴

作者信息 +

Impact of embedded global value chains on the quality of export forest products in the context of “double cycle”

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】分析嵌入全球价值链如何影响出口林产品质量及其内在作用机制,为国家依托林产品实现高质量发展提供理论和政策参考。【方法】以木质林产品为研究对象,基于ADB-MRI2021数据与联合国粮农组织林产品统计年鉴的数据,分别测算林产品全球价值链参与度指数与出口林产品质量,并结合当前现状运用固定效应模型进行深入实证研究。【结果】①全球价值链参与度对出口林产品的质量具有较为显著的正向影响。②出口国人均GDP、出口国林产品产量与出口国劳动力投入均是影响出口林产品质量的主要因素。③对发达国家而言,全球价值链参与对出口林产品质量影响不大,而对发展中国家而言,全球价值链参与对出口林产品质量的正向影响极为显著。④全球价值链前后向参与度对出口林产品质量皆有显著的正向影响,而后向参与度对于出口林产品质量的正向影响程度更大。【结论】注重“质”的提升,摆脱“低端锁定”;优化人力资本的投入,减少其负面影响;重视全球价值链的后向嵌入,致力于向高附加值环节的价值链方向延伸,推动产品质量的整体提升。

Abstract

【Objective】This study clarifies how embedded global value chains affect the quality of exported forest products and their internal mechanisms and provides theoretical and policy references for countries to achieve high-quality development through reliance on forest products. 【Method】This study focused on wood forest products, calculating the global value chain participation index and the quality of exported forest products based on the data from ADB-MRI2021 and the FAO Statistical Yearbook of Forest Products. It conducted in-depth empirical research using the fixed effect model in conjunction with the current situation. 【Result】(1) Global value chain participation significantly enhanced the quality of exported forest products. (2) The per capita GDP, the output of forest products, and the labor input from exporting countries were the primary factors influencing the quality of exported forest products. (3) For developed countries, global value chain participation had minimal impact on the quality of exported forest products; however, for developing countries, it significantly boosted the quality. (4) Both forward and backward participation in the global value chain significantly improved the quality of exported forest products, with backward participation having a deeper positive impact. 【Conclusion】First, focus on improving “quality” and avoid “low-end locking.” Second, optimize the input of human capital to mitigate its negative effects. Third, emphasize the importance of backward integration into the global value chain and strive to reach high value-added links to enhance overall product quality.

导出引用

熊立春, 张智国, 程宝栋, 等. “双循环”背景下嵌入全球价值链对出口林产品质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2025, 49(2): 242-251 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310017

XIONG Lichun, ZHANG Zhiguo, CHENG Baodong, et al. Impact of embedded global value chains on the quality of export forest products in the context of “double cycle”[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(2): 242-251 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310017

中图分类号： F307.22

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	余淼杰, 张睿. 中国制造业出口质量的准确衡量:挑战与解决方法[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017, 17(2):463-484. YU M J, ZHANG R. Estimating China’s manufacturing export quality:pitfalls and remedy[J]. China Econ Q, 2017, 17(2):463-484.DOI: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2017.01.02. 本文引用 [1]

[2]

熊立春, 李丽, 侯柘, 等. 建设贸易强国背景下中国出口林产品质量水平及国际比较[J]. 世界林业研究, 2023, 36(5):95-100.

XIONG

L C

, LI

, HOU

, et al. Quality level of China’s exported forest products and its international comparison under the background of building a strong country in trade[J]. World For Res, 2023, 36(5):95-100.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2023.0073.y.

本文引用 [2]

[3]

周莹莹, 程宝栋, 尤薇佳, 等. 全球原木贸易网络结构及其危机传播的仿真分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5):192-200.

ZHOU

Y Y

, CHENG

B D

, YOU

W J

, et al. Analysis of global log trade network structure and crisis propagation simulation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(5):192-200.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101040.

本文引用 [2]

[4]	苏蕾, 袁辰. 中国木质林产品全球价值链地位分析:基于出口技术复杂度视角[J]. 林业经济问题, 2018, 38(2):93-97,112. SU L, YUAN C. Global value chain status analysis of China’s woody products from the perspective of export technology complexity[J]. Issues For Econ, 2018, 38(2):93-97,112.DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2018.02.015. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	聂娜, 谢兰兰. 国际贸易框架下出口产品品质的测度方法:研究述评[J]. 经济问题探索, 2017(2):183-190. NIE N, XIE L L. Measurement methods of export product quality under the framework of international trade:a review of research[J]. Inq Econ Issues, 2017(2):183-190. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	王思语, 郑乐凯. 全球价值链嵌入特征对出口技术复杂度差异化的影响[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(5):65-82. WANG S Y, ZHENG L K. The impact of global value chain embedment features on export technical sophistication heterogeneity[J]. J Quant Tech Econ, 2019, 36(5):65-82.DOI: 10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2019.05.004. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	徐建炜, 姚洋. 国际分工新形态、金融市场发展与全球失衡[J]. 世界经济, 2010, 33(3):3-30. XU J W, YAO Y. The new international division of labor,financial integration,and global imbalances[J]. J World Econ, 2010, 33(3):3-30. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	KOOPMAN R, WANG Z, WEI S J. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports[J]. Am Econ Rev, 2014, 104(2):459-494.DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.2.459. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	洪银兴. 关于创新驱动和协同创新的若干重要概念[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2013, 33(5):5-12. HONG Y X. Some conceptions on innovation-driven growth and collaborative innovation[J]. Econ Theory Bus Manag, 2013, 33(5):5-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2013.05.001. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	马丹, 郁霞, 翁作义. 中国制造“低端锁定” 破局之路:基于国内外双循环的新视角[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2021, 36(1):32-46. MA D, YU X, WENG Z Y. Out of the “low-lock” dilemma:based on the new prospective of dual value chain[J]. J Stat Inf, 2021, 36(1):32-46.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2021.01.004. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	郭惠君, 王黎瑶. 全球价值链重构下我国贸易高质量发展的机制及对策[J]. 国际经济合作, 2020(6):87-102. GUO H J, WANG L Y. Analysis on Chinese foreign trade development under the background of global value chain adjustment[J]. J Int Econ Coop, 2020(6):87-102. 本文引用 [1]

[12]

邱斌, 叶龙凤, 孙少勤. 参与全球生产网络对我国制造业价值链提升影响的实证研究:基于出口复杂度的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(1):57-67.

QIU

, YE

L F

, SUN

S Q

. An empirical study on the impact of GPNs on China’s manufacturing industries’ upgrading in global value chains: an analysis from the perspective of ESI[J]. China Ind Econ, 2012(1):57-67.DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2012.01.006.

本文引用 [2]

[13]

李芳芳, 解希玮, 程宝栋. 国际产业转移视角下的劳动力成本与全球价值链参与度:基于多国(地区)制造业部门的门槛效应研究[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 41(6):109-122,200.

F F

, XIE

X W

, CHENG

B D

. The relationship of labor cost and GVCs participation from the perspective of international industrial transfer:based on the research on threshold effect of manufacturing sector in multi countries(regions)[J]. J Soochow Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed), 2020, 41(6):109-122,200.DOI: 10.19563/j.cnki.sdzs.2020.06.013.

本文引用 [1]

[14]	OREFICE G, ROCHA N. Deep integration and production networks:an empirical analysis[J]. World Econ, 2014, 37(1):106-136.DOI: 10.1111/twec.12076. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	MELITZ M J. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity[J]. Econometrica, 2003, 71(6):1695-1725.DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00467. 本文引用 [2]

[16]	HALLAK J C C, SIVADASAN J. Firms’ exporting behavior under quality constraints[J]. NBER Working Paper, 2009, 14928:1-44.DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1444548. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	吕越, 李小萌, 吕云龙. 全球价值链中的制造业服务化与企业全要素生产率[J]. 南开经济研究, 2017(3):88-110. LÜ Y, LI X M, LÜ Y L. Servicification in global value chain and firm’s productivity[J]. Nankai Econ Stud, 2017(3):88-110.DOI: 10.14116/j.nkes.2017.03.006. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	刘维林, 李兰冰, 刘玉海. 全球价值链嵌入对中国出口技术复杂度的影响[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(6):83-95. LIU W L, LI L B, LIU Y H. The impact of global value chain embeddedness on technological sophistication of China’s export[J]. China Ind Econ, 2014(6):83-95.DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2014.06.008. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	樊海潮, 郭光远. 出口价格、出口质量与生产率间的关系:中国的证据[J]. 世界经济, 2015, 38(2):58-85. FAN H C, GUO G Y. The relationship among export price,export quality and productivity:evidence from China[J]. J World Econ, 2015, 38(2):58-85. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	黄永明, 张文洁. 出口复杂度的国外研究进展[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2012(3):167-176. HUANG Y M, ZHANG W J. A review of foreign research in export sophistication[J]. J Int Trade, 2012(3):167-176.DOI: 10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2012.03.016. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	戴翔. 中国服务贸易出口技术复杂度变迁及国际比较[J]. 中国软科学, 2012(2):52-59. DAI X. Evolution of technological level of Chinese service export:an international comparison[J]. China Soft Sci, 2012(2):52-59.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2012.02.007. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	BERRY S T. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation[J]. RAND J Econ, 1994, 25(2):242.DOI: 10.2307/2555829. 本文引用 [3]

[23]	KHANDELWAL A. The long and short (of) quality ladders[J]. Rev Econ Stud, 2010, 77(4):1450-1476.DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937x.2010.00602.x. 本文引用 [2]

[24]	陈丰龙, 徐康宁. 中国出口产品的质量阶梯及其影响因素[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2016(10):15-25. CHEN F L, XU K N. The quality ladders of China’s export and its determinants[J]. J Int Trade, 2016(10):15-25.DOI: 10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2016.10.002. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	施炳展. 中国企业出口产品质量异质性:测度与事实[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014, 14(1):263-284. SHI B Z. The product quality heterogeneity of China firms’ export:measurement and facts[J]. China Econ Q, 2014, 14(1):263-284.DOI: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2014.01.011. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2014:252-254. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	张会清, 翟孝强. 全球价值链、汇率传递与出口贸易弹性[J]. 世界经济研究, 2019(2):85-98,137. ZHANG H Q, ZHAI X Q. Global value chain,exchange rate pass-through and export elasticity[J]. World Econ Stud, 2019(2):85-98,137.DOI: 10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2019.02.008. 本文引用 [1]