PDF(4815 KB)
PDF(4815 KB)
PDF(4815 KB)
黑龙江杓兰属植物表型特征及系统发育分析
Phenotypic characteristics and analysis of Cypripedium in Heilongjiang Province
【目的】黑龙江省杓兰属(Cypripedium)植物表型变异丰富,为厘清物种界限模糊及亲缘关系复杂等问题,以该地区调查获取的13个杓兰属居群为材料,初步探讨其亲缘关系与分类界线。【方法】测定13个居群的18项表型性状,进行多样性分析与聚类分析;同时通过测序、组装与注释,获取其核基因ITS序列及3个叶绿体DNA片段(trnH—psbA、trnL—F与rbcL),利用DnaSP、PhyloSuite、FigTree等软件,结合NCBI数据库数据,统计核苷酸多态性并构建系统发育树。【结果】退化雄蕊(斑点与大小)可作为黑龙江杓兰属植物的关键野外识别特征。东北杓兰(C. × ventricosum)表现出显著的杂种优势,其叶片大小与株高、地径可作为分类依据。表型与系统发育分析共同表明:白花与粉花大花杓兰(C. macranthos)实为同种;杓兰(C. calceolus)与山西杓兰(C. shanxiense)可能是由同一母本分化的姐妹群;东北杓兰居群DB1、DB2、DB5聚为一支,其母本可能为杓兰,而居群DB3、DB4、DB6、DB7、DB8聚为另一支,可能源于大花杓兰,其中DB6可能与大花杓兰发生过回交;紫点杓兰(C. guttatum)则与其他种类亲缘关系较远。【结论】仅凭单一表型性状或DNA片段难以准确判定杓兰属植物的亲缘关系,尤其对于杂交种,必须综合表型、叶绿体DNA与核DNA等多层次证据,方能全面阐明其系统发育与分类界限。
【Objective】This study aims to clarify the phylo genetic relationships and taxonomic boundaries of Cypripedium in Heilongjiang Province, where the genus exhibits extensive phenotypic variation, ambiguous species delimitation, and complex phylogenetic patterns.【Method】A total of 13 natural populations collected from the region were used as the research material, we measured 18 phenotypic traits across these 13 populations and performed phenotypic diversity and cluster analyses. Furthermore, we sequenced, assembled and annotated the nrITS region and three chloroplast DNA fragments (trnH—psbA, trnL—F, and rbcL). Nucleotide polymorphism was statistically analyzed, and phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using software packages DnaSP, PhyloSuite and FigTree, incorporating relevant sequences from the NCBI public database.【Result】Staminode characteristics (presence of mottling and size) serve as key traits for field identification of C. species in Heilongjiang Province. C. × ventricosum exhibits significant heterosis, with leaf size, plant height and stem diameter at ground level providing reliable morphological markers for its classification. Integrated phenotypic and phylogenetic analyses consistently demonstrated that: the white-and pink-flowered forms of C. macranthos constitute the same species; C. calceolus and C. shanxiense likely represent sister lineages derived from the same maternal ancestor; populations DB1, DB2 and DB5 of C. × ventricosum form a distinct clade potentially originating from C. calceolus as the maternal parent, while populations DB3, DB4, DB6, DB7 and DB8 cluster in another clade likely descended from C. macranthos, with population DB6 showing evidence of possible backcrossing with C. macranthos; C. guttatum remains phylogenetically distant from all other studied species.【Conclusion】Inferring genetic relationships in Cypripedium, particularly for hybrid taxa, cannot rely solely on a single phenotypic trait or single DNA marker. A comprehensive approach integrating phenotypic data with both chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences is essential for accurately elucidating phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic boundaries.
杓兰属植物 / 表型特征 / 系统发育关系 / 植物分类 / 叶绿体基因
Cypripedium plants / phenotypic characteristics / phylogenetic relationship / plant taxonomy / chloroplast genes
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
傅沛云. 中国东北部种子植物种的分布区类型[M]. 东北大学出版社. 2003.
|
| [3] |
傅沛云, 刘淑珍. 东北草本植物志:第十二卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社. 1960:220-278.
|
| [4] |
赵国英. 长白山区杓兰属植物的调查及遗传多样性研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2013.
|
| [5] |
吕惠子, 邱爽, 杨威, 等. 长白山区天桥岭野生杓兰属植物的多样性研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2012, 31(6):72-73,77.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
张毓, 王苗苗, 张雪, 等. 中国华北和东北地区杓兰属植物的数量分类研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(5):933-942.
|
| [8] |
孙叶迎. 长白山区杓兰属植物遗传多样性的ISSR分析[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2014.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
蒋明, 李温平, 周晶, 等. 10种杓兰属植物rDNA ITS序列的克隆与分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2012, 39(6):689-695.
|
| [14] |
张业栋. 基于ITS和trnH-psbA对川西南杓兰的分子系统学研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2012.
|
| [15] |
陈心启, 刘仲健, 陈利君, 等. 中国杓兰属植物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
|
| [16] |
郎楷永, 陈心启, 罗毅波, 等. 中国植物志:第十七卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999, 20-52.
|
| [17] |
中国科学院生物多样性委员会. 中国生物物种名录 2023年度名录[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2023.
The Biodiversity Committee of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Catalogue of Life China: 2023 Annual Checklist[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2023.
|
| [18] |
李建挥, 李柏海, 吴思政, 等. 湘西地区核桃坚果表型特征及多样性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(1):171-179.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
陈丽飞, 刘淑英, 孙叶迎, 等. 长白山区杓兰属植物的种子微形态特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012, 40(10):134-136.
|
| [29] |
陈丽飞, 赵和祥, 顾德峰, 等. 5种杓兰属植物花粉的微形态扫描电镜观察[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(9):161-163.
|
| [30] |
陈丽飞, 孙叶迎, 王满玲, 等. 长白山区杓兰属植物的叶片表皮研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2012, 23:68-70.
|
| [31] |
李鹏, 罗毅波. 中国特有兰科植物褐花杓兰的繁殖生物学特征及其与西藏杓兰的生殖隔离研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(4):406-413.
|
| [32] |
王恒蓉, 李鹏, 李俊霖, 等. 3种同域分布的杓兰属植物的种子及杂交种子特征分析[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(1):31-38.
|
| [33] |
陈心启, 刘仲健, 罗毅波, 等. 中国兰科植物鉴别手册[M]. 北京: 林业出版社, 2009.
|
| [34] |
韦中强, 肖波, 韩如刚, 等. 天麻种间杂交优势利用研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2015(13):85-86.
|
| [35] |
邓辉, 陈乃富, 李耀亭, 等. 霍山产3种药用石斛及其杂交优势种的ISSR-PCR分子标记鉴别[J]. 种子, 2009, 28(2):43-45.
|
| [36] |
刘红梅, 张宪春, 曾辉. DNA序列在蕨类分子系统学研究中的应用[J]. 植物学报, 2009, 44:143-158.
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
姚仁秀, 陈燕, 吕晓琴, 等. 海拔及环境因子影响杜鹃属植物的表型特征和化学性状[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2):27-41.
|
| [40] |
朱润军, 杨巧, 李仕杰, 等. 植物表型可塑性对环境因子的响应研究进展[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(1):183-187.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |