干旱对杨树人工林土壤颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的影响

肖若瑜, 阮宏华, 刘晖晖, 方玉, 查全智, 谢友超, 徐亚明, 曹国华, 沈彩芹

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 55-64.

PDF(2378 KB)
PDF(2378 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 55-64. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202312002
专题报道:土壤碳汇与养分元素循环利用研究(执行主编 张金池 薛建辉 阮宏华)

干旱对杨树人工林土壤颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of drought on soil particulate organic carbon and mineral-associated organic carbon in poplar plantation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】全球干旱事件日益频繁,显著影响森林生态系统的结构和功能。研究旨在评估干旱对杨树人工林地不同深度土层颗粒有机碳(POC)和矿物结合态有机碳(MAOC)的影响,为预测未来森林土壤有机碳(SOC)及其稳定性对干旱的响应提供依据。【方法】以江苏东台林场10年生杨树人工林为研究对象,于2018年8月在此设置了隔离穿透雨的3种干旱处理:即空白对照处理(CK)、隔离30%穿透雨的中度干旱(D30%)、隔离50%穿透雨的重度干旱(D50%)。各处理设置3个重复样地,共9块样地。经过连续4年的野外控制实验,于2022年7月、11月,2023年2月、4月,采集各干旱处理样地内的土壤样品,测定生长季(2022年7月)和非生长季(2023年2月)的土壤POC和MAOC含量,以及上述4个时段的总土壤有机碳、可溶性有机碳、微生物生物量碳、易氧化有机碳等土壤理化性质。基于方差分析、相关性分析以及冗余分析,量化干旱胁迫下土壤POC和MAOC含量的变化特征,并分析驱动其含量变化的关键因子。【结果】干旱对土壤POC含量没有显著影响,对土壤MAOC含量的影响受季节、干旱程度和土层深度的制约。具体表现为:在生长季,中度干旱(D30%)显着增加了[0,10)cm表层土的MAOC含量,两种干旱处理(D30%和D50%)均显著降低了[10,20)cm中层土和[20,40)cm下层土的MAOC含量;在非生长季,两种干旱处理(D30%和D50%)均显著降低了表层土的MAOC含量,对中下层土的影响则不显著。从垂直分布上看,总体上土壤POC和MAOC含量随土层加深而显著降低。相关性分析结果表明,POC和MAOC含量与大多数土壤理化性质呈极显著正相关关系(P<0.01),与容重(BD)和碳氮比(C/N)呈极显著负相关关系(P<0.01)。冗余分析结果表明,干旱处理下,土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)是驱动土壤POC和MAOC含量动态变化的关键因子。【结论】干旱对杨树人工林土壤POC含量无显著影响,但显著改变了土壤MAOC含量,其影响效应受季节、干旱程度和土层深度等因素的制约。本研究表明, 在预测未来森林土壤碳库稳定性对干旱的响应时应充分考虑季节、干旱程度和土层深度等因素。

Abstract

【Objective】The increasing frequency of global drought events has significantly affected the structure and function of forest ecosystems. This study aims to estimate the effects of drought on contents of particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) at different soil depths in poplar plantation, providing a theoretical basis for predicting the responses of forest soil organic carbon (SOC) and its stability to drought in the future.【Method】We took a 10-year-old poplar plantation in Dongtai Forest Farm, Jiangsu Province as the research object. In August 2018, three drought treatments for reducing throughfall were set up: i.e., a control treatment (CK), a moderate drought with reduced 30% throughfall (D30%), and a severe drought with reduced 50% throughfall (D50%). Three replicate sample plots were set up for each treatment with a total of nine sample plots. After four consecutive years of field controll experiments, soil samples were collected in July and November 2022, and February and April 2023 in each drought-treated sample plot to determine soil POC and MAOC contents in the growing (July 2022) and non-growing (February 2023) seasons, as well as soil physicochemical properties such as SOC, dissolved organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and readily oxidizable organic carbon in these four periods. Based on ANOVA, correlation analysis, and redundancy analysis, we quantified the characteristics of changes in soil POC and MAOC under drought stress and analyzed the key factors driving the variation in their contents.【Result】Drought had no significant effect on soil POC content, while its impact on soil MAOC content was constrained by season, drought degree and soil depth. Specifically, during the growing season, moderate drought (D30%) significantly increased the MAOC content in the surface soil [0,10)cm, while both drought treatments (D30% and D50%) significantly decreased the MAOC content in the middle soil layer ([10,20)cm) and lower soil layers ([20,40) cm). During the non-growing season, both drought treatments (D30% and D50%) significantly reduced the MAOC content in the surface soil, but had no significant effect on the middle and lower soil layers. Vertically, the soil POC and MAOC content decreased significantly with soil depth. The correlation results showed that POC and MAOC content were significantly and positively correlated with most soil physical and chemical properties, while were significantly and negatively correlated with bulk density and carbon to nitrogen ratio(C/N). Redundancy analysis indicated that soil microbial biomass carbon was the key factor driving the dynamic changes of soil POC and MAOC content under drought.【Conclusion】Drought had no significant effect on soil POC content in the poplar plantation; however, it significantly altered soil MAOC contents, and the effect was constrained by factors such as season, drought degree, and soil depth. This study suggests that when predicting the response of forest soil carbon pool stability to drought in the future, factors such as season, drought degree and soil depth should be fully considered.

关键词

土壤有机碳 / 微生物生物量碳 / 生长季节 / 穿透雨减少 / 杨树人工林

Key words

soil organic carbon / microbial biomass carbon / season of growing / throughfall reduction / poplar plantation

引用本文

导出引用
肖若瑜, 阮宏华, 刘晖晖, . 干旱对杨树人工林土壤颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(5): 55-64 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202312002
XIAO Ruoyu, RUAN Honghua, LIU Huihui, et al. Effects of drought on soil particulate organic carbon and mineral-associated organic carbon in poplar plantation[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(5): 55-64 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202312002
中图分类号: S715.8   

参考文献

[1]
GROVER M, MAHESWARI M, DESAI S, et al. Elevated CO2:plant associated microorganisms and carbon sequestration[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 95:73-85.DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.006.
[2]
KARUNARATNE S B, BISHOP T F A, BALDOCK J A, et al. Catchment scale mapping of measureable soil organic carbon fractions[J]. Geoderma, 2014, 219/220:14-23.DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.005.
[3]
WU Q C, JIANG X H, ZHANG C Z, et al. Accumulation of chemically degraded organic carbon in the soil profile of Chinese fir plantations[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 100(3):245-252.DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2019-0142.
[4]
LIU F T, QIN S Q, FANG K, et al. Divergent changes in particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon upon permafrost thaw[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1):5073.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32681-7.
[5]
LIAO J J, YANG X, DOU Y X, et al. Divergent contribution of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter to soil carbon in grassland[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 344:118536.DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118536.
[6]
习丹, 翁浩东, 胡亚林, 等. 林冠氮添加和林下植被去除对杉木林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(21):8525-8534.
XI D, WENG H D, HU Y L, et al. Effects of canopy nitrogen addition and understory removal on soil organic carbon fractions in a Chinese fir plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(21):8525-8534.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202008162130.
[7]
SOKOL N W, WHALEN E D, JILLING A, et al. Global distribution,formation and fate of mineral-associated soil organic matter under a changing climate:a trait-based perspective[J]. Functional Ecology, 2022, 36(6):1411-1429.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14040.
[8]
HECKMAN K, PRIES C E H, LAWRENCE C R, et al. Beyond bulk:density fractions explain heterogeneity in global soil carbon abundance and persistence[J]. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28(3):1178-1196.DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16023.
[9]
BRUNN M, KRÜGER J, LANG F. Experimental drought increased the belowground sink strength towards higher topsoil organic carbon stocks in a temperate mature forest[J]. Geoderma, 2023, 431:116356.DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116356.
[10]
PAETSCH L, MUELLER C W, KÖGEL-KNABNER I, et al. Effect of in situ aged and fresh biochar on soil hydraulic conditions and microbial C use under drought conditions[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):6852.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25039-x.
[11]
JASSAL R S, BLACK T A, AREVALO C, et al. Carbon sequestration and water use of a young hybrid poplar plantation in north-central Alberta[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2013, 56:323-333.DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.023.
[12]
孙长山. 探索中国森林资源发展现状[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2020, 49(4):22-24,42.
SUN C S. Exploration on the development status of forest resources in China[J]. Forestry Prospect and Design, 2020, 49(4):22-24,42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4505.2020.04.008.
[13]
MAO Y, WU Z Y, HE H, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of drought in a typical plain region based on the soil moisture anomaly percentage index[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 576:752-765.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.116.
[14]
REN T T, YU X Y, LIAO J H, et al. Application of biogas slurry rather than biochar increases soil microbial functional gene signal intensity and diversity in a poplar plantation[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2020, 146:107825.DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107825.
[15]
GE Z W, FANG S Y, CHEN H, et al. Soil aggregation and organic carbon dynamics in poplar plantations[J]. Forests, 2018, 9(9):508.DOI: 10.3390/f9090508.
[16]
PEGUERO G, FOLCH E, LIU L, et al. Divergent effects of drought and nitrogen deposition on microbial and arthropod soil communities in a Mediterranean forest[J]. European Journal Of Soil Biology, 2021, 103:103275.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103275.
[17]
BU X L, GU X Y, ZHOU X Q, et al. Extreme drought slightly decreased soil labile organic C and N contents and altered microbial community structure in a subtropical evergreen forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 429:18-27.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.036.
[18]
黄永梅, 杨智杰, 郭剑芬, 等. 隔离降雨对杉木林土壤可溶性有机碳和微生物生物量碳的影响[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2014, 9(1):38-45.
HUANG Y M, YANG Z J, GUO J F, et al. Effects of rainfall exclusion on soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in a Chinese fir forest[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2014, 9(1):38-45.DOI: 10.19687/j.cnki.1673-7105.2014.01.006.
[19]
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
LU R K. Methods of soil agrochemical analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Scientech Press, 2000.
[20]
TATZBER M, SCHLATTER N, BAUMGARTEN A, et al. KMnO4 determination of active carbon for laboratory routines:three long-term field experiments in Austria[J]. Soil Research, 2015, 53(2):190.DOI: 10.1071/sr14200.
[21]
JONES D, WILLETT V. Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(5):991-999.DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012.
[22]
WU J, JOERGENSEN R G, POMMERENING B, et al. Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction: an automated procedure[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1990, 22(8):1167-1169.DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3.
[23]
CAMBARDELLA C A, ELLIOTT E T. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1992, 56(3):777-783.DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x.
[24]
WANG C T, SUN Y, ZOU X M, et al. Increased fine root production coupled with reduced aboveground production of plantations under a three-year experimental drought[J]. Science of the total environment, 2024, 908:168370.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168370.
[25]
VILLARINO S H, PINTO P, JACKSON R B, et al. Plant rhizodeposition:a key factor for soil organic matter formation in stable fractions[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(16):eabd3176.DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd3176.
[26]
SUN Y, LIU X F, LU S X, et al. Depth-dependent response of particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon to long-term throughfall reduction in a subtropical natural forest[J]. CATENA, 2023, 223:106904.DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106904.
[27]
YANG Y J, LIU S R, SCHINDLBACHER A, et al. Topsoil organic carbon increases but its stability declines after five years of reduced throughfall[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2021, 156:108221.DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108221.
[28]
LUGATO E, LAVALLEE J M, HADDIX M L, et al. Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14:295-300.DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00744-x.
[29]
YANG M Y, YANG N. Comparison of soil active organic carbon fractions in different vegetation zones in purple-soil of hill slope[J]. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 2020, 49(3):541-547.DOI: 10.3329/bjb.v49i3.49637.
[30]
柳敏, 宇万太, 姜子绍, 等. 土壤活性有机碳[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(11):1412-1417.
LIU M, YU W T, JIANG Z S, et al. A research review on soil active organic carbon[J]. Chinese Joural Ecology, 2006, 25(11):1412-1417.
[31]
雷丽群, 卢立华, 农友, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(6):954-960.
LEI L Q, LU L H, NONG Y, et al. Stoichiometry characterization of soil C,N and P of Pinus massoniana plantations at different age stages[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(6):954-960.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.06.010.
[32]
汤靖文, 李晨晞, 彭政淋, 等. 氮磷钾肥对水曲柳雌雄株叶片光合生理及化学计量特征的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (2): 30-38, 46.
TANG J W, LI C X, PENG Z L, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on photosynthetic physiological and stoichiometric characteristics of male and female leaves of Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(2): 30-38, 46. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.02.004
[33]
CANARINI A, CARRILLO Y, MARIOTTE P, et al. Soil microbial community resistance to drought and links to C stabilization in an Australian grassland[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2016, 103:171-180.DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.024.
[34]
SU X, SU X L, YANG S C, et al. Drought changed soil organic carbon composition and bacterial carbon metabolizing patterns in a subtropical evergreen forest[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 736:139568.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139568.
[35]
KAISER M, KLEBER M, BERHE A A. How air-drying and rewetting modify soil organic matter characteristics:an assessment to improve data interpretation and inference[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2015, 80:324-340.DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.018.
[36]
GEORGIOU K, JACKSON R B, VINDUŠKOVÁ O, et al. Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1):3797.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31540-9.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2021YFD2200403)
国家自然科学基金项目(32071594)
江苏省林业局揭榜挂帅项目(LYKJ【2022】01)
江苏省林业局造林专项项目(【2021-2022】)

编辑: 王国栋
PDF(2378 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/