防治松材线虫高效复配制剂的药效分析

张娇, 叶建仁, 陈婷婷, 程浩

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 73-80.

PDF(2345 KB)
PDF(2345 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 73-80. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404035
专题报道Ⅱ: 松材线虫病防控研究(执行主编 叶建仁 骆有庆)

防治松材线虫高效复配制剂的药效分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of the efficacy of efficient combined formulations against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究一种自制新型复配杀线虫剂3%(质量分数,下同)氟吡菌酰胺-5%甲维盐微乳剂,探究其对松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)的毒力活性及其在防治松材线虫病方面的潜力,为研发出更加高效且具备快速输导能力的药剂提供参考。【方法】采用浸虫法测定这种新型复配微乳剂(3%氟吡菌酰胺-5%甲维盐微乳剂)以及另外两种市售常用药剂(5%甲维盐微乳剂和5%阿维菌素乳油)的杀线效果;以这3种药剂的两种亚致死浓度(LC10和LC30)处理松材线虫来检测其对线虫繁殖能力的抑制效果;在林间将这3种药剂进行树干注射,观察药剂的可吸收性,以及被树体成功吸收药剂对马尾松造成的敏感性状况;在注药90 d后采集注干松树的枝干样本,检测分析药剂在树体内的输导分布动态;并在注药后100 d对处理马尾松进行人工接种松材线虫,观察统计各药剂对松材线虫病的防治效果。【结果】3%氟吡菌酰胺-5%甲维盐自配微乳剂、5%甲维盐微乳剂、5%阿维菌素乳油处理松材线虫24 h后,测定的致死中浓度(LC50)数值分别为2.644 0、27.678 4、42.891 1 mg/L。3 种供试药剂中,3%氟吡菌酰胺-5%甲维盐微乳剂的杀线能力最强,并且经过低浓度药剂处理过的松材线虫的种群繁殖数量均显著低于对照组。3种药剂注干7 d后,自制复配药剂和5%阿维菌素乳油能够被树体完全吸收,5%甲维盐微乳剂难以被吸收。各药剂注射180 d后,自制复配药剂对树体造成的敏感性情况轻微,注药点的木质部产生轻微的变色情况,5%阿维菌素乳油对树体造成的敏感性严重,注药点的木质部产生了严重的变色情况。在注药90 d后,在树体顶部能够检测到所有药剂的残留。在注干点以下0.5 m位置,复配3%氟吡菌酰胺-5%甲维盐微乳剂中氟吡菌酰胺残留含量(质量分数,下同)达到最高,为0.13 mg/kg,甲维盐残留含量0.07 mg/kg,5%阿维菌素残留含量0.1 mg/kg。2种药剂残留含量均在注干点以上0.5 m位置达到最高,此部位复配药剂中的氟吡菌酰胺的残留含量为55.65 mg/kg,残留含量显著高于其余药物。并且从整体看,复配药剂中的氟吡菌酰胺在树体内的残留含量高于甲维盐的残留含量以及5%阿维菌素乳油。于当年7月中旬接种松材线虫,在接种270 d后注射过药剂的马尾松均保持健康,而未经药剂处理的马尾松在接种后100 d出现感染迹象,表明所有药剂都能有效预防松材线虫病的发生。【结论】毒力效果分析表明,新型自制复配药剂对松材线虫具有较强的毒力作用,在林间对马尾松进行注射后,其可吸收性良好,马尾松对其敏感性轻微,并且在松树体内有良好的输导效果。同时,能够预防松材线虫的感染,具备良好的防效,可继续开展配方的优化以及林间的大面积应用。

Abstract

【Objective】Injecting agents into pine trees to prevent pine wilt disease is an effective control measure. This study aimed to develop more efficient and fast-delivery agents by combining two different drugs to create a novel microemulsion. The virulence activity of this combined (3% fluopyram-5% emamectin benzoate) microemulsion against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and its potential for controlling pine wilt disease were explored.【Method】The nematocidal effects of the newly developed combined microemulsion, along with two commonly used agents for pine wilt disease-5% emamectin benzoate microemulsion and 5% avermectin emulsifiable concentrate-were assessed using the insect immersion method. B. xylophilus was treated with lethal concentrations (LC10 and LC30) of each agent to determine their impact on nematode reproduction. Three agents were injected into the trunks of Pinus massoniana trees in the forest to observe agent absorption and tree sensitivity to successfully absorbed agents. After 90 days of injection, samples of the treated trees were collected to analyze the dynamic distribution of drug transport within the tree body. Additionally, 100 days after inoculation, the treated trees were artificially inoculated with B. xylophilus to observe and statistically analyze the control effects of each agent on pine wilt disease.【Result】The LC50 values after 24 hours of treatment with the 3% fluopyram-5% emamectin benzoate microemulsion, 5% emamectin benzoate microemulsion, and 5% avermectin emulsifiable concentrate on pine wood nematodes were 2.644 0, 27.678 4, and 42.891 1 mg/L, respectively. Among the tested agents, the 3% fluopyram-5% emamectin benzoate microemulsion exhibited the strongest nematocidal activity. The population reproduction of nematodes treated with low concentrations of the agents was significantly lower than the control group. Seven days after injection, both the self-made combined microemulsion and 5% avermectin emulsifiable concentrate were fully absorbed by the tree, whereas absorption of the 5% emamectin benzoate microemulsion was more limited. After 180 days, the self-made combined microemulsion showed minimal sensitivity to the tree, with slight discoloration at the injection point, while the 5% avermectin emulsifiable concentrate caused significant discoloration of the xylem at the injection site. After 90 days, residual concentrations of all agents were detected at the top of the tree. The highest residual concentration of fluopyram (0.13 mg/kg) was found 0.5 m below the injection point in the combined 3% fluopyram-5% emamectin benzoate microemulsion, while emamectin benzoate had a residual concentration of 0.07 mg/kg, and 5% avermectin's residual concent ration had 0.1 mg/kg. The highest residual concentrations of all agents were observed 0.5 m above the injection point, with fluopyram in the combined microemulsion reaching 55.65 mg/kg, significantly higher than the other agents. Overall, the residual concentration of fluopyram was higher than that of emamectin benzoate in the combined microemulsion and higher than 5% avermectin emulsifiable concentrate. Inoculation with pine wood nematodes in mid-July showed that, 270 days after inoculation, the trees treated with the agents remained healthy, while untreated trees exhibited signs of infection 100 days post-inoculation. All agents effectively prevented the onset of pine wilt disease.【Conclusion】The toxicity analysis of the new self-made combined agent demonstrates its strong nematocidal effect, good absorbability after injection into P. massoniana, and mild sensitivity to the tree. It also exhibits excellent transport ability within the tree and provides effective prevention against pine wood nematode infection. Further optimization of the formula and large-scale application in forest management is recommended.

关键词

松材线虫病 / 复配药剂 / 毒力分析 / 树干注射 / 氟吡菌酰胺-甲维盐微乳剂 / 杀线剂

Key words

pine wilt disease / combined agents / toxicity analysis / trunk injection / fluopyram-emamectin benzoate / nematicide

引用本文

导出引用
张娇, 叶建仁, 陈婷婷, . 防治松材线虫高效复配制剂的药效分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(6): 73-80 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404035
ZHANG Jiao, YE Jianren, CHEN Tingting, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of efficient combined formulations against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2025, 49(6): 73-80 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202404035
中图分类号: S763   

参考文献

[1]
KIYOHARA T, TOKUSHIGE Y. Inoculation experiments of a nematode,Bursaphelenchus sp.,onto pine trees[J]. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, 1971,53:210-218.DOI: 10.11519/JJFS1953.53.7_210.
[2]
TAKAI K, SOEJIMA T, SUZUKI T, et al. Emamectin benzoate as a candidate for a trunk-injection agent against the pine wood nematode,Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Pest Management Science, 2000, 56(10):937-941.DOI: 10.1002/1526-4998(200010)56:10937:AID-PS213>3.0.CO;2-B.
[3]
MOTA M M, BRAASCH H, BRAVO M A, et al. First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe[J]. Nematology, 1999, 1(7):727-734.DOI: 10.1163/156854199508757.
[4]
KIM B N, KIM J H, AHN J Y, et al. A short review of the pinewood nematode,Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, 2020, 12(4):297-304.DOI: 10.1007/s13530-020-00068-0.
[5]
叶建仁. 松材线虫病在中国的流行现状、防治技术与对策分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9):1-10.
YE J R. Epidemic status of pine wilt disease in China and its prevention and control techniques and counter measures[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(9):1-10.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190901.
[6]
李卫斌, 安炳贞, 孔玉辉, 等. 基于无人机遥感影像的松材线虫病监测方法概述[J]. 林业工程学报, 2023, 8(2):21-29.
LI W B, AN B Z, KONG Y H, et al. A review of monitoring methods for pine wilt disease based on UAV remote sensing images[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2023, 8(2):21-29.DOI: 10.13360/j.issn.2096-1359.202203008.
[7]
JAMES R, TISSERAT N, TODD T. Prevention of pine wilt of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) with systemic abamectin injections[J]. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 2006, 32(5):195-201.DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2006.025.
[8]
LEE D H, SUH D Y, SEO S T, et al. Insecticidal activity of Japanese pine sawyer (Monochamus alternatus) and pine sawyer (Monochamus saltuarius) using abamectin and emamectin benzoate[J]. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 2020, 36(3): 255-258.DOI: 10.7747/jfes.2020.36.3.255.
[9]
甘绍泽, 王晓飞, 陈旭华, 等. 注干施用“松线静”(5%阿维菌素乳油)防控松材线虫病研究[J]. 温带林业研究, 2023, 6(3):42-47.
GAN S Z, WANG X F, CHEN X H, et al. Research on the prevention and control of pine wilt disease by trunk injection of “Songxianjing” (5% abamectin emulsion)[J]. Journal of Temperate Forestry Research, 2023, 6(3):42-47.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4900.2023.03.007.
[10]
REN Q Y, LU H Y, CHEN Z, et al. Joint toxicity of insecticides against Hyalomma asiaticum[J]. Experimental Parasitology, 2023,245:108438.DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2022.108438.
[11]
IBRAHIM A, SHALABY H, EL-SAADANY H M. Interaction between the entomopathogenic fungus,Beauveria bassiana and some insecticides against the whitefly,Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera:Aleyrodidae)[J]. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 2009, 19:41-48.DOI: 10.1002/mmnd.200900031.
[12]
尹福强, 宋珍, 徐琴, 等. 多花黄精灰霉病病原菌Botrytis deweyae生物学特性及防治药剂筛选[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(10):1818-1825.
YIN F Q, SONG Z, XU Q, et al. Biological characteristics and fungicides screening of Botrytis deweyae causing gray mold of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 40(10):1818-1825.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.10.006.
[13]
TANG T, ZHAO M P, WANG P, et al. Control efficacy and joint toxicity of thiamethoxam mixed with spirotetramat against the Asian citrus psyllid,Diaphorina citri Kuwayama[J]. Pest Management Science, 2021, 77(1):168-176.DOI: 10.1002/ps.6004.
[14]
凌文政, 曹海潮, 余佳敏, 等. 氟吡菌酰胺纳米纤维剂的研制及其对南方根结线虫的生物活性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(15):2997-3009.
LING W Z, CAO H C, YU J M, et al. preparation of fluopyram-loaded nanofiber nematicide and its biological activity against meloidogyne incognita[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(15):2997-3009.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.15.007.
[15]
JI X X, LI J J, DONG B, et al. Evaluation of fluopyram for southern root-knot nematode management in tomato production in China[J]. Crop Protection, 2019, 122:84-89.DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.04.028.
[16]
OKA Y, SAROYA Y. Effect of fluensulfone and fluopyram on the mobility and infection of second-stage juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita and M.javanica[J]. Pest Management Science, 2019, 75(8):2095-2106.DOI: 10.1002/ps.5399.
[17]
GUO Y J, MA J Y, YOU Z Y, et al. Field efficacy of fluopyram suspension concentrate against pine wilt disease and its distribution and persistence in pine tree tissues[J]. Forests, 2023, 14(2):338.DOI: 10.3390/f14020338.
[18]
龙鼎新, 伍一军, 李薇, 等. 8种化学药剂单独及两两联合染毒对松材线虫杀灭作用试验[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2006, 26(5):39-42.
LONG D X, WU Y J, LI W, et al. Toxicities of eight chemicals on Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2006, 26(5):39-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2006.05.011.
[19]
谈家金, 杨荣铮, 吴慧平. 不同地理种群的松材线虫对马尾松的致病力差异[J]. 植物检疫, 2000, 14(6):324-325.
TAN J J, YANG R Z, WU H P. Difference of virulence of several geographical populations of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus to Pinus massoniana[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2000, 14(6):324-325.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2000.06.002.
[20]
曹娜, 赵小云, 宋鲜梅, 等. 阿维菌素与常用杀虫剂复配对Q型烟粉虱的增效作用及田间防效[J]. 农药, 2019, 58(11):849-855,858.
CAO N, ZHAO X Y, SONG X M, et al. Synergistic effect and field control effect of abamectin combined with common insecticides on Bemisia tabaci biotype Q[J]. Agrochemicals, 2019, 58(11):849-855,858.DOI: 10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2019.11.021.
[21]
LIU G Y, LIN X, XU S Y, et al. Efficacy of fluopyram as a candidate trunk-injection agent against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2020, 157(2):403-411.DOI: 10.1007/s10658-020-02023-8.
[22]
LEE J W, MWAMULA A O, CHOI J H, et al. Comparative bioactivity of emamectin benzoate formulations against the pine wood nematode,Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. The Plant Pathology Journal, 2023, 39(1):75-87.DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.08.2022.0120.
[23]
朱丽华, 林丽, 蒋鹏, 等. 不同致病力松材线虫的繁殖能力和移动能力比较[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(12):76-79.
ZHU L H, LIN L, JIANG P, et al. Comparison on fecundity and migration ability of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus with different virulence[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2017, 45(12):76-79.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.12.016.
[24]
RUI L, LIU H B, LIANG R, et al. Resistance genes mediate differential resistance to pine defensive substances α-Pinene and H2O2 in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus with different levels of virulence[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32(4):1753-1762.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01182-y.
[25]
谭瑞娜, 郝昕, 邓振, 等. 松材线虫谷胱甘肽S转移酶基因响应阿维菌素胁迫功能研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(8):159-168.
TAN R N, HAO X, DENG Z, et al. Functional study of the glutathione S-transferase gene of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in response to abamectin exposion[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(8):159-168.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2023.08.016.
[26]
BI Z Z, GONG Y T, HUANG X J, et al. Efficacy of four nematicides against the reproduction and development of pinewood nematode,Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Journal of Nematology, 2015, 47(2):126-132.DOI: 10.2214/ajr.105.1.147.
[27]
申继忠. 影响农药产品使用价值和寿命的因素分析[J]. 世界农药, 2021, 43(1):10-22,33.
SHEN J Z. Analysis of factors influencing pesticide use value and life-span[J]. World Pesticide, 2021, 43(1):10-22,33.DOI: 10.16201/j.cnki.cn10-1660/tq.2021.01.02.
[28]
莫启进, 卓梅芳, 王健, 等. 松脂掺杂物中氯化钠的快速检测[J]. 广西林业科学, 2014, 43(1):105-107.
MO Q J, ZHUO M F, WANG J, et al. Fast detection of sodium chloride in adulterants of oleoresin[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2014, 43(1):105-107.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2014.01.022.
[29]
李长强, 叶建仁, 张婉君, 等. 注干施用甲维盐防治松材线虫病的研究[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2022, 42(3):16-19.
LI C Q, YE J R, ZHANG W J, et al. Study on the control efficacy of trunk injection with emamectin benzoate microemulsion against pine wilt disease[J]. China Plant Protection, 2022, 42(3):16-19.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2022.03.003.
[30]
孙太凡. 绿色农药剂型:微乳剂的研究进展[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2007, 19(6):86-88.
SUN T F. Progress in microemulsion: a green pesticide model[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University, 2007, 19(6):86-88.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2007.06.022.
[31]
张扬, 杨鼎超, 李正昀, 等. 高效新型杀松材线虫剂的筛选及其林间防效[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(5):856-862.
ZHANG Y, YANG D C, LI Z Y, et al. Screening and prevention effect of new and effective pesticides against pine wilt nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2017, 44(5):856-862.DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2017.2017007.
[32]
向帆, 叶建仁, 张婉君. 注干施用 3 种药剂防治松材线虫病研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(3):95-101.
XIANG F, YE J R, ZHANG W J. Study on the control of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus by trunk injection with three kinds of agents[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2025, 49(3):95-101.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202409042.
[33]
TAKAI K, SUZUKI T, KAWAZU K. Distribution and persistence of emamectin benzoate at efficacious concentrations in pine tissues after injection of a liquid formulation[J]. Pest Management Science, 2004, 60(1):42-48.DOI: 10.1002/ps.777.
[34]
CABRERA J A, MENJIVAR R D, DABABAT A E F A, et al. Properties and nematicide performance of avermectins[J]. Journal of Phytopathology, 2013, 161(2):65-69.DOI: 10.1111/jph.12014.
[35]
RATHOD P H, SHAH P G, PARMAR K D, et al. The fate of fluopyram in the soil-water-plant ecosystem:a review[J]. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2022, 260(1):1.DOI: 10.1007/s44169-021-00001-7.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1400903)

编辑: 王国栋
PDF(2345 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/