林业碳汇市场化交易机制研究

彭红军; 刘奕辰; 吴祎扬; 徐笑; 窦逗

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404006

林业碳汇市场化交易机制研究

彭红军, 刘奕辰, 吴祎扬, 徐笑, 窦逗

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 270-280.

PDF(1946 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1946 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 270-280. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404006

研究论文

林业碳汇市场化交易机制研究

彭红军 ¹ ,
刘奕辰 ¹ ,
吴祎扬 ² ,
徐笑 ¹ ,
窦逗 ³

作者信息 +

Research on market-based trading mechanisms for forestry carbon sequestration

PENG Hongjun ¹ ,
LIU Yichen ¹ ,
WU Yiyang ² ,
XU Xiao ¹ ,
DOU Dou ³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

国际林业碳汇市场推动了各国在森林保护和恢复方面的合作,为林地经营者提供了新的盈利模式和经济增长点。深入了解国际林业碳汇市场化交易机制,可以为中国构建高效、公平、可持续发展的林业碳汇市场化交易机制提供宝贵的实践经验与理论基础,对中国林业碳汇市场发展产生有效助力。本研究通过文献综述、案例分析从国际市场框架、市场准入机制、市场供求机制、市场价格形成机制4个方面梳理国内外林业碳汇市场化交易机制,总结国际林业碳汇市场的经验与启示。从市场化交易角度概括中国林业碳汇市场化交易机制的影响因素,包括交易产品体系有待丰富、缺乏统一的市场标准、市场准入门槛加重我国碳汇指标流失风险、缺乏持续有效的市场需求、缺乏市场化的价格形成机制。提出构建中国林业碳汇市场化交易机制的政策建议,包括构建可持续发展的林业碳汇市场框架;建立多元化的市场标准体系;完善数字化信息共享机制;鼓励金融创新,健全林业碳汇金融体系;优化市场准入机制,强化市场供给保障;统筹强制与自愿市场,提振市场需求。

Abstract

The international forestry carbon sink market has fostered cooperation among countries for forest protection and restoration, introducing new profit models and economic opportunities for woodland operators. An indepth understanding of the international market-oriented trading mechanism for forestry carbon sinks can offer valuable practical experience and theoretical insights foundation for China to develop an efficient, fair, and sustainable market-oriented trading mechanism for forestry carbon sinks, effectively boosting the development of of China's forestry carbon sink market. This study systematically reviewed domestic and international forestry carbon sink market-oriented trading mechanisms through literature reviews and case studies, focusing on four aspects: international market framework, market access mechanism, market supply and demand mechanism, and market price formation mechanism. It summarized the experiences and insights from the international forestry carbon sink market. From a market trading perspective, the study identified factors affecting China's forestry carbon sink market trading mechanism, including inadequate diversity of trading, the lack of unified market standards, market access thresholds increasing the risk of carbon sink index loss, insufficient sustainable and effective market demand, and the absence of a market-based price formation mechanism. The sutdy proposes policy recommendations for establishing a forestry carbon sink market trading mechanism in China, including building a sustainable market framework, establishing a diversified market standard system, improving the digital information sharing mechanism, enhancing the forestry carbon sink financial system and improving the forestry carbon sink financial system, optimizing market access mechanisms, and strengthening market supply guarantees. It also suggests coordinating compulsory and voluntary markets to boost demand.

导出引用

彭红军, 刘奕辰, 吴祎扬, 等. 林业碳汇市场化交易机制研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2025, 49(6): 270-280 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404006

PENG Hongjun, LIU Yichen, WU Yiyang, et al. Research on market-based trading mechanisms for forestry carbon sequestration[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 2025, 49(6): 270-280 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404006

中图分类号： S7-9;F316.23

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]

杨元合, 石岳, 孙文娟, 等. 中国及全球陆地生态系统碳源汇特征及其对碳中和的贡献[J]. 中国科学(生命科学), 2022, 52(4):534-574.

YANG

Y H

, SHI

, XUN

W J

, et al. Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality[J]. Science in China(Series C), 2022, 52(4):534-574. DOI:10.1360/SSV-2021-0362.

本文引用 [1]

[2]	PAN Y D, BIRDSEY R A, FANG J Y, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):988-993. DOI:10.1126/science.1201609. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	PUGH T A M, LINDESKOG M, SMITH B, et al. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics[J]. PNAS, 2019, 116(10):4382-4387. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1810512116. 本文引用 [1]

[4]

CHENG.

S H

, COSTEDOAT

, STERLING

E J

, et al. What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol[J]. Environmental Evidence, 2022, 11(1):15. DOI:10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w.

本文引用 [1]

[5]	GRISCOM B W, BUSCH J, COOK-PATTON S C, et al. National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.Series B,Biological Sciences, 2020, 375(1794):20190126. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2019.0126. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	QIN Z C, DENG X, GRISCOM B, et al. Natural climate solutions for China: The last mile to carbon neutrality[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, 38(6):889-895. DOI:10.1007/s00376-021-1031-0. 本文引用 [1]

[7]

秦国伟, 田明华. “双碳”目标下林业碳汇的发展机遇及实施路径[J]. 行政管理改革, 2022(1):45-54.

QIN

G W

, TIAN

M H

. The development opportunities and implementation path of forestry carbon sequestration under the target of carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Administration Reform, 2022(1):45-54. DOI:10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2022.01.008.

本文引用 [1]

[8]	PIRIS-CABEZAS P, LUBOWSKI R N, LESLIE G. Estimating the potential of international carbon markets to increase global climate ambition[J]. World Development, 2023,167:106257. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106257. 本文引用 [2]

[9]	TAVONI M, SOHNGEN B, BOSETTI V. Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(11):5346-5353. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.036. 本文引用 [2]

[10]	HORN C. Brazil's Amazon fund: a “green fix” between offset pressures and deforestation crisis[J]. Antipode, 2023, 55(6):1686-1710. DOI:10.1111/anti.12932. 本文引用 [2]

[11]	BENJAMINSEN G, KAARHUS R. Commodification of forest carbon: REDD+ and socially embedded forest practices in Zanzibar[J]. Geoforum, 2018, 93:48-56. DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.021. 本文引用 [2]

[12]	PELLETIER J, HORNING N, LAPORTE N, et al. Anticipating social equity impacts in REDD+ policy design: An example from the Democratic Republic of Congo[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 75:102-115. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.011. 本文引用 [2]

[13]	VALATIN G. Additionality and climate change mitigation by the UK forest sector[J]. Forestry, 2012, 85(4):445-462. DOI:10.1093/forestry/cps056. 本文引用 [2]

[14]	杨博文. “资源诅咒”抑或“制度失灵”?:基于中国林业碳汇交易制度的分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2021(5):51-70. YANG B W. “Resource curse” or “institutional failure”? an analysis based on China's forestry carbon sequestration and trading system[J]. China Rural Survey, 2021(5):51-70. DOI:10.20074/j.cnki.11-3586/f.2021.05.004. 本文引用 [2]

[15]

刘海燕, 于胜民, 李明珠. 中国国家温室气体自愿减排交易机制优化途径初探[J]. 中国环境管理, 2022, 14(5):22-27.

LIU

H Y

, YU

S M

, LI

M Z

. Optimization suggestions on the management and reboot of national greenhouse gas voluntary emission reduction trading mechanism in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 14(5):22-27. DOI:10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2022.05.022.

本文引用 [1]

[16]	MAKKONEN M, HUTTUNEN S, PRIMMER E, et al. Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: an ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2015, 50:153-162. DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.003. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	吴伟光, 孙婷, 许骞骞, 等. 林业碳汇政策对林业增汇的影响与启示[J]. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42(6):659-665. WU W G, SUN T, XU Q Q, et al. The effect of forestry carbon sinks policies on forestry incremental carbon sinks and its implications[J]. Issues For Econ, 2022, 42(6):659-665. DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20220135. 本文引用 [1]

[18]

刘珉, 胡鞍钢. 中国打造世界最大林业碳汇市场(2020—2060年)[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(4):89-103.

LIU

, HU

A G

. Building the world's largest forestry carbon sink market in China(2020-2060)[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2022, 43(4): 89-103. DOI:10.14100/j.cnki.65-1039/g4.20211110.001.

本文引用 [2]

[19]

王华, 唐敏, 王石, 等. 森林碳汇交易模式的构建—以陕西省为例[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(1):118-127.

WANG

, TANG

, WANG

, et al. Construction of forest carbon sequestration trading mode: take Shaanxi as an example[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 19(1):118-127. DOI: 10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2019.01.15.

本文引用 [1]

[20]

贺晓波, 王冬梅, 曾诗鸿. 附碳汇收益的林业投资项目价值评估—基于实物期权定价理论[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(3):39-48.

X B

, WANG

D M

, ZENG

S H

. Valuation for forestry investment projects with carbon sequestration benefits: based on real option pricing theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(3):39-48. DOI:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.03.005.

本文引用 [2]

[21]

曹先磊, 贾小茹, 单永娟, 等. 基于实物期权的碳汇造林项目碳汇价值评估模型及应用[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(3):187-196.

CAO

X L

, JIA

X R

, SHAN

Y J

, et al. Assessment model on the value of China certified emission reduction issued by afforestation project for carbon sink based on real options and its application[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2021, 41(3):187-196. DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2021.03.020.

本文引用 [2]

[22]	WHITE D. A perfect storm? Indigenous rights within a national REDD plus readiness process in Peru[J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2014, 19(6):657-676. DOI:10.1007/s11027-013-9523-6. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	World bank. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023[EB/OL].2023-05. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/58f2a409-9bb7-4ee6-899d-be47835c838f. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/58f2a409-9bb7-4ee6-899d-be47835c838f 本文引用 [4]

[24]	BETTELHEIM E C, ORIGNY G. Carbon sinks and emissions trading under the Kyoto Protocol: a legal analysis[J]. Philosophical Transactions.Series A,Mathematical,Physical,and Engineering Sciences, 2002, 360(1797):1827-1851. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1035. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	PAINULY J P. The Kyoto protocol, emissions trading and the CDM: an analysis from developing countries perspective[J]. The Energy Journal, 2001, 22(3):147-169. DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol22-no3-6. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	高帅, 李梦宇, 段茂盛, 等. 《巴黎协定》下的国际碳市场机制:基本形式和前景展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(3):222-231. GAO S, LI M Y, DUAN M S, et al. International market mechanisms under Paris Agreement: basic form and future prospects[J]. Clim Change Res, 2019, 15(3): 222-231. DOI: 10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2018.155. 本文引用 [1]

[27]	SUTTER C, PARREÑO J C. Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects[J]. Climatic Change, 2007, 84(1):75-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9269-9. 本文引用 [2]

[28]	高沁怡, 金婷, 顾光同, 等. 林业碳汇项目类型及开发策略分析[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32(6):97-102. GAO Q Y, JIN T, GU G T, et al. Analysis on the types of forestry carbon sequestration projects and their development strategies[J]. World Forestry Research, 2019, 32(6):97-102.DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2019.0078.y. 本文引用 [2]

[29]	KAINE G, EDWARDS P, POLYAKOV M, et al. Who knew afforestation was such a challenge Motivations and impediments to afforestation policy in New Zealand[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2023, 154:103031. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103031. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market. Core Carbon Principles, Assessment Framework And Assessment Procedure[EB/OL]. 2024-1-1. https://icvcm.org/core-carbon-principles/. https://icvcm.org/core-carbon-principles/ 本文引用 [1]

[31]	黎元生. 生态产业化经营与生态产品价值实现[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2018(4):84-90. LI Y S. Industrialized operation of ecology and realizing the value of ecological goods[J]. Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2018(4):84-90. 本文引用 [1]

[32]	刘元, 刘洁, 熊曦. 林业碳汇市场化融资机制初探[J]. 湖湘论坛, 2016, 29(3):99-103. LIU Y, LIU J, XIONG X. Preliminary study on marketization financing mechanism of forestry carbon sink[J]. Huxiang Forum, 2016, 29(3):99-103. DOI: 10.16479/j.cnki.cn43-1160/d.2016.03.017. 本文引用 [1]

[33]	董丙瑞, 黄振镛, 吴彬红, 等. 林业碳汇的价值实现模式研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2023, 43(1):1-8. DONG B R, HUANG Z Y, WU B H, et al. The value realization mode of forestry carbon sinks[J]. Issues For Econ, 2023, 43(1):1-8.DOI:10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20220285. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	KOLLMUSS A, LAZARUS M, LEE C, et al. Handbook of Carbon Offset Programs: trading systems, funds, protocols and standards[M]. London: Earthscan, 2010. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	LEE D H, KIM D H, KIM S I. Characteristics of forest carbon credit transactions in the voluntary carbon market[J]. Climate Policy, 2018, 18(2):235-245. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1277682. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	穆亚丽, 郭建龙, 杨红强. 基于双重关联市场的林业CCER相关研究进展及问题[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2024, 40(4):503-510. MU Y L, GUO J L, YANG H Q. Research progress and questions of forestry CCER in duel-associated markets[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2024, 40(04):503-510. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2024.04.003 本文引用 [1]

[37]	潘文琦, 杨红强. 林业碳泄漏评估方法学研究进展[J]. 林业经济, 2023, 45(3):21-35. PAN W Q, YANG H Q. Research progress on evaluation methodology of forest carbon leakage[J]. Forestry Economics, 2023, 45(3):21-35. DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.20230515.004. 本文引用 [1]

[38]

张颖, 张莉莉, 金笙. 基于分类分析的中国碳交易价格变化分析—兼对林业碳汇造林的讨论[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(2):116-124.

ZHANG

, ZHANG

L L

, JIN

. Carbon trading price changes in China's carbon emission rights trading trials based on classification analysis: a discussion on forestry carbon sequestration afforestation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(2):116-124.DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180198.

本文引用 [1]

[39]	CHANG W Y, LI Z L, LU K F, et al. Optimal eco-compensation for forest-based carbon sequestration programs: a case study of larch carbon sink plantations in Gansu, northwest China[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(2):268-268. DOI:10.3390/F13020268. 本文引用 [1]

[40]	沈木珠. 可持续发展原则与应对全球气候变化的理论分析[J]. 山东社会科学, 2013(1):164-168. SHEN M Z. Theoretical analysis of the principles of sustainable development and the response to global climate change[J]. Shandong Social Sciences, 2013(1):164-168. DOI:10.14112/j.cnki.37-1053/c.2013.01.001. 本文引用 [1]

[41]	蒋平. 环境可持续发展的协同效益研究[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2018. JIANG P. Studies on co-benefits of environmental sustainable development[M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2018. 本文引用 [1]