
锦竹组培快繁技术体系的构建
Establishment of rapid propagation technology system for Hibanobambus tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’
【目的】通过系统优化锦竹(Hibanobambus tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’)组培快繁各关键技术环节,建立高效的组培快繁体系,为其规模化生产提供理论依据和技术支撑。【方法】以观赏竹种锦竹秆芽为材料,进行组培快繁研究。于不同季节采集锦竹秆芽,进行外植体灭菌、丛生芽诱导、继代增殖、生根诱导、炼苗移栽等处理,筛选锦竹组培快繁的最适生长条件,优化其快繁体系。【结果】锦竹秆芽的最佳采集季节为夏初,最佳灭菌处理为:体积分数为70%乙醇溶液处理60 s→无菌水冲洗3~5次→体积分数为2%的次氯酸钠溶液处理15 min(添加3~4滴吐温80)→无菌水冲洗3~5次→滤纸吸干水分接种,灭菌率为81.72%。锦竹丛生芽诱导培养基为6-BA 4 mg/L+KT 0.5 mg/L+TDZ 0.5 mg/L,诱导率为100.00%;最佳增殖培养基为6-BA 5 mg/L+KT 0.2 mg/L,增殖系数为6.75。丛生芽增殖过程中易出现褐化现象,添加3种不同种类及浓度的抗褐化剂以及降低蔗糖浓度可抑制锦竹丛生芽褐化,其中蔗糖质量浓度在10 g/L时效果最佳,褐化率为0。3种抗褐化剂中抗褐化效果依次为聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)>L-谷氨酰胺>活性炭,其中PVP添加量为0.2 g/L时,丛生芽褐化率最低,为13.13%。锦竹不定根诱导时间较长,属于难生根竹种,通过不同生长调节物质配比进行诱导试验,筛选出锦竹最佳生根诱导培养基为1/2MS+6-BA 1 mg/L+NAA 1 mg/L+IBA 1 mg/L,生根率可达88.68%。锦竹炼苗移栽过程中,最佳移栽基质为壤土、草炭土、蛭石,质量比为1∶1∶1。【结论】建立了锦竹组培快繁体系,明确夏初为最佳外植体采集时期,优化了灭菌、激素配比及抗褐化策略并促进难生根竹种的生根。该技术体系可为锦竹的规模化繁殖及种质资源保存提供可靠方法,同时为其他难繁殖竹种的组培研究提供参考。
【Objective】This research aims to optimize critical steps in tissue culture rapid propagation and establish an efficient system for Hibanobambus tranquillans ‘Shiroshima’, supporting its large-scale production. 【Method】Using stem buds of the ornamental bamboo H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ as explants, tissue culture rapid propagation system was investigated. Stem buds were collected across different seasons and subjected to sterilization, shoot cluster induction, subculture proliferation, rooting induction, browning control, hardening off and transplantation. Optimal growth conditions were screened to refine and optimize the rapid propagation system. 【Result】The best collection season for culm buds of H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ was in early June, and the best sterilization treatment for H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ culm buds was as follows: 70% alcohol treatment for 60 s→sterile water rinsing 3-5 times→2% sodium hypochlorite solution treatment for 15 minutes (3-4 drops of Tween 80) →sterile water rinsing 3-5 times→filter paper to absorb moisture for inoculation, with a good sterilization effect of 81.72%. Different concentrations of 6-BA, KT, NAA and TDZ were selected to carry out the orthogonal test in the process of cluster bud induction and proliferation. The cluster bud induction rate of H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ was 100.00% with 6-BA 4 mg/L+KT 0.5 mg/L+TDZ 0.5 mg/L, and the best proliferation medium was 6-BA 5 mg/L+KT 0.2 mg/L, the multiplication coefficient was 6.75. The browning phenomenon is easy to appear in the process of cluster bud proliferation. Adding three different kinds and concentrations of anti-browning agents or reducing the sucrose content in the medium can inhibit the browning of H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’. Among these treatments, best effect was achieved when the sucrose concentration was 10 g/L. The browning effect of the three anti-browning agents is PVP>L-glutamine>activated carbon, in which the browning rate of cluster buds was the lowest (13.13%) when the dosage of PVP was 0.2 g/L. H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ had a longer induction time for adventitious roots, which was difficult to develop roots. Through lots of experiments with different plant growth regulators, the best rooting induction medium was 1/2MS+6-BA 1 mg/L+NAA 1 mg/L+IBA 1 mg/L, and the rooting rate could reach 88.68%. During the transplanting process the best transplanting medium was loam, turf, vermiculite with mass ratio. 【Conclusion】An efficient tissue culture rapid propagation system for H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ was established. Early summer was confirmed as the optimal period for explant collection. The sterilization procedures, hormone formulations, and anti-browning strategies were optimized, and the rooting difficulties of this hard-to-root bamboo species were overcome. This technical system provides a reliable method for large-scale propagation and germplasm conservation of H. tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’, while also serving as a reference for tissue culture research on other difficult-to-propagate bamboo species.
Hibanobambus tranguillans ‘Shiroshima’ / tissue culture and rapid propagation / browning control / root induction
[1] |
陈懿涵. 毛竹种胚试管繁殖的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江林学院, 2008.
|
[2] |
周国强, 高会彬, 余英, 等. 花秆孝顺竹组培快繁体系的建立[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2022, 20(1): 24-29.
|
[3] |
郑毅, 郑笑, 林树燕, 等. 翠竹鞭芽组培快繁高效再生技术体系的构建[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50(6): 1-6.
|
[4] |
曹雄丽, 文韵, 陶现灵, 等. 32种经济竹种的组培及苗木培育技术研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2012, 37(5): 128-134.
|
[5] |
王光萍, 丁雨龙. 几种观赏竹种组织培养研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2002, 21(2): 5-9.
|
[6] |
黄滔, 刘玮, 唐红, 等. 4个观赏竹种的光合特性及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016, 25(1): 24-33.
|
[7] |
曾余力, 王旭锋, 林新春, 等. 白纹阴阳竹试管快繁技术研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010, 30(3): 38-41.
|
[8] |
王涛, 彭立新. 豆瓣绿(Peperomia obtusifolia)的组织培养与快速繁殖研究[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2011, 18(2): 1-5.
|
[9] |
李雪, 李国泽, 杨玲, 等. 越桔属植物组织培养研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(5): 921-930.
|
[10] |
曹剑, 黄志伟. 毛叶木姜子组织培养中无菌苗建立的初探[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(1): 146-151.
|
[11] |
肖祖飞, 王玲玲, 曹璐瑶, 等. 柠檬醛猴樟茎段组织培养技术研究[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(2): 196-201.
|
[12] |
饶宝蓉, 陈泳和, 刘忠辉, 等. 瓜蒌组培快繁体系研究[J]. 热带农业科学, 2020, 40(3): 55-60.
|
[13] |
杨兰芳, 黄桂云, 张国禹, 等. 茶条槭组织培养防止外植体褐化的方法研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(15): 133, 136.
|
[14] |
张玮, 黄树燕, 谢锦忠, 等. 花吊丝竹组培快繁育苗技术研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(6): 914-919.
|
[15] |
林树燕, 赵荣, 郑笑. 马来簕竹的组织培养与快速繁殖[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(12): 2175-2180.
|
[16] |
何安国, 史文辉, 左璐莹, 等. 花叶凤尾竹(Bambusa glaucescens f. albo)组培快繁体系的建立[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(7): 2320-2325.
|
[17] |
宋微, 张虎, 王磊, 等. 铁线莲‘Polish Spirit’组培快繁体系的建立[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(1): 261-267.
|
[18] |
张铁, 万京. 勃氏甜龙竹的组培快繁[J]. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 13(3): 203-206.
|
[19] |
郑静楠, 董文渊, 钟欢, 等. 筇竹组培快繁技术[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(1): 50-54, 59.
|
[20] |
郑祥亁, 陈凌娜, 孙茂盛, 等. 基于种子无菌苗的云南甜龙竹组培快繁研究[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2019, 17(4): 26-29, 33.
|
[21] |
徐强兴, 杨广超. 吊丝球竹的组培快繁技术研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2007(2): 42-44.
|
[22] |
李蓉, 郭起荣, 曾炳山, 等. 毛竹种子“以芽繁芽”组培快繁初步研究[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2008, 6(6): 9-13.
|
[23] |
潘学峰, 庄伟, 关朝优, 等. 马来甜龙竹组培快繁技术研究[J]. 贵州科学, 2003, 21(4): 81-84.
|
[24] |
潘娟, 李先源, 李名杨. 植物组织培养过程中常见问题及解决方法[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(6): 2392-2394.
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
王成韬. 海南粗榧愈伤组织增殖及抗褐变研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2013.
|
[27] |
王瑶. 两种芍药愈伤组织的诱导及褐化抑制的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2009.
|
[28] |
陶俊锋, 苏娟, 钞晶晶, 等. 蒜头果组培褐化控制技术研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2018, 47(1): 81-83.
|
[29] |
农艳丰, 李健. 不同防褐化措施对芒果茎段培养抗褐化效果的研究初探[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2017, 37(8): 20-21, 73.
|
[30] |
陈拓. 雷公藤组织培养技术研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2011.
|
[31] |
周俊辉, 周家容, 曾浩森, 等. 园艺植物组织培养中的褐化现象及抗褐化研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2000(S1): 481-486.
|
[32] |
王淑杰, 赵子瑞, 孟慧雯, 等. 光培养条件对东北红豆杉外植体组培效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(6): 2313-2318.
|
[33] |
王佳琦, 牛雯倩, 李雅丽, 等. 甘草细胞悬浮培养初期褐化发生的机理研究[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(1): 96-100, 108.
|
[34] |
张明文, 陈力耕. 银杏组织培养中控制褐化的研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2003, 32(3): 51-52.
|
[35] |
韩思仪, 崔永一. 蝴蝶兰原球茎组织防褐化研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(13): 67-71.
|
[36] |
曾庆旻. 撑绿竹组织培养与快速繁殖技术研究[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2018, 30(2): 6-8.
|
[37] |
余云云. 桢楠组培技术研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2019.
|
[38] |
张宁. 版纳甜龙竹愈伤组织诱导与植株再生体系的建立[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2011.
|
[39] |
夏登云, 项艳, 卞林玲, 等. 慈竹种子胚的组织培养[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2009, 28(1): 12-15.
|
[40] |
李在留, 辉朝茂. 珍稀竹种巨龙竹组织培养研究[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(2): 43-48.
|
[41] |
刘正娥. 3种丛生竹快速繁殖技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2012.
|
[42] |
廖成章, 余翔华. 分形理论在植物根系结构研究中的应用[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2001, 23(2): 192-196.
|
[43] |
杨晨星. 2种苦苣苔科观赏植物组织培养及应用[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2020.
|
[44] |
陈懿涵, 桂仁意, 林新春, 等. 花秆绿竹试管快速繁殖[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2008, 25(3): 397-400.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |