PDF(1910 KB)
不同海拔森林土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质和生态化学计量比关系分析
畅翔, 脱云飞, 谭豪, 何霞红
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 131-140.
PDF(1910 KB)
PDF(1910 KB)
不同海拔森林土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质和生态化学计量比关系分析
Analysis of soil enzyme activities and their relationships with soil physicochemical properties and ecological stoichiometric ratios in forest soils at different altitudes
【目的】探究四川栗子坪国家级自然保护区森林土壤酶活性沿海拔梯度垂直变化特征,及其对土壤理化性质和生态化学计量比的响应机制。【方法】以自然保护区海拔1 800、2 100、2 400、2 700 m森林土壤为研究对象,研究土壤酶活性、土壤理化性质及生态化学计量比垂直分布特征,采用冗余分析、蒙特卡洛检验和逐步回归法分析土壤理化性质及生态化学计量比对土壤酶活性的影响。【结果】随海拔升高,土壤脲酶活性先减后增;蔗糖酶活性增加;酸性磷酸酶活性先增后减;过氧化氢酶活性减弱。海拔2 700 m土壤脲酶和蔗糖酶活性最大值分别为1.09和2.13 mg/(g·h);海拔2 400 m土壤酸性磷酸酶活性最大值0.97 mg/(g·h);海拔1 800 m土壤过氧化氢酶活性最大值3.41 mg/(g·h)。不同海拔森林土壤理化性质及生态化学计量比存在显著差异,且生态化学计量比对土壤酶活性有重要影响,其中非毛管孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、土壤容重、全氮、有机碳含量是土壤酶活性的重要影响因子(P<0.01)。此外,土壤碳磷比、毛管孔隙与非毛管孔隙比同土壤碳氮等环境因子组合也能较好解释土壤酶活性变化。【结论】海拔变化通过改变土壤理化性质和生态化学计量特征,驱动4种关键土壤酶活性的变化。该研究为自然保护区海拔梯度土壤酶活性变化规律及驱动因素分析提供理论支撑。
【Objective】This study aims to investigate, vertical variation characteristics of soil enzyme activities along an elevational gradient and their response mechanisms to soil physicochemical properties and ecological stoichiometric ratios in the forest ecosystems of Liziping National Nature Reserve, Sichuan.【Method】Forest soils at four distinct elevations (1 800, 2 100, 2 400 and 2700 m) within the reserve were investigated. We analyzed the vertical distribution patterns of soil enzyme activities, soil physicochemical properties, and ecological stoichiometric ratios. The effects of soil physicochemical properties and ecological stoichiometric ratios on soil enzyme activities were assessed using redundancy analysis (RDA), the Monte Carlo permutation test, and stepwise regression analysis.【Result】The soil urease activity initially decreased and then increased with rising elevation, sucrase activity increased, acid phosphatase activity increased initially and then decreased, and catalase activity decreased. The maximum urease (1.09 mg/(g·h)) and sucrase (2.13 mg/(g·h)) activities occurred at 2 700 m. The peak acid phosphatase activity (0.97 mg/(g·h)) was observed at 2 400 m, while the highest catalase activity (3.41 mg/(g·h)) was recorded at 1 800 m. Forest soil physicochemical properties and ecological stoichiometric ratios exhibited significant differences across the studied elevations. Ecological stoichiometric ratios exerted a significant influence on soil enzyme activities. Among the key factors identified, non-capillary porosity, capillary porosity, total nitrogen, organic carbon, and soil bulk density were significant influencing factors for soil enzyme activities (P<0.01). Furthermore, combinations of environmental factors, including the soil carbon-to-phosphorus ratio (C/P), the capillary porosity to non-capillary porosity ratio, along with soil carbon and nitrogen, provided good explanatory power for the observed variations in soil enzyme activities.【Conclusion】Altitude drives differential responses in the four key soil enzyme activities by altering soil physicochemical properties and ecological stoichiometric ratios. This study provides theoretical support for understanding the patterns and driving factors of soil enzyme activity variations along elevational gradients in nature reserves.
海拔梯度 / 土壤酶活性 / 土壤理化性质 / 生态化学计量比 / 冗余分析 / 四川栗子坪国家级自然保护区
altitude gradient / soil enzyme activity / soil physicochemical properties / ecological stoichiometry ratio / redundancy analysis / Liziping National Nature Reserve in Sichuan Province
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
万红云, 陈林, 庞丹波, 等. 贺兰山不同海拔土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9):3045-3052.
|
| [5] |
金章利, 刘高鹏, 周明涛, 等. 喀斯特山地草地土壤酶活性及土壤微生物碳代谢活性研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(3):37-44.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
段益莉, 李继侠, 江强, 等. 长白山东坡不同海拔落叶松土壤微生物碳代谢及酶活性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(4):652-660.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
冯燕辉, 梁文俊, 魏曦, 等. 关帝山不同海拔梯度华北落叶松林土壤养分特征分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2020, 49(4):68-73,98.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
田静, 盛茂银, 汪攀, 等. 西南喀斯特土地利用变化对植物凋落物-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(9):4278-4286.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
任玉连, 陆梅, 曹乾斌, 等. 南滚河自然保护区森林土壤酶活性对海拔升高的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4):22-34.
|
| [18] |
李聪, 吕晶花, 陆梅, 等. 滇东南典型常绿阔叶林土壤酶活性的海拔梯度特征[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(6):170-179.
|
| [19] |
申佳艳, 李小英, 袁勇, 等. 纳板河自然保护区土壤酶对不同海拔、坡向的响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(1):111-119,125.
|
| [20] |
郭志明, 张心昱, 李丹丹, 等. 温带森林不同海拔土壤有机碳及相关胞外酶活性特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9):2888-2896.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
肖璐瑶, 张勘, 朱玉东, 等. 大凉螈保护空缺分析与四川栗子坪国家级自然保护区保护成效评估[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(11):4502-4514.
|
| [24] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
| [25] |
关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
马剑, 刘贤德, 金铭, 等. 祁连山青海云杉林土壤理化性质和酶活性海拔分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2):207-213.
|
| [28] |
及利, 马立新, 程政磊, 等. 大兴安岭北部不同海拔天然林土壤胞外酶化学计量特征及其季节动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8):2491-2499.
|
| [29] |
周琳, 艾应伟. 川西高寒地区不同海拔高度土壤酶活性特征研究[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 60(3):166-170.
|
| [30] |
秦海龙, 付旋旋, 卢瑛, 等. 广西猫儿山不同海拔土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):711-717.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
袁颖红, 芮绍云, 周际海, 等. 生物质炭及过氧化钙对旱地红壤酶活性和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(1):93-101.
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
李新星, 刘桂民, 吴小丽, 等. 马衔山不同海拔土壤碳、氮、磷含量及生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3):758-765.
|
| [38] |
黄伟佳, 刘春, 刘岳, 等. 南岭山地不同海拔土壤生态化学计量特征及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1):80-89.
|
| [39] |
高海宁, 李彩霞, 孙小妹, 等. 祁连山北麓不同海拔土壤化学计量特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(1):219-227.
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
荆瑞勇, 曹焜, 刘俊杰, 等. 东北农田黑土土壤酶活性与理化性质的关系研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(4):132-137,142.
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |