景观组成和景观配置对百山祖国家公园生态系统服务的影响

王超锐, 钟佳辉, 张勇, 刘伟, 王增, 方向华, 林杰, 张相

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 101-111.

PDF(15939 KB)
PDF(15939 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3) : 101-111. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202410005
专题报道(Ⅲ):基于自然解决方案的生态修复与生态系统服务权衡研究(执行主编 薜建辉 毛岭峰)

景观组成和景观配置对百山祖国家公园生态系统服务的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of landscape composition and configuration on ecosystem services of Baishanzu National Park

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】不同植被类型和结构在提供生态系统服务方面具有不同的特点和价值,这些服务对维持生态平衡和人类福祉至关重要。本研究旨在厘清不同森林类型和景观配置变化对生态系统服务的影响,明晰森林类型组成及结构变化引起的生态系统服务供给差异。【方法】以浙江省百山祖国家公园为例,选择InVEST和CASA模型量化2000—2020年的植被净初级生产力、生境质量、土壤保持和水源供给4种生态系统服务功能,并通过地理加权回归分析不同植被类型和森林景观配置对生态系统服务的空间异质性特征。【结果】研究期间,森林覆盖面积整体增加,但针叶林面积呈下降趋势;研究区中部的景观趋于集中化,而西部和北部的景观趋于破碎化。生态系统服务方面,水源供给、土壤保持和植被净初级生产力整体呈上升趋势,而生境质量则有所下降。【结论】森林景观组成及配置的变化对生态系统服务产生了不同的影响,其中针阔混交林面积的增加对净初级生产力有正向影响,而建设用地和裸地的增加则对水源供给和土壤保持产生了负向影响。这些发现可为优化区域生态管理和森林经营措施提供科学依据。

Abstract

【Objective】Vegetation types and structural configurations exhibit distinct characteristics and values in delivering ecosystem services, which are critical for maintaining ecological balance and human well-being. This study aims to elucidate the impacts of forest type composition and landscape configuration changes on ecosystem services (ES), and to clarify the differences in ES provision caused by variations in forest community structure.【Method】Taking Baishanzu National Park in Zhejiang Province as a case study, we quantified four key ES functions—vegetation net primary productivity (NPP), habitat quality, soil retention, and water yield—from 2000 to 2020 using the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs (InVEST) and carnegie-ames-stanford approach (CASA) models. Spatial heterogeneity of ES influenced by vegetation types and forest landscape configurations were analyzed through geographically weighted regression (GWR).【Result】During the study period, total forest coverage increased, while the area of coniferous forests declined significantly. Landscape patterns exhibited central aggregation but fragmentation in western and northern regions. Three ES metrics—water yield, soil retention, and NPP—showed overall upward trends, whereas habitat quality deteriorated.【Conclusion】Changes in forest composition and configuration differentially affected ES: expansion of coniferous-broadleaved mixed forests positively influenced NPP, while increased construction land and bare land negatively impacted water yield and soil retention. These findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing regional ecological management and forest conservation strategies.

关键词

生态系统服务 / 景观组成 / 景观配置 / 地理加权回归 / 驱动因素

Key words

ecosystem service / landscape composition / landscape configuration / geographically weighted regression / driving factor

引用本文

导出引用
王超锐, 钟佳辉, 张勇, . 景观组成和景观配置对百山祖国家公园生态系统服务的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 50(3): 101-111 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202410005
WANG Chaorui, ZHONG Jiahui, ZHANG Yong, et al. Effects of landscape composition and configuration on ecosystem services of Baishanzu National Park[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2026, 50(3): 101-111 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202410005
中图分类号: Q148;S7-9   

参考文献

[1]
COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2.
[2]
BROCKERHOFF E G, JACTEL H, PARROTTA J A, et al. Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 301:43-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.018.
[3]
PANDIT J, SHARMA A K. A comprehensive review of climate change’s imprint on ecosystems[J]. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2023, 14(11):4273-4284. DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2023.476.
[4]
JI Y Y, ZENG S D, LIU X, et al. Mutual inhibition effects of elevated CO2 and climate change on global forest GPP[J]. Environmental Research, 2024, 252:119145. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119145.
[5]
BASTOS J R, CAPELLESSO E S, VIBRANS A C, et al. Human impacts, habitat quantity and quality affect the dimensions of diversity and carbon stocks in subtropical forests:a landscape-based approach[J]. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2023, 73:126383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126383.
[6]
LAMY T, LISS K N, GONZALEZ A, et al. Landscape structure affects the provision of multiple ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2016, 11(12):124017. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124017.
[7]
YOHANNES H, SOROMESSA T, ARGAW M, et al. Impact of landscape pattern changes on hydrological ecosystem services in the Beressa watershed of the Blue Nile basin in Ethiopia[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 793:148559. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148559.
[8]
殷格兰, 邵景安, 郭跃, 等. 林地资源变化对森林生态系统服务功能的影响:以南水北调核心水源地淅川县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(20):6973-6985.
YIN G L, SHAO J A, GUO Y, et al. Effects of forest resource changes on ecosystem function:a case study of Xichuan County,the main source of water for south-to-north water transfer in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(20):6973-6985. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201605170954.
[9]
WANG H R, ZHANG M D, WANG C Y, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of landscape patterns and their effects on ecosystem services in the Huaihe River basin,China[J].Land, 2022, 11(4):513. DOI: 10.3390/land11040513.
[10]
DICKIE I A, YEATES G W, JOHN M G, et al. Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade-offs in two woody successions[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 48(4):926-934. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01980.x.
[11]
JENNRICH R I, SAMPSON P F. Application of stepwise regression to non-linear estimation[J]. Technometrics, 1968, 10(1):63-72. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1968.10490535.
[12]
BRUNSDON C, FOTHERINGHAM S, CHARLTON M. Geographically weighted regression[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:Series D (The Statistician), 1998, 47(3):431-443. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9884.00145.
[13]
蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2):19-24.
CAI C F, DING S W, SHI Z H, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(2):19-24. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.02.005.
[14]
刘园, 周勇, 杜越天. 基于InVEST模型的长江中游经济带生境质量的时空分异特征及其地形梯度效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(10):2429-2440.
LIU Y, ZHOU Y, DU Y T. Study on the spatio-temporal patterns of habitat quality and its terrain gradient effects of the middle of the Yangtze River economic belt based on InVEST model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze basin, 2019, 28(10):2429-2440. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201910015.
[15]
ZHANG S H, FAN W W, LI Y Q, et al. The influence of changes in land use and landscape patterns on soil erosion in a watershed[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 574:34-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.024.
[16]
董春媛, 黄海涛, 乔荣荣, 等. 宁夏沿黄绿洲景观多样性时空变化与尺度依赖性[J]. 干旱区地理, 2023, 46(1):76-85.
DONG C Y, HUANG H T, QIAO R R, et al. Spatiotemporal variations and scale dependence of landscape diversity in oasis along the Yellow River in Ningxia[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023, 46(1):76-85. DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.161.
[17]
熊波. 浙江省森林砍伐的时空格局及其对生态系统服务的影响研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2022.
XIONG B. Spatio-temporal patterns of deforestation and its impact on ecosystem services in Zhejiang Province of China[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2022.
[18]
吴榛, 徐可依, 钱燕萍, 等. 南京市生境质量时空演变特征与影响因素研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(5):213-220.
WU Z, XU K Y, QIAN Y P, et al. Characteristics of spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of habitat quality in Nanjing[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2023, 38(5):213-220. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2023.05.28.
[19]
武金翠, 周军, 张宇, 等. 毛竹林固碳增汇价值的动态变化:以福建省为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4):181-187.
WU J C, ZHOU J, ZHANG Y, et al. Carbon sequestration value and its change of Phyllostachys edulis forest:a case study of Fujian Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(4):181-187. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200420.
[20]
FANG Z, BAI Y, JIANG B, et al. Quantifying variations in ecosystem services in altitude-associated vegetation types in a tropical region of China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 726:138565. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138565.
[21]
WANG L J, GONG J W, MA S, et al. Ecosystem service supply-demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province,China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 140:109058. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109058.
[22]
童冉, 周本智, 姜丽娜, 等. 毛竹入侵对森林植物和土壤的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(11):3808-3815.
TONG R, ZHOU B Z, JIANG L N, et al. Influence of Moso bamboo invasion on forest plants and soil:a review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(11):3808-3815. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201806131319.
[23]
陈相标, 丁文荣. 滇中高原湖泊流域土地利用变化及生态系统服务功能[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3):205-212.
CHEN X B, DING W R. Land use change and ecosystem service function in lake basin of central Yunnan Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(3):205-212. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2022.03.002.
[24]
胡欣欣. 龙栖山国家级自然保护区森林景观空间格局分析[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2011, 31(2):136-139.
HU X X. Analysis of forest landscape pattern of Longqishan National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2011, 31(2):136-139. DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2011.02.016.
[25]
LIU L W, CHEN X R, CHEN W X, et al. Identifying the impact of landscape pattern on ecosystem services in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomerations,China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(14):5063. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145063.
[26]
KERTÉSZ Á, NAGY L A, BALÁZS B. Effect of land use change on ecosystem services in Lake Balaton Catchment[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 80:430-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.005.
[27]
HUANG C B, ZHAO D Y, DENG L. Landscape pattern simulation for ecosystem service value regulation of Three Gorges Reservoir area,China[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2022, 95:106798. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106798.
[28]
LIU S L, YIN Y J, LIU X H, et al. Ecosystem services and landscape change associated with plantation expansion in a tropical rainforest region of Southwest China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 353:129-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.009.
[29]
杨婉清, 杨鹏, 孙晓, 等. 北京市景观格局演变及其对多种生态系统服务的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16):6487-6498.
YANG W Q, YANG P, SUN X, et al. Changes of landscape pattern and its impacts on multiple ecosystem services in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(16):6487-6498. DOI: 10.5846/stxb202107272042.
[30]
ZHANG J, QU M, WANG C, et al. Quantifying landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes:a case study at the county level in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 23:e01110. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01110.
[31]
LIANG F C, ZHU R M, LIN S H. Exploring spatial relationship between landscape configuration and ecosystem services:a case study of Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou in China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2023, 486:110527. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110527.

基金

百山祖国家公园科研项目(2022JBGS06)
百山祖国家公园科研项目(2024JBGS01)
国家自然科学基金项目(32271844)
国家重点研发计划(2023YFD220040503)

责任编辑: 孟苗婧
PDF(15939 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/