基于风洞试验的树木风致响应特征数值模拟研究

郝艳峰, 李政, 胡桂清

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 196-204.

PDF(5701 KB)
PDF(5701 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 196-204. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404031
研究论文

基于风洞试验的树木风致响应特征数值模拟研究

作者信息 +

Numerical simulation study on wind-induced response characteristics of trees based on wind tunnel test

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究不同来流风下树木的风致响应特性,分析树叶数量和湍流度剖面对树枝和树干加速度概率分布特征和树干加速度极值的影响,为防护林的维护和管理提供参考。【方法】基于满足主要相似要求的树木缩尺气弹模型,设计8种不同树叶数量的树冠形态,参照工程科学数据集ESDU 85020中的全尺寸理论风场,在风洞中构建能够覆盖平坦、开阔和城郊地貌的4类风场,通过测量风速、树枝和树干加速度,开展树木风致加速度概率分布特征及极值研究。【结果】以基于对应80%累积概率的偏度和峰度值作为关键点,确定树干加速度高斯分布的判别准则。树干加速度概率分布多数符合高斯分布特征,树枝加速度概率分布不符合高斯分布特征。树枝加速度对应80%累积概率的偏度和峰度值随湍流度的增加而显著增加。通过对比广义极值理论Gumbel法、广义Pareto法、峰值因子法3种计算方法,广义Pareto法对树干顺风向加速度极值的拟合效果最好。二次多项式可以较好地拟合树干顺风向极限加速度与平均风速的关系,树干顺风向极限加速度随平均风速的增加而增加,随湍流度的增加而增加。【结论】基于树木气弹模型风洞试验研究,得到了能够反映全尺寸下树枝和树干加速度的概率分布特征和极值特征。

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to investigate the wind-induced response characteristics of trees across different terrains. It specifically examines to analyze how leaf quantity and turbulence profiles affect the acceleration probability distribution and extremes of the branches and trunks. By analyzing these factors, the study aims to provide valuable references for maintaining and managing protective forests. Understanding how environmental variables impact the aerodynamic behavior of trees can aid in designing better protective measures against wind damage.【Method】An aeroelastic model tree, designed to meet primary similarity requirements, served as the research foundation. Eight distinct crown shapes, varying in leaf quantity, were meticulously crafted to replicate realistic tree structures. These models were tested in wind tunnel terrains, constructed based on the Engineering Sciences Data Unit (ESDU) 85020 framework. Four terrain were replicated in the wind tunnel to measure wind-induced responses. Wind speed, along with branch and trunk accelerations, were recorded to explore the probability distribution and extremes of these accelerations. This comprehensive setup ensured a thorough investigation of how different wind conditions and tree structures affect wind-induced responses.【Result】Skewness and kurtosis values at the 80% cumulative probability were used to establish criteria for determining the Gaussian distribution of trunk acceleration. The number of leaves had a limited effect on the skewness and kurtosis values for trunk acceleration in the along wind and cross wind directions but had a strong effect on branch acceleration. The trunk accelerations in both wind directions generally followed a Gaussian distribution, while branch accelerations did not. Skewness and kurtosis values for branch acceleration significantly increased with turbulence intensity. Trunk acceleration samples in the along-wind direction approximately exhibited a bell shape, with a high peak and heavy tails. The Generalized Pareto distribution fited the central part of the sample data best, followed by the Gaussian distribution, while the Gumbel distribution fited the worst. Similarly, the Generalized Pareto distribution best fitted the tail data, followed by the Gaussian and Gumbel distributions. This indicated that the Generalized Pareto distribution was more effective for fitting the probability distribution of sample data than the Gaussian and Gumbel distributions. Among the three calculation methods, Generalized Extreme Value (Gumbel) method, Generalized Pareto method, and Peak Factor method, the Generalized Pareto method best fited extreme values of trunk accelerations in the along-wind direction. A quadratic polynomial effectively modeled the relationship between extreme trunk accelerations in the along wind direction and average wind speed. Trunk acceleration increaseed with both average wind speed and turbulence levels.【Conclusion】Based on wind tunnel tests with an aeroelastic model tree, this study provides insights into the probability distribution characteristics and extreme characteristics of branch and trunk accelerations at full scale.

关键词

树木气弹模型 / 风洞试验 / 风致响应 / 概率分布 / 极值

Key words

tree aeroelastic model / wind tunnel test / wind-induced response / probability distribution / extreme value

引用本文

导出引用
郝艳峰, 李政, 胡桂清. 基于风洞试验的树木风致响应特征数值模拟研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(6): 196-204 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404031
HAO Yanfeng, LI Zheng, HU Guiqing. Numerical simulation study on wind-induced response characteristics of trees based on wind tunnel test[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2025, 49(6): 196-204 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404031
中图分类号: S761.2   

参考文献

[1]
王仁德, 邹学勇, 赵婧妍. 半湿润地区农田土壤粉尘释放的风洞模拟研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(11):1364-1369.
WANG R D, ZOU X Y, ZHAO J Y. Farmland soil dust emission in semi-humid areas by wind-tunnel simulation[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(11): 1364-1369. DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.11.011.
[2]
MCTAINSH G H, LYNCH A W, TEWS E K. Climatic controls upon dust storm occurrence in eastern Australia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1998, 39(3): 457-466. DOI: 10.1006/jare.1997.0373.
[3]
邹学勇, 张春来, 程宏, 等. 土壤风蚀模型中的影响因子分类与表达[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(8):875-889.
ZOU X Y, ZHANG C L, CHENG H, et al. Classification and representation of factors affecting soil wind erosion in a model[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(8): 875-889. DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.08.0875.
[4]
BHUTTO S L, MIRI A, ZHANG Y, et al. Experimental study on the effect of four single shrubs on aeolian erosion in a wind tunnel[J]. Catena, 2022, 212: 106097. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106097.
[5]
宋歌, 韩芳, 许景伟, 等. 基于LandUSEM模型的山东沿海防护林树种分布适宜性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4):42-50.
SONG G, HAN F, XU J W, et al. Distribution suitability analysis of the tree species of shelter forest in coastal area of Shandong based on LandUSEM model[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47(4): 42-50. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109006.
[6]
刘开琳, 段晓峰, 刘淑娟, 等. 防护林降低沙尘暴风速及农作物损伤的调查分析[J]. 防护林科技, 2022,5:7-11.
LIU K L, DUAN X F, LIU S J, et al. Investigation of shelterbelt in reducing dust storm wind speed and crops damage[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2022, 5: 7-11. DOI: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2022.05.002.
[7]
桑巴叶, 陈启民. 基于流场分析的不同规格防护林防风效能研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2022,5:12-22.
SANG B Y, CHEN Q M. Study on windbreak efficiency of different size shelterbelts based on flow field analysis[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2022, 5: 12-22. DOI: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2022.05.003.
[8]
田稼穑. 乌兰察布市风蚀沙化区防护林防风效能及风蚀量研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2023,3:11-13.
TIAN J Q. Research on wind prevention efficiency and wind erosion of shelterbelt in wind erosion and desertification area of Wulanchabu city[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2023, 3: 11-13. DOI: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2023.03.003.
[9]
白子怡, 董治宝, 肖锋军, 等. 基于野外移动风洞实验的沙打旺植被空气动力学特征研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(3):1-8.
BAI Z Y, DONG Z B, XIAO F J, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of Astragalus adsurgens vegetation based on mobile wind tunnel experiment[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(3): 1-8. DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00102.
[10]
孔玲玲, 董治宝, 白子怡, 等. 植被盖度和配置方式对土壤风蚀影响的风洞试验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(1):235-243.
KONG L L, DONG Z B, BAI Z Y, et al. Effects of vegetation cover and configuration on soil wind erosion based on wind tunnel experiments[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(1): 235-242. DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2023.00134.
[11]
SCHINDLER D, SCHONBORN J, FUGMANN H, et al. Responses of an individual deciduous broadleaved tree to wind excitation[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 177: 69-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.001.
[12]
SCHINDLER D, MOHR M. Non-oscillatory response to wind loading dominates movement of Scots pine trees[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 250-251: 209-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.258.
[13]
SCHINDLER D, MOHR M. No resonant response of Scots pine trees to wind excitation[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 265: 227-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.021.
[14]
MAYER H. Wind-induced tree sways[J]. Trees, 1987, 1(4): 195-206. DOI: 10.1007/BF01816816.
[15]
吴红华, 徐海杰, 李正农, 等. 柳树风致响应的实测分析与预测[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(9):163-172.
WU H H, XU H J, LI Z N, et al. Analysis and prediction of wind-induced response of willow[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 48(9): 163-172. DOI: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2021.09.018.
[16]
PICKANDS J. Statistical inference using extreme order statistics[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 1975, 3(1): 119-131. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176343003.
[17]
Li Z N, Hao Y F, Kopp G A, et al. Identification of multimodal dynamic characteristics of a decurrent tree with application to a model-scale wind tunnel study[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(15): 7432. DOI: 10.3390/app12157432.
[18]
ESDU. 85020 G-2001 Characteristics of atmospheric turbulence near the ground. Part II: single point data for strong winds (neutral atmosphere)[S]. London: Engineering Sciences Data Unit, 2001.
[19]
Hao Y F, Kopp G A, Wu C H, et al. A wind tunnel study of the aerodynamic characteristics of a scaled aeroelastic model tree[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 197: 104088. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104088.
[20]
MAYHEAD G J. Some drag coefficients for British forest trees derived from wind tunnel studies[J]. Agricultural Meteorology, 1973, 12: 123-130. DOI: 10.1016/0002-1571(73)90013-7.
[21]
王澈泉, 李正农, 胡佳星, 等. 城市地貌高空台风特性及湍流积分尺度的研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(6):801-806, 822.
WANG C Q, LI Z N, HU J X, et al. Study on typhoon characteristics at high urban landform altitude and turbulence integral length scale[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(6): 801-806, 822. DOI: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0090.
[22]
GIOFFRE M, GUSELLA V, GRIGORIU M. Non-Gaussion wind pressure on prismatic buildings. I: Stochastic field[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127(9): 981-989. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(981).
[23]
孙瑛, 武岳, 林志兴, 等. 大跨屋盖结构风压脉动的非高斯特性[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(4):1-5.
SUN Y, WU Y, LIN Z X, et al. Non-Gaussian features of fluctuating wind pressures on long span roofs[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(4): 1-5. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2007.04.001.
[24]
GONG B, WANG Z F, LI Z N, et al. Fluctuating wind pressure characteristics of heliostats[J]. Renewable Energy, 2013, 50: 307-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.037.
[25]
佘宇晨, 陈彩虹, 常双双, 等. 基于箱线图的海南省东方市景观格局适宜窗口分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016(3):104-111.
SHE Y C, CHEN C H, CHANG S S, et al. Analysis on landscape patterns of Dongfang city based on box plot method[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2016, 3: 104-111.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.03.019.
[26]
张泽宇, 惠记庄, 张浩博, 等. 发动机与液力变矩器的主次工况功率匹配方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(16):300-314.
ZHANG Z Y, HUI J Z, ZHANG H B, et al. Research on power matching method for primary and secondary conditions of engine and hydraulic torque converter[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(16): 300-314. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2023.16.300.
[27]
HUANG B, LIU J K, LI Z N, et al. Analysis of wind pressure characteristics of typical agricultural greenhouse buildings on tropical islands[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2024, 6(1): 1-21. DOI: 10.1186/s42774-023-00170-0.
[28]
CHEN F B, ZHANG T, YI J R, et al. Non-Gaussian characteristics and extreme wind pressure of long-span roof under various approaching flow turbulences[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 76: 107266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107266.
[29]
JAMES K R. A dynamic structural analysis of trees subject to wind loading[D]. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2010.
[30]
KOLBE S, RENTSCHLER F, FREY J, et al. Assessment of effective wind loads on individual plantation-grown forest trees[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(7): 1026. DOI: 10.3390/f13071026.

基金

新疆土壤与植物生态过程重点实验室开放课题(XJKL202309)
山东省技术创新引导计划中央引导地方科技发展专项资金项目(YDZX2023010)
山西省高等学校科技创新项目(2024L427)
山西省高等学校科技创新项目(2024L428)
山西省统计科学研究项目(2024Y027)

编辑: 孟苗婧
PDF(5701 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/