麋鹿野放对盐城滨海湿地土壤生态化学计量特征的影响

陈利, 栾兆擎, 李敏, 李静泰, 刘垚, 张陈岩, 何晓柔, 吴晓威, 吴翠玲

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 38-44.

PDF(1758 KB)
PDF(1758 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 38-44. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202401010
专题报道:土壤碳汇与养分元素循环利用研究(执行主编 张金池 薛建辉 阮宏华)

麋鹿野放对盐城滨海湿地土壤生态化学计量特征的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of wild release of Elaphurus davidianus on soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics of Yancheng coastal wetlands

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究麋鹿(Elaphurus davidianus)活动干扰对盐城滨海湿地土壤生态化学计量特征的影响,了解土壤退化现状,为保护区可持续发展与管理提供科学依据。【方法】以盐城大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区第3核心区为研究对象,结合实地调查结果将第3核心区划分为弱度干扰(Ⅰ)、轻度干扰(Ⅱ)、中度干扰(Ⅲ)、次重度干扰(Ⅳ)、重度干扰(Ⅴ)5个麋鹿干扰等级,通过室内试验对土壤容重(BD)、含水率(WC)、pH、土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)含量进行测定,分析麋鹿不同干扰强度对土壤基本性质及生态化学计量特征的影响。【结果】①随着麋鹿干扰强度的增加,土壤BD先减后增、土壤pH增加,土壤WC、TP、TN含量先增后减,SOC含量呈波动变化趋势。②随着麋鹿干扰强度的增加,土壤碳氮比(C/N)升高,土壤氮磷比(N/P)降低,土壤碳磷比(C/P)呈波动变化。③土壤C/P与SOC,N/P与TN相关性极高,土壤C/N随着麋鹿干扰强度的增强与SOC的相关性逐渐降低。SOC含量是土壤C/N、C/P的主要限制因素,土壤TN含量是土壤N/P的主要限制因素。【结论】麋鹿干扰不仅会改变土壤基本性质和生态化学计量特征,还会改变制约土壤化学计量比各因素的强度。麋鹿中度、轻度干扰更利于土壤矿化和养分循环。因此,将麋鹿野放的数量控制在合理范围内更有助于维持盐城滨海湿地土壤养分平衡与循环。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aimed to investigate the impacts of Elaphurus davidianus disturbance on soil ecological stoichiometry in Yancheng coastal wetlands, assess the current state of soil degradation, and provide a scientific foundation for the sustainable management of the reserve.【Method】The third core area of Yancheng Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve was selected as the study site. Based on field surveys, the area was stratified into five disturbance intensity levels: weak (Ⅰ), mild (Ⅱ), moderate (Ⅲ), secondary heavy (IV), and severe (V). Soil physicochemical properties, including bulk density (BD), soil water content (WC), pH, the content of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), were measured through laboratory analyses. The effects of varying disturbance intensities on soil properties and ecological stoichiometric ratios were systematically evaluated. 【Result】(1) With the increase of E. davidianus disturbance intensity, soil BD frist decreased, and then increased, soil pH increased, while soil TN, TP content and soil WC first increased and then decreased, and SOC content showed a fluctuating trend. (2) With the increase of E. davidianus disturbance intensity, the soil C/N (mass ratio) increased, the soil N/P (mass ratio) decreased, and the soil C/P (mass ratio) fluctuated. (3) The correlations between soil C/P and SOC, and between soil N/P and TN were extremely high, and the correlation between C/N and SOC gradually decreased with the increase of E. davidianus disturbance intensity. SOC content was the main limiting factor of soil C/N and C/P, and soil TN content was the main limiting factor of soil N/P. 【Conclusion】E. davidianus disturbance not only changes the basic soil properties and ecological stoichiometric characteristics, but also changes the intensity of soil stoichiometric ratios. Moderate and mild disturbance of E. davidianus is more conducive to soil mineralization and nutrient cycling. These findings suggest that maintaining E. davidianus populations within a reasonable threshold is critical for preserving soil nutrient equilibrium in Yancheng coastal wetlands.

关键词

盐城滨海湿地 / 麋鹿 / 土壤基本性质 / 生态化学计量特征

Key words

Yancheng coastal wetlands / Elaphurus davidianus(elk) / soil basic properties / ecological stoichiometric characteristics

引用本文

导出引用
陈利, 栾兆擎, 李敏, . 麋鹿野放对盐城滨海湿地土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(5): 38-44 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202401010
CHEN Li, LUAN Zhaoqing, LI Min, et al. Effects of wild release of Elaphurus davidianus on soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics of Yancheng coastal wetlands[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(5): 38-44 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202401010
中图分类号: S713;S154.1   

参考文献

[1]
王振, 王子煜, 韩清芳, 等. 黄土高原苜蓿草地土壤碳、氮变化特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(6): 1073-1079.
WANG Z, WANG Z Y, HAN Q F, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen variation characteristics of alfalfa grassland in Loess Plateau area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(6): 1073-1079. DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.006.
[2]
GÜSEWELL S, KOERSELMAN W, VERHOEVEN J T A. Biomass N∶P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitation for plant populations in wetlands[J]. Ecological Applications, 2003, 13(2): 372-384. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0372:bnraio]2.0.co;2.
[3]
盖杨菊, 刘爽, 张昆, 等. 围栏禁牧对纳帕海湿地土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2351-2358.
GAI Y J, LIU S, ZHANG K, et al. Effects of exclosure on soil ecological stoichiometry in Napahai wetland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(10): 2351-2358. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202310.024.
[4]
王军, 满秀玲. 去除凋落物和草毡层对寒温带典型森林土壤氮素的短期影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (4): 1-9.
WANG J, MAN X L. Short term effects of litter and sod layer removal on soil nitrogen in typical forests in cold temperate zone[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(4):1-9. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.04.001
[5]
HUNTER H E, HUSBY P O, FIDEL J, et al. Ecological health of grasslands and sagebrush steppe on the northern Yellowstone range[J]. Rangelands, 2018, 40(6): 212-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.rala.2018.10.008.
[6]
DAI Y J, GUO J Y, LI Y Q, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties affected by long-term grazing on the desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Catena, 2022, 211: 105996. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105996.
[7]
刘丝雨, 李晓兵, 李梦圆, 等. 内蒙古典型草原植被和土壤特性对放牧强度的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(9): 23-31.
LIU S Y, LI X B, LI M Y, et al. The response of vegetation and soil properties to grazing intensity in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(9): 23-31. DOI: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.20210016.
[8]
刘忆轩, 李多才, 侯扶江. 甘肃马鹿春秋季放牧对高寒草原土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(2): 273-283.
LIU Y X, LI D C, HOU F J. Effect of grazing in spring and autumn on the physical and chemical properties of soil in Qilian Mountain[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(2): 273-283. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2018-0404.
[9]
朱明淏, 刘艳菊, 张婷婷, 等. 不同栖息环境下麋鹿活动对土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35(1): 208-217.
ZHU M H, LIU Y J, ZHANG T T, et al. The impact of Elaphurus davidianus in different habitats on soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2016, 35(1): 208-217. DOI: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.01.2015070803.
[10]
张亮, 沈潮, 邓杰, 等. 放牧干扰对草地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2016(12): 1-4, 17.
ZHANG L, SHEN C, DENG J, et al. Effects of grazing disturbance on soil physical and chemical properties in grassland[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2016(12): 1-4, 17. DOI: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2016.12.001.
[11]
王东波, 陈丽. 放牧对草地生态系统土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2006(10): 105-106.
WANG D B, CHEN L. Effects of grazing on soil physical and chemical properties in grassland ecosystem[J]. Inner Mongolia Science Technology & Economy, 2006(10): 105-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6921.2006.10.050.
[12]
刘玉祯, 刘文亭, 杨晓霞, 等. 放牧对全球草地生态系统碳氮磷化学计量特征影响的Meta分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1251-1259.
LIU Y Z, LIU W T, YANG X X, et al. Effects of livestock grazing on the C∶N∶P stoichiometry in global grassland ecosystems: a meta analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1251-1259. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.011.
[13]
王立波, 姜慧, 安玉亭, 等. 中国麋鹿种群现状分析及保护对策探讨[J]. 野生动物学报, 2020, 41(3): 806-813.
WANG L B, JIANG H, AN Y T, et al. Current status and conservation measures for Père David’s Deer in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 2020, 41(3): 806-813. DOI: 10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2020.03.034.
[14]
安玉亭, 刘彬, 王立波, 等. 不同麋鹿干扰强度对栖息地土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(11): 3571-3578.
AN Y T, LIU B, WANG L B, et al. Effects of Père David Deer (Elaphurus davidianus) grazing on soil physicochemical properties[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(11): 3571-3578. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201906111236.
[15]
张怀胜. 石首麋鹿栖息地生态环境评价研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2020.
ZHANG H S. Study on the ecological environmental evaluation of the habitat of Shishou Milu[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2020.
[16]
周存宇, 费永俊, 吴雷, 等. 麋鹿放养对天鹅洲草地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 115-121.
ZHOU C Y, FEI YONG Y J, WU L, et al. Effects of elk grazing on soil physical and chemical properties of grassland on Tiane Island[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(4): 115-121. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb20100416.
[17]
么秀颖, 闫丹丹, 李静泰, 等. 盐城大丰麋鹿自然保护区滨海湿地土壤有机碳分布特征[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2022, 44(3): 101-108.
YAO X Y, YAN D D, LI J T, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon in the coastal wetland of Dafeng Milu National Nature Reserve, Yancheng[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2022, 44(3): 101-108. DOI: 10.13984/j.cnki.cn37-1141.2022.03.014.
[18]
徐安宏, 俞晓鹏. 大丰麋鹿保护现状与可持续发展策略探讨[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(5): 107-109.
XU A H, YU X P. Conservation status and sustainable development strategy of milu (Elaphurus davidianus) in Dafeng[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(5): 107-109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2019.05.029.
[19]
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[20]
丁小慧, 宫立, 王东波, 等. 放牧对呼伦贝尔草地植物和土壤生态化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15): 4722-4730.
DING X H, GONG L, WANG D B, et al. Grazing effects on eco-stoichiometry of plant and soil in Hulunbeir, Inner Mogolia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(15): 4722-4730. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201104200523.
[21]
戎郁萍, 韩建国, 王培, 等. 放牧强度对草地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2001, 23(4): 41-47.
RONG Y P, HAN J G, WANG P, et al. The effects of grazing intensity on soil physics and chemical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2001, 23(4): 41-47. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-5021.2001.04.009.
[22]
CHEN L L, WANG K X, BAOYIN T. Effects of grazing and mowing on vertical distribution of soil nutrients and their stoichiometry (C∶N∶P) in a semi-arid grassland of North China[J]. Catena, 2021, 206: 105507. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105507.
[23]
杨林, 马秀枝, 李依倩. 放牧对荒漠草原克氏针茅种群和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2020, 40(2): 328-334.
YANG L, MA X Z, LI Y Q. Effects of grazing on ecological stoichiometry of Stipa krylovii and soil in desert grassland[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 328-334. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2020.02.0328.
[24]
张旭冉, 张卫青, 王海茹, 等. 克氏针茅草原土壤生态化学计量特征对放牧强度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(13): 5309-5316.
ZHANG X R, ZHANG W Q, WANG H R, et al. Response of soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics to grazing intensity in Stipa kirschnii grassland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(13): 5309-5316. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202006051464.
[25]
LI L, HE X Z, ZHANG X M, et al. Different effects of grazing and nitrogen addition on ecosystem multifunctionality are driven by changes in plant resource stoichiometry in a typical steppe[J]. Plant and Soil, 2022, 481(1): 179-194. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-022-05624-w.
[26]
张国斌, 薛建辉, 吴永波. 半圈养状态下麋鹿对生境的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(7): 180-184.
ZHANG G B, XUE J H, WU Y B. Analysis of the impact on habitat under semi-free range milu (Elaphurus davidinus)[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(7): 180-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.07.043.
[27]
李云龙, 许益伟, 郁洁, 等. 蚯蚓粪施用对滨海盐碱地土壤质量及玉米产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(11): 2053-2061.
LI Y L, XU Y W, YU J, et al. Effects of vermicompost application on soil quality and maize yield in coastal saline-alkali land[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 40(11): 2053-2061. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.11.009.
[28]
BAI Y F, WU J G, CLARK C M, et al. Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C∶N∶P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49(6): 1204-1215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02205.x.
[29]
方昕, 郭雪莲, 郑荣波, 等. 不同放牧干扰对滇西北高原泥炭沼泽土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(2): 9-14.
FANG X, GUO X L, ZHENG R B, et al. Effect of difference grazing distributions on soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics in peatland of northwest Yunnan Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(2): 9-14. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.02.002.
[30]
郝建锋, 周润惠, 姚小兰, 等. 二代野猪放牧对夹金山针阔混交林物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 197-207.
HAO J F, ZHOU R H, YAO X L, et al. Effects of the second generation wild boar grazing on species diversity and soil physicochemi-cal properties of coniferous-broad-leaved mixed forest in Jiajin Mountain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(2): 197-207. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0107.
[31]
CAO J, YAN R R, CHEN X Y, et al. Grazing affects the ecological stoichiometry of the plant-soil-microbe system on the Hulunber Steppe, China[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(19): 5226. DOI: 10.3390/su11195226.
[32]
安钰, 安慧, 李生兵. 放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(12): 94-102.
AN Y, AN H, LI S B. Effects of grazing on ecological stoichiometry of soil and dominant plants in desert grassland[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 94-102. DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018039.
[33]
高巧静, 朱文琰, 侯将将, 等. 放牧强度对高寒草甸植物叶片生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(3): 45-50.
GAO Q J, ZHU W Y, HOU J J, et al. Effects of grazing intensity on ecostoichiometric characteristics of plant leaves in alpine meadow[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(3): 45-50. DOI: 10.16742/j.zgcdxb.20180268.
[34]
HE M, ZHOU G Y, YUAN T F, et al. Grazing intensity significantly changes the C: N: P stoichiometry in grassland ecosystems[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2020, 29(2): 355-369. DOI: 10.1111/geb.13028.
[35]
吴雨晴, 田赟, 周建琴, 等. 不同放牧制度草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(4): 801-807.
WU Y Q, TIAN Y, ZHOU J Q, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus under different grazing regimes[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(4): 801-807. DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.10004.
[36]
李岚. 滩羊放牧对典型草原生态化学计量特征和多功能性的影响[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
LI L. Effects of tan-sheep grazing on C:N:P stoichiometry and multifunctionality of typical steppe[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021.
[37]
张建文, 徐长林, 杨海磊, 等. 高寒草甸冷季放牧对凋落物分解及C、N、P化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(10): 2009-2016.
ZHANG J W, XU C L, YANG H L, et al. Effect of grazing on chemical characteristics of litter in alpine grassland during the cold season[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(10): 2009-2016. DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2016-0516.
[38]
蓝芙宁, 李衍青, 赵一, 等. 放牧对峰丛洼地植物-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国岩溶, 2018, 37(5): 742-751.
LAN F N, LI Y Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Influence of grazing on characteristics of chemical metrology for C, N and P in plants and soil of peak-cluster depressions[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2018, 37(5): 742-751. DOI: 10.11932/karst20180512.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(41871097)

编辑: 王国栋
PDF(1758 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/