PDF(2839 KB)
砧穗组合对青钱柳嫁接苗生长及叶片次生代谢物的影响
郭旭辰, 孙操稳, 许润, 尚旭岚, 方升佐
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 181-188.
PDF(2839 KB)
PDF(2839 KB)
砧穗组合对青钱柳嫁接苗生长及叶片次生代谢物的影响
Effects of rootstock-scion combinations on seedling growth and leaf secondary metabolites of Cyclocarya paliurus
【目的】探究不同砧穗组合对青钱柳嫁接苗成活率、生长和次生代谢产物等方面的影响,分析不同砧穗组合青钱柳嫁接苗嫁接完全成活后相关生长指标及叶片有效成分的差异,为青钱柳嫁接苗的科学繁育提供理论支撑。【方法】2023年春季,在南京溧水区南京林业大学白马实验基地以湖北五峰(WF)、广西金钟山(JZS)、陕西略阳(LY)种源青钱柳1年生苗为砧木,以青钱柳2年根1年干无性系LS3、LC4、CR4为接穗进行枝接,测定嫁接苗成活率等生长指标,将叶片烘干粉碎制成提取液,以芦丁为标准品测黄酮含量,以香草醛-冰醋酸比色法测三萜含量,使用福林酚法测多酚含量。【结果】不同青钱柳砧穗组合嫁接苗成活率差异极其显著,WF-CR4和JZS-CR4组合成活率达80%,而以LC4为接穗的嫁接组合成活率仅为30%,不同砧木的嫁接苗成活率差异不显著;不同砧木的嫁接苗各项生长指标均差异显著,其中LY-LC4组合的接穗生长6个月长度最高达106.13 cm,WF-LC4组合的仅为38.56 cm,各接穗在组合间生长指标无显著差异;不同砧穗组合嫁接苗叶片三萜、多酚含量无显著差异,不同接穗组合的黄酮含量差异显著,LC4为接穗的叶片黄酮含量(质量分数)较高,LY-LC4组合的叶片黄酮含量(质量分数)高达19.50 mg/g,JZS-LS3的仅为11.69 mg/g。【结论】青钱柳接穗差异对嫁接苗成活率影响显著,CR4为接穗时嫁接成活率较高;砧木差异对嫁接苗生长状况影响显著,广西略阳(LY)为砧木的嫁接苗生长最旺盛;青钱柳叶片黄酮含量与接穗差异显著相关。以JZS-CR4、WF-CR4组合成活率最高,达80%,是繁育高含量三萜、多酚等叶用林的优良组合。
【Objective】This study aims to investigate the effects of different rootstock-scion combinations on the survival rate, growth performance, and secondary metabolite accumulation in grafted seedlings of Cyclocarya paliurus, and to analyze the variations in related growth traits and bioactive leaf components after successful grafting. The findings are expected to provide a theoretical basis for the scientific propagation of C. paliurus grafted seedlings.【Method】In spring 2023, one-year-old seedlings of C. paliurus from three provenances-Wufeng, Hubei (WF); Jinzhongshan, Guangxi (JZS); and Lueyang, Shaanxi (LY)-were used as rootstocks. Two-year-root, one-year-stem clones ‘LS3', ‘LC4' and ‘CR4' were grafted as scions via branch grafting at the Baima Experimental Base of Nanjing Forestry University in Lishui District, Nanjing. Survival rates and growth parameters of the grafted seedlings were recorded. Dried leaf samples were ground and extracted to determine flavonoid content using rutin as a standard, triterpenoid content via the vanillin-glacial acetic acid colorimetric method, and polyphenol content using the Folin-Ciocalteu assay.【Result】Significant differences were observed in the grafting survival rates among different scion combinations. The combinations WF-CR4 and JZS-CR4 achieved the highest survival rate of 80%, whereas those with LC4 as the scion had the lowest survival rate of only 30%. No significant differences were detected in survival rates among rootstocks. Growth indicators varied significantly among rootstocks. The LY-LC4 combination showed the greatest scion growth length at six months, reaching 106.13 cm, while WF-LC4 showed the lowest, at 38.56 cm. No significant differences were detected among scion combinations in growth metrics. Leaf triterpenoid and polyphenol contents did not differ significantly among rootstock-scion combinations. However, flavonoid content varied significantly with scion type. Grafts with LC4 scions exhibited higher flavonoid levels, with the LY-LC4 combination reaching the highest value of 19.50 mg/g, and JZS-LS3 the lowest, at 11.69 mg/g.【Conclusion】Scion genotype significantly influenced graft survival rate, with CR4 yielding the highest survival rate. Rootstock provenance markedly affected seedling growth, with Lueyang (LY) rootstocks promoting the most vigorous growth. Leaf flavonoid content was strongly associated with scion type. The combinations JZS-CR4 and WF-CR4, with survival rates up to 80%, are recommended as superior combinations for cultivating leaf-oriented plantations aimed at triterpenoid and polyphenol production.
青钱柳 / 砧穗组合 / 嫁接成活率 / 黄酮 / 三萜 / 多酚
Cyclocarya paliurus / rootstock-scion combination / grafting survival rate / flavonoids / triterpenoids: polyphenols
| [1] |
方升佐, 洑香香. 青钱柳资源培育与开发利用的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(1):95-100.
|
| [2] |
方升佐. 青钱柳产业发展历程及资源培育研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):115-126.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
石晨, 舒其榜, 舒任庚, 等. 不同消解方法对青钱柳茶叶中6种有益元素含量的影响[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2020, 37(17):2057-2060.
|
| [5] |
余乐, 叶军, 陆辉, 等. 青钱柳的繁育与栽培技术探究[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(21):69-71.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
郭春兰, 柳水香, 肖仁才, 等. 我国特有单种属珍稀资源植物青钱柳繁育技术研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2024, 43(8):64-69,75.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
李娜, 朱培林, 丰采, 等. 青钱柳嫁接愈合过程中砧穗生理特性及其与亲和性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):13-20.
|
| [10] |
李富民, 谭杰, 聂少平, 等. 青钱柳总黄酮测定方法研究[J]. 江西食品工业, 2006(4):34-37.
|
| [11] |
冯茜, 王宇欣, 卜鑫瑞, 等. 超声辅助乙醇提取核桃青皮总黄酮及纯化工艺[J]. 林业工程学报, 2024, 9(6):106-113.
|
| [12] |
邓波, 尚旭岚, 方升佐, 等. 超声辅助提取青钱柳叶总三萜化合物的工艺优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(6):101-104.
|
| [13] |
游见明, 曹新志. 福林酚法测定茶树中茶多酚的分布水平[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(10):2417-2419.
|
| [14] |
马青, 杨晓慧, 桑贤东, 等. 不同嫁接方式对巨桉成活率及接穗长度的影响[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2023, 39(6):20-26.
|
| [15] |
张敏, 蒋国秀, 秦丽萍, 等. 不同嫁接方法对黄枝油杉成活率及生长的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(4):483-487.
|
| [16] |
唐艺荃, 王红红, 胡渊渊, 等. 山核桃属种间嫁接亲和性分析[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(5):584-593.
|
| [17] |
王习政, 陈霞, 苏文娟, 等. 山苍子嫁接愈合过程的组织解剖和生理特性[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(3):56-64.
|
| [18] |
王威力, 刘佳佳, 殷姣姣, 等. 核桃砧木适应性在嫁接繁殖中的作用[J]. 现代园艺, 2020(15):225-226.
|
| [19] |
张浩, 宋扬, 王建国, 等. 刺角瓜嫁接对厚皮甜瓜抗南方根结线虫病及成熟期果实风味、品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(5):817-826.
|
| [20] |
夏腾飞, 冯依欣, 王春梅, 等. 海南油茶种苗高位嫁接适宜砧木筛选[J]. 分子植物育种, 2024, 22(24):8195-8202.
|
| [21] |
温如斯, 蔡娅, 周招娣, 等. 4种砧木对普通油茶‘岑软3号'生长发育的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2018, 36(4):73-79.
|
| [22] |
杨锋, 闫忠业, 王冬梅, 等. 苹果砧木根系和砧段组织结构与生理功能差异调控接穗生长的研究进展[J]. 中国果树, 2023(12):1-7.
|
| [23] |
韦晓娟, 伍思宇, 张幸, 等. 金花茶优良砧穗组合初选及嫁接亲和力研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2023, 44(7):1453-1459.
|
| [24] |
杨一帆, 黄河, 吴海波, 等. 秋季施肥对不同砧木类型红松嫁接苗生长、生理及开花的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (5): 11-21.
|
| [25] |
贾瑞瑞, 祝艳艳, 杨秀莲, 等. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(5):97-106.
|
| [26] |
李含芬, 李鼎立, 王然, 等. 不同矮化中间砧对黄金梨树体生长的影响及嫁接亲和性相关性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(6):1175-1182.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
池小娜, 张欢欢, 顾文媛, 等. DNA甲基化调控园艺植物生长发育及非生物胁迫应答研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2023, 24(5):1215-1222.
|
| [31] |
杜浩, 陈瑶, 吴庆贤, 等. 砧/穗间交流的物质及其嫁接愈合效应[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2024, 46(2):327-335.
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
刘伟, 周龙飞, 李会, 等. 沙棘中三萜酸物质的提取及含量测定[J]. 生物加工过程, 2023, 21(1):50-56.
|
| [34] |
邓波, 刘桂华, 余云云, 等. 遮荫和种源对青钱柳三萜类化合物积累的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2):383-390.
|
| [35] |
林源, 陈培, 周明明, 等. 天然居群青钱柳叶主要生物活性物质及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(2):10-16.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |