“双碳”目标下我国碳排放配额分配机制及其优化策略

郭春艳, 秦涛, 宋肖肖

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 1-13.

PDF(2499 KB)
PDF(2499 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 1-13. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404015
特邀专论

“双碳”目标下我国碳排放配额分配机制及其优化策略

作者信息 +

The allocation mechanism and optimization strategies of carbon emission allowance in China under Carbon Peak and Neutrality Goals

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】建设全国碳市场是利用市场机制控制和减少温室气体排放、推进绿色低碳发展的一项重大制度创新,也是推动实现碳达峰目标与碳中和愿景的重要政策工具,科学、公平、合理地分配碳排放配额是碳交易开展过程的核心问题。基于碳排放配额分配现状,分析碳交易体系中碳排放配额分配机制及成效,并提出优化策略以助力我国碳交易市场发展。【方法】以“现状—问题—对策”为研究路径,采用文献综述、案例归纳分析、比较分析等方法对国际主要碳市场的配额分配模式进行分析,归纳梳理我国碳排放配额分配机制的现状及主要问题,并对今后的机制和策略优化提出相关建议。【结果】①基于国际视角总结主要市场在碳排放配额分配方面的实践经验,在制定碳市场适当的减排目标和灵活的调整机制、建立充足的参与信心和稳定的价格机制、健全完善的市场机制和配套的法律制度基础上,有序落实免费与有偿相结合的碳排放配额分配方式,为我国碳排放配额分配提供启示和参考。②基于国内视角总结我国碳排放配额分配方面的现状,我国碳排放配额分配取得一定成效,配额总量逐步分层优化,覆盖行业范围逐步扩大,分配原则多元化发展以及分配方式由免费向有偿逐步过渡;但仍存在顶层设计有待完善、分配方式较为单一、市场活力尚未激发和配套措施有待健全等诸多亟需解决的问题。【结论】立足我国碳排放配额分配现状及未来发展趋势,加强分配的统筹规划和顶层设计,推动分配的渐进式发展,建立科学合理的交易生态,健全法律法规、分配方法、市场机制等配套措施,推动碳排放配额分配的市场化赋能和策略优化,可为我国碳交易市场的发展、有效实现碳减排目标提供解决路径和模式参考。

Abstract

【Objective】The establishment of the national carbon market represents a significant institutional innovation for reducing greenhouse gas emissions through market mechanisms and promoting green and low-carbon development. It also serves as a crucial policy instrument for advancing the achievement of the carbon-peak goal and the carbon-neutrality vision. The scientific, fair, and reasonable allocation of carbon emission quotas lies at the core of the carbon trading process. This study analyzed the allocation of carbon emission quotas within the carbon trading system based on the current situation and proposed optimization strategies to offer references for the development of China’s carbon trading market.【Method】Adopting the research path of “status quo-problems-countermeasures”, this study employed methods such as literature review, case summarization, and comparative analysis. It analyzed the quota allocation models of major international carbon markets, summarized the current status and main problems of China’s carbon emission quota allocation mechanism, and puts forward relevant suggestions for future mechanism and strategy optimization.【Result】(1) From an international perspective, the practical experiences of major markets in carbon emission quota allocation were summarized. For instance, setting appropriate emission-reduction targets and flexible adjustment mechanisms in the carbon market, building sufficient confidence in participation and a stable price mechanism, as well as establishing a sound and perfect market mechanism and supporting legal system, provided valuable insights and references for the orderly implementation of a combination of free and paid carbon emission quota allocation methods.(2) From a domestic perspective, the current situation of China’s carbon emission quota allocation was summarized. With the development of China’s carbon trading market, certain achievements have been made in carbon emission quota allocation, including the gradual optimization of the tier-by-tier total quota amount, the progressive expansion of the covered industry scope, the diversification of allocation principles, and the gradual transition of the allocation mode from free to paid. Nevertheless, there are still numerous issues to be addressed, such as the need to improve the top-level design, the relative simplicity of the allocation method, the lack of stimulation of market vitality, and the necessity to enhance supporting measures.【Conclusion】Based on the current situation and future development trends of China’s carbon emission quota allocation, it is essential to strengthen the overall planning and top-level design of allocation, promote the progressive development of allocation, establish a scientific and reasonable trading ecosystem, improve laws, regulations, allocation methods, market mechanisms, and other supporting measures, and promote the market-based empowerment and optimization of the carbon emission quota allocation strategy. This will offer solution paths and model references for the development of China’s carbon trading market and the effective realization of carbon-emission-reduction targets.

关键词

碳排放权交易 / 碳排放配额分配 / 发展模式 / 优化策略

Key words

carbon emissions trading / carbon emission allowance allocation / development model / optimization strategy

引用本文

导出引用
郭春艳, 秦涛, 宋肖肖. “双碳”目标下我国碳排放配额分配机制及其优化策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(3): 1-13 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404015
GUO Chunyan, QIN Tao, SONG Xiaoxiao. The allocation mechanism and optimization strategies of carbon emission allowance in China under Carbon Peak and Neutrality Goals[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(3): 1-13 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404015
中图分类号: S7-9   

参考文献

[1]
文亚, 张弢. 中国与欧盟碳市场建设理念与实践比较研究:历史沿革、差异分析与决策建议[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(5):12-22.
WEN Y, ZHANG T. Comparative study on the concept and practice of China and EU carbon market:historical evolution,difference analysis and decision-making suggestions[J]. China Soft Science, 2023(5):12-22.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2023.05.002.
[2]
李汪繁, 吴何来. “双碳”目标下我国碳市场发展分析及建议[J]. 南方能源建设, 2022, 9(4):118-126.
LI W F, WU H L. Analysis and suggestions for the development of carbon emissions trading markets in China under carbon peak and neutrality goals[J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2022, 9(4):118-126.DOI:10.16516/j.gedi.issn2095-8676.2022.04.015. 6.
[3]
邹晓明, 王国兵, 葛之葳, 等. 林业碳汇提升的主要原理和途径[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):167-176.
ZOU X M, WANG G B, GE Z W, et al. Mechanisms and methods for augmenting carbon sink in forestry[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(6):167-176.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209008.
[4]
中国证券监督管理委员会. 碳金融产品:JR/T 0244—2022[S]. 北京: 中国证券监督管理委员会,2022-04-12.
CSRC. Carbon finanical products:JR/T 0244—2022[S]. Beijing: CSRC, 2022-04-12.
[5]
BOHM P, LARSEN B. Fairness in a tradeable-permit treaty for carbon emissions reductions in Europe and the former Soviet Union[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1994, 4(3):219-239.DOI:10.1007/BF00692325.
[6]
KVERNDOKK S. Tradeable CO2 emission permits: initial distribution as a justice problem[J]. Environmental Values, 1995, 4(2):129-148.DOI:10.3197/096327195776679529.
[7]
JANSSEN M, ROTMANS J. Allocation of fossil CO2 emission rights quantifying cultural perspectives[J]. Ecological Economics, 1995, 13(1):65-79.DOI:10.1016/0921-8009(94)00058-4.
[8]
CRAMTON P, KERR S. Tradeable carbon permit auctions: how and why to auction not grandfather[J]. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(4):333-345.DOI:10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00100-8.
[9]
VAILLANCOURT K. Equity in international greenhouse gases abatement scenarios: a multicriteria approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 153(2):489-505.DOI:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00170-x.
[10]
MIKETA A, SCHRATTENHOLZER L. Equity implications of two burden-sharing rules for stabilizing greenhouse-gas concentrations[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(7):877-891.DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.050.
[11]
王文举, 陈真玲. 中国省级区域初始碳配额分配方案研究:基于责任与目标、公平与效率的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(3):81-98.
WANG W J, CHEN Z L. Study on the allocation plan of initial carbon allowance in China’s province-level regions: based on the perspective of responsibility and goals,fairness and efficiency[J]. Management World, 2019, 35(3):81-98.DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2019.0036.
[12]
方恺, 张琦峰, 杜立民. 初始排放权分配对各省区碳交易策略及其减排成本的影响分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(2):696-709.
FANG K, ZHANG Q F, DU L M. Analyzing the impacts of allocation schemes for initial emission allowance on provincial emission trading strategies and their abatement costs[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021, 41(2):696-709.DOI:10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2020.0244.
[13]
吴军, 李曼, 徐广姝, 等. 碳排放总量控制下行业间碳配额分配的博弈机制研究[J]. 北京化工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(6):115-120.
WU J, LI M, XU G S, et al. Carbon quota allocation among industries with carbon emission control by using game model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 47(6):115-120.DOI:10.13543/j.bhxbzr.2020.06.015.
[14]
张益纲, 朴英爱. 世界主要碳排放交易体系的配额分配机制研究[J]. 环境保护, 2015, 43(10):55-59.
ZHANG Y G, PIAO Y A. Research on allowance allocation mechanism of main carbon emission trading systems in the world[J]. Environmental Protection, 2015, 43(10):55-59.DOI:10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2015.10.012.
[15]
宣晓伟, 张浩. 碳排放权配额分配的国际经验及启示[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(12):10-15.
XUAN X W, ZHANG H. International experiences and lessons of carbon emission permit allocation method[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(12):10-15.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.12.002.
[16]
段茂盛. 碳市场配额分配机制的国内外实践及优化调整的建议[J]. 中国电力企业管理, 2024(7):26-28.
DUAN M S. Practice of quota allocation mechanism in carbon market at home and abroad and suggestions for optimization and adjustment[J]. China Power Enterprise Management, 2024(7):26-28.
[17]
王科, 吕晨. 中国碳市场建设成效与展望(2024)[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(2):16-27.
WANG K, LYU C. Achievements and prospect of China’s national carbon market construction(2024)[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 26(2):16-27.DOI:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2024.7182.
[18]
ADEBAYO T S, ACHEAMPONG A O. Modelling the globazation-CO2 emission nexus in Australia: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(7): 9867-9882.DOl:10.1007/s11356-021-16368-y.
[19]
RONTARD B, REYES HERNÁNDEZ H. Political construction of carbon pricing: experience from New Zealand emissions trading scheme[J]. Environmental Development, 2022,43: 100727.DOI:10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100727.
[20]
PARK H, HONG W K. Korea’s emission trading scheme and policy design issues to achieve market-efficiency and abatement targets[J]. Energy Policy, 2014, 75: 73-83.DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.001.
[21]
嵇欣. 国外碳排放交易体系的政策设计对我国的启示[J]. 上海经济研究, 2014, 26(2):92-101.
JI X. Policy design of foreign countries’ carbon emission trading scheme and its implication for China[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2014,(2):92-101.DOI:10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2014.02.010.
[22]
蒋金星. 欧盟碳市场有效性评价及改进的经验借鉴[J]. 山东师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 68(4):115-123.
JIANG J X. Experience in evaluating and improving the effectiveness of the EU carbon market[J]. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Social Sciences), 2023, 68(4):115-123.DOI:10.16456/j.cnki.1001-5973.2023.04.014.
[23]
邢佰英. 美国碳交易经验及启示:基于加州总量控制与交易体系[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2012(9):84-86.
XING B Y. Experience and enlightenment of carbon trading in the United States:based on California’s total control and trading system[J]. Macroeconomic Management, 2012(9):84-86.DOI:10.19709/j.cnki.11-3199/f.2012.09.033.9.
[24]
吕建中. 以碳排放权交易市场机制助推绿色低碳转型[J]. 世界石油工业, 2021, 28(4):1-6.
LYU J Z. Carbon emission trading market mechanism to promote the green and low-carbon transformation[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2021, 28(4):1-6.DOI:10.20114/j.issn.1006-0030.2021.04.001.
[25]
郑鹏程, 张妍钰. “双碳” 目标实现的市场化路径及其制度完善[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 36(4):107-112.
ZHENG P C, ZHANG Y Y. The marketization path of the realization of “dual carbon” goal and its system improvement[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences), 2022, 36(4):107-112.DOI:10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbskb.2022.04.014.
[26]
齐绍洲, 程师瀚. 中国碳市场建设的经验、成效、挑战与政策思考[J]. 国际经济评论, 2024(3):108-128.
QI S Z, CHENG S H. Experiences,achievements,challenges and policy reflections on China’s carbon emissions trading system[J]. International Economic Review, 2024(3):108-128.
[27]
熊灵, 齐绍洲, 沈波. 中国碳交易试点配额分配的机制特征、设计问题与改进对策[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 69(3):56-64.
XIONG L, QI S Z, SHEN B. The comparative features,problems and improvement measures of allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots[J]. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences),2016, 69(3):56-64.DOI:10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2016.03.007.
[28]
田晓丽, 侯忠男. 浅议我国碳排放权初始配额分配机制[J]. 时代金融, 2022(6):76-78.
TIAN X L, HOU Z N. On the initial quota allocation mechanism of carbon emission rights in China[J]. Times Finance, 2022(6):76-78.
[29]
孙振清, 张喃, 贾旭, 等. 中国区域碳排放权配额分配机制研究[J]. 环境保护, 2014, 42(1):44-46.
SUN Z Q, ZHANG N, JIA X, et al. Study on the allocation mechanism of regional carbon emission quota in China[J]. Environmental Protection, 2014, 42(1):44-46. DOI:10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2014.01.013.
[30]
刘粮, 傅奕蕾, 宋阳, 等. 国际经验推动我国碳金融市场成熟度建设的发展建议[J]. 西南金融, 2024(1):43-53.
LIU L, FU Y L, SONG Y, et al. Development recommendations for enhancing the maturity of China’s carbon financial market based on international experience[J]. Southwest Finance, 2024(1):43-53.
[31]
魏庆坡. 碳交易与碳税兼容性分析:兼论中国减排路径选择[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(5):35-43.
WEI Q P. Study on the pathway of China to mitigate emissions based on the compatibility of carbon tax and ETS[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(5):35-43.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.05.005.
[32]
潘晓滨, 史学瀛. 碳排放交易中配额无偿分配的制度构建[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(4):338-343.
PAN X B, SHI X Y. Construction of free allowance allocation system in emission trading scheme[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), 2016, 18(4):338-343.
[33]
张潇, 邵鑫潇, 蒋惠琴. 行业碳排放权的初始配额分配:文献综述[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018, 34(11):1520-1525.
ZHANG X, SHAO X X, JIANG H Q. Initial allocation of carbon emission rights in the industry: literature review[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2018, 34(11):1520-1525.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.11.007.
[34]
魏咏梅, 王心雨, 丁毅宏, 等. 碳达峰目标下考虑碳转移的中国电力行业省域碳配额分配研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(7):19-26.
WEI Y M, WANG X Y, DING Y H, et al. Provincial carbon quota allocation for China’s electric power industry considering carbon transfer under the carbon peaking target[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(7):19-26.DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2023.157.
[35]
关海玲, 张华. 基于碳排放总量约束的我国产业部门碳配额分配研究[J]. 经济问题, 2024(3):76-84.
GUAN H L, ZHANG H. Research on carbon quota allocation in China’s industrial sectors based on total carbon emission constraints[J]. On Economic Problems, 2024(3):76-84.DOI:10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2024.03.003.
[36]
秦涛, 郭春艳, 任立久. 我国碳资产证券化的发展模式、制约因素与突破方向[J]. 经济问题, 2024(5):67-75.
QIN T, GUO C Y, REN L J. Development model,constraints and breakthrough direction of carbon asset securitization in China[J]. On Economic Problems, 2024(5):67-75.DOI:10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2024.05.011.
[37]
彭红军; 徐笑; 俞小平. 林业碳汇产品价值实现路径综述[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):177-186.
PENG H J, XU X, YU X P. A review of the value realization path of forestry carbon sink products[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(6):177-186.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202207023.
[38]
尚文芳, 张冰倩, 张智勇. 考虑有偿配额和碳交易的供应链碳减排决策研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2022, 42(6):1-7.
SHANG W F, ZHANG B Q, ZHANG Z Y. Research on supply chain carbon emission reduction decision-making considering paid allowances and carbon trading[J]. Modernization of Management, 2022, 42(6):1-7.DOI:10.19634/j.cnki.11-1403/c.2022.06.001.
[39]
齐绍洲, 徐珍珍, 谭秀杰, 等. 中国碳市场产能过剩行业的碳排放配额如何分配是有效的?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(9):73-85.
QI S Z, XU Z Z, TAN X J, et al. How to allocate carbon allowances effectively for industries with overcapacity in China’s carbon market?[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(9):73-85.DOI:10.12062/cpre.20210104.
[40]
杨姗姗, 郭豪, 杨秀, 等. “双碳”目标下建立碳排放总量控制制度的思考与展望[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2023, 19(2):191-202.
YANG S S, GUO H, YANG X, et al. Consideration and prospect of total carbon emission control system under the double carbon target[J]. Climate Change Research, 2023, 19(2):191-202.

基金

中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(2023SKY03)
北京林业大学教学改革项目(BJFU2022JYZD011)
北京林业大学“双一流”建设项目(2022XKJS0305)
2020年国家社科基金后期资助项目(20FGLB022)

编辑: 郑琰燚
PDF(2499 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/