半干旱区不同杨树品种及造林密度对林分生长和叶片抗旱性状的影响

王梓豪, 张伟溪, 丁昌俊, 余金金, 魏航, 苗露澜, 苏晓华, 白立东, 闫茂林, 李爱平, 黄秦军

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 205-214.

PDF(1755 KB)
PDF(1755 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2) : 205-214. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202409023
研究论文

半干旱区不同杨树品种及造林密度对林分生长和叶片抗旱性状的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of different poplar varieties and plantation densities on stand growth and leaf drought resistance in semi-arid region

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】研究自然半干旱条件下杨树生长及叶片抗旱相关性状对不同造林密度的响应特征,为半干旱区杨树人工林品种与立地精准适配提供有益信息。【方法】在位于内蒙古达拉特旗的蒙鄂沙生植物园,以高(株行距2 m×3 m)和低(株行距3 m×3 m)两种造林密度栽植的5年生‘哲林4号’杨(Populus deltoides ‘Zhelin 4’)、‘汇林88号’杨(P. × simonii ‘Huilin 88’)和‘中雄4号’杨(P. deltoides × P. suaveolens ‘Zhongxiong 4’)为对象,观测分析其生长和叶片解剖结构、光合参数、脯氨酸等生理生化指标特征差异,并采用主成分分析和隶属函数综合法进行评价。【结果】①低造林密度下3个杨树品种的平均胸径和平均树高均显著大于高造林密度下,增幅均值分别为45.73%和20.52%,2种造林密度下‘中雄4号’杨生长表现均较好,且叶片厚度均显著高于其他品种。低造林密度下‘中雄4号’杨的叶片厚度和栅海比较高造林密度均显著增加,表明其具有更适应低造林密度的叶片结构;②从低造林密度到高造林密度,3个杨树品种的净光合速率(Pn)均显著下降,‘中雄4号’杨与‘汇林88号’杨Pn降幅分别为12.02%和16.05%,‘哲林4号’杨降幅最大,达48.26%,而‘中雄4号’杨和‘汇林88号’杨的蒸腾速率(Tr)、瞬时水分利用效率(WUEi)和气孔导度(Gs)在2种造林密度间差异均不显著。‘哲林4号’杨在高造林密度下的Tr和Gs显著下降且低于其他品种,综合表明低造林密度下杨树的光合能力更强;③高造林密度下3个杨树品种间的脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量差异不显著,‘中雄4号’杨的可溶性蛋白含量显著高于其他品种。而低造林密度下‘哲林4号’杨、‘汇林88号’杨和‘中雄4号’杨分别以可溶性糖、脯氨酸和可溶性蛋白含量显著最高,表明不同杨树品种可能以不同渗透调节物质适应干旱环境。【结论】自然半干旱条件下,低造林密度更有利于杨树生长,不同杨树品种通过不同性状指标特征响应造林密度以调节植株适应干旱环境;‘中雄4号’杨在两种造林密度下的生长及叶片抗旱性状表现更优,能适应半干旱区自然条件下更多造林密度的人工林营建。

Abstract

【Objective】This study explored the growth and leaf drought resistance-related traits of poplar under natural semi-arid conditions in response to different plantation densities, thereby offering valuable insights for the precise matching of poplar varieties to site conditions in semi-arid regions.【Method】At the Meng’e Shasheng Plant Park in Dalate Banner, Inner Mongolia, three poplar varieties, Populus deltoides ‘Zhelin 4’, P. × simonii ‘Huilin 88’and P. deltoides × P. suaveolens ‘Zhongxiong 4’, planted in high plantation density (2 m×3 m) and low plantation density (3 m×3 m), at their five years old, were selected as the research objects, the characteristics of growth, leaf anatomical structure, photosynthetic parameters, proline and other physiological and biochemical indexes were observed and analyzed. Principal component analysis and membership function synthesis method were used to evaluate the differences.【Result】(1)The average DBH and average tree height of the three poplar varieties under low plantation density were significantly higher than those under high plantation density, with an average increase of 45.73% and 20.52%, respectively. The growth performance of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ under the two plantation densities was better, and the leaf thickness was significantly higher than that of other varieties. Under low plantation density, the leaf thickness and palisade to spongy ratio of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ were significantly increased compared with high plantation density, indicating that the leaf structure of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ was more suitable for low plantation density. (2)From low plantation density to high plantation density, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of the three poplar varieties decreased significantly. The Pn of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ and ‘Huilin 88’ decreased by 12.02% and 16.05%, respectively, while the Pn of ‘Zhelin 4’ decreased by 48.26%. The transpiration rate (Tr), instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi) and stomatal conductance (Gs) of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ and ‘Huilin 88’ were not significantly different between the two plantation densities. Tr and Gs of ‘Zhelin 4’ decreased significantly under high plantation density and were lower than those of other varieties, indicating that the photosynthetic capacity of poplar was stronger under low plantation density. (3)At high plantation density, there was no significant difference in the contents of proline and soluble sugar among the three poplar varieties, the soluble protein content of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ was significantly higher than that of other varieties. However, at low density, ‘Zhelin 4’, ‘Huilin 88’, and ‘Zhongxiong 4’ exhibited the highest concentrations of soluble sugar, proline, and soluble protein. This suggests that different poplar varieties may adapt to drought environment with different osmotic regulatory substances.【Conclusion】Under natural semi-arid conditions, low plantation density is more conducive to poplar growth, and different poplar varieties respond to plantation density through differenttrait indicators to adjust the drought adaptability of trees. The growth and drought resistance of the leaves of ‘Zhongxiong 4’ were better under the two plantation densities, which could adapt to the construction of plantations with more plantation densities under the natural conditions of semi-arid region.

关键词

杨树 / 半干旱区 / 造林密度 / 生长性状 / 叶片解剖结构 / 光合参数 / 渗透调节物质

Key words

poplar / semi-arid region / plantation densities / growth trait / leaf anatomical structure / photosynthetic parameter / osmotic regulator

引用本文

导出引用
王梓豪, 张伟溪, 丁昌俊, . 半干旱区不同杨树品种及造林密度对林分生长和叶片抗旱性状的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(2): 205-214 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202409023
WANG Zihao, ZHANG Weixi, DING Changjun, et al. Effects of different poplar varieties and plantation densities on stand growth and leaf drought resistance in semi-arid region[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(2): 205-214 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202409023
中图分类号: S718;S725   

参考文献

[1]
丁昌俊, 黄秦军, 张冰玉, 等. 北方型美洲黑杨不同无性系重要性状评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29(3):331-339.
DING C J, HUANG Q J, ZHANG B Y, et al. Evaluation of important traits of different clones of north-typed Populus deltoides[J]. Forest Research, 2016, 29(3):331-339. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2016.03.004.
[2]
胡彦波, 张鹏, 张政, 等. 松嫩平原西部3种杨树生长、木材属性及形态生理学特征比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(10):2945-2952.
HU Y B, ZHANG P, ZHANG Z, et al. Comparison on growth performance, wood properties,and morpho-physiological characters among three poplar species in western Songnen plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43(10):2945-2952. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202410.027.
[3]
国家林业和草原局. 中国森林资源报告(2014—2018)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019.
National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Forest resources report of China(2014—2018)[M]. Beijing: China Foresty Publishing House, 2019.
[4]
赵子夜. 中国“三北” 防护林工程建设现状及思考[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 18(3):67-76,89.
ZHAO Z Y. Current situation of and reflection on China’s “Three-North” shelter forest program[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 18(3):67-76,89. DOI: 10.16397/j.cnki.1671-1165.2018.03.009.
[5]
李政宏, 丁昌俊, 张伟溪, 等. 美洲黑杨无性系苗木对不同光周期处理的生长与生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(3):127-144.
LI Z H, DING C J, ZHANG W X, et al. Growth and physiological response of seedlings of Populus deltoides clones to different photoperiods[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(3):127-144. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220634.
[6]
苗婷婷, 吴中能, 刘俊龙, 等. 7个杨树品种苗期叶片解剖结构和叶绿素荧光特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(24):51-59.
MIAO T T, WU Z N, LIU J L, et al. Study on leaf anatomical structure and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of seven poplar varieties at seedling stage[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(24):51-59. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0819.
[7]
刘宁, 丁昌俊, 李波, 等. 造林密度对欧美杨3品种在东北地区生长及材性的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(4):9-18.
LIU N, DING C J, LI B, et al. Effect of planting density on growth and wood property of three Populus × euramericana cultivars[J]. Forest Research, 2020, 33(4):9-18. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.04.002.
[8]
贾亚运, 何宗明, 周丽丽, 等. 造林密度对杉木幼林生长及空间利用的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(5):1177-1181.
JIA Y Y, HE Z M, ZHOU L L, et al. Effects of planting densities on the growth and space utilization of young Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(5):1177-1181. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201605.035.
[9]
BENOMAR L, DESROCHERS A, LAROCQUE G R. The effects of spacing on growth,morphology and biomass production and allocation in two hybrid poplar clones growing in the Boreal region of Canada[J]. Trees, 2012, 26(3):939-949. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-011-0671-6.
[10]
VERLINDEN M S, BROECKX L S, VAN DEN BULCKE J, et al. Comparative study of biomass determinants of 12 poplar (Populus) genotypes in a high-density short-rotation culture[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 307:101-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.062.
[11]
黄绢, 李丹, 王宁宁, 等. 不同配置方式杨树超短轮伐人工林光合特性及生长差异[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(8):131-137.
HUANG J, LI D, WANG N N, et al. Differences in photosynthetic characteristics and growth in short-rotation poplar of different spacing configurations[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(8):131-137. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160816.
[12]
潘存娥, 田丽萍, 李贞贞, 等. 5种杨树无性系叶片解剖结构的抗旱性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(2):21-25.
PAN C E, TIAN L P, LI Z Z, et al. Studies on drought resistance on anatomical structure of leaves of 5 poplar clones[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(2):21-25. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2010-2383.
[13]
尹春英, 李春阳. 杨树抗旱性研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(6):662-668.
YIN C Y, LI C Y. Advance in research on drought resistance of Populus[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Environmental Biology, 2003, 9(6):662-668. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-687X.2003.06.024.
[14]
苏晓华, 丁昌俊, 马常耕. 我国杨树育种的研究进展及对策[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(1):31-37.
SU X H, DING C J, MA C G. Research progress and strategies of poplar breeding in China[J]. Forest Research, 2010, 23(1):31-37. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.01.020.
[15]
马小芬, 王兴芳, 李强, 等. 不同种源地文冠果叶片解剖结构比较及抗旱性分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(6):92-96.
MA X F, WANG X F, LI Q, et al. The analysis of drought resistance and the comparison of anatomical structures of the leave of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge introduced from different regions[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013, 27(6):92-96. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2013.06.013.
[16]
张莉, 续九如. 水分胁迫下刺槐不同无性系生理生化反应的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003, 39(4):162-167.
ZHANG L, XU J R. Studies on physiological and biochemical responses of Robinia pseudoacacia clones under water stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39(4):162-167. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20030428.
[17]
孔祥生, 张妙霞, 王学永, 等. 水分胁迫下2个牡丹品种生理生化差异比较[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(9):162-167.
KONG X S, ZHANG M X, WANG X Y, et al. Comparative studies on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of two Paeonia suffruticosa varieties under water stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(9):162-167. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110928.
[18]
郑旭, 赵文静, 刘兴满, 等. 苏北滨海盐渍土土壤基本性质及其对中山杉生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2023, 39(9):1854-1861.
ZHENG X, ZHAO W J, LIU X M, et al. Basic properties of coastal saline soil in northern Jiangsu and their effects on the growth of Taxodium‘Zhongshanshan’[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 39(9):1854-1861. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.09.007.
[19]
刘夏岚, 宋子琪, 胡凤荣, 等. 青钱柳二倍体和四倍体叶特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(4):76-84.
LIU X L, SONG Z Q, HU F R, et al. A comparative study on leaf characters between diploid and tetraploid of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(4):76-84. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305024.
[20]
张江涛, 杨亚峰, 刘艳, 等. 杨树品种2025及其2个芽变彩叶品种对土壤持续干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(11):1-6.
ZHANG J T, YANG Y F, LIU Y, et al. Physiological response of poplar 2025 and two bud mutation colored-leaf varieties to soil continuous drought stress[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(11):1-6. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20141106.002.
[21]
GIANNOPOLITIS C N, RIES S K. Occurrence in higher plants[J]. Plant Physiol, 1972, 59:309-314. DOI: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309.
[22]
张赞培, 谷月营, 尚旭岚, 等. 自然低温下23个青钱柳家系耐寒性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(4):85-92.
ZHANG Z P, GU Y Y, SHANG X L, et al. An evaluation on the cold tolerance of twenty-three Cyclocarya paliurus families under natural low temperatures[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(4):85-92. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208024.
[23]
邹琦. 植物生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
ZOU Q. Plant physiology and biochemistry experiment guidance[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003.
[24]
陈存, 丁昌俊, 黄秦军, 等. 美洲黑杨表型和生理性状多样性及群体结构分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(6):1-12.
CHEN C, DING C J, HUANG Q J, et al. Phenotypic and physiological trait diversity and population structure of Populus deltoides[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(6):1-12. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200231.
[25]
董雪婷, 张静, 张志东, 等. 树种相互作用、林分密度和树木大小对华北落叶松生产力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8):2722-2728.
DONG X T, ZHANG J, ZHANG Z D, et al. Effects of tree species interaction,stand density,and tree size on the productivity of Larix principis-rupprechtii[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(8):2722-2728. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.006.
[26]
徐慧兰, 颜培栋, 杨章旗. 造林密度对15年生马尾松生长和材性的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(5):505-511.
XU H L, YAN P D, YANG Z Q. Effects of planting density on wood growth and properties of 15-year-old Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2020, 40(5):505-511. DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2020.05.007.
[27]
张喜年, 张长耀, 李紫帅, 等. 干旱胁迫对西藏半干旱河谷区典型灌木生理特性和解剖结构的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2023, 51(12):81-88.
ZHANG X N, ZHANG C Y, LI Z S, et al. Physiological characteristics and anatomical structure of typical shrubs in semi-arid valley areas of Tibet in response to drought stress[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2023, 51(12):81-88. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2023.12.018.
[28]
苏东凯, 周永斌, 唐庆华, 等. 不同杨树品种光合生理生态特性的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2006, 21(2):39-41.
SU D K, ZHOU Y B, TANG Q H, et al. Ecophysiological characteristis of photosynthesis in different poular trees[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2006, 21(2):39-41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2006.02.011.
[29]
高苗琴, 赵瑜琦, 宗毓铮, 等. 2025杨及其3种芽变红叶杨光合生理和生态适应性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(2):102-107.
GAO M Q, ZHAO Y Q, ZONG Y Z, et al. Photosynthetic traits and ecological adaptability of poplar 2025 and its 3 bud sporting color-leafed cultivars[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35(2):102-107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2020.02.14.
[30]
巴合提牙尔·克热木, 郭靖, 徐业勇, 等. 南疆地区2个引种大樱桃品种光合特性对比研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(2):86-91.
Bahetiyaer· Keremu, GUO J, XU Y Y, et al. Comparative studies on photosynthetic characteristics of two cherry cultivars in southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2016, 31(2):86-91. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.02.15.
[31]
黄彩霞, 张明, 巴玉春, 等. 造林密度对新疆杨人工林生长发育和光合特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017, 52(2):61-64,70.
HUANG C X, ZHANG M, BA Y C, et al. Effect of planting density on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Xinjiang poplar plantation[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2017, 52(2):61-64,70. DOI: 10.13432/j.cnki.jgsau.2017.02.010.
[32]
邓松录, 狄晓艳, 王孟本, 等. 杨树无性系光合特征的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2006, 26(5):600-608.
DENG S L, DI X Y, WANG M B, et al. A comparison of photosynthetic characteristics in four poplar clones[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2006, 26(5):600-608. DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.05.018.
[33]
张小全, 徐德应, 赵茂盛. 林冠结构、辐射传输与冠层光合作用研究综述[J]. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12(4):411-421.
ZHANG X Q, XU D Y, ZHAO M S. Review on forest canopy structure, radiation transfer and canopy photosynthesis[J]. Forest Research, 1999, 12(4):411-421. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.1999.04.014.
[34]
于均屹, 徐立清, 张勇, 等. 光照和地下竞争对林冠下人工更新紫椴苗木形态和生物量分配的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2023, 39(4):38-47.
YU J Y, XU L Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of light and underground competition on seedling morphology and biomass allocation of Tilia amurensis artificially regenerated under forest canopy[J]. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39(4):38-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.04.005.
[35]
何凤, 杜红岩, 刘攀峰, 等. 干旱胁迫对杜仲叶片结构特征的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(6):947-956.
HE F, DU H Y, LIU P F, et al. Effects of drought stress on leaf structure of Eucommia ulmoides[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(6):947-956. DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.06.013.
[36]
梁青兰, 韩友吉, 乔艳辉, 等. 干旱胁迫对黑杨派无性系生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(10):81-89.
LIANG Q L, HAN Y J, QIAO Y H, et al. Effects of drought stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Sect.Aigeiros clones[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45(10):81-89. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220266.
[37]
易嘉欣, 马晓雨, 孙国语, 等. 铅锌复合胁迫对小黑杨、黑青杨生长及生理的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50(4):15-20.
YI J X, MA X Y, SUN G Y, et al. Characteristics of lead-zinc composite stress on the growth and physiological response of Populus simonii × P.nigra and P.euramericana ‘N3016’ × P.ussuriensis[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2022, 50(4):15-20. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2022.04.002.
[38]
TRIFILÒ P, CASOLO V, RAIMONDO F, et al. Effects of prolonged drought on stem non-structural carbohydrates content and post-drought hydraulic recovery in Laurus nobilis L.:the possible link between carbon starvation and hydraulic failure[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017, 120:232-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.10.003.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2021YFD2201205)
中国林业科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2020SZ002)

责任编辑: 王国栋
PDF(1755 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/