原始阔叶红松林中不同生活型阔叶植物枝叶性状的变异及权衡

侯瑄珠; 李楠

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403012

侯瑄珠, 李楠

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 163-171.

PDF(2763 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(2763 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 163-171. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403012

研究论文

原始阔叶红松林中不同生活型阔叶植物枝叶性状的变异及权衡

侯瑄珠 ¹ ,
李楠 ²^,^*

作者信息 +

Variation and trade-offs of twig and leaf traits among different broadleaved life form plants in the primitive broadleaved-Korean pine forest

HOU Xuanzhu ¹ ,
LI Nan ²^,^*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】了解植物枝叶性状间的权衡关系,为进一步揭示植物在不同环境胁迫下采取的资源分配策略提供参考。【方法】以原始阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林中的优势或常见的12种阔叶植物为研究对象,采用单因素方差分析或非参数秩和检验对不同生活型植物或物种间的性状进行差异性分析,以标准化主轴估计(standardized major axis estimation,SMA)对枝叶性状间相关关系进行研究。【结果】不同生活型阔叶植物的枝叶性状有相似的变异趋势,其中枝横截面积和出叶强度变异程度均高于30%,枝干质量变异高于20%,而单叶干质量、总叶面积和单叶面积变异均低于15%;乔木的单叶面积、总叶面积和单叶干质量均显著高于灌木;乔木枝横截面积与单叶面积之间为正异速生长关系,灌木为正等速生长关系;乔木和灌木枝横截面积与总叶面积之间均为正等速生长关系,仅部分物种存在正异速生长关系;乔木和灌木出叶强度与单叶面积、单叶干质量之间为负异速生长关系,仅部分乔木物种呈负等速生长关系。【结论】不同生活型植物间枝叶性状以异速生长关系为主,异速生长更有利于植物生存策略的调节,不同生活型阔叶植物枝叶性状的权衡模式取决于生长方式。

Abstract

【Objective】The trade-off between twig and leaf traits is crucial for understanding how plants allocate resources under various environmental stresses. This study focused on 12 dominant or common broadleaved plants in a natural broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest. 【Method】We used one-way ANOVA or non-parametric rank-sum tests to analyze trait differences among different life forms or species. Standardized major axis estimation (SMA) was employed to investigate correlations between twig and leaf traits. 【Result】Broadleaved plants of different life forms exhibited similar trends in twig and leaf traits. Specifically, variation in twig cross-sectional area and volume-based leafing intensity were greater than 30%, twig mass variation exceeded 20%, while individual leaf mass, total leaf area, and individual leaf area variations were below 15%. Trees had significantly higher individual leaf area, total leaf area, and individual leaf mass compared to shrubs. There was a positive allometric relationship between twig cross-sectional area and individual leaf area in trees, while shrubs showed a positive isometric relationship. Both trees and shrubs exhibited positive isometric relationships between twig cross-sectional area and total leaf area, with only some species showing positive allometric relationships. Both tree and shrub species demonstrated negative allometric relationships between volume-based leafing intensity and individual leaf area or mass, with some tree species showing negative isometric relationships. 【Conclusion】The results suggest that twig and leaf traits across different plant life forms generally follow allometric relationships. Allometric growth enhances plant survival strategies, and the trade-off model of twig and leaf traits is influenced by growth patterns.

导出引用

侯瑄珠, 李楠. 原始阔叶红松林中不同生活型阔叶植物枝叶性状的变异及权衡[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2025, 49(3): 163-171 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403012

HOU Xuanzhu, LI Nan. Variation and trade-offs of twig and leaf traits among different broadleaved life form plants in the primitive broadleaved-Korean pine forest[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(3): 163-171 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403012

中图分类号： S718.5

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	KATTGE J, DÍAZ S, LAVOREL S, et al. TRY: a global database of plant traits[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(9):2905-2935.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	VIOLLE C, ENQUIST B J, MCGILL B J, et al. The return of the variance:intraspecific variability in community ecology[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2012, 27(4):244-252.DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014. 本文引用 [2]

[3]	WRIGHT I J, REICH P B, WESTOBY M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature, 2004, 428(6985):821-827.DOI: 10.1038/nature02403. 本文引用 [2]

[4]	YANG J, SONG X Y, CAO M, et al. On the modelling of tropical tree growth:the importance of intra-specific trait variation,non-linear functions and phenotypic integration[J]. Annals of Botany, 2021, 127(4):533-542.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa085. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	LEVIONNOIS S, COSTE S, NICOLINI E, et al. Scaling of petiole anatomies,mechanics and vasculatures with leaf size in the widespread Neotropical pioneer tree species Cecropia obtusa Trécul (Urticaceae)[J]. Tree Physiology, 2020, 40(2):245-258.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpz136. 本文引用 [2]

[6]	ELLNER S P, SNYDER R E, ADLER P B, et al. An expanded modern coexistence theory for empirical applications[J]. Ecology Letters, 2019, 22(1):3-18.DOI: 10.1111/ele.13159. 本文引用 [4]

[7]	WESTOBY M, FALSTER D S, MOLES A T, et al. Plant ecological strategies:some leading dimensions of variation between species[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2002, 33:125-159.DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452. 本文引用 [2]

[8]	CORNWELL W K, ACKERLY D D. Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2009, 79(1):109-126.DOI: 10.1890/07-1134.1. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	MIGLIAVACCA M, MUSAVI T, MAHECHA M D, et al. The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function[J]. Nature, 2021, 598(7881):468-472.DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03939-9. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	TAYLOR A, WEIGELT P, DENELLE P, et al. The contribution of plant life and growth forms to global gradients of vascular plant diversity[J]. New Phytologist, 2023, 240(4):1548-1560.DOI: 10.1111/nph.19011. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	MOUILLOT D, GRAHAM N A J, VILLÉGER S, et al. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2013, 28(3):167-177.DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	YAN E R, WANG X H, CHANG S X, et al. Scaling relationships among twig size,leaf size and leafing intensity in a successional series of subtropical forests[J]. Tree Physiology, 2013, 33(6):609-617.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpt042. 本文引用 [5]

[13]

杨冬梅, 占峰, 张宏伟. 清凉峰不同海拔木本植物小枝内叶大小-数量权衡关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4):281-291.

YANG

D M

, ZHAN

, ZHANG

H W

. Trade-off between leaf size and number in current-year twigs of deciduous broad-leaved woody species at different altitudes on Qingliang Mountain, southeastern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(4):281-291.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00281.

本文引用 [1]

[14]	CORNER E J H. The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree[J]. Annals of Botany, 1949, 13(4):367-414.DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083225. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	SUN S C, JIN D M, SHI P L. The leaf size-twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient:an invariant allometric scaling relationship[J]. Annals of Botany, 2006, 97(1):97-107.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcj004. 本文引用 [2]

[16]	MENG F Q, ZHANG G F, LI X C, et al. Growth synchrony between leaves and stems during twig development differs among plant functional types of subtropical rainforest woody species[J]. Tree Physiology, 2015, 35(6):621-631.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpv021. 本文引用 [2]

[17]	PRESTON K A, ACKERLY D D. Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2003, 90(10):1502-1512.DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.10.1502. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	BROUAT C, GIBERNAU M, AMSELLEM L, et al. Corner’s rules revisited:ontogenetic and interspecific patterns in leaf-stem allometry[J]. New Phytologist, 1998, 139(3):459-470.DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00209.x. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	BAIRD A S, TAYLOR S H, PASQUET-KOK J, et al. Developmental and biophysical determinants of grass leaf size worldwide[J]. Nature, 2021, 592(7853):242-247.DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03370-0. 本文引用 [2]

[20]	YANG Y Z, WANG H, HARRISON S P, et al. Quantifying leaf-trait covariation and its controls across climates and biomes[J]. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(1):155-168.DOI: 10.1111/nph.15422. 本文引用 [2]

[21]	KLEIMAN D, AARSSEN L W. The leaf size/number trade-off in trees[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95(2):376-382.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01205.x. 本文引用 [3]

[22]	WESTOBY M, WRIGHT I J. The leaf size-twig size spectrum and its relationship to other important spectra of variation among species[J]. Oecologia, 2003, 135(4):621-628.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1231-6. 本文引用 [2]

[23]

徐丽娜, 金光泽. 小兴安岭凉水典型阔叶红松林动态监测样地:物种组成与群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(4):470-481.

L N

, JIN

G Z

. Species composition and community structure of a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest plot in Liangshui Nature Reserve,northeast China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2012, 20(4):470-481.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.12233.

本文引用 [1]

[24]	WARTON D I, DUURSMA R A, FALSTER D S, et al. Smatr 3: an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012, 3(2):257-259.DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00153.x. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	R CORE TEAM. R: a language and environment for statistical computing[Z]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021. http://www.R-project.org/. http://www.R-project.org/ 本文引用 [1]

[26]	NIINEMETS Ü, KEENAN T F, HALLIK L. A worldwide analysis of within-canopy variations in leaf structural,chemical and physiological traits across plant functional types[J]. New Phytologist, 2015, 205(3):973-993.DOI: 10.1111/nph.13096. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	DONG N, PRENTICE I C, WRIGHT I J, et al. Components of leaf-trait variation along environmental gradients[J]. New Phytologist, 2020, 228(1):82-94.DOI: 10.1111/nph.16558. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	ANDEREGG L D L, LOY X, MARKHAM I P, et al. Aridity drives coordinated trait shifts but not decreased trait variance across the geographic range of eight Australian trees[J]. New Phytologist, 2021, 229(3):1375-1387.DOI: 10.1111/nph.16795. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	SCHÖB C, ARMAS C, GULER M, et al. Variability in functional traits mediates plant interactions along stress gradients[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101(3):753-762.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12062. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	WESTOBY M, WRIGHT I J. Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006, 21(5):261-268.DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.004. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	VLEMINCKX J, FORTUNEL C, VALVERDE-BARRANTES O, et al. Resolving whole-plant economics from leaf,stem and root traits of 1467 Amazonian tree species[J]. Oikos, 2021, 130(7):1193-1208.DOI: 10.1111/oik.08284. 本文引用 [1]

[32]

王进, 朱江, 艾训儒, 等. 湖北星斗山地形变化对不同生活型植物叶功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5):447-457.

WANG

, ZHU

, AI

X R

, et al. Effects of topography on leaf functional traits across plant life forms in Xingdou Mountain, Hubei,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2019, 43(5):447-457.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0228.

本文引用 [1]

[33]	WESTERBAND A C, FUNK J L, BARTON K E. Intraspecific trait variation in plants:a renewed focus on its role in ecological processes[J]. Annals of Botany, 2021, 127(4):397-410.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab011. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	HE D, BISWAS S R, XU M-S, et al. The importance of intraspecific trait variability in promoting functional niche dimensionality[J]. Ecography, 2021, 44(3):380-390.DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05254. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	GIVNISH T J, VERMEIJ G J. Sizes and shapes of Liane leaves[J]. The American Naturalist, 1976, 110(975):743-778.DOI: 10.1086/283101. 本文引用 [3]

[36]	FAN Z X, STERCK F, ZHANG S B, et al. Tradeoff between stem hydraulic efficiency and mechanical strength affects leaf-stem allometry in 28 Ficus tree species[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017,8:1619.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01619. 本文引用 [2]

[37]	FAJARDO A, MORA J P, ROBERT E. Corner’s rules pass the test of time:little effect of phenology on leaf-shoot and other scaling relationships[J]. Annals of Botany, 2020, 126(7):1129-1139.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa124. 本文引用 [1]

[38]

李曼, 郑媛, 郭英荣, 等. 武夷山不同海拔黄山松枝叶大小关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2):537-544.

, ZHENG

, GUO

Y R

, et al. Scaling relationships between twig size and leaf size of Pinus hwangshanensis along an altitudinal gradient in Wuyi Mountains,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(2):537-544.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.039.

本文引用 [1]

[39]	SLOT M, REY-SÁNCHEZ C, GERBER S, et al. Thermal acclimation of leaf respiration of tropical trees and lianas:response to experimental canopy warming,and consequences for tropical forest carbon balance[J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(9):2915-2926.DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12563. 本文引用 [1]

[40]	WRIGHT I J, DONG N, MAIRE V, et al. Global climatic drivers of leaf size[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6354):917-921.DOI: 10.1126/science.aal4760. 本文引用 [3]

[41]	LIU R, YANG X J, GAO R R, et al. Allometry rather than abiotic drivers explains biomass allocation among leaves,stems and roots of Artemisia across a large environmental gradient in China[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109(2):1026-1040.DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13532. 本文引用 [1]

[42]	YANG D M, LI G Y, SUN S C. The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species[J]. Annals of Botany, 2008, 102(4):623-629.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn135. 本文引用 [1]

[43]	OSADA N, NABESHIMA E, HIURA T. Geographic variation in shoot traits and branching intensity in relation to leaf size in Fagus crenata:a common garden experiment[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2015, 102(6):878-887.DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1400559. 本文引用 [1]

[44]	CUI E Q, WENG E S, YAN E R, et al. Robust leaf trait relationships across species under global environmental changes[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1):2999.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16839-9. 本文引用 [1]

[45]

李锦隆, 王满堂, 李涵诗, 等. 冠层高度对江西69种阔叶树小枝单叶生物量与出叶强度关系的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(2):62-71.

J L

, WANG

M T

, LI

H S

, et al. Effects of canopy height on the relationship between individual leaf mass and leafing intensity of 69 broad leaved trees in Jiangxi province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(2):62-71. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210207.

本文引用 [1]

[46]	ZHANG L, COPINI P, WEEMSTRA M, et al. Functional ratios among leaf,xylem and phloem areas in branches change with shade tolerance,but not with local light conditions,across temperate tree species[J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 209(4):1566-1575.DOI: 10.1111/nph.13731. 本文引用 [1]

[47]	OSADA N, HIURA T. How is light interception efficiency related to shoot structure in tall canopy species?[J]. Oecologia, 2017, 185(1):29-41.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3926-0. 本文引用 [2]

[48]	MENG F Q, CAO R, YANG D M, et al. Trade-offs between light interception and leaf water shedding:a comparison of shade-and sunvadapted species in a subtropical rainforest[J]. Oecologia, 2014, 174(1):13-22.DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2746-0. 本文引用 [1]