油楠种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择

何栋, 杨锦昌, 谭全中, 苏宇, 李荣生, 董明亮, 刘志龙

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 147-153.

PDF(1420 KB)
PDF(1420 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5) : 147-153. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202406003
研究论文

油楠种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择

作者信息 +

Genetic variation and early selection of growth traits among Sindora glabra provenances and families

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探究油楠(Sindora glabra)种源家系试验林生长性状的遗传变异规律,确定油楠种源家系早期选择的适宜年龄,为筛选优良种源家系提供科学依据。【方法】对4、5、6、8、10年生油楠6个种源63个家系的生长性状进行调查,分析不同种源家系生长性状在各林龄的遗传变化规律,利用主成分分析对早期选择效果进行评价。【结果】不同林龄油楠的树高、胸径、冠幅在种源、家系间的差异均达到极显著水平(P<0.01);各性状表型和遗传变异系数分别为24.63%~39.13%和7.83%~16.65%;家系遗传力和单株遗传力分别为0.42~0.79和0.25~0.71,随着林龄增加,各性状遗传力逐渐减小并趋向稳定;各性状表型和遗传相关性极显著(P<0.01),同一性状年份相隔时间越长,相关系数越小;以10年生油楠为标准,在4年生时进行早期选择具有一定可靠性;筛选出13个优良家系,5年内树高、胸径、冠幅现实增益为12.09%~27.24%,遗传增益为5.08%~20.08%。【结论】油楠种源家系具有丰富的遗传变异,生长性状受中等至偏强家系遗传控制且相关性极显著,初步认为在4年生时进行早期选择准确率可能较高,但仍需观测,35、62、45号家系可作为推广应用的首选。

Abstract

【Objective】This research aims to investigate the patterns of genetic variation in growth traits within a Sindora glabra provenance and family trial forest, determine the optimal age for early selection, and provide a scientific basis for selecting superior provenances and families. 【Method】Growth traits (tree height, DBH, crown diameter) were measured in 63 families from 6 provenances of S. glabra. Genetic variation in these traits was analyzed, and the efficacy of early selection was evaluated using principal component analysis at ages of 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 years. 【Result】Significant differences (P<0.01) in tree height, DBH, and crown diameter were observed among provenances and families across all measurement ages. Phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV) ranged from 24.63% to 39.13%, while genetic coefficients of variation (GCV) ranged from 7.83% to 16.65%. Family heritability (${h}_{f}^{2}$) and individual heritability (${h}_{i}^{2}$) for the traits ranged from 0.42 to 0.79 and 0.25 to 0.71, respectively. Heritability values gradually decreased and stabilized with increasing of tree age. Phenotypic and genetic correlations among traits were highly significant (P<0.01), but the correlation coefficients diminished as the time interval between measurements increased. Using the 10-year-old trees as the reference standard, early selection at 4 years old was found to be feasible. Thirteen superior families were identified, achieving actual gains in tree height, DBH, and crown width of 12.09% to 27.24% at age 10, with corresponding genetic gains of 5.08% to 20.08% over the five-year period. 【Conclusion】Provenances and families of S. glabra exhibit substantial genetic variation in growth traits. These traits display moderate to high family heritability and strong genetic correlations. Early selection at age four years shows promising accuracy, although further observation is warranted. Families No. 35, No. 62, and No. 45 are recommended as primary candidates for promotion.

关键词

油楠 / 生长性状 / 遗传变异 / 早期选择 / 遗传增益

Key words

Sindora glabra / growth traits / genetic variation / early selection / genetic gain

引用本文

导出引用
何栋, 杨锦昌, 谭全中, . 油楠种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025, 49(5): 147-153 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202406003
HE Dong, YANG Jinchang, TAN Quanzhong, et al. Genetic variation and early selection of growth traits among Sindora glabra provenances and families[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2025, 49(5): 147-153 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202406003
中图分类号: S722   

参考文献

[1]
杨锦昌, 邹文涛, 尹光天, 等. 不同处理方法对油楠成熟和过熟种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2017, 25(4):331-338.
YANG J C, ZOU W T, YIN G T, et al. Effects of different treatments on germination characteristics of mature and over-mature seeds of Sindora glabra[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2017, 25(4):331-338.
[2]
YU N, SUN H X, YANG J C, et al. The diesel tree Sindora glabra genome provides insights into the evolution of oleoresin biosynthesis[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 12:794830.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.794830.
[3]
潘启龙. 肥料与生长调节剂对油楠和刨花润楠幼苗生长的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2012.
PAN Q L. The impact of seedling growth by fertilization and growth regulator to Sindora glabra and Machilus pauhoi[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2012.
[4]
吴忠锋, 杨锦昌, 成铁龙, 等. 海南油楠的重要生物学特性及产油特征[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(4):144-151.
WU Z F, YANG J C, CHENG T L, et al. Biological characteristics and oleoresin production of Sindora glabra in Hainan Island[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(4):144-151.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20140421.
[5]
陈朝黎, 余纽, 李荣生, 等. 油楠倍半萜类合成酶基因SgSTPS3的克隆与表达分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(11):68-78.
CHEN Z L, YU N, LI R S, et al. Cloning and expression analysis of sesquiterpene synthase gene SgSTPS3 in Sindora glabra[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(11):68-78.
[6]
CAPPA E P, PATHAUER P S, LOPEZ G A. Provenance variation and genetic parameters of Eucalyptus viminalis in Argentina[J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2010, 6(6):981-994.DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0307-9.
[7]
胡文杰, 王晓荣, 胡兴宜, 等. 枫香优良种源及家系早期选择[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(6):5-11.
HU W J, WANG X R, HU X Y, et al. Early selection of fine families and individuals of Liquidambar formosana[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2017, 45(6):5-11.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.06.002.
[8]
张娇娇. 苦楝种源/家系生长性状遗传变异研究及早期选择[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2019. DOI: 10.27152/d.cnki.ghanu.2019.000721.
ZHANG J J. Study on geographical genetic variation of growth traits and selection of provenance-family in Melia azedarach[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2019. DOI: 10.27152/d.cnki.ghanu.2019.000721.
[9]
王婧, 李培, 陈晓阳, 等. 黄樟种源、家系早期生长性状变异与初步选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(2):57-63.
WANG J, LI P, CHEN X Y, et al. Growth traits variation analysis and preliminary selection of Cinnamomum porrectum seedling of different provenances and families[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(2):57-63.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.02.009.
[10]
何畅. 基于叶片表型与SSR标记的油楠种质资源遗传多样性分析[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2019. DOI: 10.27625/d.cnki.gzlky.2019.000130.
HE C. Analysis on genetic diversity of germplasm resources of Sindora glabra based on leaf phenotype and SSR markers[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2019.DOI: 10.27625/d.cnki.gzlky.2019.000130.
[11]
陈伟, 孙晓梅, 董雷鸣, 等. 思茅松半同胞和全同胞子代测定林生长性状遗传分析与选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(11):163-172.
CHEN W, SUN X M, DONG L M, et al. Genetic analysis of growth traits in half-sib and full-sib progenies and superior genetic materials selection of Pinus kesiya var.langbia-nensis[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(11):163-172.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2023.11.017.
[12]
肖丽娜, 魏瑞研, 谭芷茵, 等. AFEchidna—动植物育种数据遗传评估分析的R程序包[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2022, 38(5):50-56.
XIAO L N, WEI R Y, TAN Z Y, et al. AFEchidna is a R package for genetic evaluation of plant and animal breeding datasets[J]. Forestry and Environmental Science, 2022, 38(5):50-56.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2022.05.009.
[13]
洪舟, 杨曾奖, 张宁南, 等. 越南黄花梨种源家系生长遗传变异及早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):25-30.
HONG Z, YANG Z J, ZHANG N N, et al. Genetic variation and juvenile selection of growth traits of Dalbergia tonkinensis Prain[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(1):25-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201906028.
[14]
吴云燕, 张露, 刘远生, 等. 不同种源/家系毛红椿连年生长性状变异及早期选择[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2024, 46(1):106-117.
WU Y Y, ZHANG L, LIU Y S, et al. Variation of annual growth traits and early selection of different provenances/families of Toona ciliata var.pubescens[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2024, 46(1):106-117.
[15]
陈兴彬, 涂圣勇, 宋晓琛, 等. 青冈种源家系幼龄期生长变异及早期选择研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2023, 43(5):1-7.
CHEN X B, TU S Y, SONG X C, et al. Variation and selection of seedling growth traits among Cyclobalanopsis glauca provenances and families[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2023, 43(5):1-7.DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202206060.
[16]
李琼琼. 油楠树干泌油性状与分泌道结构特征的研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017.
LI Q Q. Study on the traits of oleoresin exudation and the structural characteristics of secretory canals in the trunk of Sindora glabra[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017.
[17]
PLIURA A, ZHANG S Y, MACKAY J, et al. Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trials[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 238(1/2/3):92-106.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.082.
[18]
贾晨, 辜云杰, 夏川, 等. 枫香半同胞家系子代测定及优良家系选择[J]. 西部林业科学, 2014, 43(5):122-128.
JIA C, GU Y J, XIA C, et al. The half-sib family progeny test and excellent family selection of Liquidambar formosana[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2014, 43(5):122-128.DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2014.05.026.
[19]
潘艳艳, 梁德洋, 郭婧, 等. 日本落叶松不同种源及家系生长性状变异分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(11):19-27.
PAN Y Y, LIANG D Y, GUO J, et al. Variance analyses on growth traits of Larix kaempferi in different seed sources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(11):19-27.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170478.
[20]
杜超群, 许业洲, 孙晓梅, 等. 鄂西亚高山区日本落叶松无性系生长性状变异分析与早期选择[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(3):19-23.
DU C Q, XU Y Z, SUN X M, et al. Variation of growth traits and early selection of Larix kaempferi clones in suba-lpine area of western Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2015, 34(3):19-23.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2015.03.020.
[21]
肖德卿, 邓章文, 罗芊芊, 等. 幼龄红豆树生长和形质性状家系变异分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(3):152-157.
XIAO D Q, DENG Z W, LUO Q Q, et al. Growth and form-quality traits diversity analysis of young Ormosia hosiei family[J]. Forest Research, 2021, 34(3):152-157.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.03.017.
[22]
林强, 徐进, 李上前, 等. 柳杉半同胞子代遗传变异分析与早期选择[J/OL]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024:1-8.(2024-06-03>). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1161.S.20240530.1436.002.html.
LIN Q, XU J, LI S Q, et al. Selection and analysis of genetic variation of Cryptomeria fortunei half-sib progeny[J/OL]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024:1-8.(2024-06-03).https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1161.S.20240530.1436.002.html.
[23]
张亚东, 马林江, 樊孝萍, 等. 不同红椿家系苗期及幼林期在江汉平原的生长表现分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(6):11-18,68.
ZHANG Y D, MA L J, FAN X P, et al. Analysis of growth performance of different families of Toona ciliata at seedling stage and young forest stage in Jianghan plain[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2024, 44(6):11-18,68.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2024.06.002.
[24]
王继刚. 水曲柳最佳种源选择与种源区划[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2001.
WANG J G. Optimal provenance selection and provenance division of Fraxinus mandshurica[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2001.
[25]
谢运海. 东北地区水曲柳地理种源遗传多样性分析及优良种源选择[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2005.
XIE Y H. Analysis of genetic diversity and selection of the geography provenance for Fraxihus manshurica in northeast of China[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2005.
[26]
伍汉斌, 段爱国, 张建国. 杉木地理种源不同林龄生长变异及选择[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(10):181-192.
WU H B, DUAN A G, ZHANG J G. Growth variation and selection effect of Cunninghamia lanceolata provenances at different stand ages[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(10):181-192.

致谢

华南农业大学林元震副教授指导数据分析,中国林业科学研究院热带林业实验中心工作人员参与试验林调查。

基金

广州市科技局社会发展项目(202206010058)
广东省自然科学基金青年提升项目(2024A1515030223)

编辑: 郑琰燚
PDF(1420 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/